Skip to main content
. 2001 May;94(5):226–231. doi: 10.1177/014107680109400507

Table 1.

Number of low-Apgar cases and CESDI classification

Oct 1994
Oct-Nov 1995
Dec 1995-Sept 1996
Aug-Dec 1997
Jan-July 1998
Aug 1998-Jan 1999
Baseline Audit 1 Audit 2 Audit 3 Audit 4 Audit 5
No. of deliveries 451 852 4220 1981 2467 2494
Low Apgar scores at 1 min 19 (4.2%) 29 (3%) 189 (4.5%) 101 (5%) 69 (3%) 80 (3%)
Low Apgar scores at 5 min 9 (1.9%) 11 (1.29%) 81 (2%) 43 (2%) 35 (1%) 46 (2%)
No. of cases 19 (4%) 31 (4%) 204 (5%) 108 (5.5%) 82 (3%) 96 (4%)
37-42 wk gestation 17 (89.5%) 20 (64.5%) 131 (64%) 71 (66%) 47 (57%) 61 (63.5%)
<37 wk gestation 2 (10.5%) 11 (35%) 73 (36%) 37 (34%) 35 (43%) 35 (36.5%)
Grade III 10 (53%) 4 (13%) 11 (5.5%) 10 (9%) 7 (8.5%) 5 (5.25%)
Grade II 4 (21%) 3 (10%) 43 (21%) 19 (18%) 19 (23%) 4 (4%)
Grade I 1 (4%) 4 (13%) 39 (19%) 29 (27%) 11 (13.5%) 9 (9.5%)
Grade 0 4 (21%) 20 (64%) 111 (54.5%) 50 (46%) 45 (55%) 78 (81.25%)
Cord pH measured 10 (53%) 17 (55%) 119 (58%) 65 (60%) 57 (69.5%) 70 (73%)
pH < 7.20 2 (20%) 7 (41%) 43 (36%) 22 (34%) 14 (25%) 25 (26%)
Term babies with low Apgar scores admitted to neonatal unit (% total deliveries) 8 (1.77%) 6 (0.7%) 30 (0.7%) 23 (1.17%) 12 (0.48%) 15 (0.6%)
CESDI=Confidential Enquiries into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy.