Table 8.
Comparison of results attained in the ablation study on the proposed CAUC model.
| Ver. no | Model name | Size | NPM | Validation time | Test time | Observation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FS | MIoU | FS | MIoU | Performance | Computational complexity | ||||
| MB | Million | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | ||||
| V1 | CAUC-wo-CBAM_AG_LCB | 63.4 | 5.51 | 98.84 | 80.05 | 96.89 | 78.52 | High | Very High |
| V2 | CAUC-wo-CBAM_AG | 4.1 | 0.281 | 96.27 | 75.26 | 94.74 | 73.12 | Low | ~ 93.53% less than V1 |
| V3 | CAUC-wo-AG | 4.3 | 0.288 | 97.70 | 79.11 | 95.82 | 77.55 |
Improved over V2 Less than V1 |
Slightly increased from V2 |
| V4 | CAUC-wo-CBAM | 5.26 | 0.370 | 97.69 | 79.21 | 95.74 | 77.65 |
Improved over V2 Less than V1 |
Slightly increased from V2 & V3 |
| V5 | Actual proposed CAUC model | 5.6 | 0.377 | 99.05 | 81.02 | 96.92 | 80.2 | Higher than all | Slightly increased from V3 & V4. |