Table 1.
Ratios of the efficiencies obtained with samples using alternative MC generators, relative to those in the nominal Powhegbox + Pythia sample used during training of the algorithm
| 70% OP | 85% OP | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DL1d | GN2 | DL1d | GN2 | ||
| Powhegbox + Herwig | b-jets | 0.984 | 0.984 | 0.989 | 0.990 |
| c-jets | 0.951 | 0.904 | 0.977 | 0.983 | |
| light-jets | 1.003 | 1.000 | 1.015 | 1.011 | |
| Sherpa | b-jets | 0.996 | 0.995 | 0.992 | 0.992 |
| c -jets | 0.923 | 0.938 | 0.947 | 0.931 | |
| light-jets | 1.039 | 1.013 | 1.077 | 1.042 | |
Statistical uncertainties from evaluating the same algorithm on different samples are negligible and thus not shown.