Abstract
T cell immunity deteriorates with age, accompanied by a decline in autophagy and asymmetric cell division. Here we show that autophagy regulates mitochondrial inheritance in CD8+ T cells. Using a mouse model that enables sequential tagging of mitochondria in mother and daughter cells, we demonstrate that autophagy-deficient T cells fail to clear premitotic old mitochondria and inherit them symmetrically. By contrast, autophagy-competent cells that partition mitochondria asymmetrically produce daughter cells with distinct fates: those retaining old mitochondria exhibit reduced memory potential, whereas those that have not inherited old mitochondria and exhibit higher mitochondrial turnover are long-lived and expand upon cognate-antigen challenge. Multiomics analyses suggest that early fate divergence is driven by distinct metabolic programmes, with one-carbon metabolism activated in cells retaining premitotic mitochondria. These findings advance our understanding of how T cell diversity is imprinted early during division and support the development of strategies to modulate T cell function.
Subject terms: T cells, Autophagy, Organelles, Cell division
Borsa et al. show that asymmetric T cell division after activation requires autophagy to promote mitochondrial turnover, with T cells inheriting older mitochondria showing decreased degradation, reduced memory potential and altered metabolism.
Main
Efficient immune responses depend on coordination amongst different immune cells and on generating diversity within the same cell type. In CD8+ T cells, one single cell can differentiate into progeny with heterogeneous fates upon activation1,2. Activation of a naive T cell produces both short-lived effector cells that exert cytotoxic effector functions and long-lived memory cells that self-renew and differentiate upon antigenic rechallenge and are central to vaccination efficacy. Despite increased understanding of mechanisms that contribute to fate decision, there is still no consensus on when these decisions occur and how long-lived memory T cells form3–5. Moreover, T cell memory is severely impaired during ageing6,7, and senescent CD8+ T cell subsets that exhibit DNA damage, cell cycle arrest, mitochondrial dysfunction8 and global poor effector function accumulate9–11. Amongst the processes supporting CD8+ T cell memory formation and maintenance, two highly conserved mechanisms stand out as being negatively impacted by ageing: macroautophagy (hereafter autophagy) and asymmetric cell division (ACD)6,12,13.
Autophagy involves the recycling and degradation of cellular cargoes through the engulfment of cellular components and organelles by autophagosomes, followed by their fusion with lysosomes. The role of autophagy in immune cell fate decision is cell- and context-dependent14. In CD8+ T cells, loss of autophagy results in impaired memory responses6,15,16, which is at least partly caused by accumulation of damaged organelles17–19. ACD has been well characterized in model organisms20, but in primary mammalian cells, evidence of its impact on fate decisions remains correlative and inconclusive21. In cells from the haematopoietic lineage, this arises from technical limitations, as identification of sibling cells has relied on cell cargoes not directly tied to fate decisions or expressed in patterns that prevent conclusive inheritance assignment from a mother cell. Thus, two critical issues remain unresolved: (1) Is there a cargo that can drive fate divergence? (2) Is inherited material synthesized post cell division, or is it inherited asymmetrically? Here, we address these questions in CD8+ T cells. ACD in CD8+ T cells generates effector-like and memory-like daughter cells22 from the very first mitosis following naive T cell activation by high-affinity T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation23,24. These cells inherit several layers of asymmetry, including surface markers, transcription factors, centrosomes, divergent metabolic activity and translation profiles25–29. Despite this, direct causal evidence linking asymmetric inheritance of premitotic (preM) T cell cargo, and the future fate of emerging daughter cells in vivo is lacking not only in T cells but across primary immune cells in general.
Because it is unclear whether cell cargo degradation can contribute to cell division asymmetries, we performed an integrated functional analysis of the contribution of autophagy and ACD to CD8+ T cell differentiation. We identified mitochondria producing superoxide as asymmetrically inherited cargo, which was amplified by mitophagy. Using a novel mouse model that allows specific and sequential mitochondria labelling, we insured unequivocal tracking between preM and postmitotic (postM) cargo and analyses of segregation, degradation and biogenesis events. This novel system allowed us to follow the presence of preM mitochondria by imaging and flow cytometry and evaluate the impact of mitochondrial inheritance by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) proteomics, metabolomics and in vivo transfer of daughter cells. Our results suggest that autophagy contributes to the generation of early fate divergency by promoting both clearance and asymmetric partitioning of heterogeneous mitochondria populations. Furthermore, we establish the first causal link between the inheritance of cell cargo and fate commitment in immune cells, as low mitochondrial turnover caused poor memory potential in CD8+ T cell immune responses. Our findings offer new insight into how T cell diversity is early imprinted and how organelle inheritance regulates metabolism and function, opening paths for refined therapeutic approaches to modulate T cell function.
Results
Divergent proteome and mitochondrial inheritance in CD8+T cell mitosis relies on autophagy
ACD in CD8+ T cells results in unequal inheritance of cell cargoes that culminates in divergent transcriptomes between daughter cells28,30–32. To broaden our understanding of early events of asymmetric segregation, we examined the global proteome of first-daughter CD8+ T cells using CD8 expression as surrogate marker of effector-like (CD8hi) and memory-like (CD8lo) progenies30 (Fig. 1a). More than 6,000 proteins were identified, and the proteomic ruler method was used to calculate both protein mass and copy numbers of each protein per cell33. Although protein mass was comparable between CD8hi and CD8lo daughter cells (Extended Data Fig. 1a), we identified several proteins that were enriched in one of these two populations, many of them with roles associated with metabolism and mitochondrial function and biogenesis (Fig. 1b). A comprehensive analysis of mitochondria-related proteins further emphasized this divergence (Fig. 1c). Given the known role of mitochondria in T cell fate, we focused on these organelles34,35. Mitochondrial inheritance in mitotic T cells has been previously investigated with conflicting results26,27,36,37. By electron microscopy, we could neither observe any differences in mitochondrial content (Fig. 1d) nor architecture. However, by confocal fluorescence microscopy, we observed that CD8hi (effector-like) daughter cells inherited more mitochondria producing reactive oxygen species (ROS, a readout of mitochondrial superoxide) (Fig. 1e). Because ROS-producing mitochondria are targets of autophagy, a mechanism essential for T cell memory and known to decline with age, we interrogated whether mitophagy contributes to this unequal inheritance. To address whether priming would be impacted by constitutive loss of autophagy, we stimulated wild-type (WT) and Atg7fl/fl Cd4Cre CD8+ T cells on supported lipid bilayers (SLB) and observed that the immune synapse area and TCR clustering were distinct between autophagy-sufficient and autophagy-deficient CD8+ T cells (Extended Data Fig. 1b,c). As immune synapse formation and TCR affinity and signalling strength are crucial for ACD22–24, we moved to an inducible model of autophagy deletion (Atg16l1fl/fl ROSA26(R26)-Ert2Cre), allowing T cell activation in presence of autophagy (Extended Data Fig. 1d). Loss of autophagy abolished the asymmetric inheritance of mitochondria producing superoxide (Fig. 1e). We also observed that the autophagic machinery itself is polarized during cell division, as membrane-bound LC3B-II (microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B light-chain 3), a marker of autophagosomes14, was preferentially inherited by CD8hi effector-like cells, suggesting reduced autophagic flux and accumulation of damaged cargo in this subset. In CD8+ T cells from aged mice, LC3B-II displayed symmetric distribution, consistent with impaired autophagy and weakened ACD potential12,15,16(Fig. 1f). Finally, proteomic comparisons reinforced these observations (Fig. 1g). In CD8+ T cells from both autophagy-deficient and aged mice the number of differentially inherited proteins was reduced compared with WT cells (Fig. 1b). Moreover, proteins linked to mitochondrial function were less represented amongst differentially inherited cargoes. Interestingly, the pool of enriched proteins found in CD8hi and CD8lo progenies from old mice was very small, reflecting the dual decline of ACD and autophagy with age. Together these findings highlight the relevance of autophagy not only to support cellular homeostasis but also to establish asymmetric inheritance patterns.
Fig. 1. Autophagy regulates asymmetries in CD8+ T cell mitosis.
a, The experimental layout: CTV-labelled naive CD8+ T cells were activated on anti-CD3-, anti-CD28- and Fc-ICAM-1-coated plates for 36–40 h. The cells were collected and stained with anti-CD8 antibodies. First-daughter cells were identified as the first peak of CTV dilution (in reference to undivided cells). CD8hi and CD8lo cells were sorted as populations expressing 20% highest or lowest CD8, respectively, as previously described30. The cell pellets were frozen and stored until being processed for proteomics analysis. b, A volcano plot showing differentially inherited proteins by CD8hi and CD8lo daughter cells. The data are pooled from four samples done in two independent experiments. Each sample had cells originally collected from two to three mice. A statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. Encoding genes for proteins among the top 50 differentially expressed in CD8lo and CD8hi daughter cells are highlighted. The genes in bold have their function linked to mitochondrial metabolism and function. c, A heat map from proteomics data (made on GraphPad) listing genes encoding mitochondrial proteins. The black squares represent proteins that were absent in one of the groups. The scale bar represents the coefficient of variation. d, Left: representative transmission electron microscopy images from CD8hi and CD8lo daughter cells emerging from the first mitosis following naive CD8+ T cell activation. The number of mitochondria per image (per slice) was calculated (right, n = 35). The experiment was performed twice with pooled cells from ten mice. e, Representative images of WT (Atg16l1fl/+ R26-Ert2Cre, n = 26) and autophagy KO (Atg16l1fl/fl R26-Ert2Cre, n = 26) mitotic CD8+ T cells 36–40 h post activation. Autophagy depletion was achieved by culturing cells in presence of 500 nM 4OHT. Inheritance of MitoSOX was calculated as previously described30. Any values above or below the grey area in the graph were considered asymmetric. The data from two independent experiments (each with cells from two to three mice) are represented as the mean ± s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. The exact P values are depicted in the figure. f, Representative images of mitotic CD8+ T cells from young (8–16 weeks old, n = 95) and old (>100 weeks old, n = 40) mice 36–40 h post activation. Inheritance of LC3B, a marker of autophagosomes, was calculated in each group. The data from more than three independent experiments (each with pooled cells from two mice) are represented as the mean ± s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. The exact P values are depicted. g, A volcano plot showing differentially inherited proteins by CD8hi and CD8lo daughter cells from Atg16l1fl/+ R26-Ert2Cre (post-tamoxifen inducible depletion of autophagy) and old (>100 weeks) mice. The data are pooled from two (old) or four (Atg16l1-KO) samples. Each sample had cells originally collected from two to three mice. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. Encoding genes for proteins among the top 50 differentially expressed in CD8lo and CD8hi daughter cells are highlighted in green and magenta, respectively, for each type of sample. The genes are ordered from top to bottom in decreasing fold-change values. The genes in bold have their function linked to mitochondrial metabolism and function. Proteomics volcano plots were done using Tableau.
Extended Data Fig. 1. Constitutive autophagy-deficiency changes immune synapse architecture, which makes inducible-deletion of Atg16l1 a more suitable model to evaluate the impact of asymmetric inheritance in CD8+ T cells.
(A) CD8hi and CD8lo first-daughter cells were sorter and sent for proteomics analysis. Protein concentration per cell was comparable across groups. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (B) Representative TIRF-images of immunological synapses of autophagy-sufficient and -deficient cells. Naïve CD8+ T cells were added on a planar supported lipid bilayer (PSLB) containing anti-TCR, ICAM-1, and CD80. Cells were fixed after 10 min and stained for CD3 and actin. Scale bar represents 1 µm. (C) Measurements of TCR area and intensity at immunological synapses. Data are represented as mean ± SEM and originated from 2 biological replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. Exact P values are depicted in the figure. (D) Atg16l1fl/fl Ert2Cre CD8+ T cells were isolated and activated on anti-CD3, anti-CD28 and human-Fc-ICAM-1 coated plates. Cells were cultured in medium containing (Z)-4-Hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT). After 36 h, cells were harvested and treated or not with Bafilomycin A (BafA) for 2 h. Cell lysates had their ATG16L1 expression determined by immunoblotting. Data representative of 1 out of 4 experiments.
Segregation of old mitochondria is autophagy-dependent
To functionally address whether organelle inheritance influences fate determination during ACD, we used a knock-in murine model in which the mitochondrial outer membrane protein 25 (OMP25) is fused to a SnapTag upon Cre recombination (Omp25-SnapTag)38. We crossed these mice to R26-Ert2Cre (hereafter Ert2Cre), which allowed inducible SnapTag expression upon tamoxifen treatment. SnapTag can covalently bind to cell-permeable substrates linked to different fluorophores, enabling sequential labelling of mitochondria and accurate discrimination between old (preM) and young (postM) organelles39,40 (Fig. 2a). With the MitoSnap system we can unequivocally link the inheritance of labelled (preM/old) mitochondria to an event of asymmetric segregation of a cell cargo that was present minimum 14 h before cell division. Furthermore, this approach is unaffected by postmitotic transcriptional, translational or anabolic events of biogenesis. Fluorescence microscopy confirmed SnapTag specificity and showed colocalization with Tom20+ structures (Fig. 2b). Importantly, MitoSnaplo cells result from segregation of old mitochondria (preM labelling) and/or degradation of old (preM) and young (postM) mitochondria, as labelling efficiency is close to 100% (Extended Data Fig. 2a). We also confirmed that old mitochondria are MitoSOX+ (Fig. 2c and Extended Data Fig. 2b).
