Abstract
Climate change and anthropogenic pressures have intensified abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, and heavy metal (HM) contamination, severely impairing plant growth and productivity. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), through their symbiotic association with plant roots, offer a promising biological strategy to enhance plant resilience under these stresses. This review synthesizes recent advances in understanding the physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms by which AMF confer stress tolerance. Key mechanisms include modulation of aquaporin expression for water homeostasis, regulation of abscisic acid (ABA) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways, enhancement of antioxidant defenses, and fine-tuning of osmolyte metabolism such as proline. Under salinity, AMF improves ion homeostasis by regulating SOS1 and NHX transporters and enhancing K+/Na+ discrimination. In HM-contaminated environments, AMF facilitate metal immobilization, chelation via phytochelatins and metallothioneins, and vacuolar sequestration, thereby reducing oxidative damage. The review also highlights AMF-mediated transcriptional reprogramming involving 14-3-3 proteins and stress-responsive transcription factors (e.g., WRKY, MYB, bHLH). By integrating rhizospheric interactions with intracellular signaling, AMF emerge as multifaceted modulators of plant stress physiology.
This review delineates key gaps in current understanding and outlines strategic directions for harnessing AMF in sustainable agriculture under complex abiotic stress scenarios. By integrating mechanistic insights across drought, salinity, and heavy metal stress, it emphasizes the convergence of AMF-mediated signaling pathways and cross-tolerance mechanisms that underpin plant resilience.
Keywords: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Abiotic stress tolerance, Osmotic adjustment, Reactive oxygen species, Phytochelatin, Proline
1. Introduction
Climate change and escalating anthropogenic activities are intensifying the severity and co-occurrence of major abiotic stresses, including drought, salinity, and heavy metal (HM) contamination.1, 2 These environmental constraints pose a significant and growing threat to global food security by disrupting fundamental plant physiological processes, such as water and ion homeostasis, and inducing widespread oxidative damage, ultimately leading to substantial yield losses.3, 4 The development of sustainable and effective strategies to enhance crop resilience against these multifaceted stresses is therefore a critical priority for modern agriculture.
In this context, the symbiotic association between plants and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) represents a powerful, nature-based solution5, 6. AMF form mutualistic relationships with the roots of approximately 80 % of terrestrial plant species, extending the plant’s effective root system through an extensive network of extraradical hyphae7. This symbiosis is well-established for its role in enhancing nutrient acquisition, particularly phosphorus, but its capacity to confer tolerance to a wide range of abiotic stresses has become a major focus of recent research5. The mechanisms underlying AMF-mediated stress tolerance are complex and highly integrated, involving a sophisticated molecular dialogue that results in profound changes to the host plant’s physiology, biochemistry, and gene expression.8
Recent studies have revealed that AMF do not simply alleviate stress through enhanced nutrient or water uptake; rather, they act as complex modulators of the plant’s internal stress response machinery. Under drought, AMF fine-tune water relations by regulating the expression of aquaporins (AQPs) and promoting osmotic adjustment through the accumulation of compatible solutes like proline9, 10. In saline environments, the fungi play a crucial role in maintaining cellular ion homeostasis by regulating the transport and compartmentalization of toxic ions such as Na+, often by influencing key transporters like salt overly sensitive 1 (SOS1), a plasma membrane Na+/H + antiporter (NHX)11, 12. Furthermore, in soils contaminated with heavy metals, AMF employ a dual strategy of metal immobilization in the rhizosphere and internal detoxification mechanisms, including chelation via phytochelatins (PCs) and metallothioneins (MTs), to reduce metal-induced oxidative stress.13, 14
Crucially, the plant’s response to these distinct stresses is not entirely separate. A common thread across AMF-mediated tolerance to drought, salinity, and HM stress is the convergence on core signaling pathways and defense mechanisms15, 16. These include the modulation of key phytohormone signaling, such as the abscisic acid (ABA) pathway,17 the activation of conserved mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades, and the significant reinforcement of the plant’s antioxidant defense system to maintain redox homeostasis18, 19. This suggests that AMF-induced resilience is underpinned by a coordinated, cross-tolerance mechanism that primes the plant to better withstand multiple environmental challenges simultaneously.7 While the individual mechanisms for each stress have been extensively studied, a comprehensive synthesis that integrates these distinct molecular and physiological responses to highlight the common, AMF-regulated hubs of cross-tolerance is still needed (Fig. 1. Table 1).
Fig. 1.
AMF effect on plant growth promoting and resisting stress. Including regulation of elements N: Nitrogen, P: Phosphorus, Zn: Zinc, GAs: Gibberellins, SLs: Strigolactones, impact on plant growth, and the mechanism of ABA: Abscisic Acid, PCs: Phytochelatins, Pro: Proline to deal with abiotic stress. IRM: intraradical mycelium, ERM: extraradical mycelium. (Figure generated using Biorender (https://www.biorender.com/).
Table 1.
An overview of AMF-assisted plant growth in drought, salinity, and heavy metals stress.
| Stresses | plant species | AMF | Mechanism | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drought | S. melongena | G. intraradices | increased fruit production, improved crop growth, dry biomass, and high-water use efficiency | 143 |
| C. melo L | G. intraradices and Glomus spp | increased chlorophyll content and improved physiological parameters and photosynthesis. | 144 | |
| Medicago truncatula | R. irregularis | Increase Pi uptake and plant growth | 145 | |
| Triticum aestivum |
R. intraradices F. mosseae F. geosporum |
optimized photochemistry, increased chlorophyll concentration, lowered relative water content, and boosted PSI photochemical activity. | 146 | |
| Zea mays L | G. versiforme | Increased levels of compatible solutes like proline, sugars, and free amino acids, as well as improved mineral uptake and assimilation, increased antioxidant system activity | 147 | |
| Poncirus trifoliata | F. mosseae, Paraglomus occultum | increased hyphal length, hyphal water absorption rate, and potential water content of leaves | 148 | |
| Salinity | S. lycopersicum | R. irregularis | Increased the fresh weight of roots and shoots as well as the number of leaves | 149 |
| Cucumis sativus | G. intraradices | Increased antioxidant enzyme levels | 150 | |
| Glycine max L. Merrill |
C. etunicatum R. irregularis F. mosseae |
Decreased generation of hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxidation. Enhanced plant growth and symbiotic efficacy by elevating endogenous auxin concentrations, facilitating superior root systems and nutrient uptake under saline stress. | 151 | |
| Cucumis sativus L |
C. etunicatum R. Irregularis F. mosseae |
Increasing biomass, pigment synthesis, antioxidant enzyme activity (including superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione reductase), and ascorbic acid content Rising Jasmonic acid, Salicylic acid, and several essential mineral elements (K, Ca, Mg, Zn, Fe, Mn, and Cu) while decreasing the uptake of harmful ions such as Na+ | 151 | |
| Phoenix dactylifera L |
Sclerocystis sp Acaulospora sp |
increase host resistance by salt root colonization, increasing H2O2 accumulation in AMF roots, which may eventually lead to arbuscular degradation | 152 | |
| Pisum Sativum L |
R. intraradices, F. mosseae, R. fasciculatum Gigaspora sp |
Increased nutrient uptake, accumulation of compatible osmolytes, and decreased electrolyte leakage in the cell | 152 | |
| Zea mays | Kocuria rhizophila | Regulating plant hormone levels (IAA and ABA) and improving nutrient acquisition, increased transcript levels of antioxidant genes (ZmGR1 and ZmAPX1), and salt tolerance genes (ZmNHX1, ZmNHX2, ZmNHX3, ZmWRKY58, and ZmDREB2A). | 153 | |
| Heavy metals | Zea mays |
Rhizophagus fasciculatus, R. intraradices, F. mosseae, G. aggregatum |
Cd, Cr, Ni, and Pb Phytoextraction improves the soil enzyme activity like dehydrogenase, β-Glucosidase, acid, and alkaline phosphatase. | 154 |
|
Cynodon dactylon (bermudagrass) |
F. mosseae, Diversispora spurcum |
Pb, Zn, and Cd AMF changed the heavy metals content and accumulation characteristics in the plant | 155 | |
| Glycine max (soybean) | R. irregularis | Cd AMF colonization did not affect Cd accumulation and translocation in HX3 and HN89 plants. | 156 | |
| Medicago sativa |
G. aggregatum, G. intraradices, G. elunicatum, G. versiforme |
Cd Reduction in cadmium uptake of alfalfa grown in Cd polluted so | 157 | |
| Sunflowers |
lomus mosseae, G. intraradices |
Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, Al, Pb, Co, Mo, Fe, and Si, Combined Glomus mosseae and sludge amendments resulted in the highest metal uptakes and glomalin contents | 158 | |
| Hordeum vulgare L |
F. mosseae, R. aggregatus, C. etunicatum, R. intraradices |
AMFs and lignin biochar (LBC) reduced bioavailable Pb | 159 | |
| Zea mays L. | G. intraradices | AMF inoculation or biochar alone can boost maize growth while lowering Cd uptake. AMF inoculation was more effective at alleviating Cd stress and promoting maize growth. Biochar was more effective at increasing soil alkalinity and immobilizing Cd. AMF inoculation and biochar worked synergistically to reduce Cd phytotoxicity. | 160 | |
This review aims to synthesize the most recent advances in understanding the molecular and physiological basis of AMF-mediated tolerance to three major abiotic stresses: drought, salinity, and heavy metal contamination. We will systematically delineate the specific mechanisms employed by AMF under each stress condition, focusing on the regulation of water transport (AQPs), ion homeostasis (SOS1, NHX), and detoxification (PCs, MTs). Furthermore, we will integrate these findings to identify the central, AMF-co-opted signaling hubs, such as the ABA and MAPK pathways, and the role of 14-3-3 proteins, that confer a broad-spectrum, cross-tolerance phenotype. Finally, we will highlight key knowledge gaps and propose strategic directions for future research to effectively harness AMF in developing climate-resilient and sustainable agricultural systems.
2. Core mechanisms of AMF-mediated stress mitigation
2.1. Aquaporin regulation and water homeostasis
AQPs are membrane-embedded proteins that facilitate the transport of water and small solutes across cellular membranes20. They are especially abundant in actively dividing or metabolically active cells, including plant roots, where they play a crucial role in optimizing water uptake to support growth and development.21 AQPs are classified into several subfamilies based on their sequence homology and subcellular localization: plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs), tonoplast intrinsic proteins (TIPs), nodulin-26-like intrinsic proteins (NIPs), small basic intrinsic proteins (SIPs), X-intrinsic proteins (XIPs), GlpF-like intrinsic proteins (GIPs), and hybrid intrinsic proteins (HIPs).22 While AMF-mediated aquaporin regulation varies across host species, these differences reflect strategic adaptations to stress severity and plant physiology. For instance, upregulation of AQPs in maize and rice under moderate drought enhances water uptake and transport, supporting growth.23, 24 Conversely, downregulation in species like trifoliate orange under severe drought minimizes water loss and ROS influx.25
Under DS, AMF modulate AQP expression in host plants through two distinct strategies. In some cases, AMF downregulate AQP genes, thereby reducing membrane permeability and promoting water retention within cells an adaptive response to severe water deficit26. In other contexts, AMF enhance AQP expression, facilitating improved water permeability, uptake, and transport to support physiological functions under moderate drought.
A molecular study identified and cloned six AQP genes GintAQP1, GintAQPF1, GintAQPF2, RcAQP1, RcAQP2, and RcAQP3 from the AMF species Glomus intraradices and Rhizophagus clarus27. Notably, AMF can modulate host plant AQP expression in diverse ways: upregulating AQPs to enhance water uptake, downregulating them to limit water loss and oxidative stress, or maintaining stable expression levels.27 This modulation of AQPs is not exclusive to drought; the maintenance of cellular water status and turgor is equally vital for osmotic adjustment under salinity and for mitigating secondary oxidative stress induced by HMs.
2.2. ABA biosynthesis and drought stress regulation
Abscisic acid (ABA) is a pivotal phytohormone that orchestrates plant responses to DS by modulating signaling networks, gene expression, and physiological adaptations.28 Elevated ABA levels under drought conditions enhance antioxidant enzyme activity, regulate ROS metabolism, and suppress malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulation, thereby mitigating oxidative damage.29, 30
In higher plants, ABA biosynthesis follows an indirect pathway originating from carotenoids.31 Key enzymes include zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP), which converts zeaxanthin to violaxanthin; 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED), which cleaves violaxanthin and neoxanthin to produce xanthoxin; and abscisic aldehyde oxidase (AAO), which catalyzes the final step converting xanthoxin to ABA32. Among AAO isoforms, AAO4 is particularly important due to its high expression in drought-stressed tissues.32
ABA-mediated drought responses include reduced leaf elongation, stomatal closure, decreased leaf area, and improved water-use efficiency, all of which contribute to limiting water loss33, 34. For example, exogenous ABA application has been shown to increase Pro accumulation in apple leaves, enhancing oxidative stress resistance,35 and improve tomato growth and water uptake under drought conditions.36
Recent evidence highlights that ABA accumulation under drought stress is tightly linked to the activation of antioxidant enzymes and Pro biosynthesis, forming a protective network against ROS and MDA damage (Fig. 2). Transcriptomic studies in Brassica napus revealed that drought stress and biostimulants such as γ-polyglutamic acid (γ-PGA) synergistically upregulate ABA biosynthetic genes, including BnZEP, BnNCED3, and BnAAO4, leading to enhanced ABA accumulation and improved drought tolerance.37, 38 Notably, γ-PGA not only amplifies ABA biosynthesis under stress but also primes ABA pathways under non-stress conditions, suggesting its potential as a pre-conditioning agent.39 The influence of AMF on ABA biosynthesis varies depending on developmental stage and stress conditions. In B. napus, AMF combined with γ-PGA enhances ABA signaling and drought resilience, whereas in orchids, AMF downregulates ABA to facilitate symbiosis during germination.40 The AMF-mediated modulation of ABA, while central to drought response, also plays a foundational role in cross-tolerance by priming the plant’s general stress response.
Fig. 2.
The diagram illustrates the role of AMF in promoting proline biosynthesis in plants. Proline is synthesized in the cytoplasm and chloroplasts via pathways involving enzymes such as pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase (P5CS) and pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase (P5CR), which convert glutamate into proline. Degradation of proline occurs in mitochondria through proline dehydrogenase (PDH) and ornithine aminotransferase (OAT), yielding intermediates like ketoglutarate (KG). The proline transporter (ProT) facilitates the movement of proline between organelles. Additionally, the figure highlights γ-polyglutamic acid (γ-PGA) as a factor enhancing drought resilience in Brassica napus. This process involves upregulating the expression of genes BnNCED3, BnZEP, and BnAAO4, which stimulate the biosynthesis of abscisic acid (ABA). Solid arrows denote activation or promotion, while dashed arrows indicate inhibitory effects (Figure generated using Biorender (https://www.biorender.com/).
2.3. Proline biosynthesis and AMF regulation
Proline (Pro) is a multifunctional amino acid that accumulates in plants under DS, contributing to osmotic adjustment, ROS scavenging, and stabilization of proteins and membranes.41 Its biosynthesis occurs via two main pathways: the glutamate pathway, involving pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS), pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase (P5CR), and the ornithine pathway, catalyzed by ornithine δ-aminotransferase (δ-OAT).42 In kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus), AMF inoculation enhanced drought tolerance by increasing Pro content and regulating AQP genes such as HcPIP1;2 and HcPIP2;7.43 Similarly, In walnut (Juglans regia), AMF symbiosis altered root metabolite profiles DS, including elevated Pro levels, indicating a metabolic shift toward stress resilience44. Furthermore, Soybean plants inoculated with AMF showed improved physiological traits and upregulation of polyamine biosynthesis genes, which are closely linked to Pro metabolism.45 Additionally, In rice, AMF enhanced Pro accumulation under low-temperature stress by decreasing glutamate and ornithine concentrations and upregulating OsP5CS2, OsOAT, and OsProDH1.46
The variation in Pro accumulation across species inoculated with AMF suggests species-specific metabolic reprogramming. In kenaf and walnut, elevated Pro levels correlate with enhanced AQP expression and antioxidant activity, while in rice, AMF modulates precursor availability and biosynthetic gene expression. These differences underscore the need for integrative studies linking metabolomics with transcriptomics to decode AMF-induced osmotic adjustment strategies. The overall pathway and AMF points of control are summarized in (Fig. 2). The ProT transporter facilitates Pro redistribution across organelles, ensuring dynamic osmotic regulation under stress.47 AMF modulates this pathway by upregulating Pro biosynthesis genes and enhancing Pro accumulation, as observed in species like H. cannabinus, J. regia, and Oryza sativa43, 44, 46. This modulation is often accompanied by improved AQP expression and antioxidant activity, contributing to enhanced drought tolerance.48, 49 ABA not only regulates stomatal closure and water-use efficiency but also promotes Pro accumulation, linking hormonal signaling with osmolyte metabolism.28 Together, these processes underscore the multifaceted role of AMF in coordinating metabolic, hormonal, and transport pathways to enhance plant resilience under drought stress.
2.4. MAPK signaling and AMF interaction
The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade is a conserved signaling pathway in plants that transduces environmental stress signals into cellular responses.50 It consists of three modules, MAPKKK, MAPKK, and MAPK, and is involved in regulating ROS detoxification, hormone signaling, and gene expression under drought stress.50, 51
Studies have demonstrated that AMF modulates MAPK gene expression in both their fungal mycelium and plant hosts during drought stress.17, 52 This dual regulation facilitates a molecular dialogue that enhances stress resilience. In soybean, coordinated expression of MAPK genes from both the host and the AMF (G. intraradices) was observed under drought conditions, suggesting that MAPK signaling operates synergistically across the symbiotic partners to regulate drought responses.53 Similarly, in Eucalyptus grandis, AMF colonization significantly upregulated 18 MAPK cascade genes, which correlated with enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) and reduced accumulation of ROS, including hydrogen peroxide and superoxide radicals.17 Additionally, In Bombax ceiba, AMF inoculation downregulated ROS-generating genes such as respiratory burst oxidase homologs (Rboh), while simultaneously upregulating a suite of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, APX, GPX, GR, MDAR, DHAR), resulting in improved ROS detoxification and reduced oxidative damage.54 These physiological changes are accompanied by improved osmotic adjustment, as evidenced by increased Pro and soluble sugar accumulation in AMF-treated plants. In soybean and apple (Malus hupehensis), the symbiosis led to higher Pro levels and better water retention, contributing to enhanced drought tolerance through osmotic balance and membrane stability.53 AMF-enhanced antioxidant system is the plant’s primary defense against the oxidative burst triggered by all abiotic stresses. This system is crucial not only for drought but also for mitigating the secondary oxidative damage caused by excessive Na+ accumulation under salinity (Section 4) and the generation of free radicals by HMs (Section 5). The convergence on redox homeostasis underscores a key principle of AMF-mediated cross-tolerance.
Moreover, Arabidopsis thaliana in DS has been shown to activate the MAPK signaling cascade, specifically through the phosphorylation of AtMKK1, which subsequently activates AtMPK4. This signaling pathway plays an essential role in regulating the accumulation of H2O2 during drought conditions by modulating the activity of CAT a key antioxidant enzyme involved in ROS detoxification.55, 56 The coordinated MAPK signaling observed under drought represents a core component of the AMF-plant molecular dialogue. This pathway is a critical point of convergence, as it is also known to regulate the expression of key genes for ion homeostasis in salinity and the activation of phytochelatin synthesis for HM detoxification (See section 6 and Fig. 6), demonstrating its role as a central hub for cross-tolerance.
Fig. 6.
Integrated signaling network linking stress-specific pathways with the AMF colonization module and ABA-MAPK-AQP hub. AMF colonization begins with Strigolactone (SLs) secretion by roots, stimulating fungal hyphal branching. AMF releases Mycorrhizal Lipo-Chitooligosaccharides (Myc-LCOs) and Chitooligosaccharides (COs), perceived by Lysin Motif Receptor-Like Kinases (LysM-RLKs) such as Chitin Elicitor Receptor Kinase 1 (CERK1), Mycorrhizal Receptor 1 (MYR1), and LysM Kinase 8 (LYK8), and trigger nuclear Ca2+ oscillations via Doesn't Make Infections 1(DMI1). These signals are decoded by Calcium and Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase (CCaMK) and Cytokinin Response Factor-Like Protein (CYCLOPS) activating GRAS transcription factors (Required for Arbuscule Morphogenesis1(RAM1), Reduced Arbuscule Development 1(RAD1)) for arbuscule development. DELLA proteins (amino acid motif) integrate gibberellin signaling, while AMF effectors (e.g., rhizophagus irregularis nuclear localized effector 1 (RiNLE1)) suppress plant immunity by inhibiting histone H2B monoubiquitination. Exposure to heavy metals triggers reactive oxygen species (ROS) and Ca2+ signals, activating MAPK Kinase Kinase (MAPKKK), MAPK Kinase (MAPKK), MAPK (MPK3/MPK6). (MAPKKK /MAPKK/MAPK). These kinases regulate detoxification genes such as phytochelatin synthase (PCS) and metallothioneins, and control transporters (Heavy Metal ATPase (HMA), zinc and iron-like protein (ZIP)) for vacuolar sequestration. MAPKs also crosstalk with ABA signaling to stabilize antioxidant defenses. High salinity activates Calcineurin B-Like Proteins (CBL) and CBL-Interacting Protein Kinases (CIPK), initiating the Salt Overly Sensitive (SOS3-SOS2-SOS1) for Na+ efflux for xylem Na+ retrieval. ABA and MAPKs co-regulate ion transporters and Aquaporins (AQPs), while stress-responsive genes such as Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA) proteins and Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinases (CDPKs) maintain osmotic balance. Water deficit elevates ABA, which binds Pyrabactin Resistance/PYR1-Like/Regulatory Component of ABA Receptors (PYR/PYL/RCAR), inhibiting Type 2C Protein Phosphatases (PP2Cs) and activating Sucrose Non-Fermenting 1-Related Protein Kinases 2 (SnRK2s), notably Open Stomata 1 (OST1) which can lead to the phosphorylation of ABA-Responsive Element Binding Factor (ABF) and ABA-Responsive Element Binding Protein (AREB). Figure generated using Biorender (https://www.biorender.com/).
