Skip to main content
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 2026 Jan 17:00333549251403368. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1177/00333549251403368

Integration of Lifestyle Medicine Into Primary Care: A Comprehensive Review

Cashmere Miller 1,2,
PMCID: PMC12812067  PMID: 41546482

Abstract

Lifestyle medicine is an evidence-based approach that uses therapeutic lifestyle interventions as the primary method for preventing, treating, and reversing chronic diseases. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 6 in 10 adults have at least 1 chronic condition and 4 in 10 adults have 2 or more chronic conditions, contributing to substantial morbidity, mortality, and escalating health care costs. Chronic conditions are responsible for 8 of the 10 leading causes of death in the United States, with lifestyle factors playing a critical role in their prevalence. This topical review synthesizes current literature on the integration of lifestyle medicine into primary care, emphasizing its 6 core pillars: optimal nutrition, physical activity, restorative sleep, risky substance avoidance, connectedness, and stress management. This review discusses evidence for the effectiveness of lifestyle medicine in chronic disease prevention and management, outlines barriers to its widespread adoption, and explores implementation strategies. This review also discusses the public health implications of scaling lifestyle medicine within primary care settings, underscoring its potential to reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases and enhance quality of life. Although lifestyle medicine presents a promising strategy to address the growing chronic disease epidemic, achieving its full potential requires policy support, interdisciplinary collaboration, and improved training for health care professionals. By addressing the root causes of chronic diseases, lifestyle medicine offers a pathway toward improved population health and health equity.

Keywords: lifestyle medicine interventions, chronic disease prevention, primary care, health promotion, public health


The United States is currently grappling with an unprecedented burden of chronic disease, with more than half of the population living with at least 1 major chronic condition, such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, obesity, or hypertension.1,2 The prevalence of these diseases has risen steadily during the past decade and shows no indications of slowing down. 1 An estimated 42% of people in the United States have 2 or more chronic conditions, and approximately 12% are affected by 5 or more chronic conditions. 3 Chronic diseases now account for 8 of the 10 leading causes of death, 5 of which are directly linked to preventable lifestyle factors. 4 Heart disease and cancer together caused nearly 40% of all US deaths in 2022.4,5 The societal and economic toll is profound: about 90% of the $4.5 trillion annual health care expenditure is directed toward managing these conditions, and adults with multiple chronic illnesses face health care costs that are 14 times higher than those of their healthier counterparts.3,6

The United States also lags behind peer nations in life expectancy, averaging 78.8 years compared with 82.6 years, with millions of lives shortened or burdened by rising rates of cancer, autoimmune and respiratory diseases, and other chronic conditions, far exceeding those in most other high-income nations.7,8 Furthermore, chronic diseases are not confined to older populations; chronic disease prevalence among young adults aged 18 to 25 years increased from 18.5% to 29.0% from 1999 to 2018, adding approximately 80 000 new cases annually and raising concerns about workforce productivity and societal stability. 9 Modifiable lifestyle factors such as poor nutrition, physical inactivity, tobacco and alcohol use, chronic stress, and social isolation are primary drivers. Studies estimate that more than 80% of heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes, and 40% of cancers, could be prevented through healthier behaviors.5,10,11 However, many people in the United States continue to engage in behaviors that heighten their risk for chronic disease, and the current US health care system is predominantly focused on treating symptoms rather than addressing the underlying causes.2,7,12

In this context, lifestyle medicine emerges as a promising solution. Lifestyle medicine is a growing, evidence-based discipline that seeks to empower individuals to adopt healthier lifestyle choices that encompass nutritious diets, regular physical activity, quality sleep, stress management, avoidance of risky substances, and the cultivation of strong social connections.11,13 Rather than functioning as an alternative to traditional medicine, lifestyle medicine is a foundational approach for effective, sustainable care of chronic diseases and is recognized as a first-line treatment in clinical practice guidelines for various lifestyle-related conditions. 13 Despite the promise of lifestyle medicine, primary care settings often fall short in fully integrating lifestyle medicine principles into routine practice. 14 As this review will explore, overcoming these barriers and integrating lifestyle medicine into primary care has critical public health implications that could shape the future of chronic disease management in the United States.

The Case for Lifestyle Medicine

Evidence demonstrates that lifestyle medicine interventions are effective in preventing, treating, or even reversing many chronic diseases, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), and selected cancers, by addressing their root causes rather than merely managing symptoms.15-30 Adopting healthy lifestyle behaviors can substantially reduce the risk of disease development and progression, lower health care costs, and enhance overall quality of life.10,11 The American College of Lifestyle Medicine (ACLM), founded in 2004, leads efforts to advance evidence-based lifestyle medicine as the foundation of health care, focusing on the prevention and reversal of chronic conditions. At the core of ACLM’s approach are 6 foundational pillars: optimal nutrition, physical activity, restorative sleep, risky substance avoidance, connectedness, and stress management (Table 1).13,31

Table 1.