Fig. 2. Segregation of old mitochondria is autophagy-dependent.
a, The experimental layout: CTV-labelled naive MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (WT-Atg16l1fl/+ Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre or KO-Atg16l1fl/fl Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre) were activated on anti-CD3-, anti-CD28- and Fc-ICAM-1-coated plates for 40 h. The cells were cultured in T cell medium containing 500 nM 4OHT. A total of 16 h post activation, the cells were collected and labelled with Snap-Cell 647-SiR to tag preM/old mitochondria and cultured for a further 24 h, when Snap-Cell Block and Snap-Cell Oregon Green incubations allowed young organelle labelling. A downstream analysis was done >2 h after cell resting in complete T cell medium at 37 °C. b, Representative confocal microscopy images showing specificity of SnapTag labelling (staining overlaps with anti-Tom20 antibody labelling) in WT MitoSnap CD8+ T cells 36 h post activation. The experiment was performed independently twice. c,Representative confocal microscopy images showing overlap between MitoSOX staining and preM/old mitochondria labelling in WT MitoSnap CD8+ T cells 36 h post activation. The experiment was performed independently twice. d, Representative flow cytometry plot of preM/old and postM/young mitochondria inheritance amongst activated MitoSnap CD8+ T cells following first cell division. e, Representative confocal microscopy images of mitotic MitoSnap CD8+ T cells 36–40 h post activation (n = 9). Asymmetric inheritance of Tom20 (total mitochondria) and SnapTag preM/old mitochondria were calculated. The data from one experiment, with three biological replicates, are represented as the mean ± s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. The exact P values are depicted in the figure. f, Representative flow cytometry plots showing inheritance of young and old mitochondria during several cell division cycles in both autophagy-sufficient (WT) and autophagy-deficient (KO) cells. The experiment was performed independently twice (pooled cells from two biological replicates). g, Representative confocal microscopy images of mitotic WT (n = 44) and KO (n = 12) MitoSnap CD8+ T cells 36–40 h post activation. The asymmetric inheritance of preM/old mitochondria was calculated in each group. The data derived from two independent experiments (cells from two or three biological replicates) are represented as the mean ± s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. The exact P values are depicted.
Extended Data Fig. 2. SnapTag labelling is highly efficient and resistant to mitochondrial enrichment.
(A) Naïve MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (Omp25-SnapTagfl/− Ert2Cre) were cultured in medium containing (Z)-4-Hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT) and activated for 16 h prior to harvesting and labelling with a cell permeable SnapSubstrate (SNAP-Cell® 647-SiR). Efficiency of labelling was assessed by flow cytometry 30 min after substrate washing. (B) Representative plots of co-expression of Tetramethylrhodamine, methyl ester (TMRM) or MitoSox in first-daughter MitoSnap cells tagged with SNAP-Cell® 647-SiR 16 h post-activation. Experiment had 2 biological replicates. (C) Representative histograms exhibiting beads of known size (0.5 μm, 1 μm and 2 μm) and mitochondrial populations enriched from Omp25-SnapTagfl/− Ert2Cre (WT) and Omp25-SnapTagfl/− Atg16l1fl/fl Ert2Cre (KO) cells. Cells (obtained from 3 biological replicates) were activated for 40 h and labelled with two SnapSubstrates (pre-mitotic (preM)/old and post-mitotic (postM)young mitochondria) as represented in Fig. 2a.
Flow cytometry of first-daughter CD8+ T cells revealed two main populations: one inheriting both preM/old and postM/young mitochondria and another with low SnapTag labelling (Fig. 2d). Fluorescence microscopy of dividing cells demonstrated that while total mitochondrial mass was evenly distributed, old mitochondria were asymmetrically partitioned, preferentially segregating into CD8hi progenies (Fig. 2e). To further verify the contribution of autophagy to the generation of MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo populations, we generated autophagy-deficient MitoSnap mice (Atg16l1fl/fl Omp25-SnapTagfl/+ Ert2Cre). Tracking mitochondria over several division cycles showed that loss of autophagy led to retention of both old and young mitochondria, indicating impaired turnover (Fig. 2f). Finally, confocal microscopy of mitotic CD8+ T cells confirmed that autophagy loss abolished asymmetric segregation of old mitochondria (Fig. 2g), placing autophagy as a critical mechanism coupling organelle quality control to asymmetric inheritance of cell fate determinants during ACD.
Mitophagy drives the emergence of cell progenies inheriting heterogeneous mitochondrial populations
To dissect the role of autophagy in generating MitoSnaplo progenies, we compared the fate of MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells following first CD8+ T cell division (Fig. 3a). We observed that WT cells that were originally MitoSnaphi became MitoSnaplo, whereas most MitoSnaphi autophagy-deficient CD8+ T cells retained their labelling (Fig. 3b). To confirm whether OMP25 staining loss is caused by mitochondrial degradation, we used bafilomycin A (BafA) to inhibit autophagy flux right after young OMP25/mitochondria labelling, which slowed their decay and provided further evidence that autophagy is required for the generation of MitoSnaplo cells (Fig. 3c). When mitophagy was induced using carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) (Fig. 3d), both MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo first-daughter cells rapidly lost young mitochondrial labelling (Fig. 3e–g), which allowed us to confirm that all live cells underwent mitochondrial biogenesis and to link any SnapTag-labelling loss to mitophagy. These results corroborated our previous observation that MitoSnaphi cells are still capable of degrading mitochondria if autophagy-sufficient (Fig. 3b). At the organelle level, analysis of mitochondrial fractions by flow cytometry further highlighted differences between autophagy-deficient and autophagy-sufficient cells. In Atg16l1-deficient cells mitochondria were on average larger and less heterogeneous (Extended Data Fig. 2c), with a strikingly higher proportion of preM/old brightly labelled structures (16.4%) in comparison with their WT counterparts (1.71%), which largely cleared them (Fig. 3h). This important observation reveals that the co-inheritance of young and old OMP25-SnapTag-labelled mitochondria reflects how mitochondrial biogenesis occurs in recently activated CD8+ T cells, where new structures are mostly added onto the existing mitochondrial network. Furthermore, the absence of bright young organelle labelling suggests that biogenesis occurs at comparable levels in autophagy-sufficient and autophagy-deficient cells post activation, and that differences arise from clearance rather than synthesis. Given that preM/old and postM/young mitochondrial structures are co-inherited at cellular and organelle level, we concluded that cells either maintaining preM/old mitochondria or not clearing postM/young mitochondria in a short timeframe are the same population and from this point were considered MitoSnaphi regardless whether young staining was performed or not. Taken together, these results suggest that the emergence of MitoSnaplo cells relies both on segregation and degradation events and that autophagy plays a role in both mechanisms.
Fig. 3. Mitophagy drives the emergence of cell progenies inheriting heterogeneous mitochondrial populations.
a, The experimental layout: CTV-labelled MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (WT-Atg16l1fl/+ Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre or KO-Atg16l1fl/fl Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre) were activated and SnapTag labelled as in Fig. 2a. MitoSnaplo cells and MitoSnaphi cells were sorted as depicted. The sorted cells were cultured for 3 days in T cell medium supplemented with IL-2, IL-7 and IL-15. b, Representative plots from MitoSnap CD8+ T cells 3 days post sorting. Sorted MitoSnaplo cells were used to set up gating strategy. The frequency of double-positive MitoSnap+ cells (for both preM/old and postM/young) was calculated. The experiment was performed twice with two or three biological replicates (nWT = 6; nKO = 4). The data are represented as the mean + s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. c, After young OMP25 staining with Snap-Cell Oregon Green, a pH-sensitive substrate, the cells were cultured in presence or not of BafA (20 nM), an inhibitor of lysosomal function that prevents autophagy flux. The loss of SnapSubstrate Oregon Green was measured at 0, 30 and 60 min post staining. d, The experimental layout: CTV-labelled naive MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (WT-Atg16l1fl/+ Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre or KO-Atg16l1fl/fl Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre) were activated on anti-CD3-, anti-CD28- and Fc-ICAM-1-coated plates for 40 h. The cells were cultured in T cell medium containing 500 nM 4OHT. A total of 16 h post activation, the cells were collected and labelled with Snap-Cell 647-SiR to tag preM/old mitochondria and cultured for a further 24 h, when Snap-Cell Block and Snap-Cell Oregon Green incubations allowed postM/young organelle labelling. The first-daughter cells were sorted and put back in culture for 2 h in presence or not of CCCP. e, The efficiency of young labelling to confirm recent mitochondrial biogenesis was performed. f, Representative histograms exhibiting young MitoSnap labelling in MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells subjected or not mitophagy induction by CCCP. g, The frequencies of cells keeping or not young OMP25 labelling after 2 h were quantified. The representative data from one out of two experiments are shown. Each experiment had cells isolated from two or three mice and three technical replicates per condition. The data are represented as the mean ± s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. h, MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (WT-Atg16l1fl/+ Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre or KO-Atg16l1fl/fl Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre) from three mice were activated and SnapTag-labelled as in Fig. 2a. Mitochondria were purified and phenotyped by flow cytometry. Left: mitochondrial gating was determined based on size and Tom20 expression (also refer to Extended Data Fig. 2C). SnapTag labelling was preserved, and maintenance of old and young organelle staining was evaluated in autophagy-sufficient and autophagy-deficient cells.
Faster mitochondrial turnover predicts memory CD8+ T cell differentiation
We next asked whether the inheritance of aged mitochondria influences CD8+ T cell fate in vivo. We generated OT-I CD45.1 MitoSnap mice, in which CD8+ T cells express a transgenic TCR specific for the OVA257–264 SIINFEKL peptide41, allowing specific activation and tracking of these cells in a host mouse. First, to exclude that mitochondrial inheritance could have been influenced by the nature of TCR-stimulation, we performed experiments using SIINFEKL peptide-loaded dendritic cells30 and again observed that the emergence of MitoSnaplo progenies derives from both degradation and segregation events (Fig. 4a). Phenotypical analysis of resulting first-daughter cells also allowed us to identify early features of fate divergence, such as significantly higher frequencies of CD44+CD62L+ cells (memory fate) within MitoSnaplo cells and higher frequencies of CD44+ CD25+ cells (effector fate) amongst MitoSnaphi cells (Fig. 4a, right). Adoptive transfer of naive OT-I MitoSnap cells followed by Listeria monocytogenes expressing OVA (LM-OVA) (Fig. 4b) infection demonstrated that heterogeneous inheritance of preM/old mitochondria also occurs in vivo: MitoSnaplo cells being more frequent amongst memory precursors (CD127+) (Fig. 4c) and MitoSnaphi cells exhibiting higher granzyme B expression (Fig. 4d). To further evaluate long-term memory potential, MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo first-daughter cells were sorted (Extended Data Fig. 3a), transferred into naive hosts and challenged with LM-OVA >4 weeks later, after which OT-I blood kinetics and maintenance were monitored (Fig. 4e). Progenies of MitoSnaplo cells consistently showed superior ability to survive and stronger re-expansion potential (Fig. 4f). At the memory-phase MitoSnaplo cells were present in higher frequencies, which were also predictive of larger absolute numbers (Fig. 4g and Extended Data Fig. 3b). Although no differences were observed in classical surface marker signatures of memory precursors (KLRG1−CD127+) or short-lived effector cells (KLRG1+CD127) (Extended Data Fig. 3c), functionally MitoSnaplo progenies produced significantly more IFN-γ and TNF than their MitoSnaphi counterparts (Fig. 4h). Independent validation using in vitro Tat-Cre driven recombination resulted in similar outcomes (Extended Data Fig. 3d). Together, these findings demonstrate that phenotype and function of MitoSnaplo CD8+ T cells grant them superior memory potential, further emphasizing that asymmetric mitochondrial inheritance provides a mechanistic basis for early fate divergence in CD8+ T cells.
Fig. 4. Faster mitochondrial turnover predicts memory CD8+ T cell differentiation.
a, Left: isolated OT-I CD8+ T cells were cocultured with SIINFEKL-loaded DC1940 dendritic cells for 40 h. Middle: coculture of OT-I cells with unloaded dendritic cells (DCs) was used as a control to determine undivided CD8+ T cells, identifed as first division gates. Right: frequencies of CD44+CD62L+ (memory-like) and CD44+CD25+ (effector-like) cells. The data are from two independent experiments (n = 10; each data point represents cells from one mouse) are represented as the mean ± s.e.m. b, FACS-purified naive MitoSnap+ OT-I CD8+ T cells (5 × 105) were transferred to new hosts, followed by infection with Listeria monocytogenes expressing SIINFEKL (ovalbumin peptide for which OT-I cells are specific for). c, First-daughter cells were identified based on CTV expression. CD127+ populations were quantified in MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo progenies (based on preM/old mitochondria expression). A statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. The data from two independent experiments, each with three biological replicates, are represented as the mean ± s.e.m. d, The frequencies of cells expressing granzyme B (ex vivo) in MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo progenies. A statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. The data from two independent experiments, each with two or three biological replicates, are represented as the mean ± s.e.m. e, The experimental layout: CTV-labelled naive OT-I MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (Atg16l1fl/+ Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre) were activated on anti-CD3-, anti-CD28- and Fc-ICAM-1-coated plates for 36–40 h. The cells were cultured in T cell medium containing 500 nM 4OHT. A total of 16 h post activation, the cells were collected and labelled with Snap-Cell 647-SiR to tag preM/old mitochondria and put back in culture. A total of 24 h later, the cells were sorted into MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells, and 5 × 103 cells were transferred to new hosts (CD45.1 and CD45.2 congenic markers were used to trace transferred cells). More than 30 days following adoptive cell transfer, the host mice were infected with 2,000 colony forming units (CFU) of Listeria monocytogenes expressing ovalbumin (OVA) (LM-OVA). Immune responses were evaluated in the blood and spleen. f, The frequency of adoptively transferred OT-I cells within CD8+ T cells in the blood of recipient mice. g, The frequency and numbers of adoptively transferred OT-I cells within CD8+ T cells in the spleens of recipient mice. The representative data are from one (same as in f) out of eight experiments, each containing three to five biological replicates per group (please refer to Extended Data Fig. 3b). The data are represented as the mean + s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using an an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. The exact P values are depicted. h, Left: the frequency of splenic IFN-γ and TNF OT-I producing cells. Right: representative flow cytometry plots of MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cytokine producing cells. The data from one (n = 3 biological replicates) out of two experiments are represented as the mean + s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. The exact P values are depicted.