3. AMF and drought stress
3.1. Role of 14-3-3 family protein and H+-ATPase activity genes
Recent research has shown that genes from the 14-3-3 protein family, particularly PcGRF10 and PcGRF11.48 While these proteins are well-known for their role in regulating the plasma membrane H+-ATPase to drive ion transport under salinity as detailed in (Section 4), their function under drought is equally significant. in P. cathayana when inoculated with AMF under DS led to increased expression of these genes, which was positively correlated with enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities and osmotic regulation.48 Another study by Han et al. (2022b) further demonstrated that AMF and phosphorus supplementation synergistically improved drought resistance by modulating ROS homeostasis, phosphorus metabolism, and 14-3-3 gene expression, with PcGRF10 and PcGRF11 again showing strong associations with stress mitigation responses57. These findings highlight the essential regulatory function of 14-3-3 proteins in AMF-induced drought tolerance. The proteins function as molecular hubs, regulating signaling cascades and physiological responses that assist plants in managing water scarcity circumstances48.
In parallel, AMF such as F. mosseae and R. irregularis have been shown to modulate plant responses to salinity and DS through both fungal and plant 14-3-3 gene expression.58 Specifically, Fm201 and Ri14-3-3, fungal 14-3-3 genes, are upregulated in mycorrhizal roots and hyphae following NaCl treatment, indicating their involvement in plant-fungal crosslink during salt stress adaptation.58
Furthermore, AMF regulates H+-ATPase activity and influences gene expression during DS through specific pathways that enhance plant resilience and recovery under adverse conditions.48 By activating these adaptive pathways, AMF enables plants to withstand water scarcity more effectively, emphasizing their pivotal role in enhancing drought resilience and ensuring survival through diverse mechanisms, as outlined below:
-
1-
Promotes H+-ATPase activity: Under DS, the activity of H + -ATPase, an enzyme that pumps protons across membranes, is significantly enhanced by AMF such as F. mosseae.59, 60 This has been observed in trifoliate orange (P. trifoliata) plants, where drought treatment increases H+ -ATPase activity in both leaves and roots, and inoculation with AMF further strengthens this increase.59
-
2-
Enhance gene expression and auxin regulation under DS: AMF inoculation with F. mosseae significantly increased PtAHA2 expression (encodes a plasma membrane H+-ATPase) in both leaves and roots under DS, PtAHA2 expression was more pronounced, especially in AMF-inoculated plants,59 it’s also enhanced H+-ATPase activity correlated with higher ammonium content in leaves and roots and lower soil pH, improving nutrient solubility and uptake.59 These changes are linked to auxin synthesis and transport, modulated by AMF.61 Interestingly, Genes involved in auxin biosynthesis (e.g., PtYUC3, PtYUC8) and transport (e.g., PtABCB19, PtLAX2) were upregulated, while auxin efflux carriers (PtPIN1, PtPIN3) were downregulated.61
3.2. AMF controls transcription factors linked to drought tolerance
AMF enhances plant drought tolerance not only through improved water and nutrient acquisition but also by reprogramming transcriptional networks that govern stress signaling and adaptation.62, 63 Recent transcriptomic studies demonstrate that AMF colonization modulates key transcription factor (TF) families bHLH, MYB, ERF, WRKY, NAC, and heat shock factors (Hsfs) which orchestrate drought-responsive gene expression.64, 65, 66 Furthermore, RNA-seq study in maize (Z. mays) inoculated with F. mosseae under drought stress reported 189 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) enriched in Ca2+ signaling and transcription factor regulation.64 Notably, co-expression analysis revealed strong positive correlations between the transcription factor WHIRLY1 and the calcium sensor gene CBL11. WHIRLY1 is a transcription factor involved in regulating stress-responsive genes related to drought tolerance,67 while CBL11 is a calcineurin B-like protein that acts as a calcium sensor decoding Ca2+ signals and mediating downstream responses.68 This regulatory interaction suggests that WHIRLY1 influences calcium signaling pathways via CBL11 to enhance drought stress adaptation in maize with F. mosseae symbiosis.64 This study highlighted that AMF symbiosis modulates expression of Ca2+ signaling components such as CBLs, CIPKs, MAPKs, and CDPKs, along with transcription factors like bHLH, ERF, and MYB families that collectively improve drought tolerance.64
AMF also influences ABA-responsive TFs (e.g., AREB/ABF) and heat shock TFs, enhancing stomatal regulation and oxidative stress mitigation. In walnut, inoculation with Diversispora spurca under DS significantly upregulated JrHsf03, JrHsf22, and JrHsf24, correlating with higher antioxidant enzyme activities and reduced ROS damage.65 This demonstrates AMF’s role in activating Hsf-centered ROS homeostasis during drought. Additionally, Transcriptomic profiling of AMF-inoculated plants under combined stresses revealed induction of WRKY72, WRKY53, WRKY6, WRKY26, MYB86, and bHLH112, highlighting AMF’s ability to regulate multiple TF families involved in osmotic adjustment, antioxidant defense, and hormone signaling.66
TFs regulated by AMF control downstream drought-responsive genes such as aquaporins (PIPs), LEA proteins, and osmolyte biosynthesis enzymes. For example, AMF inoculation in maize upregulated ZmPIP2,4, a plasma membrane aquaporin critical for water transport and drought tolerance, illustrating how AMF-TF networks connect to functional drought gene.64 Details key transcription factors modulated by AMF under drought stress, including their roles in hormone signaling, aquaporin regulation, and MAPK cascade activation depicted in (Table 2).
Table 2.
The transcription factors influenced by AMF during drought stress.
| Physiological responses | Plants | AMF | Effect on gene expression | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant hormones | P. trifoliata | F. mosseae | Regulate genes involved in Indoleacetic acid (IAA) biosynthesis PtYUC3, PtYUC8 PtABCB19, PtLAX2. | 161 |
| Malus pumila | R. irregularis | Regulate strigolactone (SL) synthesis genes MdIAA24 | 162 | |
| S. lycopersicum | R. intraradices | Regulate genes responsible for the Abscisic acid (ABA) signalling pathway, TFT2, and TFT3. | 163 | |
| Transporter proteins | G. max |
G. intraradices G. mosseae |
Genes involved in Aquaporins expression, GmPIP2 | 164 |
| Poncirus trifoliata | F. mosseae | Upregulate genes involved in Aquaporins expression, PtTIP1;2, PtTIP2;1, PtTIP4;1, PtTIP5;1, Downregulate aquaporins genes expression PtTIP1, 1, PtTIP2;2 | 165 | |
| Drought tolerance | Soybean | G. intraradices | MAPK cascade genes improve the resistance of mycorrhizal soybeans to drought stress. | 17 |
| Poncirus trifoliata | G. mosseae | Upregulated genes expression PtTIP1;2, PtTIP1;3, PtTIP4;1 which is Significantly enhanced leaf relative water content and plant growth performance | 162 |
3.3. Biochemical mechanisms of AMF-assisted drought stress tolerance
AMF enhances drought resilience in plants by modulating biochemical pathways that mitigate oxidative stress and maintain cellular homeostasis. Two primary mechanisms underline the reduced oxidative damage in AMF-colonized plants:
-
1.
Fungal-Mediated water transport: AMF hyphae extend beyond the root depletion zone, absorbing water from soil micropores inaccessible to roots and delivering it to the host plant69. This improves plant hydration, alleviates drought-induced water deficit, and stabilizes physiological processes such as photosynthesis and stomatal conductance.70 A compartmentalized experiment using 18O-labeled water demonstrated that AMF hyphae directly contributed 12.3 % of total transpiration water under high soil moisture and 17.0 % under low soil moisture in alfalfa71. Another study using isotopic mixing models and fluorescent dyes showed that AMF hyphae can transport water across air gaps, accounting for up to 34.6 % of transpired water in host plants.69
-
2.
Antioxidant defense: Under DS, plants experience oxidative damage due to the excessive accumulation of ROS, which harm proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids72. To counteract this, plants activate both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense mechanisms that help maintain cellular integrity and redox balance73, 74. A recent meta-analysis confirmed that AMF inoculation under drought conditions increased SOD activity by 32 %, CAT by 23 %, and POD by 28 %, while reducing H2O2 accumulation by 20 %.75 These findings underscore the importance of strategic AMF management in arid and semi-arid agroecosystems, including rhizosphere optimization in nurseries and field-scale AMF inoculation, to enhance crop resilience and survival under water-limited conditions.
Integrated drought responses across water transport, osmolytes, ROS detoxification, and photosynthesis are schematized in (Fig. 3). It integrated key pathways such as AQP regulation, osmolyte biosynthesis, antioxidant defense, and hormonal signaling, which are discussed across various sections of the article. AMF improves water acquisition by expanding the root-soil interface through extraradical hyphae, facilitating water uptake from micropores inaccessible to roots.70, 76 This fungal-mediated water transport contributes significantly to transpiration, especially under drought conditions. At the molecular level, AMF upregulate AQP genes such as PIP1 and PIP2, enhancing water permeability and maintaining cellular hydration.26 Simultaneously, AMF stimulates the biosynthesis of osmolytes like Pro and soluble sugars, which stabilize proteins and membranes under osmotic stress.39 The diagram also explores the AMF-induced activation of antioxidant enzymes such as POD, which mitigate ROS accumulation and oxidative damage, discussed in (Section 2.4)75. Moreover, AMF influence photosynthetic efficiency by stabilizing photosystems and regulating intercellular CO2 concentration, contributing to sustained growth under drought stress.77 While AMF-mediated drought tolerance relies heavily on AQP regulation and ABA signaling, these same pathways along with osmolyte accumulation also support AMF’s role in salinity adaptation, where ionic homeostasis becomes critical.
Fig. 3.
