Table 2.
Gendered and cultural dynamics across themes
| Theme | Boys | Girls | Cultural factors shaping both |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gatekeeping of recognition | Disruptive behaviors flagged early; boys referred for diagnosis at young ages | Inattentive or organizational struggles overlooked or reframed as lack of effort, leading to delayed diagnosis | Cultural reluctance to “label” children delays recognition; recent increase in awareness, especially for girls |
| Institutional fit/misfit | Struggled with prolonged Talmud study, rigid schedules, and risk of exclusion | Expected to be naturally organized and self-reliant; struggles seen as personal failings | Educational structures reinforce gendered roles; some schools adopting adaptations (learning in pairs, project-based learning) |
| Pharmacological compliance vs. personality preservation | Strong pressure to medicate to sustain study loads and classroom discipline | Reluctance to medicate due to fears of “dulling” personality or changing identity | Medication attitudes influenced by cultural values around scholarship, modesty, and family roles |
| Gendered care work and advocacy | Fathers are more involved in boys’ religious learning and behavior issues | Mothers bear primary responsibility for advocacy, school communication, and therapy | Division of parental roles reflects broader community gender norms; growing maternal peer networks and advocacy |