Extended Data Fig. 3. MitoSnaplo and MitoSnaphi progenies show distinct survival and re-expansion rates, do not differ phenotypically at the memory-phase following cognate-antigen challenge, and the Tat-Cre recombinase system replicates results obtained using Ert2Cre system.
(A) Experimental layout: CTV labelled naïve MitoSnap CD8 + T cells were activated on anti-CD3, anti-CD28 and Fc-ICAM-1 coated plates for 40 h. Cells were cultured in T cell medium containing 500 nM Z-4-Hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT). 16 h post-activation, cells were harvested and labelled with Snap-Cell 647-SiR to tag preM/old mitochondria and cultured for a further 24 h. Cells were harvested and sorted as in the representative plot into MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo populations. (B) Frequency within CD8+ T cells and numbers of adoptively transferred OT-I cell progenies in the spleens of recipient mice (pooled data from 8 experiments where 5-50×103 cells were adoptively transferred, n = 30). Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test. (C) OT-I MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (Omp25-SnapTagfl/fl Ert2Cre) were activated, labelled for preM/old and postM/young mitochondria (Fig. 2a) and sorted into MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo prior to adoptive transfer (5×104 cells intravenously) into new hosts. Progenies emerging from MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells were monitored over the course of an immune response against Listeria monocytogenes expressing OVA (LM-OVA) (Fig. 3a). At 30 days post-challenge, phenotype of OT-I cells was evaluated by the expression of KLRG1 and CD127. Frequencies of short-lived effector cells (KLRG1+ CD127−) and memory-committed (KLRG1−CD127+) were calculated. Gating strategy is depicted on the right. Representative data of 1 (n = 3 biological replicates) out of 3 experiments. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (C) Tat-cre driven-recombination was used as an alternative for the 4OHT-driven recombination using Ert2Cre. Recombination efficiency was evaluated by SnapTag labelling. Cells that did express Omp25-SnapTag up to 16 h post Tat-cre recombination were sorted and cultured for further 24 h. First-daughter OT-I MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells were sorted and used in adoptive transfer experiments (2×104 cells intravenously) (similar to Fig. 3a). Progenies emerging from MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells were monitored over the course of an immune response against Listeria monocytogenes expressing ovalbumin (OVA) (LM-OVA). Representative data of 1 (nhi=4, nlo = 5) out of 2 experiments.
Mitochondrial inheritance patterns control T cell fate commitment
Effector CD8+ T cells are highly proliferative, whereas memory CD8+ T cells divide slower and remain quiescent. This fate is established early after T cell activation, with cell cycle speed predictive of CD8+ T cell fate23,42. CD8+ T cells also differ metabolically: effector cells rely on glycolysis, while long-lived naive and memory cells perform mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and fatty acid oxidation to produce adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Mitochondrial architecture influences these processes as fission supports glycolysis, whereas mitochondrial fusion promotes fatty acid oxidation34,35. We examined whether MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo CD8+ T cells (sorted as in Extended Data Fig. 3a) display distinct mitochondrial dynamics by confocal microscopy. Mitochondrial networks were rendered from three-dimensional reconstructions (Z-stacks) and geometric features from individual mitochondria were quantified (Fig. 5a and Extended Data Fig. 4). Mitochondria from MitoSnaphi cells exhibited heterogeneous SnapTag labelling intensity, which we accounted for in our analysis (Fig. 5b). SnapTaghi mitochondria from MitoSnaphi CD8+ T cells were significantly larger, less compact and more complex than other mitochondria labelled with lower levels of SnapTag in both cell types (Fig. 5c). These are features of tubular, fused mitochondria, which prevent their degradation by autophagy, while mitigating stress and preserving OXPHOS capacity upon mitochondrial damage43,44. Similar patterns were observed for young-OMP25 organelles, confirming co-inheritance of postM/young and preM/old OMP25-SnapTag mitochondria (Extended Data Fig. 5). We then used a modified version of the Scenith assay45, which measures translation via O-propargyl-puromycin (OPP, a puromycin analogue) incorporation as a proxy for ATP production to perform metabolic dependency measurements. MitoSnaphi CD8+ T cells exhibited higher global translation rates, which were significantly reduced by both glycolysis and OXPHOS inhibitors, while quiescent MitoSnaplo cells remained largely unaffected by metabolic modulators (Fig. 5d). When directly measuring oxygen consumption rates (OCR) in autophagy-sufficient and autophagy-deficient MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells, we observed no significant differences (Fig. 5e and Extended Data Fig. 6a). Direct measurements of ATP levels further confirmed increased production in cells inheriting preM/old mitochondria, consistent with the conclusions of the Scenith assay (Fig. 5f). To evaluate the functional consequences of inheriting distinct mitochondrial pools, MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells were cultured with IL-2, IL-7 and IL-15 in the absence of T cell activation. MitoSnaphi cells exhibited faster, more homogeneous proliferation and lower frequencies of slow-dividing cells than MitoSnaplo cells, corroborating their less quiescent status that might contribute to premature cell death (Fig. 5g). Autophagy-deficient cells proliferated slower regardless of mitochondrial inheritance, suggesting a role for autophagy in cell cycle regulation, consistent with reports of autophagy-dependent degradation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B (CDKN1B) in T cells46. In cytokine-limiting conditions, as expected for the effector-like population, autophagy-sufficient MitoSnaphi cells showed reduced survival (Fig. 5h), while MitoSnaplo cells were enriched for CD44+CD62L+ memory-like cells23,42 (Fig. 5i). Autophagy-deficient cells were poor survivors and did not exhibit differences in phenotype linked to early mitochondrial inheritance (Fig. 5hand Extended Data Fig. 6b,c). Because in WT cells aged mitochondria are cleared after 3 days even in MitoSnaphi cells that inherited their mitochondria from the mother cell, our results suggest that organelles inherited at first division influence the decision between cellular quiescence (memory fate) and differentiation (effector fate). Our results provide the first unequivocal data linking organelle inheritance—here mitochondria—in immune cells to changes in cell function that culminate in fate commitment of cells in vivo.
Fig. 5. Mitochondrial inheritance patterns control T cell fate commitment.
a, FACS-purified MitoSnaplo and MitoSnaphi CD8+ T cells were imaged by confocal microscopy and their mitochondrial architecture was analysed (based on Tom20 labelling to identify organelles). b, MitoSnap labelling intensity per individual mitochondria was used to cluster them into four groups. MitoSnaplo cells exhibited only mitochondria with low intensity of SnapTag labelling, whereas mitochondria of MitoSnaphi cells were arbitrarily stratified into low (lo), intermediate (mid) and high (hi) based on StapTag brightness. The data are represented as the mean ± s.e.m. A total of 1,961 mitochondria were used for further analysis. The pooled data from two independent experiments, each containing sorted cells from two to three biological replicates, are shown. c, The geometric parameters were extracted and used to generate uniform manifold approximation and projections (UMAPs) of mitochondria found in MitoSnaplo and MitoSnaphi cells. The squares in the UMAPs highlight regions with high compactness, area (A)/ volume (V) ratio and complexity. Right: the quantifications of mitochondrial complexity (high values, round organelles), compactness (high values, organelles with tight architecture), volume (V) and sphericity (lower values, high roundness/sphericity) are represented. The data are represented as the mean ± s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using a non-parametric Dunn test with Bonferroni correction. The exact P values are depicted (MitoSnaplo, 972 mitochondria; MitoSnaphi, 989 mitochondria). d, MitoSnap CD8+ T cells were collected 36–40 h post activation and prepared for the Scenith assay to evaluate their metabolic reliance. OPP incorporation was used as a readout of translation. 2-Deoxy-D-glucose was used to inhibit glycolysis and oligomycin was used to inhibit mitochondrial respiration. A combination of both inhibitors was used to supress both metabolic pathways and obtain an OPP baseline. An analysis was done by flow cytometry, which allowed the discrimination of MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells. The data are represented as the mean ± s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s post hoc test. The exact P values are depicted. Representative data of one out of two experiments are shown. e, The OCR of sorted MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo first-daughter CD8+ T cells was measured under basal conditions and in response to indicated drugs. The data are represented as the mean ± s.e.m. The data points represent two to four biological replicates from independent sorting experiments. f, ATP production by sorted MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo first-daughter CD8+ T cells originally isolated from WT (Atg16l1fl/+ Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre) or KO (Atg16l1fl/fl Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre) mice. The data are represented as the mean ± s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. The exact P values are depicted. The data points represent four biological replicates from independent sorting experiments. g, WT and KO MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells were sorted as represented in Fig. 2g and cultured for 3 days in T cell medium supplemented with IL-2, IL-7 and IL-15. The frequency of slow-dividing cells (one or two divisions) was calculated. The data are represented as the mean + s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA. The exact P values are depicted. The data points represent technical replicates from two pooled biological samples per group (nWT = 6; nKO = 4). The representative data from one out of two experiments are shown. h, WT and KO MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells were sorted as represented in Fig. 2g and cultured for 7 days in T cell medium supplemented with IL-2, IL-7 and IL-15. The frequency of viable cells was calculated. The data are represented as the mean + s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA. The exact P values are depicted. The data points represent four to five technical replicates from three pooled experiments (nWT = 15; nKO = 17). i, The frequency of CD44+CD62L+ cells within surviving cells from g was calculated. Right: the gating strategy is depicted. The data are represented as the mean + s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. The exact P values are depicted. The data points represent three to five technical replicates from four biological samples per group (n = 15). The pooled data from three independent experiments are shown.
Extended Data Fig. 4. UMAP projections from individual mitochondria reveal their heterogeneity.
OT-I MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (Omp25-SnapTagfl/fl Ert2Cre) were activated, labelled for preM/old mitochondria and, following one division cycle (first-daughter cells), sorted into MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo populations. Cells were prepared for immunofluorescence and imaged by confocal microscopy. Individual mitochondria were segmented and had their geometric parameter measurements extracted and standardized. Fluorescence intensity of preM/old mitochondria SnapTag labelling was also quantified. UMAP projections (generated using geometrical parameters) highlighting: (A) surface area; (B) volume; (C) roundness; (D) sphericity; (E) complexity; (F) compactness; (G) area/volume; (H) intensity of preM/old SnapTag labelling in individual mitochondria. 1961 mitochondria were used to generate these projections. Pooled data from 2 independent experiments, each containing sorted cells from 2-3 biological replicates.
Extended Data Fig. 5. Maintenance of young OMP-25 preferentially occurs in less compact mitochondria structures.
FACS-purified MitoSnaphi CD8+ T cells from 3 biological replicates (based on preM/old and young MitoSnap expression) were imaged by confocal microscopy and had the mitochondrial architecture of young+ (n = 1262) and young− (n = 1171) networks compared. This was accompanied by quantification of MitoSnap labelling (young and preM/old OMP-25-SnapTag) intensities in each individual mitochondrion. Statistical analysis was performed using a non-parametric Dunn test with Bonferroni correction. Exact P values are depicted in the figure.
Extended Data Fig. 6. MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo progenies show similar oxygen consumption rate and autophagy-deficient daughter-cells do no differ phenotypically in survival assays.
(A) OT-I MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (Omp25-SnapTagfl/fl Ert2Cre or Omp25-SnapTagfl/− Atg16l1fl/fl Ert2Cre) were activated, labelled for preM/old and postM/young mitochondria (Fig. 2a) and sorted into MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells. Their oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was then measured using a XF96 MitoStress Test. Basal respiration, maximal respiration, ATP-linked respiration and spare respiratory capacity (SRC) were calculated. 2-4 biological replicates from independent sorting experiments. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (B) MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (Omp25-SnapTagfl/− Atg16l1fl/fl Ert2Cre) were activated, labelled for preM/old and postM/young mitochondria (Fig. 2a), sorted into MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo populations after 36-40 h and cultured for further 7 days in medium containing IL-2, IL-7 and IL-15. Surviving cells had their phenotype evaluated concerning the co-expression of CD44 and CD62L. (C) Representative plots showing gating strategy. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Datapoints represent 5 technical replicates from 1 biological sample per group. Representative data from 1 out of 3 experiments (total of 3 biological replicates across experiments).