A diagram of several pathways facilitated by AMF to enhance growth and yield under drought stress. AMF enhances water-holding ability, increases root exudation, expands water surface area, promotes lateral root development, and activates molecular mechanisms such as P5CS, SPS, PIP1, and PIP2. It also increases physiochemical mechanisms involving ABA, POD, and ROS, substantially increasing drought stress tolerance. Furthermore, AMF enhances hormonal interactions osmolyte accumulation and induces signaling transduction phenolic accumulation, maintains ionic homeostasis, optimizes the efficiency of PS-I and PS-II, regulates intercellular CO2 concentration, and augments gene expression, thereby improving drought stress tolerance and promoting plant growth and yield under drought conditions. Figure generated using Biorender (https://www.biorender.com/).
4. AMF and salinity stress
Global salinization currently affecting substantial fractions of irrigated and arable lands reduces plant growth by combining osmotic stress with Na+/Cl− toxicity and nutrient imbalances78. AMF mitigates these constraints through a suite of mechanisms that translate into significant biomass gains across diverse hosts, AMF taxa, and salinity levels, with effect sizes increasing at higher salinity and over longer exposure (>4 weeks).78
Recent syntheses conclude that AMF-inoculated plants under salt stress show increased K+/Na+ ratios, better osmotic adjustment (e.g., Pro, glycine betaine, soluble sugars), improved photosynthesis, and higher water-use efficiency compared with non-mycorrhizal controls79. A classic meta-analysis spanning 43 studies showed AMF increase total, shoot, and root biomass and uptake of P, N, and K while reducing Na accumulation establishing a generalizable growth and nutrition benefit under salinity.80
Additionally, AMF hyphae exude glomalin-related soil proteins (GRSP) that stabilize soil aggregates, improve structure and water retention, and can bind cations properties that indirectly improve plant performance in saline substrates.81 Salinity and osmotic stress can even stimulate glomalin production in AMF in vitro, potentially reinforcing aggregate stability in stressed soils82. At the signaling and transport levels, AMF interactions influence plant AQPs and polyamines, modulating water flow and redox balance in a context-dependent manner; AMF can upregulate or downregulate host AQPs to optimize water acquisition versus conservation under stress,10 these mechanisms justify AMF’s role as “bio-ameliorators” for salinity in agroecosystems.79
4.1. AMF-driven nutrient and water uptake under salt stress
AMF-mediated ion homeostasis under salinity is fundamentally driven by the plasma membrane H+-ATPase, which generates the electrochemical gradient necessary for the function of transporters like SOS1 and NHX,83 (discussed in Section 6). This H+-ATPase activity is tightly regulated by 14-3-3 proteins, which, as noted in the context of drought (Section 3.1), also modulate key enzymes in the antioxidant defense system, thus linking ion and redox homeostasis across stresses. Salinity stress causes ionic imbalances, mainly through the excessive accumulation of sodium ions (Na+), which disrupt plant cellular functions and nutrient uptake78. Study in maize demonstrated that co-inoculation of AMF and spore-associated bacteria (SAB) under salinity stress improved K+/Na+ ratios in roots.84 This was achieved through upregulation of ion transporter genes such as ZmAKT2, ZmSOS1, and ZmSKOR, which are involved in K+ uptake and Na+ exclusion.84
Furthermore, Evelin et al. (2019) reviewed the physiological and molecular mechanisms by which AMF mitigates salinity stress.85 They highlighted that AMF enhances nutrient uptake, regulate Na+ extrusion, and promote K+ acquisition, thereby maintaining favorable K+/Na+ ratios. Moreover, salinity stress disrupts plant cellular function primarily through excessive accumulation of Na+, which interferes with nutrient uptake and water balance. Recent advances in biophysical and genetic research have shed light on the distinct spatial functions of ion transporters involved in systemic Na+ regulation, with particular emphasis on the SOS1 Na+/H+ antiporter (as discussed in Section 6 & Fig. 6)86, 87. SOS1 operates in outer root tissues to limit cytosolic Na+ and restricts its translocation to shoots. Under specific conditions, SOS1 expression in the central vascular region promotes Na+ loading into the xylem, enabling dynamic regulation of Na+ distribution within the plant.86 In addition to vacuolar sequestration, OsSOS1, a plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter, plays a central role in rice’s response to salt stress by mediating Na+ efflux from the cytosol and facilitating Na+ loading into the xylem88. This mechanism helps prevent Na+ accumulation in photosynthetic tissues and contributes to long-distance Na+ transport.88
In Robinia pseudoacacia roots under salinity stress, AMF symbiosis facilitates the exclusion of Na+ from root cells, unloading of Na+ from the xylem, and enhanced translocation of K+ to the shoots.89 These beneficial physiological effects are closely associated with the upregulation of key ion transporter genes in roots, including RpSOS1, RpSKOR (a K+ outward-rectifying channel facilitating K+ loading into the xylem), and RpHKT1 (a transporter implicated in Na+ retrieval from the xylem), which collectively mediate ion homeostasis under salt stress.89 Co-inoculation with AMF and salt-tolerant rhizobia notably enhances the expression of these genes, thereby improving the K+/Na+ ratio and overall salt tolerance in Robinia seedlings.90
4.2. AMF-driven osmotic balance under salinity
With regard to the organic acids (OAs) such as citric, malic, fumaric, and oxalic acids are key intermediates of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and play multiple roles in plant stress physiology91. Under salt stress, plants accumulate OAs in vacuoles to maintain osmotic balance, regulate cytosolic pH, and chelate excess cations like Na+, thereby reducing ionic toxicity.92 AMF colonization alters the concentration and composition of OAs in host plants. In maize, AMF-inoculated plants under salt stress showed increased levels of acetic, citric, fumaric, malic, and oxalic acids, while formic and succinic acids decreased compared to non-mycorrhizal plants lactic acid remained unchanged.93 Furthermore, direct OA production by AMF has been reported by AMF itself to secrete low-molecular-weight organic acids (LMWOAs) such as citrate and oxalate, which facilitate nutrient mobilization (e.g., phosphorus) and may indirectly influence host OA metabolism.94 However, AMF enhance plant resilience to salinity by improving ion homeostasis, water uptake, and organic acid-mediated osmotic adjustment, yet the precise molecular and metabolic mechanisms remain unclear. Bridging these gaps through integrated multi-omics and field validation is essential for developing sustainable AMF-based strategies for saline agriculture.
4.3. AMF enhance photosynthesis process under salinity stress
Similar to drought, salinity stress triggers oxidative imbalance and ion toxicity. AMF-mediated mechanisms such as ROS detoxification, 14-3-3 protein regulation, and vacuolar sequestration provide a unifying framework for cross-tolerance.3 Salinity stress impairs photosynthesis by inducing stomatal closure, reducing CO2 assimilation, and damaging photosystem II (PSII) (demonstrated in Fig. 3), leading to photoinhibition and oxidative stress95, 96. AMF inoculation mitigates these effects by improving stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and net photosynthetic rate (Pn), while maintaining higher chlorophyll content and relative water content.97
Recent meta-analyses confirm that AMF enhance PSII efficiency by increasing the actual quantum yield (ΦPSII), electron transport rate (ETR), and photochemical quenching, while reducing non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), thereby optimizing energy utilization under saline conditions.98, 99 Studies in woody species (Populus spp.) and high-value crops (Pistacia vera) demonstrate that AMF not only preserve PSII photochemistry but also maintain physiological homeostasis under severe salinity, highlighting their potential as a sustainable bio-amelioration strategy for saline soils.97, 99 Key physiological contrasts between mycorrhizal and non‑mycorrhizal plants under salinity are illustrated in (Fig. 4). In non-mycorrhizal plants, salinity stress leads to excessive ROS accumulation, chlorophyll degradation, impaired photosynthesis, and reduced water and nutrient uptake, resulting in cellular dehydration and growth inhibition.100, 101 Additionally, AMF activates MAPK signaling cascades and ABA pathways (discussed in Section 6), which regulate transcription factors (e.g., WRKY, MYB) that drive osmolyte biosynthesis, including Pro, trehalose, and sucrose.102 In combination, these interconnected pathways underline the systemic function of AMF in managing water relations, ion transport, osmolyte metabolism, and redox homeostasis under saline circumstances.
Fig. 4.
Illustrates the role of AMF symbiosis in alleviating salinity stress. Key enzymes involved in this process include pyroline-5-carboxylate synthase (P5CS), trehalose-6-phosphate synthase (TPS), sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS), and sucrose synthase (SS). Under conditions of salinity stress, increased levels of sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl−) ions in the soil lower the water potential compared to that of plant cells, limiting water absorption and leading to cellular dehydration. To combat these effects, plants boost the synthesis of osmolytes such as proline, trehalose, polyamines, and sucrose, stabilizing cellular hydration and safeguarding against stress-induced damage. Additionally, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades, comprising MAPKKK, MAPKK, and MAPK, function as osmotic sensors, transmitting stress signals and coordinating adaptive responses to restore osmotic balance. Furthermore, the figure contrasts mechanisms in plants with AMFs with those without them. Figure generated using Biorender (https://www.biorender.com/).
5. AMF and heavy metal stress
Remediating HMs using AMF involves altering mycorrhizal plants' root architecture and rhizosphere. Numerous plants exhibit significant potential for enhancing HM stress tolerance associated with AMF.103, 104 An excessive buildup of HMs in plant tissues can result in toxicity, damage the integrity of cell membranes, impede photosynthesis and the intake of nutrients, affect morpho-physiological and biological processes, and eventually interfere with plant growth105. Rapidly expanding hyphae, capable of thriving in adverse metal toxicity levels and challenging environmental situations, promote the establishment of AMF symbiosis with host plants106. AMF can elicit alterations in host plants necessary to adapt to the hazardous conditions encountered during symbiotic interactions,107 It also indirectly enhances plant tolerance by promoting the absorption of water and mineral nutrients, augmenting shoot biomass, inducing alterations in root architecture, and mitigating oxidative stress from heavy metal exposure.108
The remediation process is accelerated by increasing shoot biomass production, and AMF plays a vital role in accumulating biomass in the presence of HM toxicity. When subjected to Zn toxicity, AMF inoculated with R. irregularis from maize plants produced more biomass than non-mycorrhizal plants.109 The cellular detoxification framework and mycorrhizal metal transport routes are depicted in (Fig. 5). The primary line of defense against HMs within the plant cell centers on glutathione (GSH) metabolism and vacuolar sequestration.110 HMs entering the cell (e.g., Cd2+, Cu2+, As3+) trigger the synthesis of GSH from its precursors (cysteine, glutamate, glycine). The enzyme PCS then catalyzes the polymerization of GSH into PCs.110 These PCs act as potent chelators, binding HMs to form HM-PC complexes.
