Table 2.
Author | Year | Criteria used, difference and range | Timing of determination | No. meeting criteria | No. done | % meeting criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anderson et al2 | 1979 | 1.0 mm | 10 | 12 | 83.3 | |
Older12 | 1983 | 1.0 mm | 108 | 113 | 95.6 | |
Putterman et al11 | 1986 | 1.5 mm | 192 | 213 | 90.1 | |
(1.0 mm) | 177 | 213 | 83.1 | |||
(0.5 mm) | 137 | 213 | 64.3 | |||
Berlin et al10 | 1989 | 1.0 mm and 2–4.5 mm | 6 weeks | 62 | 87 | 71.3 |
Long term, up to 6.7 mo | 47 | 87 | 54.0 | |||
Shore et al12 | 1990 | 1.0 mm and ≥ 3mm for bilat | 178 | 207 | 89.5 | |
Doxanas9 | 1992 | 1.0 mm | 86 | 92 | 93.5 | |
Liu4 | 1993 | 1.0 mm | 162 | 169 | 95.9 | |
Bartley et al8 | 1996 | 1.0 mm | 11 | 17 | 64.7 | |
Lucarelli et al6 | 1999 | 1.0 mm | 25 | 28 | 89.3 | |
Meltzer et al5 | 2001 | 0.5 mm | 46 | 51 | 89.3 | |
McCulley et al7* | 2003 | 1.0 mm and 2–4.5 mm | Unilateral | 404 | 77.0 | |
Bilateral | 399 | 76.0 |
The success rates for McCulley and coworkers are estimates with a range, so no numbers meeting criteria are given.