Unequal inheritance of mitochondrial populations drives changes in the transcriptome and proteome of CD8+T cells
To further investigate the metabolism and fate-divergency drivers in daughter cells inheriting distinct mitochondrial pools, we labelled preM/old mitochondria in activated CD8+ T cells, sorted MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo first-daughter cells (as in Extended Data Fig. 3a) and performed single-cell transcriptomics (scRNA-seq) and bulk proteomics analysis (Fig. 6a). Proteomics allowed us to identify a restricted set of differentially inherited proteins (Fig. 6b). MitoSnaplo cells expressed higher levels of Werner protein (WRN), an enzyme important for genome stability47, and NADH dehydrogenase 4 (mt-ND4), a component of the mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I. MitoSnaphi cells were enriched in hypoxia inducible factor 1 subunit alpha (HIF1a) and late endosomal/lysosomal adaptor 2 (LAMTOR2), proteins involved in mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) metabolism, which is known to boost effector CD8+ T cell differentiation, as well as proteins linked to cell cycle progression48,49. In previous studies, including our own, transcriptional profiling of first-daughter CD8+ T cell cells, using both bulk and single cell strategies relied on the expression of reporter genes or surface markers with dynamic expression or on in vivo models where symmetric and ACDs could not be distinguished28,30–32,50, which impedes a direct link between transcriptional divergences and asymmetric inheritance of cell fate determinants. Here, unbiased clustering of single cell transcriptomes visualized with UMAPs defined nine clusters (Fig. 6c). Both cell types were distributed across clusters, but some were enriched in MitoSnaphi (clusters 2, 6 and 8) or MitoSnaplo (clusters 1 and 7) daughter cells. Gene expression of proteomics hits positively correlated with protein levels (Fig. 6d). Furthermore, MitoSnaphi proteome signatures aligned with transcriptomes of clusters 2 and 3, whereas MitoSnaplo signatures were enriched in clusters 1 and 4. Functional annotation of clusters further highlighted the divergent fates of MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells. Based on the genes mostly expressed in each cluster, we could assign functional signatures to each of them. Cluster 1, dominated by MitoSnaplo cells, displayed a memory-related signature with Tcf7 (TCF1) and Sell (CD62L) expression, key for stemness maintenance and lymphoid homing. Cluster 7, also enriched in MitoSnaplo, featured genes linked to mitochondrial function and biogenesis. By contrast, MitoSnaphi cells were more abundant in clusters where the gene signature could be linked to effector functions (clusters 5, 6 and 8), showing increased expression of genes involved in cell cycling and nutrient uptake, including higher expression of the serine importer gene Slc1a5 (SLC1A5) (Extended Data Fig. 7a,b). A pseudotime analysis also allowed us to propose the potential differentiation trajectories of MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells, clearly indicating that MitoSnaphi exhibited a stronger path towards becoming terminally differentiated cytotoxic cells (Fig. 6e). These results were complemented by a stronger transcriptional signature of genes linked to memory fate commitment in MitoSnaphi CD8+ T cells (Fig. 6f,g). Together, these integrated proteomic and transcriptomic analyses demonstrate that asymmetric mitochondrial inheritance generates divergent metabolic and transcriptional programme, coupling higher mitochondrial turnover rates to enhanced memory potential.
Fig. 6. Unequal inheritance of mitochondrial populations drives changes in the transcriptome and proteome of CD8+ T cells.
a, The experimental layout: CTV-labelled naive MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (Atg16l1fl/+ Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre) were activated on anti-CD3-, anti-CD28- and Fc-ICAM-1-coated plates for 36–40 h. The cells were cultured in T cell medium containing 500 nM 4OHT. A total of 16 h post activation, the cells were collected and labelled with Snap-Cell 647-SiR (preM/old mitochondria) and cultured for further 24 h. The cells were collected and sorted into MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo populations, and their proteome and transcriptome were analysed. b, A volcano plot showing differentially inherited proteins by MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells. The data are pooled from six samples done in four independent experiments. MitoSnaphi- and MitoSnaplo-enriched proteins (represented by their encoding genes) are highlighted in orange and blue, respectively. A statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. c, Left: UMAP and clustering of integrated MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells obtained from five mice per group. In italic is a selection of the top 50 differentially expressed genes in each cluster, which contributed for cluster classification. d, The expression of genes encoding proteins enriched in MitoSnaphi or MitoSnaplo were projected onto UMAP clusters from c. e, MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells were separately submitted to pseudotime analysis (see Methods for details). Inferred trajectory of each cell type is depicted in black. Cluster 1 was assigned as the origin. f, The expression of memory-signature genes in MitoSnaphi or MitoSnaplo cells were projected onto UMAP clusters from c. g, The expression of effector-signature genes in MitoSnaphi or MitoSnaplo cells were projected onto UMAP clusters from c. The UMAP projections were extracted from Loupe Cell Browser. The proteomics volcano plot was done using Tableau for b.
Extended Data Fig. 7. MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo progenies show distinct transcriptional profile.
OT-I MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (Omp25-SnapTagfl/fl Ert2Cre) were activated, labelled for preM/old and postM/young mitochondria (Fig. 2a) and sorted into MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo populations. Single-cell transcriptomics analysis revealed that genes linked to (A) cell cycling and (B) involved in nutrient transport are preferentially found in MitoSnaphi CD8+ T cells. UMAP projections were extracted from Loupe Cell Browser.
Maintenance of old mitochondria triggers one-carbon metabolism
When performing our transcriptomics analysis, we also found a cluster enriched in genes that are linked to one-carbon (1C) metabolism (for example Mthfd2, Phgdh and Shmt2, cluster 2). This cluster was formed by a majority of MitoSnaphi cells, 1C metabolism signature being also stronger in this population in comparison with MitoSnaplo cells (Fig. 7a). In CD4+ T cells, 1C metabolism is essential for proliferation and effector function as an inducer of mTOR activity51. Thus, aiming to functionally validate this finding, we again measured metabolic reliance of MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo sorted cells through Scenith (Fig. 7b), using inhibitors of serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT1/2), methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (MTHFD1/2) and phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH) activity, key enzymes in the folate cycle of 1C metabolism (Fig. 7c). Our results suggest that in MitoSnaphi cells, SHMT1/2 and PHGDH inhibitors indeed suppress their translation rates, a phenotype that was not shared by MitoSnaplo cells (Fig. 7d). Because SHMT1/2 inhibition led to the most significant reduction of translation rates in MitoSnaphi cells, we evaluated the expression of the SHMT2 enzyme in individual mitochondria by confocal microscopy. We found that organelles exhibiting high expression of old-OMP25-SnapTag labelling are those expressing more SHMT2, which corroborates the hypothesis that changes in 1C metabolism are due to the inheritance of preM/old mitochondria (Extended Data Fig. 8). As serine (Ser) and glycine (Gly) are the main amino acids fuelling 1C metabolism, we sorted MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells and cultured them for 3 days in Ser/Gly-depleted conditions (Fig. 7b), after which we could identify a shift in phenotype shared by both subsets that led to lower frequencies of effector-like CD44+CD25+CD8+ T cell progenies (Fig. 7e). Ser/Gly restriction also led to increased survival of MitoSnaphi CD8+ T cells in vitro. Because glucose-derived serine can be synthesized by PHGDH, we also kept cells in Ser/Gly-depleted medium combined with PHGDH inhibition, and we did not observe any further increase in survival rates (Fig. 7f). Thus, despite the higher expression of Phgdh in MitoSnaphi cells and considering the higher expression of nutrient transporters, 1C metabolism seems to mostly rely on amino acid uptake and not on de novo synthesis of serine.
Fig. 7. Maintenance of old mitochondria triggers one-carbon metabolism, which can be modulated to rescue terminal differentiation.
a, The genes involved in one-carbon (1C) metabolism were projected onto UMAP clusters. b, CTV-labelled naive MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (Atg16l1fl/+ Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre) were activated on anti-CD3-, anti-CD28- and Fc-ICAM-1-coated plates for 36–40 h. They were cultured in T cell medium containing 500 nM 4OHT. Sixteen hours post activation, the cells were collected and labelled with Snap-Cell 647-SiR (preM/old mitochondria) and cultured for further 24 h. Cells were subsequently collected and prepared for the Scenith assay, aiming to evaluate their metabolic reliance, or cultured in different serine and glycine availability conditions for 7 days. c, 1C metabolism summary. In red are depicted the enzymes found to have increased transcripts in MitoSnaphi cells. The inhibitors of specific 1C metabolism enzymes are highlighted in green, with inhibitory symbols. d, OPP incorporation was used as a readout of translation. A combination of both 2-deoxy-D-glucose and oligomycin was used to supress both metabolic pathways and obtain an OPP baseline. The inhibitors specific to MTHFD1/2, SHMT1/2 and PHGDH were used to assess reliance on 1C metabolism pathways. An analysis was done by flow cytometry. The data from three biological replicates are represented as the mean ± s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s post hoc test. The exact P values are depicted. Representative data of one out of two experiments are shown. e, Sorted MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells were kept for 3 days in medium depleted of serine (Ser) and glycine (Gly). The frequency of CD44+CD25+ cells within surviving cells was calculated. Left: the gating strategy is depicted. The data from seven biological replicates are represented as the mean + s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s post hoc test. The exact P values are depicted. The pooled data from two independent experiments are shown. f, The frequency of MitoSnaplo and MitoSnaphi live cells after 7 days in culture under different serine and glycine availability conditions. The data points depict biological replicates (n = 7, except for the +PHGDHi condition, where n = 3) and are represented as the mean + s.e.m. A statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s post hoc test. The exact P values are depicted. The pooled data are from two out of three independent experiments.
Extended Data Fig. 8. Pre-mitotic old SnapTaghi mitochondria express the highest levels of 1 C metabolism enzymes.
FACS-purified MitoSnaplo and MitoSnaphi CD8+ T cells were imaged by confocal microscopy and had the expression of 1 C metabolism enzymes (SHMT2 and MTHFD2) evaluated (same cells used to extract geometric parameter measurements). (A) Representative confocal microscopy images showing pre-mitotic/old SnapTag labelling and anti-SHMT2 staining in a MitoSnaphi cell with heterogeneous mitochondria. (B) UMAP projections (generated using geometrical parameters) highlighting expression of the 1 C enzyme SHMT2 in individual mitochondria (left panel). 1961 mitochondria were used to generate these projections. Higher values indicate higher intensity. Quantification of SHMT2 MFI is represented as mean ± SEM (right panel). Statistical analysis was performed using a non-parametric Dunn test with Bonferroni correction. Exact P values are depicted in the figure. Pooled data from 2 independent experiments with pooled cells from at least 2-3 biological replicates.
To more definitively dissect metabolic differences between MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells, we performed targeted metabolomics of WT and autophagy-deficient first-daughter cells (Fig. 8a and sorting as in Extended Data Fig. 3a). We combined it with flux analysis (24 h) of both 13C-glucose and 13C-serine (Fig. 8b). Our results revealed that cells retaining preM older mitochondria, as a consequence of segregation and/or lower mitochondrial turnover, exhibit higher abundance of serine. We also observed a discrete but significant higher flux of 13C carbon units originating from glucose or serine to these amino acids (Fig. 8c,d). By evaluating the metabolic profile of autophagy-deficient cells, we confirmed that mitochondrial turnover is a major driver of this phenotype, as MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells mostly did not exhibit significant differences in serine and glycine abundance and 13C fraction contribution within these amino acids (Fig. 8d and Extended Data Fig. 9). However, the expression profile of other metabolites appeared to be influenced by the presence of preM/old mitochondria, even under autophagy-deficient conditions, such as glutathione, pentose phosphate and NAD (Extended Data Fig. 10). Thus, these results further support that inheritance of heterogeneous mitochondrial pools drives T cell fate divergence and this is caused by distinct strategies to fulfil metabolic demands: MitoSnaplo cells are more quiescent and quickly turn over mitochondria, which includes mitochondrial biogenesis, while MitoSnaphi cells keep old mitochondria, rely on glycolysis and turn on one-carbon metabolism, one of the first consequences after a mitochondrial insult52.
Fig. 8. Serine and glycine abundance and 13C incorporation (metabolic flux) are influenced by mitochondrial inheritance and autophagy status.
a, CTV-labelled naive MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (WT-Atg16l1fl/+ Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre or KO-Atg16l1fl/fl Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre) were activated on anti-CD3-, anti-CD28- and Fc-ICAM-1-coated plates for 40 h. The cells were cultured in T cell medium containing 500 nM 4OHT. A total of 16 h post activation, the cells were collected and labelled with Snap-Cell 647-SiR (preM/old mitochondria) and cultured for further 24 h in presence of 13C-glucose (2 g l−1) or 13C-serine (30 mg l−1). MitoSnaplo and MitoSnaphi cells were sorted and their metabolome was evaluated. b, 1C metabolism summary. Labelled glucose or serine was used to evaluate metabolic flux. c, Pie charts were generated using Travis Pies v1.310000. The diameter represents metabolite abundance (AU) and red fractions represent the fraction contribution (FC) of labelled carbon units originating from 13C-glucose (left half) or 13C-serine (right half) (metabolic flux). d, AU and FC quantification from WT cells in c represented as the mean + s.e.m. (see Extended Data Fig. 9 for KO cells). A statistical analysis was performed using a paired two-tailed Student’s t-test. WT, five biological replicates; KO, three biological replicates.