Fig. 5.
Illustrates the mitigation of heavy metal (HM) stress through AMF by employing chelating agents. The figure depicts the uptake of heavy metals facilitated by zinc and iron-like protein (ZIP) transporters and other ion channels. Upon entering the cytosol, HM ions activate the enzyme phytochelatin synthase (PCS), which catalyzes the formation of phytochelatins (PCs) from glutathione (GSH). GSH is synthesized from glutamate (Glu) and cysteine (Cys) through the transfer of γ-glutamyl-cysteinyl (γ Glu-Cys) conjugates, a process mediated by glutathione synthetase (GS). PCs then bind to cytosolic HM ions, forming heavy metal-phytochelatin (HM-PC) complexes that are transported into the vacuole via ATP-binding cassettes (ABC), P1B ATPase (P1B), and various transporters, including heavy metal ATPases (HMA) and natural resistance-associated macrophage proteins (NRAMP). Moreover, HM ions contribute to generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide radicals (O2−). These radicals are dissimulated by superoxide dismutase (SOD), resulting in the production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which is subsequently decomposed into water (H2O) by ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and catalase (CAT). Additional enzymes involved in this process include peroxidase (POD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and glutathione reductase (GR). Additionally, the mycorrhizal pathway encompasses several metal transporters that facilitate the transfer of metals from the extraradical mycelium (ERM) to the intraradical mycelium (IRM) and ultimately to the plant root at the symbiotic interface. These transporters include a fungal copper transporter, iron permease, manganese transporter, and zinc transporter. Figure generated using Biorender (https://www.biorender.com/).
This chelation is crucial for neutralizing the reactive and toxic forms of metals. Subsequent sequestration involves transporting these HM-PC complexes from the cytosol into the vacuole.110 This energy-dependent process is facilitated by ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) transporters located on the vacuolar membrane, consuming ATP to power the translocation. Alternative fates for complexes, such as the formation of NH4-PC complexes or degradation, may also occur.111 Additionally, specific HM ATPases (HMAs), often located on the plasma membrane or internal membranes, actively pump free metal: ions either out of the cell or into compartments, further reducing cytosolic HM concentrations.112 Ion channels and transporters on the cell wall and plasma membrane represent the initial points of HM entry or exclusion.113 AMFs can reduce heavy metals in different ways, involving:
-
1.
AMFs promote biomass accumulation and mitigate HM stress in plants: By forming symbiotic associations with host plants, AMF modulates HM dynamics, often sequestering metals in root tissues and restricting their translocation to aerial parts.114 This “metal immobilization” strategy reduces HM bioavailability in shoots, thereby mitigating phytotoxicity and improving shoot biomass.115 For instance, in wheat (T. aestivum) AMF particularly (G. mosseae) colonization significantly reduced Cd accumulation in grains while increasing Cd retention in roots, suggesting a protective role against edible tissue contamination.116 Similarly, Z. mays colonized by F. mosseae and Diversispora spp. in HM-contaminated soils exhibited enhanced root uptake of arsenic (As), Cd, Zn, and Pb, with limited transfer to shoots, underscoring AMF’s role in metal compartmentalization.117 Concurrently, AMF upregulates plant genes encoding metal transporters (e.g., ZIP, NRAMP) and PCs which bind and detoxify HMs in root vacuoles118. This dual-action soil immobilization and cellular sequestration minimize oxidative stress in shoots while promoting root biomass, which acts as an HM sink.119 Additionally, studies also highlight AMF-mediated modulation of soil pH and organic acid exudation, further immobilizing HMs like Cd and Pb in less bioavailable forms.120, 121 Notably, AMF species exhibit functional diversity in HM management. For instance, R. irregularis enhances the phytostabilization of Cd in legumes, while Claroideoglomus etunicatum improves Zn tolerance in hyperaccumulators like Sedum alfredii.122, 123
-
2.
Fungal metal transporters and their regulation in AM symbiosis: Beyond plant transporters, AMF possess their own suites of metal transporters that operate across extraradical mycelium (ERM), intraradical mycelium (IRM), and the symbiotic interface. Genome-wide analysis in R. irregularis indicates expanded families for Cu transporters (CTR/Ctr-like), Fe uptake modules (Fet3-Ftr1 permease-oxidase system; FTR), and Zn transporters, among others, with stage-specific up-regulation in mycorrhizal roots consistent with active metal handling during symbiosis.124 Putative NRAMP and CDF/HMA-like transporters likely contribute to intracellular trafficking and sequestration.115, 124 Together, these fungal systems can buffer external metal loads, coordinate micronutrient delivery, and indirectly shape host detoxification demands (e.g., PCs/MTs and vacuolar flux), thereby complementing plant ABC/HMA/NRAMP activity depicted in (Fig. 5).
-
3.
AMF-Facilitated nutrient absorption under HMs stress: The enhanced nutrient uptake by host plants facilitated by AMF is a well-established benefit of this symbiotic relationship. A recent pot experiment investigated the role of C. etunicatum under Cd and lanthanum (La) stress125. The results demonstrated that AMF significantly increased plant biomass and improved nutrient acquisition, with N, P, and K uptake rising by 20.1 % to 76.8 % in maize tissues. Additionally, AMF reduced the toxic effects of HMs by limiting their accumulation in plant organs, highlighting their protective role under HM stress.125 Across drought, salinity, and HM stress, AMF-mediated tolerance converges on three core strategies: (i) maintaining water and ion homeostasis, (ii) reinforcing antioxidant defenses, and (iii) reprogramming signaling networks via hubs such as 14-3-3 proteins and MAPK cascades. These shared pathways highlight AMF’s potential to confer cross-tolerance under combined stress scenarios.
HMs exposure inevitably leads to the generation of reactive ROS, resulting in oxidative stress. Plant tolerance in this context relies heavily on the AMF-enhanced antioxidant defense system detailed in (Section 2.5), which is universally activated across all stress types. Furthermore, the upstream signaling for this defense, involving the ABA and MAPK pathways (2.2, 2.4), is co-opted to regulate the expression of antioxidant enzymes and chelation agents like PCs and MTs, thereby linking the molecular response to HMs with the general stress response.
6. Integrated ABA-MAPK signaling, and aquaporin regulation in stress adaptation
AMF establish a conserved mutualistic relationship with most terrestrial plants common symbiosis signaling pathway (CSSP). Under phosphate-deficient conditions, plant roots secrete strigolactones that stimulate AMF spore germination and hyphal branching, while AMF release Myc factors lipo-chitooligosaccharides (Myc-LCOs) and short-chain chitooligosaccharides (CO4/CO5) to initiate symbiotic signaling.126 These signals are perceived by plant LysM receptor-like kinases such as CERK1, MYR1, and LYK8, which form receptor complexes to distinguish symbiotic signals from pathogenic chitin fragments, thereby activating SYMRK (also known as DMI2) to initiate downstream signaling.126 SYMRK activation triggers nuclear calcium oscillations via ion channels DMI1(Doesn't Make Infections 1), CASTOR, and POLLUX located on the nuclear envelope, which are decoded by CCaMK and its partner CYCLOPS to translate calcium signatures into transcriptional responses.127 This leads to transcriptional reprogramming through GRAS family transcription factors such as RAM1 and RAD1, which activate genes required for arbuscule development, while DELLA proteins interact with the CCaMK-CYCLOPS complex to stabilize symbiotic progression.127
To facilitate colonization, AMF secrete nuclear-targeted effectors like RiNLE1 that suppress plant immunity by inhibiting histone H2B monoubiquitination, reducing defense gene expression and promoting fungal accommodation128 Ultimately, arbuscules form within root cortical cells to enable nutrient exchange plants absorb phosphate via PT4 transporters on the periarbuscular membrane, while supplying carbohydrates and lipids to the fungus and AMF further enhance plant stress tolerance through ABA accumulation, MAPK activation, and AQP regulation.128
The ABA signaling pathway initiates with ABA perception by PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors, which inhibit Type 2C protein phosphatases (PP2Cs), releasing sucrose non-fermenting 1-related protein kinases 2 (SnRK2s) to activate via autophosphorylation. Activated SnRK2s phosphorylate ABA-responsive element binding factors (ABFs), which translocate to the nucleus and regulate ABA-responsive genes, orchestrating stress adaptation129. In parallel, MAPK cascades (discussed in 2.4) comprising MAPKKKs, MAPKKs, and MAPK serve as key transducers of environmental and symbiotic signals129. These cascades are activated by drought, salinity, heavy metal exposure, and notably AMF colonization, which primes host plants for enhanced stress tolerance by triggering MAPK modules and modulating hormonal signaling130, 131. AMF not only activate MAPKs but also amplify ABA signaling, creating a synergistic effect that strengthens stress resilience.132
A critical downstream target of this integrated network is AQPs, membrane channels essential for water transport and hydraulic conductance. ABA upregulates AQP gene expression particularly PIP-type aquaporins such as HcPIP1;2 and HcPIP2;7 under drought stress in AMF-colonized plants discussed in (section 2.3)10, 23. This regulation occurs via ABA-activated SnRK2s and ABF-mediated transcription. Concurrently, MAPKs such as MPK3 and MPK6 can phosphorylate transcription factors that bind AQP promoters, adding an additional layer of control.132
Beyond AQPs, ABA-MAPK integration regulates a broad spectrum of stress-responsive genes. Under salinity stress, AMF-colonized plants exhibit enhanced expression of genes involved in the SOS pathway, CDPKs, and late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins, which collectively maintain ion homeostasis, osmoregulation, and cellular protection131. Similarly, MAPKs such as MPK3 and MPK6 modulate genes associated with HM detoxification, chelation, and transport, reducing metal accumulation and toxicity.113, 133 This multilayered regulation underscores the central role of ABA-MAPK signaling in orchestrating complex transcriptional networks that enable plants to withstand diverse abiotic stresses while benefiting from symbiotic. This integrated signaling network is illustrated in (Fig. 6), which links stress-specific pathways with the AMF colonization module and the ABA-MAPK-AQP hub, highlighting key molecular players and their interactions under abiotic stress conditions.
7. Current challenges and future directions
Despite the significant potential of AMF in enhancing plant stress resilience, several critical challenges must be addressed to enable their effective integration into agricultural systems:
-
1.
Species-specific compatibility and functional variability: AMF symbiosis demonstrates significant specificity regarding host genotype and fungal strain, resulting in diverse colonization efficiency and stress alleviation effects. However, the lack of standardized screening protocols for determining optimal AMF-host pairings constitutes a substantial impediment to practical implementation.134
-
2.
Limited field validation and environmental complexity: Most insights into AMF-mediated stress tolerance derive from controlled experiments, which fail to capture the heterogeneity of field conditions. Soil type, native microbial communities, and climatic variability significantly influence AMF performance. Long-term, multi-location field trials are essential to validate laboratory findings and ensure ecological robustness.135
-
3.
Microbiome interactions and community-level dynamics: AMF operates within a broader soil microbiome, where interactions with other beneficial microbes (e.g., rhizobia, endophytes) can be synergistic or antagonistic.136 Deciphering these community-level dynamics is critical for designing effective microbial consortia that enhances plant resilience under stress.
-
4.
Formulation stability and commercial scalability: Developing AMF inoculants with consistent efficacy, extended shelf-life, and adaptability across diverse cropping systems remains a technological challenge. Optimization of carrier materials, spore viability, and application strategies is necessary to achieve large-scale deployment.137
-
5.
Real-world implementation, soil pH & fertility, and integration with sustainable systems: Soil pH and fertility shape AMF colonization and community structure. Nutrient additions can shift pH and alter colonization rates, spore density, and dominant taxa; high available P often suppresses root colonization, while moderate P can sustain AMF benefits in the field.138 Long-term P management, N forms, and crops phenology interact with pH to restructure AMF communities and function, necessitating site-specific fertility plans integration strategies resulting in align AMF with reduced tillage and cover crops (off-season hosts), seed coating or in-furrow inoculation at root-zone placement, co-formulation with biochar or PGPB, and moderate P programs to avoid colonization suppression.139 These practices fit well within low-input/regenerative systems and can be adapted to high-input systems with careful nutrient and pesticide stewardship.
-
6.
Integration under combined abiotic stresses: Emerging case studies illustrate AMF’s potential under multi-stress conditions. For example, AMF combined with biochar improved sweet pepper resilience under simultaneous drought and salinity by enhancing photosynthetic pigments and antioxidant defenses140. Similarly, maize under calcium-saline stress plus drought exhibited improved photosynthesis and nutrient stoichiometry with AMF inoculation141. However, trade-offs exist; coastal dune grass inoculated with native AMF showed higher survival under mild salinity but reduced performance under drought, underscoring the need for environment-specific AMF consortia.142 Therefore, Integration of AMF under combined abiotic stresses addresses challenges such as multi-stress tolerance, nutrient imbalance, oxidative damage, photosynthetic decline, soil degradation, and the need for stress-specific AMF consortia. Future research should employ integrated omics approaches transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to unravel these complexity of the multiple stresses interactions.
To translate these insights into practice, we propose a research roadmap: (1) develop standardized AMF-host screening protocols, (2) conduct long-term field trials under multi-stress conditions, (3) integrate AMF with beneficial microbial consortia, (4) advance formulation technologies for scalable inoculants, and (5) develop guidelines for pH adjustment and moderate P fertilization to sustain AMF colonization without suppression. These steps will unlock AMF’s full potential in climate-smart agriculture.
8. Conclusion
AMFs have emerged as pivotal biological allies in enhancing plant resilience against the escalating threats of drought, salinity, and heavy metal, contamination. This review consolidates mechanistic insights across physiological, biochemical, and molecular domains, revealing how AMF orchestrates a multifaceted defense strategy. Through modulation of AQPs, ABA and MAPK signaling, antioxidant systems, and ion transporters, AMF not only improve water and nutrient uptake but also fine-tune stress-responsive gene expression and redox homeostasis. Their role in regulating transcription factors, osmolyte biosynthesis, and vacuolar sequestration underscores their systemic influence on plant stress physiology.
Importantly, AMF-mediated tolerance is not confined to isolated stress conditions; evidence suggests a convergence of mechanisms that confer cross-tolerance under combined stress scenarios. This positions AMF as integrative modulators capable of synchronizing rhizospheric interactions with intracellular signaling networks. The review also highlights the ecological and agronomic relevance of AMF, including their contributions to soil structure, nutrient cycling, and sustainable crop production.
Emerging combined‑stress studies reinforce the integrative model. For instance, in maize facing calcium‑salinity plus drought, AMF improved growth, photosynthesis, and C:N:P stoichiometry primarily under water deficit, indicating context‑dependent synergies under compound stress. In coastal dune grass, native AMF enhanced survival at low salinity but reduced survival under drought, highlighting potential trade‑offs that demand environment‑specific consortia and management. These cases underscore the need for predictive rules linking AMF taxa, host genotype, and stress matrices, resolved through field‑based multi‑omics.
As climate change intensifies the frequency and severity of abiotic stresses, leveraging AMF-based strategies offers a promising avenue for resilient agriculture. However, translating these insights into field-ready applications demands a deeper understanding of AMF diversity, host specificity, and multi-stress integration. Future research should prioritize multi-omics approaches, long-term field trials, and the development of robust AMF formulations to unlock their full potential in climate-smart farming systems.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Mutaz Mohammed Abdallah: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Software. Chenmei Suo: Writing – original draft, Validation, Investigation. Youxin Cui: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Conceptualization. Rana Hissan Ullah: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. Hoang Hong Nhung: Writing – original draft, Validation, Software. Lixin Li: Validation, Supervision, Conceptualization. Changli Liu: Visualization, Supervision.
Informed consent
All the authors have given their consent for publication of this manuscript by Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Funding
The authors gratefully acknowledged the funding supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [Grant Number ZHLJZR230150002].
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgement
Not applicable.
Contributor Information
Lixin Li, Email: 1326785586@qq.com.
Changli Liu, Email: 3099734274@qq.com.
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
- 1.Mansinhos I., Gonçalves S., Romano A. How climate change-related abiotic factors affect the production of industrial valuable compounds in Lamiaceae plant species: a review. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1370810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang X., et al. Alleviation of plant abiotic stress: mechanistic insights into emerging applications of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms in agriculture. Plants. 2025;14(10):1558. doi: 10.3390/plants14101558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boorboori M.R., Lackóová L. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and salinity stress mitigation in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2025;15 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1504970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Khan N.A., et al. Complexity of combined abiotic stresses to crop plants. Plant Stress. 2025;17 [Google Scholar]
- 5.Smith S.E., et al. Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant phosphorus nutrition: interactions between pathways of phosphorus uptake in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots have important implications for understanding and manipulating plant phosphorus acquisition. Plant Physiol. 2011;156(3):1050–1057. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.174581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Qi S., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi contribute to phosphorous uptake and allocation strategies of Solidago canadensis in a phosphorous-deficient environment. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.831654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Samanta I., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi–a natural tool to impart abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2025;20(1) doi: 10.1080/15592324.2025.2525843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Khan Y., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-mediated abiotic stress tolerance: emerging roles in nutrient exchange, antioxidant defence, and hormonal crosstalk. Plant Stress. 2025 [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ye Q., Wang H., Li H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance drought stress tolerance by regulating osmotic balance, the antioxidant system, and the expression of drought‐responsive genes in Vitis vinifera L. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2023;2023(1) [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sharma K., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhiza-mediated regulation of polyamines and aquaporins during abiotic stress: deep insights on the recondite players. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.642101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang W.-D., et al. SOS1, HKT1; 5, and NHX1 synergistically modulate Na+ homeostasis in the halophytic grass Puccinellia tenuiflora. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:576. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Abdelrady W.A., et al. NHX transporters: Molecular mechanisms and applications for enhancing crop resilience to soil salinity in changing environments. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2025 doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.110603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cobbett C., Goldsbrough P. Phytochelatins and metallothioneins: roles in heavy metal detoxification and homeostasis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53(1):159–182. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ma Y., et al. Plant-mycorrhizal fungi interactions in phytoremediation of geogenic contaminated soils. Front Microbiol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.843415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Golldack D., et al. Tolerance to drought and salt stress in plants: unraveling the signaling networks. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:151. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kandalgaonkar K.N., Barvkar V.T. Intricate phytohormonal orchestration mediates mycorrhizal symbiosis and stress tolerance. Mycorrhiza. 2025;35(2):1–20. doi: 10.1007/s00572-025-01189-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang S., et al. Insights on the impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis on eucalyptus grandis tolerance to drought stress. Microbiol Spectrum. 2023;11(2):e04381–e04422. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04381-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang A., et al. Mitogen-activated protein kinase is involved in abscisic acid-induced antioxidant defense and acts downstream of reactive oxygen species production in leaves of maize plants. Plant Physiol. 2006;141(2):475–487. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.075416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cao Z., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance plant salt tolerance to salt stress using endogenous phytohormones. Arch Microbiol. 2025;207(12):1–12. doi: 10.1007/s00203-025-04538-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Maurel C., et al. Aquaporins in plants. Physiol Rev. 2015;95(4):1321–1358. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00008.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kapilan R., Vaziri M., Zwiazek J.J. Regulation of aquaporins in plants under stress. Biol Res. 2018;51(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40659-018-0152-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Afzal Z., et al. The roles of aquaporins in plant stress responses. J Dev Biol. 2016;4(1):9. doi: 10.3390/jdb4010009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ni Y., et al. Aquaporin ZmPIP2; 4 promotes tolerance to drought during arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi symbiosis. Plant Soil. 2025;508(1):1–20. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu Z., et al. Water strategy of mycorrhizal rice at low temperature through the regulation of PIP aquaporins with the involvement of trehalose. Appl Soil Ecol. 2014;84:185–191. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cheng X.-F., et al. Mycorrhizal response strategies of trifoliate orange under well-watered, salt stress, and waterlogging stress by regulating leaf aquaporin expression. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021;162:27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang D., et al. Aquaporin ZmTIP2; 3 promotes drought resistance of maize through symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(8):4205. doi: 10.3390/ijms25084205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Aroca R., et al. Expression analysis of the first arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi aquaporin described reveals concerted gene expression between salt-stressed and nonstressed mycelium. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2009;22(9):1169–1178. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-9-1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li S., et al. The interaction of ABA and ROS in plant growth and stress resistances. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1050132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jiang Z., et al. Exogenous ABA enhances the antioxidant defense system of maize by regulating the AsA-GSH cycle under drought stress. Sustainability. 2022;14(5):3071. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cao M., et al. An ABA-mimicking ligand that reduces water loss and promotes drought resistance in plants. Cell Res. 2013;23(8):1043–1054. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nambara E., Marion-Poll A. Abscisic acid biosynthesis and catabolism. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005;56(1):165–185. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hamisch D., et al. Transgenic poplar plants for the investigation of ABA-dependent salt and drought stress adaptation in trees. Am J Plant Sci. 2016;7(9):1337–1356. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mukherjee A., et al. Integration of light and ABA signaling pathways to combat drought stress in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2023;42(5):829–841. doi: 10.1007/s00299-023-02999-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Daszkowska-Golec A. Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants, Vol 2: Molecular and Genetic Perspectives. Springer; 2016. The role of abscisic acid in drought stress: how ABA helps plants to cope with drought stress; pp. 123–151. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jie Y., et al. Promotion of proline accumulation in apple leaves by bioregulators. Acta Hortic. 2008;774:237–242. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sharp R.E., et al. Root growth maintenance during water deficits: physiology to functional genomics. J Exp Bot. 2004;55(407):2343–2351. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang Z., et al. Unveiling the molecular mechanisms of γ-polyglutamic acid-mediated drought tolerance in cotton through transcriptomic and physiological analyses. BMC Plant Biol. 2025;25(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06406-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Villiers F., et al. Transcriptomic dynamics of ABA response in Brassica napus guard cells. Stress Biology. 2024;4(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s44154-024-00169-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Xu Z., et al. Poly-γ-glutamic acid induces system tolerance to drought stress by promoting abscisic acid accumulation in Brassica napus L. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):252. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57190-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Miura C., Pujasatria G.C., Kaminaka H. Advances in Orchid Biology, Biotechnology and Omics. Springer; 2023. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of orchid mycorrhizal symbiosis from genetic information; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Furlan A.L., et al. Proline metabolic dynamics and implications in drought tolerance of peanut plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;151:566–578. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Verbruggen N., Hermans C. Proline accumulation in plants: a review. Amino Acids. 