The 6 pillars of lifestyle medicine, key behaviors, and associated health outcomes

The 6 pillars of lifestyle medicine Key behaviors Associated health outcomes
Optimal nutrition Eating predominantly whole-food, plant-based diet, reducing processed foods, balanced diet Reduced risk of chronic diseases, improved energy and digestion
Physical activity Regular aerobic and strength exercises, staying active daily Heart health, weight control, mental well-being, improved muscle strength, function, and glycemic control
Restorative sleep Consistent sleep schedule, good sleep hygiene, adequate sleep duration Better mood, immune function, metabolic health
Risky substance avoidance Limiting alcohol intake, avoiding tobacco and recreational drugs Decreased risk of addiction, cancers, liver disease
Connectedness Building relationships, community engagement, social support, spirituality, and connection to nature Improved mental health, reduced depression and loneliness
Stress management Mindfulness, relaxation techniques, emotional regulation Lower blood pressure, reduced anxiety, resilience

Optimal Nutrition

A predominantly whole-food, plant-based diet rich in vegetables, fruit, whole grains, legumes, nuts, and seeds, with minimal processed foods and animal products, is foundational to lifestyle medicine. Numerous studies have established that plant-based and Mediterranean-style diets significantly reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases, especially CVD.15,16,18-20,24 A large multicenter study in Spain demonstrated that a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil or nuts led to a significant reduction in major cardiovascular events compared with a control diet during a nearly 5-year period. 15 Additionally, landmark studies such as the Lifestyle Heart Trial and Pritikin interventions, which emphasize low-fat, plant-based nutrition along with other lifestyle pillars, have shown regression of coronary atherosclerosis and improvements in cardiometabolic outcomes, including reductions in body weight, hemoglobin A1c, cholesterol, and blood pressure.16,17 Plant-based diets are also associated with lower rates of type 2 diabetes and improved outcomes for those already diagnosed, as supported by both clinical trials and observational research. A review of observational and clinical studies demonstrated that adopting a plant-based diet rich in legumes, whole grains, fruit, vegetables, nuts, and seeds can prevent and treat type 2 diabetes by improving insulin sensitivity, reducing risk factors such as obesity and CVD, and lowering rates of complications. 18 Furthermore, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, including 1 review that found that plant-based diets were associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and mortality, and another that reported a significant protective effect of vegetarian diets against ischemic heart disease and total cancer incidence, consistently demonstrate the benefits of plant-based eating in reducing chronic disease risk.19,20

Physical Activity

Regular moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, tailored to individual capacity and preferences, is a core pillar of lifestyle medicine, with a recommended goal of 150 to 300 minutes per week of moderate-intensity aerobic activity, 75 to 150 minutes per week of vigorous-intensity aerobic activity, or an equivalent combination of both. 32 Recent evidence underscores the vital role of regular physical activity in reducing mortality and improving health outcomes across diverse populations. A large 30-year prospective cohort study of US adults found that engaging in approximately 150 to 300 minutes per week of long-term leisure-time vigorous-intensity physical activity or 300 to 600 minutes per week of moderate-intensity physical activity, or an equivalent combination, was associated with a 35% to 42% reduction in all-cause mortality, with the greatest benefits observed when individuals combined medium or high levels of both activity types. 21 Similarly, a 2024 multinational cohort study confirmed that physical activity at any age is linked to lower all-cause mortality, with risk reductions observed across all age groups. 23 Several randomized controlled studies have also demonstrated that various forms of physical activity and activity-related counseling are effective in reducing depressive symptoms and enhance mood across diverse populations, from adolescents to young adults and people with major depression.33-35

Even brief bouts of moderate-to-vigorous–intensity physical activity throughout the day result in significant mortality benefits, as shown in a study published in 2023. 25 Physical activity also protects against cancer progression and mortality. A 2025 study reported that individuals with moderate- to high-intensity physical activity prior to a cancer diagnosis had significantly lower risks of disease progression and death compared with inactive individuals. 22 Furthermore, regular moderate exercise improves sleep quality and should be prioritized. 36 Collectively, these findings reinforce current guidelines recommending at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity or 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity activity per week for optimal health. 32

Restorative Sleep

Restorative sleep, defined as 7 to 9 hours of quality sleep per night, is increasingly recognized as vital for both physical and mental health.37,38 Attention to sleep hygiene and management of sleep disorders are key components of this pillar. Recent studies show that interventions intended to improve restorative sleep, whether by extending sleep duration, enhancing sleep quality, or promoting healthy sleep habits, lead to measurable benefits in weight management and energy balance, mental health and mood, daytime alertness and functioning, and overall sleep quality and efficiency.26,27 A randomized controlled trial demonstrated that a 10-week intervention incorporating sleep hygiene, nutrition, exercise, and positive psychology significantly improved psychological flourishing and overall well-being. 39 The trial provides evidence that sleep is a vital factor in overall health, emphasizing that interventions targeting sleep habits can have a meaningful effect on psychological and physical health outcomes. 39 Furthermore, a cohort study identified nonrestorative sleep as a significant risk factor for chronic pain in young adults, independent of physical inactivity and stress. 40 This study aligns with previous research demonstrating that restorative sleep is independently associated with the resolution of chronic widespread pain and return to musculoskeletal health, even after adjusting for psychosocial factors. 40