Extended Data Fig. 9. Abundance and flux of the amino acids serine and glycine in autophagy-deficient cells.
CTV labelled naïve autophagy-deficient MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (Atg16l1fl/fl Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre) were activated on anti-CD3, anti-CD28 and Fc-ICAM-1 coated plates for 40 h. Cells were cultured in T cell medium containing 500 nM Z-4-Hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT). 16 h post-activation, cells were harvested and labelled with Snap-Cell 647-SiR (old mitochondria) and cultured for further 24 h in presence of 13C Glucose (2 g/L) or 13C Serine (30 mg/L). MitoSnaplo and MitoSnaphi cells were sorted and their metabolome was evaluated. Quantification of abundance and 13C fraction contribution originating from 13C-Glucose or 13C-Serine in ATG16L1-KO MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo progenies (refer to Fig. 8a-c). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using paired two-tailed Student’s t test. n = 3 biological replicates.
Extended Data Fig. 10. The abundance (AU) and fractional contribution (FC) of glucose- or serine-derived 13C in metabolites related to one-carbon metabolism are influenced by both mitochondrial inheritance and autophagy status.
Pie Charts were generated using Travis Pies v1.31. Diameter represents metabolite abundance and red fractions represent the contribution of labelled carbon units originating from 13C-Glucose (13C-Glu) or 13C-Serine (13C-Ser) in WT (n = 5) and KO (n = 3) CD8+ T cells. Experimental layout can be found in Fig. 8.
Discussion
Most of the previous functional readouts evaluating the role of ACD in early fate decisions have relied on sorting daughter cells based on the expression of CD8 or the transcription factor c-Myc, with CD8hi/c-Mychi cells being effector-like and CD8lo/c-Myclo cells being memory-like progenies22,24,27. However, the expression of these molecules is highly dynamic and cannot be directly linked to asymmetric segregation events. Asymmetric mTOR activity in effector-like daughter cells has been linked to its translocation to lysosomes and amino acid sensing, but in vivo function readouts relied on correlative CD8 expression49. Concerning the asymmetric partitioning of degradation pathways, proteasome activity has been shown to contribute to distinct T-bet distribution between daughter cells, but the results were not directly linked to in vivo T cell fates25. A recent pioneering study used genetic barcoding to evaluate the transcriptome of genuine sister cells and demonstrated that early fate trajectories can be established since first CD8+ T cell division28. However, there is currently no evidence to directly link this divergence to the inheritance of a fate determinant. A previous report provides preliminary evidence that mitochondrial clearance can impact on lymphocyte metabolism36 but relied on the loss of Mitotracker Green FM fluorescence, a labelling that can be perturbed by the oxidative status of the cell, affecting cell viability and prone to cell efflux53–55. Thus, we are first to show that the asymmetric inheritance of an unequivocal preM cell cargo, which is regulated by differential autophagy-dependent mitochondrial turnover rates, causes divergent T cell fate commitment. This was possible because the MitoSnap system allows specific labelling of mitochondria and discrimination of segregation, degradation and biogenesis events that can influence organelle inheritance. Tagging mitochondria before and after mitosis allows precise discrimination of segregation and degradation events, something which was not achieved in previous reports using dyes, expression of surface markers or reporter genes.
Mitochondria are organelles required to meet the cell’s energetic demands. They are the site of OXPHOS, tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and fatty acid oxidation, pathways involved in the generation of ATP. They are also involved in maintaining the redox balance of the cell, as they can produce ROS, are involved in calcium signalling, can drive apoptotic cell death and, by being core metabolic modulators, also contribute to epigenetic regulation of cell function5,56. The results from several studies provide evidence that different T cells subsets exhibit distinct mitochondrial metabolism and function: effector cells are highly glycolytic and memory cells rely on fatty acid oxidation34,35,57,58. Accordingly, mitochondrial quality control plays an important role in T cell fate decisions with mitophagy being a crucial regulator of cell survival17,19,59,60. Thus, mitochondria constitute a suitable cell cargo to be linked to differentiation trajectories, which was corroborated by our initial proteomics screening identifying mitochondrial-related proteins being differentially enriched in memory-like and effector-like CD8+ T cell daughters.
The emergence of cells that maintain or lose their MitoSnap labelling during CD8+ T cell proliferation could result from different cell biological processes, and we dissected the mechanisms underlying the inheritance of mitochondria from the mother cell. First, we identified that ACD contributes to the polarized inheritance of preM/old mitochondria. However, progenies able to clear preM/old mitochondria also rapidly lost their labelling for postM/young mitochondria, suggesting that MitoSnaplo cells emerge from both segregation and degradation events, with mitophagy levels being higher in this population. Autophagy and mitophagy support memory CD8+ T cell responses, but it remained unclear when these mechanisms are required to contribute to the formation of memory precursors or the maintenance of long-lived cells15–17,19. To address whether autophagy plays a role in unequal mitochondrial inheritance, we used autophagy-deficient cells and found that asymmetric inheritance of preM/old mitochondria was impaired and, as opposed to autophagy-competent cells, old mitochondria were kept for several days. These results and the more symmetric proteome of CD8hi and CD8lo progenies from autophagy-deficient or old CD8+ T cells, corroborate our initial hypothesis and place ACD and autophagy/mitophagy as mechanisms that work synergistically to promote early asymmetric inheritance of cell fate determinants. This was confirmed by our finding that significant differences found between the metabolomes of MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo first-daughter cells were lost when they emerged from autophagy-deficient mother cells.
By following the frequencies of cells inheriting or not preM/old mitochondria (MitoSnaphi/lo) over the course of the immune responses it became clear that MitoSnaplo cells were more functional memory cells, as they showed better maintenance, re-expansion potential and ability to produce effector-cytokines upon restimulation. This resembles results obtained for CD8hi/c-Mychi and CD8lo/c-Myclo cells22,27, with the advantage that we can finally draw a definitive link between the inheritance of a cell cargo that already existed in the mother cell to the biased fate of its progenies. Due to poor survival after adoptive transfer and delayed antigenic challenge, we were unable to assess the in vivo fate of autophagy-deficient progenies, highlighting the importance of mitochondrial turnover for the long-term maintenance of T cells. We then directed our attention to determine what drives the different fates of MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells. By using sorted populations or approaches that provide single-cell resolution, we determined that the metabolism, survival and proliferative capacity of these progenies are different. Exhibiting lower translation rates, higher frequencies of slow-dividing cells and CD62L expression and better survival capacity in absence of antigen, MitoSnaplo cells clearly showed a stronger memory phenotype than MitoSnaphi cells23,42. Although, surprisingly, we could not observe significant differences in mitochondrial respiration rates, MitoSnaphi cells relied more on glycolysis, a feature seen in effector CD8+ T cells. As old organelles also produced mitochondrial ROS as measured by MitoSOX, it is reasonable to assume that they have deteriorated mitochondrial fitness and that this might promote their early metabolic shift34. Mitophagy has recently been reported to contribute to memory CD8+ T cell formation17. Our results add to this, showing that mitophagy contributes to the decision for memory CD8+ T cell fate commitment as early as the first mitosis following CD8+ T cell stimulation, as directly measured by the rapid loss of young mitochondria in MitoSnaplo cells.
Finally, to obtain an unbiased overview of the differences between MitoSnaplo and MitoSnaphi cells following the first mitosis post naive CD8+ T cell activation, we performed both bulk proteomics and single cell transcriptomics of these two populations. In line with our expectations, we observed proteins linked to effector cell fate decision in MitoSnaphi cells and proteins linked to DNA health and mitochondrial biogenesis in MitoSnaplo cells. It also came to our attention that a long list of kinesins (Kif genes) was enriched in effector-like MitoSnaphi daughters. Kinesins are motor proteins directly involved in intracellular trafficking of cell components along microtubules, which is important for organelle movement and for cell division events61. We speculate that these proteins might promote polarization of autophagosomes and mitochondria towards the MitoSnaphi daughter cell, but addressing this in T cell is challenging because of their small cytoplasm. Single cell transcriptomics allowed us to identify clusters that were enriched in MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells. The presence of a memory-like cluster enriched in MitoSnaplo cells, where this signature was also stronger than in MitoSnaphi cells, further cements this cell type as the one inheriting memory potential.
Transcriptomics analysis also led us to identify a new metabolic pathway more abundant in MitoSnaphi cells, with a signature characterized by the significantly upregulated expression of genes involved in 1C metabolism, which was confirmed by metabolomics analysis. 1C metabolism comprises methionine and folate cycles that provide 1C units to boost de novo synthesis of nucleotides and promote amino acid homeostasis and redox defence, particularly important in dividing cells such as cancer cells62. Enzymes involved in 1C metabolism can be found in the cytoplasm and the mitochondria, and both sets were upregulated in MitoSnaphi cells. This was confirmed by evaluating the expression of SHMT2 in individual mitochondria by microscopy. However, when comparing the metabolome of MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells from WT and autophagy-deficient cells, it became clear that autophagy loss is not solely responsible for the unequal expression of several metabolites, highlighting the synergy between mitochondrial segregation and degradation events in T cell fate commitment. Serine is an important donor of the 1C units when it is converted to glycine, and in CD8+ T cells, this amino acid has been shown to be important for clonal expansion of effector cells63. 1C metabolism has also been directly investigated in different CD4+ T cell subsets and studies support its role in mTOR activation and the establishment of proinflammatory and highly proliferative populations51. Because expression of several amino acid transporters, including serine transporters, is upregulated in MitoSnaphi cells, which also exhibit defective translation upon 1C metabolism inhibition, our results provide further evidence of the role of this pathway in effector T cell metabolism and also suggest that it can be effectively targeted to modulate T cell fate decisions.
Collectively, our results support the notion that unequal organelle inheritance plays an important role in CD8+ T cell fate decision and contributes to the metabolic status of cell progenies. Previous reports using the SnapTag model in epithelial-stem like cell lines found that inheritance of old organelles promotes oxidative metabolism leading to cell differentiation64. In intestinal stem cells, progenies inhering old mitochondria produce elevated levels of α-ketoglutarate, which benefits Paneth cell formation and supports niche renewal38. In cells from the haematopoietic lineage, the polarized presence of organelles during mitosis followed by long-term quantitative single-cell imaging has been reported, with the caveat that they were identified by dyes or probes that limit interpretation about their inheritance65. Here, we show that organelle inheritance in primary T cells results from both degradation and segregation and that mitophagy and ACD work synergistically to form early memory-like cells and effector-like cells. As cells retaining (or not) older organelles are endowed with distinct metabolic signatures, our results suggest that therapeutic modulation of T cells can have different outcomes depending on when it is performed. PreM modulation will globally impact on T cell differentiation, and postmitotic approaches can selectively target a certain cell type, memory or effector, by inhibiting or improving its function. We anticipate that these findings will be relevant to a better understanding of how T cell diversity is early imprinted. Whether knowledge gained from this study is likely to be applicable to other cells that undergo ACD is to be investigated. Overall our data will pave the way for the development of more efficient therapeutic strategies in the context of regenerative medicine and particularly important in the context of ageing.
Methods
Study design
This study aimed to evaluate whether organelle inheritance controls CD8+ T cell differentiation. To achieve that, we investigated the role of ACD and autophagy in patterns of mitochondria inheritance. The novel MitoSnap model was used to allow specific tracking of old versus young organelles. We used imaging analysis of mitotic CD8+ T cells, flow cytometry readouts that allow single cell resolution, metabolic analysis and unbiased OMICS approaches to measure differences in phenotype and function between MitoSnaplo and MitoSnaphi progenies. We used adoptive cell transfers of TCR-transgenic OT-I MitoSnap cells coupled to Listeria monocytogenes-OVA infections as a tool to assess immune responses and the impact of old organelle inheritance in vivo. All conclusions rely on at least two experiments. No randomization or blinding was used. No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample sizes but our sample sizes are similar to those reported in previous publications from the field, including our own.
Animal models
All animal work was reviewed and approved by Oxford Ethical committee and the UK Home office under the project licences PPL30/3388 and P01275425. Mice were bred under specific pathogen-free conditions in-house, housed on a 12 h dark–light cycle, with a 30 min period of dawn and dusk and fed ad libitum. The temperature was kept between 20 °C and 24 °C, with a humidity level of 45–65%. Housing cages were individually ventilated and provided an enriched environment for the animals. Omp25-SnapTagfl/fl mice were kindly provided by the lab of Professor Pekka Katajisto. This strain was then bred with CD45.1 Atg16l1fl/fl Ert2Cre OT-I mice expressing a TCR specific for OVA257–264 SIINFEKL peptide41 and maintained as CD45.1 or CD45.1/2 mice. Host mice in adoptive transfer experiments were either B6.SJL.CD45.1 or C57BL/6 naive mice. The 6–16-week-old mice were considered young, and >100-week-old mice were considered aged.
CD8+ T cell isolation and activation
Spleen and inguinal lymph nodes were collected. Single-cell suspensions were used for naive CD8+ T cell isolation using EasySep Mouse Naive CD8+ T Cell Isolation Kit (Stemcell Technologies) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified populations were cultured (at 37 °C, 5% CO2) in T cell medium: RPMI-1640 containing HEPES buffer and L-glutamine (R5158, Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% filtered foetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich), 1× penicillin–streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich), 1× non-essential amino acids (Gibco), 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol (Gibco) and 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Gibco). T cell activation was done on anti-CD3 (5 μg ml−1) (145-2C11, BioLegend), anti-CD28 (5 μg ml−1) (37.51, BioLegend) and recombinant human or murine Fc-ICAM-1 (10 μg ml−1) (R&D Systems) coated plates. The 36–40 h post activation cells were used in downstream assays. Autophagy deletion and/or SnapTag expression were induced by culturing cells in presence of 500 nM (Z)-4-hydroxytamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich, H7904-5MG). To determine cell division events, cells were stained with Cell Trace Violet (CTV) (Life Technologies) following manufacture’s guidelines.