2008;35(4):753–759. doi: 10.1007/s00726-008-0061-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Xu G., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-mediated drought stress tolerance in Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.): a mechanistic approach. Plant Growth Regul. 2024;103(3):803–824. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zou Y.-N., et al. Metabolomics reveals arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-mediated tolerance of walnut to soil drought. BMC Plant Biol. 2023;23(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04111-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Soliman E.R., Abdelhameed R.E., Metwally R.A. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in drought-resilient soybeans (Glycine max L.): unraveling the morphological, physio-biochemical traits, and expression of polyamine biosynthesis genes. Bot Stud. 2025;66(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40529-025-00455-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Liu Z., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhanced rice proline metabolism under low temperature with nitric oxide involvement. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.962460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lehmann S., et al. Proline metabolism and transport in plant development. Amino Acids. 2010;39(4):949–962. doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0525-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Han Y., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhanced drought resistance of Populus cathayana by regulating the 14-3-3 family protein genes. Microbiol Spectrum. 2022;10(3):e02456–e02521. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02456-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chun S.C., Paramasivan M., Chandrasekaran M. Proline accumulation influenced by osmotic stress in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiotic plants. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2525. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lin L., et al. Plant mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in environmental stresses. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(4):1543. doi: 10.3390/ijms22041543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ning J., et al. A Raf-like MAPKKK gene DSM1 mediates drought resistance through reactive oxygen species scavenging in rice. Plant Physiol. 2010;152(2):876–890. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.149856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tao J., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance photosynthesis and drought tolerance by regulating MAPK genes expressions of Populus simonii× P. nigra. Physiol Plant. 2022;174(6) doi: 10.1111/ppl.13829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Liu Z., et al. Coordinated regulation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soybean MAPK pathway genes improved mycorrhizal soybean drought tolerance. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2015;28(4):408–419. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-09-14-0251-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Li Z., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi contribute to reactive oxygen species homeostasis of Bombax ceiba L. under drought stress. Front Microbiol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.991781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Matsuoka D., et al. Activation of AtMEK1, an Arabidopsis mitogen‐activated protein kinase kinase, in vitro and in vivo: analysis of active mutants expressed in E. coli and generation of the active form in stress response in seedlings. Plant J. 2002;29(5):637–647. doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7412.2001.01246.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Xing Y., Jia W., Zhang J. AtMEK1 mediates stress-induced gene expression of CAT1 catalase by triggering H2O2 production in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(11):2969–2981. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Han Y., et al. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphorus on drought-induced oxidative stress and 14-3-3 proteins gene expression of Populus cathayana. Front Microbiol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.934964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sun Z., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal 14-3-3 proteins are involved in arbuscule formation and responses to abiotic stresses during AM symbiosis. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:91. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cheng H.-Q., Wu Q.-S., Kuča K. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate drought stress in trifoliate orange by regulating H+-ATPase activity and gene expression. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.659694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Liu X.-Q., et al. Defense responses and symbiotic functional initiation in trifoliate orange‒arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi interaction. Chem Biol Technol Agric. 2024;11(1):3. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Liu C.-Y., et al. Mycorrhiza stimulates root-hair growth and IAA synthesis and transport in trifoliate orange under drought stress. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1978. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20456-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Tang H., et al. The critical role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to improve drought tolerance and nitrogen use efficiency in crops. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.919166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Quiroga G., et al. Enhanced drought stress tolerance by the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in a drought-sensitive maize cultivar is related to a broader and differential regulation of host plant aquaporins than in a drought-tolerant cultivar. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1056. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhang Q., et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals the molecular mechanisms for mycorrhiza-enhanced drought tolerance in maize by regulating the Ca2+ signaling pathway. J Fungi. 2025;11(5):375. doi: 10.3390/jof11050375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ma W.-Y., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhiza induces low oxidative burst in drought-stressed walnut through activating antioxidant defense systems and heat shock transcription factor expression. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1089420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Li W., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhanced resistance to low-temperature weak-light stress in snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus L.) through physiological and transcriptomic responses. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1330032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Taylor R.E., West C.E., Foyer C.H. WHIRLY protein functions in plants. Food Energy Secur. 2023;12(2):e379. doi: 10.1002/fes3.379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Su W., et al. Sugarcane calcineurin B-like (CBL) genes play important but versatile roles in regulation of responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):167. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57058-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kakouridis A., et al. Routes to roots: direct evidence of water transport by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to host plants. New Phytol. 2022;236(1):210–221. doi: 10.1111/nph.18281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wu X.-L., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance nitrogen assimilation and drought adaptability in tea plants by promoting amino acid accumulation. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1450999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wu C., Bi Y., Zhu W. Is the amount of water transported by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal hyphae negligible? Insights from a compartmentalized experimental study. Plant Soil. 2024;499(1):537–552. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Gupta D.K., Palma J.M., Corpas F.J. Springer; 2015. Reactive oxygen species and oxidative damage in plants under stress. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Laxa M., et al. The role of the plant antioxidant system in drought tolerance. Antioxidants. 2019;8(4):94. doi: 10.3390/antiox8040094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kaur G., Asthir B. Molecular responses to drought stress in plants. Biol Plant. 2017;61(2):201–209. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chandrasekaran M., Paramasivan M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and antioxidant enzymes in ameliorating drought stress: a meta-analysis. Plant Soil. 2022;480(1):295–303. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ma H., et al. Poly-γ-glutamic acid could enhance the salt resistance of maize by collectively increasing the osmotic, ion, and oxidative stresses resistance and enriching the salt-tolerant PGPBs in rhizosphere soil. Plant Soil. 2025:1–18. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Fan Q.-J., Liu J.-H. Colonization with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus affects growth, drought tolerance and expression of stress-responsive genes in Poncirus trifoliata. Acta Physiol Plant. 2011;33(4):1533–1542. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Dastogeer K.M., et al. Plant salinity tolerance conferred by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and associated mechanisms: a meta-analysis. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.588550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Pooja P., et al. Role played by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in amelioration of salinity stress: a review. Plant Soil. 2024:1–16. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Chandrasekaran M., et al. A meta-analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal effects on plants grown under salt stress. Mycorrhiza. 2014;24(8):611–625. doi: 10.1007/s00572-014-0582-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Son Y., Martínez C.E., Kao-Kniffin J. Three important roles and chemical properties of glomalin-related soil protein. Front Soil Sci. 2024;4 [Google Scholar]
- 82.Hammer E.C., Rillig M.C. The influence of different stresses on glomalin levels in an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus—salinity increases glomalin content. PLoS One. 2011;6(12) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Janicka-Russak M, Kabała K, The role of plasma membrane H+-ATPase in salinity stress of plants, in Progress in Botany: Vol. 76. 2014, Springer. p. 77-92.
- 84.Selvakumar G., et al. Spore associated bacteria regulates maize root K+/Na+ ion homeostasis to promote salinity tolerance during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1317-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Evelin H., et al. Mitigation of salinity stress in plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: current understanding and new challenges. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:470. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Shi H., et al. The putative plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 controls long-distance Na+ transport in plants. Plant Cell. 2002;14(2):465–477. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.El Mahi H., et al. A critical role of sodium flux via the plasma membrane Na+/H+ exchanger SOS1 in the salt tolerance of rice. Plant Physiol. 2019;180(2):1046–1065. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Munns R., Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59(1):651–681. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Chen J., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis alleviates salt stress in black locust through improved photosynthesis, water status, and K+/Na+ homeostasis. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Hui Q., et al. Inoculation with salt‐tolerant rhizobia and AMF regulates K+/Na+ homeostasis in Robinia pseudoacacia L. alleviating salinity. Plant Cell Environ. 2025 doi: 10.1111/pce.15621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Panchal P., Miller A.J., Giri J. Organic acids: versatile stress-response roles in plants. J Exp Bot. 2021;72(11):4038–4052. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Silva P., Gerós H. Regulation by salt of vacuolar H+-ATPase and H+-pyrophosphatase activities and Na+/H+ exchange. Plant Signal Behav. 2009;4(8):718–726. doi: 10.4161/psb.4.8.9236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Sheng M., et al. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on organic solutes in maize leaves under salt stress. Mycorrhiza. 2011;21(5):423–430. doi: 10.1007/s00572-010-0353-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Andrino A., et al. Production of organic acids by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their contribution in the mobilization of phosphorus bound to iron oxides. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.661842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Chaves M.M., Flexas J., Pinheiro C. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot. 2009;103(4):551–560. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Hnilickova H., et al. Salinity stress affects photosynthesis, malondialdehyde formation, and proline content in Portulaca oleracea L. Plants. 2021;10(5):845. doi: 10.3390/plants10050845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Han S., et al. Enhancing salt tolerance in poplar seedlings through arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi symbiosis. Plants. 2024;13(2):233. doi: 10.3390/plants13020233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Wang Y., et al. The effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on photosystem II of the host plant under salt stress: a meta-analysis. Agronomy. 2019;9(12):806. [Google Scholar]
- 99.Hamzehzadeh H., et al. AMF-mediated salinity adaptation in pistachio plants: photosynthetic efficiency and ionic balance. Biologia. 2025;80(1):1–17. [Google Scholar]
- 100.Lu C., et al. Salt stress inhibits photosynthesis and destroys chloroplast structure by downregulating chloroplast development–related genes in Robinia pseudoacacia seedlings. Plants. 2023;12(6):1283. doi: 10.3390/plants12061283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Parihar P., et al. Effect of salinity stress on plants and its tolerance strategies: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22(6):4056–4075. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3739-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Singh P., et al. Salt stress resilience in plants mediated through osmolyte accumulation and its crosstalk mechanism with phytohormones. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1006617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Bano S.A., Ashfaq D. Role of mycorrhiza to reduce heavy metal stress. Nat Sci. 2013;2013 [Google Scholar]
- 104.Kuang Y., et al. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth and root cell ultrastructure of Eucalyptus grandis under cadmium stress. J Fungi. 2023;9(2):140. doi: 10.3390/jof9020140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Kumar P., et al. Plant Metal and Metalloid Transporters. Springer; 2022. Heavy metals: transport in plants and their physiological and toxicological effects; pp. 23–54. [Google Scholar]
- 106.Wahab A., et al. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in regulating growth, enhancing productivity, and potentially influencing ecosystems under abiotic and biotic stresses. Plants. 2023;12(17):3102. doi: 10.3390/plants12173102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Dowarah B., Gill S.S., Agarwala N. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in conferring tolerance to biotic stresses in plants. J Plant Growth Regul. 2022;41(4):1429–1444. [Google Scholar]
- 108.Bui V.C., Franken P. Acclimatization of Rhizophagus irregularis enhances Zn tolerance of the fungus and the mycorrhizal plant partner. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:3156. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Zhan F., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance antioxidant defense in the leaves and the retention of heavy metals in the roots of maize. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25:24338–24347. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2487-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Chia J-C, Phytochelatin synthase in heavy metal detoxification and xenobiotic metabolism. 2021: IntechOpen.
- 111.Jalmi S.K. Plant Metal and Metalloid Transporters. Springer; 2022. The role of ABC transporters in metal transport in plants; pp. 55–71. [Google Scholar]
- 112.Sinha D., et al. Plant Metal and Metalloid Transporters. Springer; 2022. Role of heavy metal ATPases in transport of cadmium and zinc in plants; pp. 109–131. [Google Scholar]
- 113.Jalmi S.K., et al. Traversing the links between heavy metal stress and plant signaling. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Crișan I., Balestrini R., Pagliarani C. The current view on heavy metal remediation: the relevance of the plant interaction with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Stress. 2024;12 [Google Scholar]
- 115.Ferrol N., Tamayo E., Vargas P. The heavy metal paradox in arbuscular mycorrhizas: from mechanisms to biotechnological applications. J Exp Bot. 2016 doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Li H., et al. Physio-biochemical and transcriptomic features of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi relieving cadmium stress in wheat. Antioxidants. 2022;11(12):2390. doi: 10.3390/antiox11122390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Zhan F., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance antioxidant defense in the leaves and the retention of heavy metals in the roots of maize. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25(24):24338–24347. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2487-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Gujre N., et al. Deciphering the dynamics of glomalin and heavy metals in soils contaminated with hazardous municipal solid wastes. J Hazard Mater. 2021;416 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Wipf D., et al. Trading on the arbuscular mycorrhiza market: from arbuscules to common mycorrhizal networks. New Phytol. 2019;223(3):1127–1142. doi: 10.1111/nph.15775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Zhao S., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-assisted phytoremediation: a promising strategy for cadmium-contaminated soils. Plants. 2024;13(23):3289. doi: 10.3390/plants13233289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Selvakumar K, Kalaiselvi T, Impact of Amf from Cultivable and Natural Ecosystems on Maize Root Exudation and Mycorrhizal Colonization. Available at SSRN 5031894.
- 122.Pan G., et al. Effects of Claroideoglomus etunicatum fungi inoculation on arsenic uptake by maize and Pteris vittata L. Toxics. 2022;10(10):574. doi: 10.3390/toxics10100574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Deng S., et al. Rhizophagus irregularis regulates flavonoids metabolism in paper mulberry roots under cadmium stress. Mycorrhiza. 2024:1–23. doi: 10.1007/s00572-024-01155-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Tamayo E., et al. Genome-wide analysis of copper, iron and zinc transporters in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:547. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Chang Q., et al. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis on growth, nutrient and metal uptake by maize seedlings (Zea mays L.) grown in soils spiked with Lanthanum and Cadmium. Environ Pollut. 2018;241:607–615. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Wu J, et al., Receptor kinases and signal pathway in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Agriculture-New Insights. 2022, IntechOpen.
- 127.Pimprikar P., Gutjahr C. Transcriptional regulation of arbuscular mycorrhiza development. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018;59(4):678–695. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Wang P., et al. A nuclear‐targeted effector of Rhizophagus irregularis interferes with histone 2B mono‐ubiquitination to promote arbuscular mycorrhization. New Phytol. 2021;230(3):1142–1155. doi: 10.1111/nph.17236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Danquah A., et al. The role of ABA and MAPK signaling pathways in plant abiotic stress responses. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32(1):40–52. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.He X., et al. The function of MAPK cascades in response to various stresses in horticultural plants. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:952. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Li S., et al. MAPK cascades and transcriptional factors: regulation of heavy metal tolerance in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(8):4463. doi: 10.3390/ijms23084463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Singh M., et al. Insights into the multifaceted roles of soil microbes in mitigating abiotic stress in crop plants: a review. Environ Exp Bot. 2024;228 [Google Scholar]
- 133.Majeed Y., et al. Harnessing the role of mitogen-activated protein kinases against abiotic stresses in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.932923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Schoen C., et al. Inter and intra-specific variability in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi affects hosts and soil health. Symbiosis. 2021;85(3):273–289. [Google Scholar]
- 135.Sweeney C.J., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the need for a meaningful regulatory plant protection product testing strategy. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2022;41(8):1808–1823. doi: 10.1002/etc.5400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Jiang Y., et al. Trophic interactions as determinants of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community with cascading plant-promoting consequences. Microbiome. 2020;8(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00918-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Ghorui M., Chowdhury S., Burla S. Recent advances in the commercial formulation of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculants. Front Ind Microbiol. 2025;3 [Google Scholar]
- 138.Liu M., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization and soil pH induced by nitrogen and phosphorus additions affects leaf C: N: P stoichiometry in Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) forests. Plant Soil. 2021;461(1):421–440. [Google Scholar]
- 139.Liu W., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil and roots respond differently to phosphorus inputs in an intensively managed calcareous agricultural soil. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):24902. doi: 10.1038/srep24902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Soussani F.-E., et al. Enhancing sweet pepper tolerance to combined drought and salinity stresses: synergistic role of biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J Crop Health. 2025;77(2):1–17. [Google Scholar]
- 141.Ran Q., et al. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on carbon assimilation and ecological stoichiometry of maize under combined abiotic stresses. J Plant Ecol. 2024;17(2) [Google Scholar]
- 142.Newman E.D., et al. Trade-offs in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal responses to drought and salinity stress in Panicum amarum (United States Gulf Coast) J Coast Res. 2024;40(1):51–63. [Google Scholar]
- 143.Acosta-Motos J.R., et al. Towards a sustainable agriculture: strategies involving phytoprotectants against salt stress. Agronomy. 2020;10(2):194. [Google Scholar]
- 144.Bakr J., et al. Mycorrhizal inoculation alleviates water deficit impact on field-grown processing tomato. Pol J Environ Stud. 2018;27(5) [Google Scholar]
- 145.Badr M., et al. Deficit irrigation and arbuscular mycorrhiza as a water-saving strategy for eggplant production. Horticulturae. 2020;6(3):45. [Google Scholar]
- 146.Bulgari R., Franzoni G., Ferrante A. Biostimulants application in horticultural crops under abiotic stress conditions. Agronomy. 2019;9(6):306. [Google Scholar]
- 147.Li Z., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) enhance the tolerance of Euonymus maackii Rupr. at a moderate level of salinity. PLoS One. 2020;15(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Hashem A., et al. Comparing symbiotic performance and physiological responses of two soybean cultivars to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019;26(1):38–48. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Ait-El-Mokhtar M., et al. Use of mycorrhizal fungi in improving tolerance of the date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) seedlings to salt stress. Sci Hortic. 2019;253:429–438. [Google Scholar]
- 150.Parihar M., et al. The effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation in mitigating salt stress of pea (Pisum sativum L.) Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2020;51(11):1545–1559. [Google Scholar]
- 151.Zhang F., et al. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, biochar and cadmium on the yield and element uptake of Medicago sativa. Sci Total Environ. 2019;655:1150–1158. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Diagne N., et al. Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant growth and performance: importance in biotic and abiotic stressed regulation. Diversity. 2020;12(10):370. [Google Scholar]
- 153.Singh G., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-assisted phytoextraction of toxic metals by Zea mays L. from tannery sludge. Soil Sediment Contam Int J. 2019;28(8):729–746. [Google Scholar]
- 154.Janeeshma E., Puthur J.T. Direct and indirect influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on enhancing metal tolerance of plants. Arch Microbiol. 2020;202:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00203-019-01730-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Babadi M., Zalaghi R., Taghavi M. A non-toxic polymer enhances sorghum-mycorrhiza symbiosis for bioremediation of Cd. Mycorrhiza. 2019;29:375–387. doi: 10.1007/s00572-019-00902-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Bi Y., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate root damage stress induced by simulated coal mining subsidence ground fissures. Sci Total Environ. 2019;652:398–405. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Sayın F., Khalvati M., Erdinçler A. Effects of sewage sludge application and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (G. mosseae and G. intraradices) interactions on the heavy metal phytoremediation in chrome mine tailings. Front Plant Sci. 2019;112:217–224. [Google Scholar]
- 158.Liu L., et al. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation and biochar amendment on maize growth, cadmium uptake and soil cadmium speciation in Cd-contaminated soil. Chemosphere. 2018;194:495–503. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Kamel L., et al. The comparison of expressed candidate secreted proteins from two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi unravels common and specific molecular tools to invade different host plants. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:124. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Zeng T., et al. Host‐and stage‐dependent secretome of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis. Plant J. 2018;94(3):411–425. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Cheng H.-Q., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate drought stress in trifoliate orange by regulating H+-ATPase activity and gene expression. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.659694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Jia-Dong H., et al. Mycorrhizas induce diverse responses of root TIP aquaporin gene expression to drought stress in trifoliate orange. Sci Hortic. 2019;243:64–69. [Google Scholar]
- 163.Quiroga G., et al. Contribution of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis to the regulation of radial root water transport in maize plants under water deficit. Environ Exp Bot. 2019;167 [Google Scholar]
- 164.Asadollahi M., et al. Synergetic effect of water deficit and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis on the expression of aquaporins in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) roots: insights from NGS RNA-sequencing. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2023;29(2):195–208. doi: 10.1007/s12298-023-01285-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.He F., Sheng M., Tang M. Effects of Rhizophagus irregularis on photosynthesis and antioxidative enzymatic system in Robinia pseudoacacia L. under drought stress. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:183. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.