Risky Substance Avoidance

Avoiding tobacco, illicit drugs, and excessive alcohol is another pillar of lifestyle medicine. Drug addiction, tobacco use, and excessive alcohol use can cause widespread harm, including physical health problems such as cancer and organ damage, mental health disorders, increased risk of infectious diseases, harm to unborn children, and dangers to others through impaired judgment, risky behaviors, and accidents.5,41,42 Abstinence or moderation in these behaviors is consistently linked to improved well-being and a reduced risk of chronic disease.28,43 An observational study that assessed how refraining from alcohol for a short time affects health risks related to metabolism and cancer found that refraining from alcohol consumption for 1 month among people who drank heavily or moderately led to improvements in insulin sensitivity, body weight, blood pressure, and factors linked to cancer growth. 28 The results also suggest that drinking alcohol may increase the risk of developing cancer and metabolic problems such as type 2 diabetes and fatty liver disease. 28 Comprehensive lifestyle interventions that include substance avoidance such as tobacco use and excessive alcohol use have been shown to substantially improve cardiometabolic health and reduce the risk of chronic diseases. 29 These interventions are particularly effective when combined with other lifestyle pillars, amplifying their protective effects. 29

Connectedness

Strong social connections, such as supportive relationships and community engagement, spirituality, and connection to nature, protect against both physical and mental illness.31,44-48 Social support also buffers the negative health effects of chronic stress and adversity, reducing measured stress on the body and promoting resilience.13,45,49,50 A meta-analysis of 148 studies found that strong social relationships significantly reduce mortality risk across various demographic characteristics and causes of death, with protective effects comparable to or exceeding the magnitude of the harmful effects of well-established risk factors such as smoking. 51 Another study found that social engagement and supportive relationships are linked to better sleep quality and overall health in healthy populations. 52 The importance of social connection is also highlighted in a study that found that social engagement was one of the most frequently used lifestyle medicine strategies to enhance well-being. 3 Strong social networks, spirituality, and connection to nature are associated with lower morbidity and mortality as well as improved mental health and resilience.31,44-48

Stress Management

Stress management is integral to preventing and reversing chronic disease. Evidence-based techniques such as mindfulness, cognitive–behavioral strategies, and relaxation practices are recommended.30,53,54 The landmark Lifestyle Heart Trial demonstrated that intensive lifestyle changes, including stress management techniques such as mindfulness and relaxation, resulted in regression of coronary artery disease and reduced cardiac events during a 5-year period. 16 Another study found that among patients with stable ischemic heart disease, both aerobic exercise and stress management training effectively reduced emotional distress and depression while improving cardiovascular risk markers such as endothelial function, autonomic control, and myocardial ischemia indicators compared with usual care. 55 A recent cohort study further highlighted that chronic stress, along with poor sleep and physical inactivity, increased the risk of chronic pain among young adults, emphasizing the interconnectedness of these lifestyle factors. 40 Social relationships also play a critical role in buffering the physiological effects of stress, thereby reducing disease risk and supporting overall well-being. 50 Thus, effective stress management is not only vital for emotional well-being but also yields measurable improvements in health outcomes.

Implementation Strategies in Primary Care

Implementing lifestyle medicine effectively within primary care involves a multifaceted approach that centers on personalized, patient-driven care. First, clinicians should use evidence-based behavior-change techniques that respect each patient’s unique circumstances and readiness to change. For example, motivational interviewing is a conversational style that helps patients explore and resolve ambivalence, and it can be a powerful tool to motivate lifestyle changes without coercion. Setting small, achievable goals, such as adding an extra serving of vegetables daily, helps build confidence and creates momentum for larger changes. 13 Supporting patients’ self-monitoring, such as using journals, mobile apps, or wearable devices, empowers them to track progress and stay engaged. Also, understanding where a patient is in their readiness to adopt new behaviors allows clinicians to tailor their approach, whether that means providing encouragement, education, or support for overcoming barriers.56,57

Given that behavior change often requires more than just advice, a team-based, multidisciplinary approach can enhance success. 58 For example, dietitians can provide detailed nutritional guidance, health coaches can support ongoing motivation, behavioral health specialists can address emotional or psychological barriers, and community health workers can connect patients to local resources such as parks or farmers’ markets that facilitate healthy choices. Another key component is medication management. As lifestyle changes take effect, clinicians can review and deprescribe unnecessary medications to minimize side effects and costs, aligning treatment plans with lifestyle goals. This approach not only reduces the number of medications prescribed but also reinforces the importance of lifestyle in managing health.59,60

To make these strategies practical, primary care clinics can incorporate brief screening tools during routine visits to identify areas for intervention. Assessment tools, including the Lifestyle Medicine Short Assessment Form, 61 which covers all domains of lifestyle medicine, can be used independently or optionally alongside other validated assessment tools to systematically assess diet, physical activity, sleep, and loneliness, thereby guiding personalized plans (Table 2).61-70 The assessment frequencies listed are suggested intervals to guide primary care teams in incorporating these assessment tools into routine practice; actual frequency should be tailored to patient needs and clinic workflows.

Table 2.

Tools for assessing lifestyle behaviors in primary care, by the 6 pillars of lifestyle medicine

6 Pillars of lifestyle medicine Assessment tool Assessment frequency
Optimal nutrition ACLM Diet Screener 62 Every visit
Lifestyle Medicine Short Assessment Form 61 Every visit
Physical activity Physical Activity Vital Sign (PAVS)63,64 Every visit
Lifestyle Medicine Short Assessment Form 61 Every visit
Restorative sleep Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index 65 Annually
Lifestyle Medicine Short Assessment Form 61 Every visit
Risky substance avoidance AUDIT, DAST66,67 Every visit
Lifestyle Medicine Short Assessment Form 61 Every visit
Connectedness UCLA Loneliness Scale68,69 Annually
Lifestyle Medicine Short Assessment Form 61 Every visit
Stress management Perceived Stress Scale 70 Every visit
Lifestyle Medicine Short Assessment Form 61 Every visit

Abbreviations: ACLM, American College of Lifestyle Medicine; AUDIT, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; DAST, Drug Abuse Screening Test; UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles.

Finally, creating an environment that encourages ongoing support through follow-up appointments, group visits, or digital communication can help sustain behavior change over time. Embedding these practices into routine primary care, supported by institutional policies and reimbursement models that value preventive care, is essential for scalability.

Barriers and Opportunities to Implementation

Despite strong evidence supporting lifestyle medicine, its adoption in primary care faces several barriers. Time constraints and competing demands during visits are primary issues. Health care providers recognize the importance of lifestyle medicine, but limited appointment durations hinder comprehensive behavioral counseling or community interventions. 14 One study estimated that delivering all recommended preventive services requires 7.4 hours daily per physician, which is unfeasible given standard workloads, leading clinicians to prioritize urgent issues over prevention. 71 A systematic review confirmed that insufficient time and workload are major obstacles to primary prevention of cardiometabolic diseases, despite positive clinician attitudes and organizational support. 72 Additionally, discussions about body weight are often deprioritized due to limited time, interactional difficulties, stigma, and lack of confidence, thereby reducing their frequency. 73

Another barrier is inadequate education and skills in lifestyle medicine among clinicians. Many clinicians report feeling insufficiently trained in lifestyle medicine principles and behavior-change techniques, resulting in low confidence. 14 One study revealed that US medical students receive only about 19.6 hours of nutrition instruction, with just 27% meeting the recommended 25 hours, often in elective courses, which can leave graduates underprepared for counseling their patients about appropriate nutrition and dietary habits. 74 Furthermore, more than 60% of internal medicine residents report minimal or no formal training in nutrition counseling for conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, and obesity. 75 Physical activity training is also limited, averaging 8 hours during a 4-year period, deemed inadequate by physicians, medical students, and residency program directors. 76 The health care system’s focus on medications and acute care exacerbates this training gap, leaving many health care providers unprepared to incorporate lifestyle medicine into practice.

A lack of billing and reimbursement codes further impedes the integration of lifestyle medicine. Many workflows favor procedures and medications over preventive counseling; without compensation, clinicians prioritize reimbursable activities.77-79 Surveys show that 55% of lifestyle medicine practitioners cannot bill for their services, and only 18% can bill for all aspects of their services, often relying on out-of-pocket payments, grants, or alternative models. 77

Patient-level barriers, including food insecurity, unsafe environments, limited access to healthy foods, and low health literacy, also hinder lifestyle changes.80,81 While physicians are increasingly aware of how the social determinants of health (SDOH), such as access to nutritious food and job opportunities, shape patient health, their awareness of broader social factors such as discrimination and access to recreation is limited. 80 Additionally, physicians practicing in areas with more exposure to SDOH tend to perceive their influence on health more strongly, and those who value lifestyle medicine competencies are more likely to acknowledge the effects of SDOH than physicians who practice in areas with less exposure to SDOH. 80 Furthermore, data collection is manual, inconsistent, and poorly integrated into electronic health records, thereby limiting clinicians’ ability to systematically address these factors. 81

Opportunities to overcome these barriers are emerging. Integrating lifestyle medicine into medical education and continued professional development can improve clinician knowledge, confidence, and practice.82-84 A recent study demonstrated that a 5.5-hour online continuing medical education course significantly enhanced clinician knowledge and confidence, while also increasing the frequency and reach of lifestyle medicine in patient care. 82 Additionally, transitioning to value-based care models and establishing standardized reimbursement for preventive counseling can incentivize the adoption of lifestyle medicine.77-79 Interdisciplinary team-based care that includes dietitians, health coaches, behavioral health specialists, and community health workers can significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce clinician workload. 58 Most studies that have examined the effectiveness of collaborative, team-based models in health care settings show that these collaborative models enhance health care efficiency and support sustainable, effective chronic disease management through integrated, team-oriented approaches. 58 Collaborating with community-based organizations can address SDOH such as food security and safe recreation spaces. Furthermore, standardizing data collection and embedding SDOH information into clinical workflows are essential to leverage the full potential of lifestyle medicine and promote health equity. 81 While barriers exist, strategic reforms, policy support, and collaboration can facilitate more effective integration of lifestyle medicine into primary care and public health, ultimately promoting healthier communities.