SnapTag labelling protocol
MitoSnap CD8+ T cells were labelled in one or three steps. Labelling of preM/old organelles was done by collecting CD8+ T cells 12–16 h post activation and washing them in PBS (500g). The cells were incubated in T cell medium containing the first fluorescent SnapSubstrate for 30 min at 37 °C, washed in PBS and put back in culture in their original wells for further 20–24 h. When postM/young organelle labelling was also performed, cells were collected, washed and incubated with T cell medium containing 5 μM of unlabelled SnapSubstrate (Snap-Cell Block S9106S, New England Biolabs (NEB)) for 30 min at 37 °C. After washing, cells rested for 30–60 min in T cell medium and then were incubated with the second fluorescent SnapSubstrate for 30 min at 37 °C. Fluorescent cell-permeable Snap-Cell substrates (NEB) were used in the following concentrations: 3 μM (Snap-Cell 647-SiR S9102S), 3 μM (Snap-Cell TMR-Star S9105S) and 5 μM (Snap-Cell Oregon Green S9104S). BafA (20 nM) or CCCP (1 µM) were used to assess the role of autophagy and mitophagy, respectively, in the loss of OMP25 SnapTag labelling.
Cell survival and proliferation assays
Following activation, isolated MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (WT versus ATG16L1-deficient or MitoSnaphi versus MitoSnaplo first-daughter cells) were cultured in T cell medium supplemented with murine IL-2, IL-7 and IL-15 (5 ng ml−1). Cell proliferation was evaluated 3 days later, and cell survival was assessed 7 days later. For experiments evaluating the role of serine and glycine depletion, RPMI-1640 was substituted by 1× RPMI-1640 media without glucose, glycine and serine (Teknova), supplemented with 2 g l−1 of D-glucose (standard concentration found in standard RPMI medium). PHGDH inhibition was done adding 10 µM of PKUMDL-WQ-2201 to the medium.
Adoptive transfer and immunization
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-purified CTV-labelled MitoSnaphi or MitoSnaplo cells (equal numbers in the same experiment to allow comparison between the two groups) were intravenously injected into naive recipients. In the following day or >30 days later, mice were infected with 2 × 103 colony forming units of Listeria monocytogenes expressing ovalbumin (LM-OVA) intravenously. LM-OVA was kindly provided by Prof. Audrey Gerard (Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, University of Oxford). LM-OVA growth was done from frozen aliquots in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth (Sigma, #53286-100G). Bacteria were used for infections when reaching exponential growth. Immune responses were tracked in the blood and at the memory-phase spleens were collected.
Immunofluorescence staining and confocal microscopy
At different timepoints post stimulation (preM or mitotic/postmitotic), CD8+ T cells were collected. In some experiments, cells were incubated with 1–2 μM MitoSOX Mitochondrial Superoxide Indicator (Invitrogen) for 15 min at 37 °C before collection. The cells were washed in PBS and transferred on poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) treated coverslips, followed by incubation for 45–60 min at 37 °C. Attached cells were fixed with 2% methanol-free paraformaldehyde in PBS (ThermoScientific) for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min and blocked in PBS containing 2% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.01% Tween 20 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at room temperature. The following antibodies were used to perform immunofluorescence stainings in murine cells: mouse anti-β-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich), anti-mouse IgG AF488 (Abcam), anti-CD8 APC 53-6.7 (BioLegend) and anti-LC3B (D11) XP Rabbit mAb PE (Cell Signalling). DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich) was used to detect DNA. ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant (ThermoScientific) was used as mounting medium. Mitotic cells (late anaphase to cytokinesis) were identified by nuclear morphology and/or presence of two microtubule organizing centres and a clear tubulin bridge between two daughter cells. A total of 40–80 Z-stacks (0.13 μM) were acquired with a ZEISS 980 Airyscan 2 with a C-Apochromat 63×/1.2 W Corr magnification objective and the ZenBlue software. The data were analysed using Fiji/ImageJ. Thresholds for quantification were set up individually for each fluorophore. Asymmetry rates were calculated based on the integrated density (volume and fluorescence intensity measurements were considered) of cell cargoes inherited by each daughter cell. This was done by using the following calculation: (P1 − P2)/(P1 + P2), where P1 is the daughter cell with higher integrated density of CD8 or old mitochondria. Any values above 0.2 or below −0.2 were considered asymmetric, which corresponds to one daughter cell inheriting at least 1.5× more of a cell cargo than its sibling.
Planar SLBs
Planar SLBs were made as described previously66. In brief, glass coverslips were plasma-cleaned and assembled into disposable six-channel chambers (Ibidi). SLBs were formed by incubation of each channel with small unilammellar vesicles containing 12.5 mol% 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-[(N-(5-amino-1-carboxypentyl) iminodiacetic acid) succinyl] (nickel salt) and 0.05 mol% 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-(cap biotinyl) (sodium salt) in 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine at total phospholipid concentration 0.4 mM. Chambers were filled with human serum albumin-supplemented HEPES-buffered saline (HBS), subsequently referred to as HEPES-buffered saline/human serum albumin. Following blocking with 5% casein in PBS containing 100 μM NiSO4, to saturate NTA sites, fluorescently labelled streptavidin was then coupled to biotin head groups. Biotinylated 2C11-Fab fragments (30 molecules per square micrometre) and His-tagged ICAM-1 (200 molecules per square micrometre) and CD80 (100 molecules per square micrometre) were then incubated with the bilayers at concentrations to achieve the indicated site densities. Bilayers were continuous liquid disordered phase as determined by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching with a 10 µm bleach spot on an FV1200 confocal microscope (Olympus).
T cell immunological synapse formation on planar SLBs
Naive murine CD8+ T cells were incubated at 37 °C on an SLB. After 10 min, the cells were fixed with 4% methanol-free formaldehyde in PHEM buffer (10 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 60 mM PIPES, 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.0) and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 20 min at room temperature. Anti-CD3 staining was used to identify TCR regions and actin was labelled with fluorescent phalloidin.
Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy
Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy was performed on an Olympus IX83 inverted microscope equipped with a four-line (405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm and 640 nm laser) illumination system. The system was fitted with an Olympus UApON 150 × 1.45 numerical aperture objective and a Photometrics Evolve Delta EMCCD camera to provide Nyquist sampling. A quantification of fluorescence intensity was performed with ImageJ.
Flow cytometry
Blood samples used for kinetics analysis were obtained from the tail vein at weeks 1, 2 and 3 post-LM-OVA challenge. At end timepoints, spleens were collected and single-cell splenocytes were prepared by meshing whole spleens through 70 µm strainers using a 1 ml syringe plunger. When cytokine production was assessed, splenocytes were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h with 1 μM of SIINFEKL peptide, followed by 4 h in presence of SIINFEKL peptide + 10 µg ml−1 of brefeldin A (Sigma-Aldrich). Specific CD8+ T cells were evaluated by incubation with SIINFEKL257-264-APC-labelled or SIINFEKL257-264-BV421-labelled tetramers (NIH Tetramer Core Facility at Emory University). Erythrocytes were lysed by red blood cell lysis buffer (Invitrogen). Conjugated antibodies used for surface staining were: anti-CD127 A7R34, anti-CD25 PC61 (AF700, PE-Cy7, BioLegend; APC, eBioscience), anti-CD44 IM7 (AF700, BV785, PE, PerCPCy5.5, BioLegend), anti-CD45.1 A20 (BV785, FITC, PB, BioLegend), anti-CD45.2 104 (AF700, BV711, FITC, BioLegend), anti-CD62L MEL-14 (FITC, BioLegend; eF450, eBioscience), anti-KLRG1 2F1 (BV711, BV785, BioLegend), anti-CD8 53-6.7 (BV510, BV605, FITC, PE, BioLegend) and anti-TCRβ H57-597 (APC-Cy7, PerCPCy5.5, BioLegend). Cells were incubated for 20 min at 4 °C. When intracellular staining was performed, cells were fixed/permed with 2× FACS Lysis Solution (BD Biosciences) with 0.08% Tween 20 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min at room temperature, washed in PBS and incubated for 1 h at RT with anti-IL-2 JES6-5H4 (APC, BioLegend), anti-IFN-γ XMG1.2 (BV421, BioLegend) and anti-TNF MP6-XT22 (PE-Cy7, Thermo Fisher). Identification of viable cells was done by fixable near-IR dead cell staining (Life Technologies). TMRM (100 nM) and MitoSOX (2 µM) labelling was done before staining of surface markers, by incubating cells for 15 min at 37 °C in T cell medium. All samples were washed and stored in PBS containing 2% FBS (Sigma-Aldrich) and 5 mM of EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich) before acquisition. Stained samples were acquired on a FACS LSR II (R/B/V) or a Fortessa X-20 (R/B/V/YG) flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) with FACSDiva software. Data analysis was done using FlowJo software (FlowJo Enterprise, version 10.10, BD Biosciences).
Cell sorting (FACS)
After activation, CTV- and SnapSubstrate-labelled MitoSnap CD8+ T cells were collected and stained for phenotypical markers (anti-CD44 IM7, anti-CD45.1 A20, anti-CD45.2 104 and anti-CD8 53-6.7 conjugated to different fluorophores depending on experiment, all BioLegend). Dead cells were excluded by staining cells with a fixable Live/Dead dye (Invitrogen, L34993 or L34957). Subpopulations of interest were sorted on a FACS Aria III cell sorter (BD Biosciences).
Metabolic reliance measured by protein translation (Scenith)
We used a modified version of the Scenith assay45, which describes a high correlation between protein translation and ATP production. New protein synthesis was measured using the Click-iT Plus OPP Protein Synthesis Assay (Thermo Fisher, C10456/C10457) according to manufacturer’s protocol. In short, the cells were incubated in T cell medium for 30 min at 37 °C without any metabolic inhibitors or in presence of 1 μM oligomycin (Merck), 100 mM 2DG (Merck), a combination of both, 1 μM of SHIN1 (Cambridge Bioscience), 20 μM of PKUMDL-WQ-2201 (Sigma-Aldrich) or 1 μM of LY345899 (Sigma-Aldrich). This was followed by incubation with 10 μM of alkynylated puromycin analogue OPP for 30 min at 37 °C. Click Chemistry was performed with Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 594 dye picolyl azide. Metabolic reliance was assessed by comparing the OPP gMFI, used as an indicator of the relative translation rate, of inhibited samples to the vehicle control.
Western blot
Following (Z)-4-hydroxytamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich, H7904-5MG) treatment for 24 h and/or BafA treatment (10 nM) for 2 h or not, cells were washed with PBS and lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche) and PhosSTOP (Roche). Protein concentration was calculated by using the BCA assay (Thermo Fisher). Samples were diluted in 4× Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad) and boiled at 100 °C for 5 min. A total of 20 µg protein per sample were used for SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis. NuPAGE Novex 4–12% Bis–Tris gradient gel (Invitrogen) with MOPS running buffer (Invitrogen) was used. Proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane (Merck Millipore) and blocked with 5% skimmed milk-TBST (TBS 10× (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted to 1× in distilled water containing 0.1% Tween 20 (Sigma-Aldrich)) for 1 h. Membranes were incubated at 4 °C overnight with primary antibodies diluted in 1% skimmed milk-TBST and at room temperature for 1 h with secondary antibodies diluted in 1% skimmed milk-TBST supplemented 0.01% SDS. Primary antibodies used were: anti-ATG16L1, clone EPR15638 (Abcam, ab187671) and anti-GAPDH and clone 6C5 (Sigma-Aldrich, MAB374). Secondary antibodies used were: IRDye 680LT Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) (Licor, 926-680-70) and IRDye 800CW Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) (Licor, 926-322-11). Images were acquired using the Odyssey CLx Imaging System. The data were analysed using Image Studio Lite or Fiji.
Mitochondrial isolation and flow cytometry (MitoFlow)
Autophagy-sufficient (Atg16l1fl/+ Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre) and autophagy-deficient (Atg16l1fl/fl Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre) MitoSnap CD8+ T cells were activated, labelled for preM/old (SNAP-Cell TMR-Star or 647-SiR, NEB) and postM/young organelles (SNAP-Cell Oregon Green, NEB), as previously described, and after 40 h washed with complete T cell medium. Cell pellets were resuspended in ice-cold mitochondria isolation buffer (320 mM sucrose, 2 mM EGTA,10 mM Tris–HCl, at pH 7.2 in water) and homogenized with a Dounce homogenizer with a 2 ml reservoir capacity (Abcam). We performed 20 strokes with a type B pretzel. The homogenizer was rinsed with distilled water before each sample was processed to avoid cross-contamination. Differential centrifugation of homogenates was done at 1,000g (4 °C for 8 min), which resulted in a pellet containing whole cells and isolated nuclei first. The supernatant containing the mitochondria was then transferred into new tubes and centrifuged at 17,000g (4 °C for 15 min). Enriched mitochondria, which appeared as brown-coloured pellets, were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde in 0.5 ml PBS on ice for 15 min, followed by a wash with PBS. Mitochondria were resuspended in blocking buffer containing anti-Tom20-BV421 antibody for 20 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS, mitochondria were resuspended in 250 μl filtered (0.2 μm) PBS and acquired using a BD Fortessa X-20 flow cytometer. The threshold for SSC-A (log-scale) was set to the minimum value (20,000) to allow acquisition of subcellular particles. Submicron particle size reference beads (0.5, 1 and 2 µm, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were also used to identify mitochondria.