Public Health Implications

Integrating lifestyle medicine into primary care and public health offers transformative opportunities to prevent and manage chronic diseases at the population level. Leading health authorities, including former US surgeons general, emphasize that interventions targeting nutrition, physical activity, stress management, social connection, and behavioral risks can substantially reduce disparities in conditions such as CVD, diabetes, and Alzheimer disease, especially among medically underserved populations. 85 Embedding lifestyle medicine principles shifts health care from reactive, symptom-focused treatment to proactive prevention, improving outcomes, lowering costs, and promoting health equity. 85

Addressing SDOH, such as systemic racism, food insecurity, inadequate housing, and limited access to recreational spaces, is essential for reducing disparities in health outcomes and life expectancy. Systemic social factors, including poverty and neighborhood conditions, can heavily influence health outcomes, with life expectancy gaps of up to 15 years between lower and higher socioeconomic groups. 86 These factors trigger physiological effects such as chronic inflammation and oxidative stress, disproportionately affecting African American populations and other medically underserved groups. 87 Community-based lifestyle medicine approaches that incorporate cultural competence and multilevel strategies have proven effective in reducing disparities and improving outcomes in low-resource settings. 88 Incorporating plant-based nutrition and behavioral interventions can also target chronic diseases that are prevalent among African American populations, thereby advancing health equity. 89

To unlock the full public health potential of lifestyle medicine, widespread education campaigns are needed to raise awareness among health care professionals and the public about lifestyle factors in disease prevention. Embedding lifestyle medicine into health care provider training, particularly in primary care, ensures clinicians can effectively promote healthy behaviors.83,90,91 Policy actions are equally vital: funding preventive programs, incentivizing clinics through value-based reimbursement, and creating environments that support healthy choices such as expanding parks, promoting active transportation (eg, walking, biking), and supporting healthy food policies.79,86,89 Collaboration among health care systems, community-based organizations, public health agencies, educators, policymakers, and businesses is crucial. Such partnerships can increase access to healthy foods, improve housing stability, and develop transportation initiatives for vulnerable communities, such as those facing systemic barriers related to poverty, cultural and language barriers, or living in medically underserved neighborhoods. 86 These collective efforts aim to create resilient communities where healthy choices are accessible, affordable, and culturally relevant.

Supporting healthy behaviors community-wide can reduce chronic disease incidence and severity, leading to better health outcomes and substantial health care cost savings. Ultimately, integrating lifestyle medicine into public health frameworks holds promise for enhancing overall well-being and fostering healthy, resilient communities.

Footnotes

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD: Cashmere Miller, DNP, APRN, FNP-C, DipACLM Inline graphic https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6823-2754

References

  • 1. Watson KB, Wiltz JL, Nhim K, Kaufmann RB, Thomas CW, Greenlund KJ. Trends in multiple chronic conditions among US adults, by life stage, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013-2023. Prev Chronic Dis. 2025;22:240539. doi: 10.5888/pcd22.240539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About chronic diseases. October 4, 2024. Accessed April 4, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/chronic-disease/about
  • 3. Buttorff C, Ruder T, Bauman M. Multiple Chronic Conditions in the United States. Rand Corp; 2017. Accessed July 4, 2025. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/tools/TL200/TL221/RAND_TL221.pdf#page=21 [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Leading causes of death. Last reviewed June 26, 2025. Accessed April 4, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm
  • 5. Islami F, Marlow EC, Thomson B, et al. Proportion and number of cancer cases and deaths attributable to potentially modifiable risk factors in the United States, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(5):405-432. doi: 10.3322/caac.21858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fast facts: health and economic costs of chronic conditions. Published August 8, 2025. Accessed April 4, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/chronic-disease/data-research/facts-stats/index.html
  • 7. The White House. Establishing the President’s Make America Healthy Again Commission. Published February 13, 2025. Accessed May 1, 2025. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/establishing-the-presidents-make-america-healthy-again-commission
  • 8. Murphy SL, Kochanek KD, Xu J, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2023. NCHS Data Brief. 2024;521:1-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Wisk LE, Sharma N. Prevalence and trends in pediatric-onset chronic conditions in the United States, 1999-2018. Acad Pediatr. 2025;25(4):102810. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2025.102810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Rippe JM. Lifestyle strategies for risk factor reduction, prevention, and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2020;13(2):204-212. doi: 10.1177/1559827618812395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hacker K. The burden of chronic disease. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2024;8(1):112-119. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.08.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Pizzorno J, Stephenson S. Health care system and addressing the determinants of health. Integr Med (Encinatas). 2017;16(1):16-18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Grega ML, Shalz JT, Rosenfeld RM, et al. American College of Lifestyle Medicine expert consensus statement: lifestyle medicine for optimal outcomes in primary care. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2023;18(2):269-293. doi: 10.1177/15598276231202970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bharati R, Kovach KA, Bonnet JP, et al. Incorporating lifestyle medicine into primary care practice: perceptions and practices of family physicians. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2022;17(5):704-716. doi: 10.1177/15598276211072506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Stewart RAH. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil or nuts. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(14):1388. doi: 10.1056/nejmc1809971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ornish D, Brown SE, Billings JH, et al. Can lifestyle changes reverse coronary heart disease? The Lifestyle Heart Trial. Lancet. 1990;336(8708):129-133. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91656-u [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Rasmussen RA, Sisson SB, Baldwin JD, et al. Comparison of traditional and intensive cardiac rehabilitation on dietary behavior and clinical risk factor outcomes. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2025;45(2):95-102. doi: 10.1097/hcr.0000000000000903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. McMacken M, Shah S. A plant-based diet for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2017;14(5):342-354. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.05.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wang Y, Liu B, Han H, et al. Associations between plant-based dietary patterns and risks of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and mortality—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr J. 2023;22(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12937-023-00877-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Dinu M, Abbate R, Gensini GF, Casini A, Sofi F. Vegetarian, vegan diets and multiple health outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016;57(17):3640-3649. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1138447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lee DH, Rezende LFM, Joh HK, et al. Long-term leisure-time physical activity intensity and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a prospective cohort of US adults. Circulation. 2022;146(7):523-534. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.121.058162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Mabena N, Rugbeer N, Lehmann S, et al. Association between recorded physical activity and cancer progression or mortality in individuals diagnosed with cancer in South Africa. Br J Sports Med. 2025;59(10):715-721. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Martinez-Gomez D, Luo M, Huang Y, et al. Physical activity and all-cause mortality by age in 4 multinational megacohorts. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(11):e2446802. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ornish D, Sherwitz LW, Billings JH, et al. Intensive lifestyle changes for reversal of coronary heart disease. JAMA. 1998;280(23):2001-2007. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.23.2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Ahmadi MN, Hamer M, Gill JMR, et al. Brief bouts of device-measured intermittent lifestyle physical activity and its association with major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in people who do not exercise: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2023;8(10):e800-e810. doi: 10.1016/s2468-2667(23)00183-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Tasali E, Wroblewski K, Kahn E, Kilkus J, Schoeller DA. Effect of sleep extension on objectively assessed energy intake among adults with overweight in real-life settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2022;182(4):365-374. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.8098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Cappuccio FP, D’Elia L, Strazzullo P, Miller MA. Sleep duration and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Sleep. 2010;33(5):585-592. doi:org/10.1093/sleep/33.5.585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Mehta G, Macdonald S, Cronberg A, et al. Short-term abstinence from alcohol and changes in cardiovascular risk factors, liver function tests and cancer-related growth factors: a prospective observational study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(5):e020673. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing chronic diseases: what you can do now. Published May 15, 2024. Accessed April 10, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/chronic-disease/prevention/index.html
  • 30. Schneider RH, Staggers F, Alexander CN, et al. A randomized controlled trial of stress reduction for hypertension in older African Americans. Hypertension. 1995;26(5):820-827. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.26.5.820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wong W. Pillar updates: stress management and social connection. American College of Lifestyle Medicine; May 15, 2025. Accessed July 2, 2025. https://lifestylemedicine.org/articles/pillar-updates-stress-management-and-social-connection [Google Scholar]