Seahorse assay
MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells were purified by FACS and their OCR were measured using a XF96 MitoStress Test (Seahorse Agilent, 103015-100). Activated CD8+ T cells were washed in RPMI-1640 without sodium bicarbonate, 10 mM glucose, 1% FCS, 2 mM pyruvate and seeded in a XF plate (Agilent, 103793-100) coated with poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) at equal densities in corresponding assay medium (XF Assay Medium, 103680-100) pH 7.4 supplemented with 10 mM glucose, 1 mM sodium pyruvate and 2 mM L-glutamine. Test compounds were sequentially injected to obtain the following concentrations: 1 µM oligomycin, 1.5 µM FCCP, 1 µM rotenone and 1 µM antimycin A. OCRs were normalized to cell number using CyQuant (Molecular Probes).
ATP synthesis assay
Sorted MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo CD8+ T cells were boiled in 100 mM Tris, 4 mM EDTA, pH 7.74 buffer for 2 min at 100 °C. Following centrifugation, the supernatant was used for analysis. ATP levels were assessed using the ATP Bioluminescence Assay Kit CLS II (Roche) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The samples and ATP standard mixtures were swiftly combined with an equal volume of luciferase and promptly measured in a luminometer (BMG CLARIOstar Plus microplate reader). Normalization was performed by adjusting values based on the total number of sorted cells. The experiment was performed twice. Each experiment was done with two samples per group (each sample pooled from two biological replicates).
Proteomics
Proteomics analysis was done as previously described67. CD8hi and CD8lo or MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo daughter cells following naive CD8+ T cell activation were purified by FACS. The cell pellets were washed 2× in PBS before being stored at −80 °C before proteomics analysis. Samples were resuspended in 200 µl of S-Trap lysis buffer (10% SDS, 100 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate) and sonicated for 15 min (30 s on, 30 s off, 100% amplitude, 70% pulse). The samples were centrifuged and supernatants were transferred to fresh tubes. Protein quantification was done using the Micro BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher). A total of 150 μg of protein was processed using S-Trap mini columns (Protifi, #CO2-mini-80). The samples were digested overnight with 3.75 μg of trypsin (Thermo Fisher, Pierce Trypsin Protease MS-Grade, #90057) with a second digest with the same amount of trypsin for 6 h the following day. The peptides were extracted, dried under vacuum and resuspended to 50 μl with 1% formic acid (Thermo Fisher, #85178) and quantified using the Pierce Quantitative Fluorometric Peptide Assay (Thermo Fisher, #23290).
Peptides were injected onto a nanoscale C18 reverse-phase chromatography system (UltiMate 3000 RSLC nano, Thermo Fisher) and electrosprayed into an Orbitrap Exploris 480 mass spectrometer (MS) (Thermo Fisher). For liquid chromatography the following buffers were used: buffer A (0.1% formic acid in Milli-Q water (v/v)) and buffer B (80% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid in Milli-Q water (v/v)). The samples were loaded at 10 μl min−1 onto a trap column (100 μm × 2 cm, PepMap nanoViper C18 column, 5 μm, 100 Å, Thermo Fisher) equilibrated in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The trap column was washed for 3 min at the same flow rate with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid then switched in-line with a Thermo Fisher, resolving C18 column (75 μm × 50 cm, PepMap RSLC C18 column, 2 μm, 100 Å). Peptides were eluted from the column at a constant flow rate of 300 nl min−1 with a linear gradient from 3% buffer B to 6% buffer B in 5 min, then from 6% buffer B to 35% buffer B in 115 min, and finally from 35% buffer B to 80% buffer B within 7 min. The column was then washed with 80% buffer B for 4 min. Two blanks were run between each sample to reduce carry-over. The column was kept at a constant temperature of 50 °C. The data was acquired using an easy spray source operated in positive mode with spray voltage at 2.60 kV, and the ion transfer tube temperature at 250 °C. The MS was operated in DIA mode. A scan cycle comprised a full MS scan (m/zrange from 350 to 1,650), with RF lens at 40%, AGC target set to custom, normalized AGC target at 300%, maximum injection time mode set to custom, maximum injection time at 20 ms, microscan set to 1 and source fragmentation disabled. MS survey scan was followed by MS/MS DIA scan events using the following parameters: multiplex ions set to false, collision energy mode set to stepped, collision energy type set to normalized, HCD collision energies set to 25.5%, 27% and 30%, orbitrap resolution 30000, first mass 200, RF lens 40%, AGC target set to custom, normalized AGC target 3,000%, microscan set to 1 and maximum injection time 55 ms. The data for both MS scan and MS/MS DIA scan events were acquired in profile mode.
Analysis of the DIA data was carried out using Spectronaut Biognosys, AG (version 14.7.201007.47784 for CD8hi and CD8lo cells obtained from young, Atg16l1-deficient and old mice; version 17.6.230428.55965 for MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells). The data were analysed using the direct DIA workflow, with the following settings: imputation, profiling and cross run normalization were disabled; data Filtering to Qvalue; Precursor Qvalue Cutoff and Protein Qvalue Cutoff (Experimental) set to 0.01; maximum of two missed trypsin cleavages; PSM, protein and peptide false-discovery rate levels set to 0.01; cysteine carbamidomethylation set as fixed modification and acetyl (N-term), deamidation (asparagine, glutamine), oxidation of methionine set as variable modifications. The database used for CD8hi and CD8lo cells was mouse_swissprot_isoforms_extra_trembl_06_20.fasta (2020-06) and for mitosnap samples was the Mus musculus proteome obtained from uniprot.org (2022-02). Data filtering, protein copy number and concentration quantification was performed in the Perseus software package, version 1.6.6.0. Copy numbers were calculated using the proteomic ruler as described33. The samples were grouped according to the condition. Outliers were excluded following analysis of histone counts in each sample. The P values were calculated via a two-tailed, unequal-variance t-test on log-normalized data. Elements with P values <0.05 were considered significant, with a fold-change cut-off >1.5 or <0.67.
Single cell transcriptomics
Single cell RNA sequencing libraries were prepared using the Chromium Single Cell 3′ GEX v3.1 assay (10x Genomics). In short, cell suspensions were encapsulated into gel beads in emulsion using the Chromium Controller. Within each gel bead in emulsion, cell lysis and barcoded reverse transcription of RNA occurred, followed by complementary DNA amplification. The amplified cDNA underwent library construction via fragmentation, end-repair, A-tailing, adaptor ligation and index PCR. Final libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 system. Initial data processing was conducted with Cell Ranger 7.2.0.
Filtered output matrices were processed using Seurat. After loading the data and assigning unique identifiers to each dataset, cells with more than 10% mitochondrial gene content were excluded to ensure data quality. The datasets were normalized using SCTransform, and PCA was conducted for dimensionality reduction. Integration of the datasets was achieved using the Harmony algorithm, followed by clustering and differential expression analysis. Finally, the integrated data were visualized using UMAP. UMAP projections of resulting clusters and gene expression of gene sets were generated using Loupe Browser. This methodology enabled a robust analysis while accounting for technical variations and maintaining biological integrity.
Trajectory analysis and visualization
To investigate the pseudotemporal dynamics of our single-cell RNA sequencing data, we utilized Monocle368, an advanced tool designed for trajectory inference and differential expression analysis. In previous steps, using the Seurat package, the cells were preprocessed, and size factors were estimated and normalized. Dimensionality reduction was performed using UMAP to capture the intrinsic structure of the data, followed by clustering to identify distinct cell populations. These clusters were annotated based on known marker genes, and the cluster annotations were integrated into the metadata for further analysis.
For trajectory inference, we converted the Seurat object to a Monocle3 object69. Separate trajectory analyses were conducted for the MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo original identities. Each subset of cells was reclustered using UMAP, and principal graphs were constructed to capture the developmental trajectories of the cells. Pseudotime values were then computed to represent the progression of cells along these inferred trajectories.
Mitochondrial architecture analysis
MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo cells were FACS isolated and prepared for immunofluorescence as described above. Z-stacks (0.13 μm) were acquired with a ZEISS 980 Airyscan 2 with a C-Apochromat 63×/1.2 W Corr magnification objective and the ZenBlue software. Image voxels were made isotropic via upscaling using the ‘zoom’ function of the SciPy Multidimensional image package70. A feathering algorithm, to pick up on mitochondria outlines, in combination with multi-Otsu thresholding and a custom set of operators (that is, erosions, closing and filling of holes) from scikit-image (Python) were used for segmentation of individual mitochondria71. Both the Tom20 and MitoSnap channels were combined to enable identification of all mitochondria. Segments smaller than 500 pixels (noise) were excluded from further analysis. Separate organelles were given a unique identifier using the ‘label’ function from scikit-image. Each segmented organelle was used to create a mask on the isotropic pixel converted images, which allowed quantification of fluorescence intensity values (calculated as the average pixel intensity/number of pixels in the segmented volume). Segmented organelles had their geometric parameter measurements extracted and standardized, and included sphericity, roundness, compactness, surface area72 and volume. Mitochondrial complexity was calculated as previously described73.
The data were visualized with UMAP. Only geometric parameters were used to remove any bias in the analysis. A Gaussian kernal density estimate was plotted to produce the contour/density map of UMAP points for visualization of mitochondria distribution shifts. Mitochondria were grouped and analysed for geometric parameters based on their cell of origin (MitoSnaphi versus MitoSnaplo) and intensity of SnapTag labelling. MitoSnaplo cells exhibited only mitochondria with low intensity of SnapTag labelling. In MitoSnaphi cells, low intensity was determined by intensity values below the maximum intensity value found in MitoSnaplo cells; mid intensity was determined as values above this threshold, but below the 75th percentile value found in MitoSnaphi cells; high mitochondria were identified using SnapTag labelling intensity values above the 75th percentile value for found in MitoSnaphi cells.
Metabolomics
CTV-labelled naive MitoSnap CD8+ T cells (WT-Atg16l1fl/+ Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre or knockout (KO)-Atg16l1fl/fl Omp25fl/+ Ert2Cre) were activated on anti-CD3, anti-CD28 and Fc-ICAM-1 coated plates for 40 h. The cells were cultured in T cell medium containing 500 nM Z-4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT). Then, 16 h post activation, the cells were collected and labelled with Snap-Cell 647-SiR (preM/old mitochondria) and cultured for further 24 h in presence of 13C-glucose (2 g l−1) or 13C-serine (30 mg l−1). Metabolites were extracted from cell pellets of sorted MitoSnaphi and MitoSnaplo daughter cells. A total of 10 µl of each sample was loaded into a Dionex UltiMate 3000 LC System (Thermo Scientific Bremen, Germany) equipped with a C18 column (Acquity UPLC -HSS T3 1.8 µm; 2.1 × 150 mm, Waters) coupled to a Q Exactive Orbitrap MS (Thermo Scientific) operating in negative ion mode. A step gradient was carried out using solvent A (10 mM TBA and 15 mM acetic acid) and solvent B (100% methanol). The gradient started with 0% of solvent B and 100% solvent A and remained at 0% B until 2 min post injection. A linear gradient to 32.3% B was carried out until 7 min and increased to 36.3% until 14 min. Between 14 and 26 min, the gradient increased to 90.9% of B and remained at 90.9% B for 4 min. At 30 min the gradient returned to 0% B. The chromatography was stopped at 40 min. The flow was kept constant at 0.25 ml min−1 and the column was placed at 40 °C throughout the analysis. The MS operated in full scan mode (m/z range 70.0000–1,050.0000) using a spray voltage of 4.80 kV, capillary temperature of 300 °C, sheath gas at 40.0 and auxiliary gas at 10.0. The AGC target was set at 3 × 106 using a resolution of 70,000, with a maximum IT fill time of 512 ms. Data collection was performed using the Xcalibur software (Thermo Scientific). The data analyses were performed by integrating the peak areas (El-Maven–Polly, Elucidata).
Statistical analysis
To test if data point values were in a Gaussian distribution, a normality test was performed before applying parametric or non-parametric statistical analysis. When two groups were compared, paired or unpaired Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney test were applied. When comparisons were done across more than two experimental groups, analyses were performed using a Dunn test with Bonferroni correction or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or two-way ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey’s test multiple testing correction. The P values were considered significant when <0.05, and the exact P values are provided in the figures. All analyses were done using GraphPad Prism 10 software.
Inclusion and ethics statement
We affirm our commitment to ethical integrity, fairness, and inclusion by engaging diverse collaborators and local researchers throughout the study, while carefully and transparently describing author contributions.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41556-025-01835-2.
Supplementary information
Source data
Statistical source data (tabs clearly labelled per figure).
Acknowledgements
We thank D. Cantrell CBE, FRSE, FRS, FMedSci, A. Howden and the FingerPrints Proteomics Core Facility of the University of Dundee for their support with proteomics analysis. We thank T. Conrad, C. Fischer, C. Dietrich, F. Solinas and C. Braeuning from the BIH/MDC Genomics Platform for their support in generating the scRNA-seq data. We thank E. Johnson (Dunn School, University of Oxford) for performing electron microscopy experiments. We thank P. C. Moreira, D. Andrew and M. Medghalchi (Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology BSU staff) for their support. We thank L. Uhl and H. Cai for helping with LM-OVA infections. This work was funded by grants from the Wellcome Trust (investigator award 103830/Z/14/Z and 220784/Z/20/Z to A.K.S., Sir Henry Wellcome Fellowship 220452/Z/20/Z to M.B. and PhD studentship award 203803/Z16/Z to F.C.R.), the Helmholz association (Helmholtz Distinguished Professorship Funding to recruit top-level international female scientists (W3) to A.K.S.), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 (Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement number 893676 to M.B. and ERC-2021-SyG_951329 to E.C.B. and M.L.D.), the Swiss National Science Foundation (Early Postdoc.Mobility P2EZP3_188074 to M.B.), the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO LT postdoctoral fellowship—ALTF1155-2019 to A.V.L.V.) and the Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology Research (KTTR) to Y.F.Y. and M.L.D. Flow cytometry was performed at the KTTR-supported facility at the Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology (Oxford), and light microscopy was performed at the Oxford-ZEISS Centre of Excellence in Biomedical Imaging.
Extended data
Author contributions
M.B., A.V.L.V. and A.K.S. designed the experiments. M.B., A.V.L.V., E.B.C., Y.Y., F.C.R., S.R. and R.M. performed the experiments. T.Y., H.B., E.K., L.S., M.L.D. and P.K. provided expert assistance and guidance. M.B., A.V.L.V., A.H.K., E.J. and E.B.C. analysed the experiments. M.B. prepared figures. M.B. and A.K.S. wrote the paper.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Cell Biology thanks Sarah Russell, Robert Salmond and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Data availability
The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD053316. Single cell transcriptomics data have been deposited at GEO (GSE270704). Raw data generated or analysed in this study are available from the corresponding lead author on reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Mariana Borsa, Email: mariana.borsa@kennedy.ox.ac.uk.
Anna Katharina Simon, Email: katja.simon@mdc-berlin.de.
Extended data
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41556-025-01835-2.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41556-025-01835-2.
References
- 1.Stemberger, C. et al. A single naive CD8+ T cell precursor can develop into diverse effector and memory subsets. Immunity27, 985–997 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gerlach, C. et al. Heterogeneous differentiation patterns of individual CD8+ T cells. Science340, 635–639 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Moller, S. H., Hsueh, P. C., Yu, Y. R., Zhang, L. & Ho, P. C. Metabolic programs tailor T cell immunity in viral infection, cancer, and aging. Cell Metab.34, 378–395 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chang, J. T., Wherry, E. J. & Goldrath, A. W. Molecular regulation of effector and memory T cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol.15, 1104–1115 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Henning, A. N., Roychoudhuri, R. & Restifo, N. P. Epigenetic control of CD8+ T cell differentiation. Nat. Rev. Immunol.18, 340–356 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Alsaleh, G. et al. Autophagy in T cells from aged donors is maintained by spermidine and correlates with function and vaccine responses. eLife9, e57950 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mittelbrunn, M. & Kroemer, G. Hallmarks of T cell aging. Nat. Immunol.22, 687–698 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Han, S., Georgiev, P., Ringel, A. E., Sharpe, A. H. & Haigis, M. C. Age-associated remodeling of T cell immunity and metabolism. Cell Metab.35, 36–55 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Quinn, K. M. et al. Age-related decline in primary CD8+ T cell responses is associated with the development of senescence in virtual memory CD8+ T cells. Cell Rep.23, 3512–3524 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mogilenko, D. A. et al. Comprehensive profiling of an aging immune system reveals clonal GZMK+ CD8+ T cells as conserved hallmark of inflammaging. Immunity54, 99–115.e12 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11.Henson, S. M. et al. p38 signaling inhibits mTORC1-independent autophagy in senescent human CD8+ T cells. J. Clin. Invest.124, 4004–4016 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Borsa, M. et al. Asymmetric cell division shapes naive and virtual memory T-cell immunity during ageing. Nat. Commun.12, 2715 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sturmlechner, I., Jain, A., Mu, Y., Weyand, C. M. & Goronzy, J. J. T cell fate decisions during memory cell generation with aging. Semin. Immunol.69, 101800 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Clarke, A. J. & Simon, A. K. Autophagy in the renewal, differentiation and homeostasis of immune cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol.19, 170–183 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Puleston, D. J. et al. Autophagy is a critical regulator of memory CD8+ T cell formation. eLife3, e03706 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xu, X. et al. Autophagy is essential for effector CD8+ T cell survival and memory formation. Nat. Immunol.15, 1152–1161 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Franco, F. et al. Regulatory circuits of mitophagy restrict distinct modes of cell death during memory CD8+ T cell formation. Sci. Immunol.8, eadf7579 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pua, H. H., Guo, J., Komatsu, M. & He, Y. W. Autophagy is essential for mitochondrial clearance in mature T lymphocytes. J. Immunol.182, 4046–4055 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sinclair, L. V. et al. Autophagy repression by antigen and cytokines shapes mitochondrial, migration and effector machinery in CD8 T cells. Nat. Immunol.26, 429–443 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sunchu, B. & Cabernard, C. Principles and mechanisms of asymmetric cell division. Development147, dev167650 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cobbold, S. P., Adams, E., Howie, D. & Waldmann, H. CD4+ T cell fate decisions are stochastic, precede cell division, depend on GITR co-stimulation, and are associated with uropodium development. Front Immunol.9, 1381 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chang, J. T. et al. Asymmetric T lymphocyte division in the initiation of adaptive immune responses. Science315, 1687–1691 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Grabnitz, F. et al. Asymmetric cell division safeguards memory CD8 T cell development. Cell Rep.42, 112468 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.King, C. G. et al. T cell affinity regulates asymmetric division, effector cell differentiation, and tissue pathology. Immunity37, 709–720 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chang, J. T. et al. Asymmetric proteasome segregation as a mechanism for unequal partitioning of the transcription factor T-bet during T lymphocyte division. Immunity34, 492–504 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pollizzi, K. N. et al. Asymmetric inheritance of mTORC1 kinase activity during division dictates CD8+ T cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol.17, 704–711 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Verbist, K. C. et al. Metabolic maintenance of cell asymmetry following division in activated T lymphocytes. Nature532, 389–393 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liedmann, S. et al. Localization of a TORC1-eIF4F translation complex during CD8+ T cell activation drives divergent cell fate. Mol. Cell82, 2401–2414 e2409 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Barandun, N. et al. Targeted localization of the mother centrosome in CD8+ T cells undergoing asymmetric cell division promotes memory formation. Cell Rep.44, 115127 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Borsa, M. et al. Modulation of asymmetric cell division as a mechanism to boost CD8+ T cell memory. Sci. Immunol.4, eaav1730 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Metz, P. J. et al. Regulation of asymmetric division and CD8+ T lymphocyte fate specification by protein kinase Czeta and protein kinase Clambda/iota. J. Immunol.194, 2249–2259 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Quezada, L. K. et al. Early transcriptional and epigenetic divergence of CD8+ T cells responding to acute versus chronic infection. PLoS Biol.21, e3001983 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wisniewski, J. R., Hein, M. Y., Cox, J. & Mann, M. A. A ‘proteomic ruler’ for protein copy number and concentration estimation without spike-in standards. Mol. Cell Proteom.13, 3497–3506 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Buck, M. D. et al. Mitochondrial dynamics controls T cell fate through metabolic programming. Cell166, 63–76 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pearce, E. L. et al. Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism. Nature460, 103–107 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Adams, W. C. et al. Anabolism-associated mitochondrial stasis driving lymphocyte differentiation over self-renewal. Cell Rep.17, 3142–3152 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Emurla, H., Barral, Y. & Oxenius, A. Role of mitotic diffusion barriers in regulating the asymmetric division of activated CD8 T cells. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2021.09.10.458880 (2021).
- 38.Andersson, S. et al. Old mitochondria regulate niche renewal via alpha-ketoglutarate metabolism in stem cells. Nat. Metab.7, 1344–1357 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Keppler, A. et al. A general method for the covalent labeling of fusion proteins with small molecules in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol.21, 86–89 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Katajisto, P. et al. Stem cells. Asymmetric apportioning of aged mitochondria between daughter cells is required for stemness. Science348, 340–343 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hogquist, K. A. et al. T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell76, 17–27 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Plambeck, M. et al. Heritable changes in division speed accompany the diversification of single T cell fate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA119, e2116260119 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rambold, A. S., Kostelecky, B., Elia, N. & Lippincott-Schwartz, J. Tubular network formation protects mitochondria from autophagosomal degradation during nutrient starvation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA108, 10190–10195 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Youle, R. J. & van der Bliek, A. M. Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress. Science337, 1062–1065 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Arguello, R. J. et al. SCENITH: a flow cytometry-based method to functionally profile energy metabolism with single-cell resolution. Cell Metab.32, 1063–1075.e7 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 46.Jia, W. et al. Autophagy regulates T lymphocyte proliferation through selective degradation of the cell-cycle inhibitor CDKN1B/p27Kip1. Autophagy11, 2335–2345 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Pichierri, P., Ammazzalorso, F., Bignami, M. & Franchitto, A. The Werner syndrome protein: linking the replication checkpoint response to genome stability. Aging3, 311–318 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Araki, K. et al. mTOR regulates memory CD8 T-cell differentiation. Nature460, 108–112 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pollizzi, K. N. et al. mTORC1 and mTORC2 selectively regulate CD8+ T cell differentiation. J. Clin. Invest.125, 2090–2108 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kakaradov, B. et al. Early transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of CD8+ T cell differentiation revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Immunol.18, 422–432 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sugiura, A. et al. MTHFD2 is a metabolic checkpoint controlling effector and regulatory T cell fate and function. Immunity55, 65–81.e69 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 52.Nikkanen, J. et al. Mitochondrial DNA replication defects disturb cellular dNTP pools and remodel one-carbon metabolism. Cell Metab.23, 635–648 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Neikirk, K. et al. MitoTracker: auseful tool in need of better alternatives. Eur. J. Cell Biol.102, 151371 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Doherty, E. & Perl, A. Measurement of mitochondrial mass by flow cytometry during oxidative stress. React. Oxyg. Species4, 275–283 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.de Almeida, M. J., Luchsinger, L. L., Corrigan, D. J., Williams, L. J. & Snoeck, H. W. Dye-independent methods reveal elevated mitochondrial mass in hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell21, 725–729.e4 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 56.Franco, F., Jaccard, A., Romero, P., Yu, Y. R. & Ho, P. C. Metabolic and epigenetic regulation of T-cell exhaustion. Nat. Metab.2, 1001–1012 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.van der Windt, G. J. et al. Mitochondrial respiratory capacity is a critical regulator of CD8+ T cell memory development. Immunity36, 68–78 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.O’Sullivan, D. et al. Memory CD8+ T cells use cell-intrinsic lipolysis to support the metabolic programming necessary for development. Immunity41, 75–88 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Corrado, M. et al. Deletion of the mitochondria-shaping protein Opa1 during early thymocyte maturation impacts mature memory T cell metabolism. Cell Death Differ.28, 2194–2206 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Girotra, M. et al. Induction of mitochondrial recycling reverts age-associated decline of the hematopoietic and immune systems. Nat. Aging3, 1057–1066 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Endow, S. A., Kull, F. J. & Liu, H. Kinesins at a glance. J. Cell Sci.123, 3420–3424 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ducker, G. S. & Rabinowitz, J. D. One-carbon metabolism in health and disease. Cell Metab.25, 27–42 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ma, E. H. et al. Serine is an essential metabolite for effector T cell expansion. Cell Metab.25, 345–357 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Dohla, J. et al. Metabolic determination of cell fate through selective inheritance of mitochondria. Nat. Cell Biol.24, 148–154 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Loeffler, D. et al. Asymmetric organelle inheritance predicts human blood stem cell fate. Blood139, 2011–2023 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Alpert, A. et al. A clinically meaningful metric of immune age derived from high-dimensional longitudinal monitoring. Nat. Med.25, 487–495 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Jenkins, B. J. et al. Canagliflozin impairs T cell effector function via metabolic suppression in autoimmunity. Cell Metab.35, 1132–1146 e1139 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Cao, J. et al. The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. Nature566, 496–502 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell177, 1888–1902.e21 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 70.Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods17, 261–272 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.van der Walt, S. et al. scikit-image: image processing in Python. PeerJ2, e453 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zhou, F. Y. et al. Surface-guided computing to analyze subcellular morphology and membrane-associated signals in 3D. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2023.04.12.536640 (2023).
- 73.Vincent, A. E. et al. Quantitative 3D mapping of the human skeletal muscle mitochondrial network. Cell Rep.26, 996–1009.e4 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Statistical source data (tabs clearly labelled per figure).
Data Availability Statement
The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD053316. Single cell transcriptomics data have been deposited at GEO (GSE270704). Raw data generated or analysed in this study are available from the corresponding lead author on reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.


