  • 32. US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. 2nd ed. 2018. Accessed April 7, 2025. https://odphp.health.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/Physical_Activity_Guidelines_2nd_edition.pdf
  • 33. Kreppke JN, Cody R, Beck J, et al. Long-term outcomes of physical activity counseling in in-patients with major depressive disorder: results from the PACINPAT randomized controlled trial. Transl Psychiatry. 2024;14(1):160. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-02885-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Philippot A, Dubois V, Lambrechts K, et al. Impact of physical exercise on depression and anxiety in adolescent inpatients: a randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 2022;301(1):145-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. O’Sullivan D, Gordon BR, Lyons M, Meyer JD, Herring MP. Effects of resistance exercise training on depressive symptoms among young adults: a randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry Res. 2023;326:115322. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Korkutata A, Korkutata M, Lazarus M. The impact of exercise on sleep and sleep disorders. NPJ Biological Timing Sleep. 2025;2(1):1-10. doi: 10.1038/s44323-024-00018-w [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Robbins R, Quan SF, Buysse D, et al. A nationally representative survey assessing restorative sleep in US adults. Front Sleep. 2022;1. doi: 10.3389/frsle.2022.935228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Hirshkowitz M, Whiton K, Albert SM, et al. National Sleep Foundation’s sleep time duration recommendations: methodology and results summary. Sleep Health. 2015;1(1):40-43. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2014.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Przybylko G, Morton D, Kent L, et al. The effectiveness of an online interdisciplinary intervention for mental health promotion: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychol. 2021;9(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00577-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Lindell M, Grimby-Ekman A. Stress, non-restorative sleep, and physical inactivity as risk factors for chronic pain in young adults: a cohort study. PLoS One. 2022;17(1):e0262601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Drugs, Brains, and Behavior: The Science of Addiction: Addiction and Health. Published July 2020. Accessed July 2, 2025. https://nida.nih.gov/publications/drugs-brains-behavior-science-addiction/addiction-health
  • 42. Murthy VH. Alcohol and Cancer Risk: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory. Office of the Surgeon General; 2025. Accessed April 10, 2025. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/oash-alcohol-cancer-risk.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Eddie D, Bergman BG, Hoffman LA, Kelly JF. Abstinence versus moderation recovery pathways following resolution of a substance use problem: prevalence, predictors, and relationship to psychosocial well-being in a U.S. national sample. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022;46(2):312-325. doi: 10.1111/acer.14765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Faries MD, Corrêa Fernandes C, Phillips E, West T, Stout R. Religion and spirituality in lifestyle medicine. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024;19(2):324-333. doi: 10.1177/15598276241276770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Holt-Lunstad J. Social connection as a public health issue: the evidence and a systemic framework for prioritizing the “social” in social determinants of health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2022;43:193-213. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052020-110732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Holt-Lunstad J. Social connection as a critical factor for mental and physical health: evidence, trends, challenges, and future implications. World Psychiatry. 2024;23(3):312-332. doi: 10.1002/wps.21224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Bożek A, Nowak PF, Blukacz M. The relationship between spirituality, health-related behavior, and psychological well-being. Front Psychol. 2020;11(1):1-13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Jimenez M, DeVille N, Elliott E, et al. Associations between nature exposure and health: a review of the evidence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9). doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Social connection. Published May 15, 2024. Accessed July 2, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/social-connectedness/about/index.html
  • 50. Ozbay F, Johnson DC, Dimoulas E, Morgan CA, Charney D, Southwick S. Social support and resilience to stress: from neurobiology to clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007;4(5):35-40. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 2010;7(7):e1000316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Gordon AM, Carrillo B, Barnes CM. Sleep and social relationships in healthy populations: a systematic review. Sleep Med Rev. 2021;57:101428. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Davis MC, Zautra AJ, Wolf LD, Tennen H, Yeung EW. Mindfulness and cognitive–behavioral interventions for chronic pain: differential effects on daily pain reactivity and stress reactivity. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015;83(1):24-35. doi: 10.1037/a0038200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Victorson D, Kentor M, Maletich C, et al. Mindfulness meditation to promote wellness and manage chronic disease. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2014;9(3):185-211. doi: 10.1177/1559827614537789 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Blumenthal JA, Sherwood A, Babyak MA, et al. Effects of exercise and stress management training on markers of cardiovascular risk in patients with ischemic heart disease. JAMA. 2005;293(13):1626-1634. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.13.1626 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Asmat K, Dhamani K, Gul R, Froelicher ES. The effectiveness of patient-centered care vs. usual care in type 2 diabetes self-management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2022;10:994766. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.994766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Bashir K, Johnson-Gonzalez CB, Dhiman A, Crawford TN, Lee JS. Lifestyle medicine implementation in family medicine clinic. Am J Lifestyle Med. Published online October 4, 2024. doi: 10.1177/15598276241289316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Kongkar R, Ruksakulpiwat S, Phianhasin L, et al. The impact of interdisciplinary team-based care on the care and outcomes of chronically ill patients: a systematic review. J Multidisc Healthc. 2025;18:445-457. doi: 10.2147/jmdh.s497846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Lloyd-Jones DM, Morris PB, Ballantyne CM, et al. 2017 Focused update of the 2016 ACC Expert Consensus decision pathway on the role of non-statin therapies for LDL-cholesterol lowering in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expect Consensus Decision Pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(14):1785-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, et al. Improving care and promoting health in populations: standards of care in diabetes—2023. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(Suppl 1):S10-S18. doi: 10.2337/dc23-s001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. American College of Lifestyle Medicine. ACLM Diet Screener. Lifestyle Medicine Short Assessment Form. American College of Lifestyle Medicine; 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 62. American College of Lifestyle Medicine. ACLM Diet Screener. American College of Lifestyle Medicine; 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Lin CY, Gentile NL, Bale L, et al. Implementation of a physical activity vital sign in primary care: associations between physical activity, demographic characteristics, and chronic disease burden. Prev Chronic Dis. 2022;19:E33. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.210457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. American College of Sports Medicine. Physical activity vital sign. 2021. Accessed April 19, 2025. https://www.exerciseismedicine.org/assets/page_documents/EIM%20Physical%20Activity%20Vital%20Sign.pdf
  • 65. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. National Library of Medicine: NIH Common Data Elements (CDE) Repository. Form: Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10). Published March 24, 2014. Accessed April 19, 2025 https://cde.nlm.nih.gov/formView?tinyId=QJPG1TWwl
  • 67. Bohn MJ, Babor TF, Kranzler HR. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): validation of a screening instrument for use in medical settings. J Stud Alcohol. 1995;56(4):423-432. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1995.56.423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Russell DW. UCLA Loneliness Scale (version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 1996;66(1):20-40. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Russell D, Peplau LA, Ferguson ML. Developing a measure of loneliness. J Pers Assess. 1978;42(3):290-294. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Koğar EY, Koğar H. A systematic review and meta-analytic confirmatory factor analysis of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10 and PSS-14). Stress Health. 2023;40(1):e3285. doi: 10.1002/smi.3285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Yarnall KSH, Pollak KI, Østbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(4):635-641. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Wändell PE, de Waard AKM, Holzmann MJ, et al. Barriers and facilitators among health professionals in primary care to prevention of cardiometabolic diseases: a systematic review. Fam Pract. 2018;35(4):383-398. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Warr W, Aveyard P, Albury C, et al. A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies exploring GPs’ and nurses’ perspectives on discussing weight with patients with overweight and obesity in primary care. Obes Rev. 2020;22(4):E1315. doi: 10.1111/obr.13151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Adams KM, Kohlmeier M, Zeisel SH. Nutrition education in U.S. medical schools: latest update of a national survey. Acad Med. 2010;85(9):1537-1542. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181eab71b [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Khandelwal S, Zemore SE, Hemmerling A. Nutrition education in internal medicine residency programs and predictors of residents’ dietary counseling practices. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2018;5:2382120518763360. doi: 10.1177/2382120518763360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Stoutenberg M, Stasi S, Stamatakis E, et al. Physical activity training in US medical schools: preparing future physicians to engage in primary prevention. Phys Sportsmed. 2015;43(4):388-394. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2015.1084868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Freeman KJ, Grega ML, Friedman SM, et al. Lifestyle medicine reimbursement: a proposal for policy priorities informed by a cross-sectional survey of lifestyle medicine practitioners. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(21):11632. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Jensen LL, Drozek DS, Grega ML, Gobble J. Lifestyle medicine: successful reimbursement methods and practice models. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2018;13(2):246-252. doi: 10.1177/1559827618817294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Gobble J, Donohue D, Grega M. Reimbursement as a catalyst for advancing lifestyle medicine practices. J Fam Pract. 2022;71(Suppl 1 Lifestyle):eS105-eS109. doi: 10.12788/jfp.0255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Bharati R, Kovach KA, Sayess P, Polk E. Impact of physicians’ perception of social determinants of health (SDoH) on the practice of lifestyle medicine. Findings from a family physicians survey. Am J Lifestyle Med. Published online November 15, 2024. doi: 10.1177/15598276241277460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. DeVoe JE, Bazemore AW, Cottrell EK, et al. Perspectives in primary care: a conceptual framework and path for integrating social determinants of health into primary care practice. Ann Fam Med. 2016;14(2):104-108. doi: 10.1370/afm.1903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Ames ML, Staffier KL, Kees A, et al. Online lifestyle medicine continuing medical education (CME) course completion predicts increases in clinician knowledge, confidence, and practice of lifestyle medicine. Am J Lifestyle Med. Published online November 5, 2024. doi: 10.1177/15598276241279523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Rea B, Worthman S, Shetty P, Alexander M, Trilk JL. Medical education transformation: lifestyle medicine in undergraduate and graduate medical education, fellowship, and continuing medical education. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021;15(5):514-525. doi: 10.1177/15598276211006629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. American College of Lifestyle Medicine. Continuing education courses. 2025. Accessed April 18, 2025. https://lifestylemedicine.org/education-courses
  • 85. Carmona R, Shurney D. Future directions for health equity and lifestyle medicine: insights from former US surgeons general. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2022;16(5):594-598. doi: 10.1177/15598276221087681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Daniel H, Bornstein SS, Kane GC, et al. Addressing social determinants to improve patient care and promote health equity: an American College of Physicians position paper. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(8):577-578. doi: 10.7326/m17-2441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Davis MG, Shurney D, Stone T, Bowman D. HEALing our nation—health equity achieved through lifestyle medicine capturing highlights from the “HEALing Our Nation” session at LM2023 and outlining the important work of the HEAL initiative. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2023;17(5):694-703. doi: 10.1177/15598276231178742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Krishnaswami J, Sardana J, Daxini A. Community-engaged lifestyle medicine as a framework for health equity: principles for lifestyle medicine in low-resource settings. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2019;13(5):443-450. doi: 10.1177/1559827619838469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Rooke J. Advancing health equity with lifestyle medicine. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2018;12(6):472-475. doi: 10.1177/1559827618780680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Trilk J, Nelson L, Briggs A, Muscato D. Including lifestyle medicine in medical education: rationale for American College of Preventive Medicine/American Medical Association Resolution 959. Am J Prev Med. 2019;56(5):e169-e175. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.10.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Rea B, Holmes S, Bernstein M, et al. Cultivating the future: the intersection of education and lifestyle medicine. Am J Lifestyle Med. Published online March 24, 2025. doi: 10.1177/15598276251327925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES