Skip to main content
Microbial Ecology logoLink to Microbial Ecology
. 2025 Dec 23;89:34. doi: 10.1007/s00248-025-02683-1

The Putative Involvement of Bacterial Symbionts in Cantharidin Biogenesis: An Explorative Study in Meloidae Insects

Arianna Basile 1,✉,#, Lucrezia Spagoni 2,#, Daniela Visaggio 1, Filippo Pasquale Riggio 1, Marco Alberto Bologna 1,3, Emiliano Mancini 3,4, Paolo Visca 1,3,5, Alessandra Riccieri 1,3,✉
PMCID: PMC12816098  PMID: 41432792

Abstract

Insect-microbes holobionts integrate host and microbial functions, with symbionts supporting nutrition, immunity, and defence, while producing metabolites, including beetle-derived compounds with therapeutic potential. Cantharidin is a toxic terpene produced by blister beetles (Coleoptera: Meloidae), endowed with defensive and pharmacological properties. Male insects produce and contain cantharidin in large quantities and transfer it to females upon mating. This study is aimed to gain information about the involvement of insect-associated bacteria in cantharidin biogenesis. To support the possibility that bacteria participate in cantharidin biogenesis, cantharidin antibacterial activity was assessed against six reference strains of representative species of Bacillota and Pseudomonadota from publicly available culture collections. All bacterial strains tolerated concentrations up to 600 µg/ml cantharidin in a standard antibacterial susceptibility test. To identify candidate bacterial lineages, 16S rRNA metataxonomic profiling of the V5–V6 region was performed in males and females from different Meloidae subfamilies and tribes. Analysis of the insect-associated microbiomes of the five cantharidin-producing species (Lydus trimaculatus, Meloe proscarabaeus, Mylabris variabilis, Hycleus polymorphus, Zonitis flava) revealed communities dominated by Pseudomonadota, with secondary contributions from Actinomycetota in Z. flava and M. proscarabaeus and Cyanobacteriota in the other host insects. Although overall community structure and composition did not differ significantly between sexes, a few taxa displayed consistent male-associated patterns, with Staphylococcus, Cutibacterium and one Enterobacteriaceae ASV resulting more abundant in males across all species. The intrinsic bacterial resistance to cantharidin, with both quantitative and qualitative differences in microbiome structure between male and female insects, makes the hypothesis of a putative involvement of bacteria in cantharidin biogenesis still viable.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00248-025-02683-1.

Keywords: Bacteria, Cantharidin, Holobiont, Insect, Meloidae, 16S metataxonomic profiling, Terpene

Introduction

Insects and their microbial partners form holobionts, functioning as unified ecological and evolutionary entities [1]. Within this framework, symbiotic microorganisms play crucial roles in processes such as nutrient acquisition, immune regulation, and chemical defence, ultimately influencing insect physiology, ecology, and evolution [2, 3]. While microbes gain diverse benefits from their insect hosts, they in turn provide essential metabolites, such as nutrients and enzymes, supporting host growth, development, and reproduction [4]. Interestingly, some beetle-associated bacteria are involved in the biogenesis of defensive secondary metabolites [5], some of which are endowed with therapeutic properties [6]. For instance, Dendroctonus frontalis (Zimmermann, 1868) (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) engages a symbiosis with Streptomyces (Actinomycetota) producing the antifungal compound mycangimycin [7] that prevents the detrimental effects of the fungus Ophiostoma minus on its larval development [8–10]. Mycangimycin also shows a similar efficacy as other clinical antimalarial drugs, such as artemisinin and chloroquine, against Plasmodium falciparum [11]. Likewise, more than 35 Paederus species (Staphylinidae) contain pederin, a defensive toxic amide and a potent antitumor agent [12], which is produced through an intimate endosymbiotic relationship between these rove beetles and Pseudomonas spp. [13, 14]. A high prevalence of pederin-producing bacteria was found in females of Paederus fuscipes that, in fact, accumulate larger amounts than males of this terpene in their hemolymph [12]. In these examples, the collective genetic repertoire of the hosts and their associated microbes, known as the hologenome, represents the functional basis of the partnership and contributes to the adaptive potential of the holobiont.

Meloidae, or blister beetles, comprise about 3,000 species [15, 16] and are best known for producing cantharidin, a toxic terpene that circulates throughout their hemolymph, and is then exuded in yellowish oily droplets from legs and antennal joints as a defensive strategy [17]. Cantharidin has therapeutic properties [18, 19], and has been widely employed in the past as an aphrodisiac and antiphlogistic. Currently, it is used in the topical treatment of warts [20] and, owing to cytotoxicity, it also holds promise as an anticancer agent [21].

Cantharidin is endogenously generated in blister beetles, but its biosynthetic pathway has not yet been fully elucidated. It is known to be a by-product of the juvenile hormone, which is synthesized via the mevalonate pathway [22], a well-characterized metabolic route involved in the production of sesquiterpenes [23]. Within this pathway, farnesol is a key intermediate. Following its synthesis, farnesol undergoes a series of enzymatic oxidations leading to farnesoic acid, which is then converted into juvenile hormone acid and subsequently into juvenile hormone acid diol [24]. It has been suggested that some cytochromes P450 (CYP450s) may function in a not-yet-clarified manner in the cantharidin final biosynthetic step, converting the juvenile hormone acid diol into cantharidin [23, 25, 26]. Within bacteria, CYP450s are known to play important roles in many biosynthetic and biodegradative processes, providing a wide range of secondary metabolites and chemical transformations [27]. Although endogenous CYP450s may provide the final step of cantharidin biosynthesis in Meloidae, the prominent involvement and diversity of the bacterial CYP450 enzymes in terpene biosynthesis suggests that a bacterial contribution cannot be overlooked, also in line with what observed in other terpene-producing beetles [12]. These considerations highlight the importance of exploring if the hologenome may represent a functional unit in the processes underlying cantharidin biosynthesis.

Although cantharidin is produced by both male and female Meloidae individuals, it is worth noting that males exhibit consistently higher cantharidin levels [24]. Indeed, males produce cantharidin in large quantities and store it in the accessory glands of their reproductive organs, while females mainly receive it from males as a nuptial gift upon mating. After oviposition, females spread cantharidin on eggs likely to protect them from potential predators and/or parasites [19].

Given the sex-biased cantharidin production, the microbiome-mediated contribution to cantharidin biosynthesis is potentially identifiable through comparative analysis of the microbiota between sexes. If present, cantharidin-producing bacteria are expected to be conserved across Meloidae, and to be more abundant in males. Despite the sex-based differences in cantharidin biosynthesis in blister beetles [17], the possible involvement of bacterial symbionts in cantharidin biogenesis has not been investigated thus far. Moreover, the bacterial susceptibility to cantharidin has not yet been fully clarified [28, 29].

In this work, we first aimed at assessing bacterial susceptibility to cantharidin. A strong antibacterial activity of cantharidin would argue against its bacterial origin, since such a property could be harmful to potential producers. Conversely, the lack of antibacterial effects could be consistent with the involvement of the insect-associated microbiome in cantharidin biosynthesis. Then, we sought to describe the bacterial community dwelling or colonizing blister beetles. The antibacterial activity was tested against six prototypic bacterial species, while the insect-associated microbiome was investigated on a total of sixty specimens belonging to five species of blister beetles and both sexes. The differences in microbiome composition between males and females were inspected to identify sex-associated bacterial lineages as candidates for cantharidin-producing symbionts.

Methods

Assay for Bacterial Susceptibility to Cantharidin

Cantharidin (Sigma Aldrich) was freshly prepared as a 30 mg/ml stock solution in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma Aldrich).

The cantharidin antibacterial activity was evaluated against six reference strains obtained from type culture collections of representative bacterial species, namely Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii ATCC 6633, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29,212, and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25,923 among Bacillota; Acinetobacter baylyi ATCC 33,304; Escherichia coli MG1655 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 15,692 among Pseudomonadota.

The endogenous cantharidin concentrations are variable and poorly defined among Meloidae family members. Indeed, quantitative assessments of cantharidin in hemolymph of two species, Lydus trimaculatus and Mylabris variabilis, revealed cantharidin concentrations of 790 µg/g and 260 µg/g, respectively [17]. Considering that the insect hemolymph has a density ranging from approximately 1.03 to 1.18 g/ml [30], the cantharidin concentrations in antimicrobial susceptibility tests were set between 150 and 600 µg/ml to approximate the physiological conditions encountered by microorganisms within the hemolymph of Meloidae beetles.

For cantharidin antibacterial susceptibility testing, bacteria were grown overnight at 37 °C in Luria Bertani broth (LB, Acumedia), washed with saline solution, and diluted to OD600 = 0.001 (corresponding to ~ 5 × 105 CFU/ml) in 96-well microtiter plates containing a final volume of 100 µl of cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB, Becton Dickinson) per well, supplemented with increasing cantharidin concentrations (two-fold dilutions). The microtiter plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. A well containing 2% DMSO in CAMHB, equivalent to the DMSO concentration in the wells containing the highest amount of cantharidin, was used as growth control.

Microbial growth was measured every two hours at OD600 using a Spark 10 M (Tecan) microplate reader.

Selection of Specimens for Microbiome Analysis

The whole microbiome composition was determined for five representative species of Meloidae of different subfamilies and tribes, namely Lydus trimaculatus Kaszab, 1952 (Meloinae: Lyttini); Meloe proscarabaeus Linnaeus, 1758 (Meloinae: Meloini); Mylabris variabilis (Pallas, 1782), Hycleus polymorphus (Pallas, 1771) (Meloinae: Mylabrini); Zonitis flava Fabricius, 1775 (Nemognathinae: Nemognathini) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Habitus of the species considered for the whole microbiome analysis. Hycleus polymorphus (a), Mylabris variabilis (b), Lydus trimaculatus (c), Meloe proscarabaeus (d) and Zonitis flava (e)

Two populations for each species were sampled, and six male and six female individuals for each population were tested. Overall, 60 specimens were included in the analyses, collected between 2015 and 2021 in different localities in Italy (Table S1). Insects were preserved in 96% ethanol at 4 °C and stored at Roma Tre University. Species and sex were determined using an Olympus SZX12 Stereomicroscope.

DNA Extraction and Illumina Sequencing

DNA was extracted from the whole body (with no surface sterilization; [31]) using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen). The DNA concentration was measured using Nanodrop (Thermo scientific), to ensure that the DNA quantity was above 600 ng/µL. The V5-V6 region of the bacterial 16 S rRNA was targeted using the primer pair 783 F and 1027R and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq v3 technology 300 bp by the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences of Bicocca University in Milan.

16 S rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequence Analysis

Raw paired-end 16 S rRNA amplicon sequencing reads were processed using the DADA2 pipeline (v 1.34.0) [32] in R. Initial quality assessment was performed with plotQualityProfile, then sequences were filtered and trimmed using filterAndTrim with truncation lengths of 250 bp (forward) and 200 bp (reverse), a maximum expected error of 2, no ambiguous bases allowed, and PhiX removal enabled. Error correction was performed separately on forward and reverse reads using the error-learning method of DADA2 (learnErrors). Erroneous sequences were identified and removed using the dada command in pooling mode. Paired-end reads were merged based on sequence overlap with the mergePairs function to obtain complete amplicon sequences, and chimeric sequences were identified and removed. Taxonomic assignment was performed using the SILVA database (v. 138.1) [33].

A phyloseq object was constructed by integrating ASV counts, sample metadata, and taxonomy. The dataset was rarefied to retain 428 reads per sample. Bray-Curtis dissimilarities and weighted UniFrac distances were calculated from ASV abundances, followed by Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) for beta diversity visualization, and differences in microbial community composition between groups were assessed using PERMANOVA as implemented in the function adonis2 of the R package vegan (v. 2.7-1).

Shannon alpha-diversity indices were calculated on the rarefied dataset using the estimate_richness function and plotted with ggplot2 (v. 3.5.1). Differences in microbial community richness between groups were assessed using the Wilcoxon Mann Whitney test. The software Functional Annotation of Prokaryotic Taxa (FAPROTAX) (v. 1.2.9) [34] was used to infer the potential metabolic functions of the identified ASVs.

The differential abundance of ASVs between sexes was assessed in the five insect species with DESeq2, using the Wald test and correcting p-values with the false discovery rate procedure [35]. To identify ASVs more abundant in male than female individuals, the difference in relative abundance was calculated using the formula:

graphic file with name d33e619.gif

where M represents the mean relative abundance in males and F in females. Positive i values indicate enriched ASVs in male individuals. For both M and F, the minimum value was arbitrarily set to 3.89408 × 10− 5 (equivalent to 1/2,568 reads), to avoid i = undefined. The threshold represents the scenario in which a single read from one biological replicate maps to the ASV of interest. Accordingly, the value of 2,568 is obtained by multiplying the number of reads retained per sample (i.e., 428) by the maximum number of replicates per sex–species combination (i.e., six).

Identification of Terpene Biosynthetic Genes in Staphylococcus and Cutibacterium Genera

High-quality genomes from the genera Staphylococcus and Cutibacterium were retrieved from the NCBI database, filtering only genomes designated as “Reference genomes.” The final dataset consisted of 64 and seven reference genomes of Staphylococcus and Cutibacterium spp., respectively. All genomes were functionally annotated using the eggNOG tool (v.2.1.7; database v.5.0.2) [36], and the resulting annotations were screened for genes involved in terpene metabolism. Genes belonging to four different key pathways annotated in KeGG database for the metabolism of terpenes were searched, namely the mevalonate pathway (M00095), the non-mevalonate pathway (M00849), the pathway of biosynthesis of trans-farnesol [24], and the pathway of biosynthesis of staphyloxanthin (M01038). In addition, all genomes were analyzed for the presence of biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) using the Antibiotics & Secondary Metabolite Analysis Shell (antiSMASH, v.8.0.0) [37] to identify secondary metabolite pathways potentially implicated in terpene biosynthesis.

Results

Bacteria are Tolerant to Cantharidin

Antibacterial susceptibility to cantharidin was tested in bacterial species from two major phyla: Bacillota (Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii ATCC 6633, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923) and Pseudomonadota (Acinetobacter baylyi ATCC 33304, Escherichia coli MG1655, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 15692), at concentrations of 150, 300, and 600 µg/ml.

Growth profiling of the selected microorganisms showed that cantharidin causes no growth inhibition of all microbial species tested except the soil bacterium A. baylyi ATCC 33,304, which showed a slower growth rate in the presence of 600 µg/ml cantharidin, although reaching the same growth level as the untreated control after 24 h (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Effect of cantharidin on bacterial growth. Bacterial strains were inoculated at OD600 = 0.001 in CAMHB supplemented with 2% DMSO or the indicated cantharidin concentrations. Bacterial growth (OD600) was measured every 2 h for 24 h. Each value is the mean of two independent experiments ± the standard deviation. Media supplemented with 2% DMSO were used as growth controls without cantharidin

Hence, the observation that cantharidin has no significant antibacterial activity would be in line with the hypothesis that its biosynthesis may be mediated or modulated by the insect-associated microbiome.

Microbiome Profiling of Five Cantharidin-Producing Meloidae Species Revealed Few Male-Specific Signatures in the Bacterial Community

To investigate the hypothesis of a bacterial contribution to cantharidin biosynthesis, we characterised the whole body-associated microbiomes of 60 individuals, both males and females, of five blister beetle species. We aimed at identifying male-associated genetic signatures of bacterial taxa potentially involved in cantharidin biogenesis.

Amplicon sequencing targeting the V5-V6 hypervariable region of the 16 S rRNA was performed, and a total of 7,572,512 paired-end raw reads were obtained, averaging 126,208 reads per sample (Table S2). The raw data were processed using the DADA2 pipeline, as detailed in Materials and Methods, yielding 4,135 ASVs (916,512 reads). Two samples, namely M_variabilis_M_4943c and L_trimaculatus_F_4195a, were excluded due to a low number of merged reads (55 and 61 reads, respectively). ASVs were then rarefied, retaining 428 reads per sample, resulting in 2,002 ASVs on a total of 24,824 reads (Table S3).

In all five Meloidae species, the microbial community is dominated by bacteria belonging to the phylum Pseudomonadota. The second most abundant phyla are Actinomycetota in Z. flava and M. proscarabaeus, and Cyanobacteriota in H. polymorphus, L. trimaculatus, and M. variabilis (Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Analysis of the bacterial communities in five insect species of the Meloidae family. (a), Microbial community composition inferred from 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing (V5-V6 region). Phyla showing 0.5% relative abundances were grouped and are displayed as “Others (< 0.5%)”. The relative abundance values are provided for each blister beetle species. The data represent mean values derived from five biological replicates for M. variabilis males and L. trimaculatus females, and from six biological replicates for all eight- remaining sex-species combinations. The cladogram reflects the phylogenetic relationships among Meloidae species [15]. (b), Box plots of the Shannon index of diversity with samples grouped by sex. Statistical differences were calculated using the Wilcoxon test, and the p-values were adjusted with the FDR method. (c), beta-diversity plot based on Bray-Curtis distances, with sorting determined by PCoA. Dotted ellipses delimit samples of the same sex (d): Box plots of Shannon index of diversity with samples grouped by insect species. Statistical differences were calculated using the Wilcoxon test, and the p-values were adjusted with the FDR method

At a finer taxonomic resolution, insect-associated microbial communities showed species-specific differences. Members of the Enterobacteriaceae family were predominant in L. trimaculatus and M. variabilis, suggesting a shared microbial niche or functional role (Fig. S1). A bacterial community primarily composed of Rickettsiaceae was detected in H. polymorphus, while M. proscarabaeus displayed a more heterogeneous composition of the bacterial taxa, including Erwiniaceae, Hafniaceae, and Comamonadaceae (Fig. S1). Bacterial community composition shows no apparent relationship with the established phylogeny of Meloidae (Fig. 3a). The distinct microbiome structures denote divergent ecological associations and potentially unique microbial functions in the host species. Nonetheless, functional category analysis across samples (Fig. S2) suggests that fermentation and chemo-organotrophy are the central energy pathways in the bacterial communities colonizing the five blister beetle species (Table S3).

Since males of Meloidae produce higher cantharidin levels than females, inter-sexual differences were more in-depth investigated. Despite the marked interspecific differences in bacterial colonization profiles of the insects, both alpha and beta diversity (measured both as Bray-Curtis and Weighted UniFrac) analyses showed no significant differences between male and female individuals of the same species, suggesting that microbial community composition and structure are similar between sexes (Fig. 3b, c; Fig. S3). Similarly, alpha diversity did not differ significantly between Meloidae species (Fig. 3d).

Overall, genus Cutibacterium was more abundant in males than in females in all insect species except Z. flava, while genus Staphylococcus was absent in females and present only in males of all species. These differences may suggest, though they do not establish, a possible link between these genera and cantharidin synthesis (Table S4).

Then, we focused on ASVs that were more abundant in male than female individuals of all five Meloidae species. The differential abundance analysis of bacterial ASVs between male and female individuals of the same species, performed using the Wald test, did not reach statistical significance in any insect species. Therefore, the difference in abundance of each ASV between sexes was expressed as i index (see Materials and Methods), a descriptive measure of differential abundance. For each ASV, the i index was calculated five times (one for each meloid species). For i values > 0, the ASV is more abundant in male than female individuals for a given insect species. Therefore, each ASV can be more abundant in males than females (i > 0) in none, one, two, three, four, or all the sampled Meloidae species (Fig. 4a).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Overview of the prevalent ASVs in male individuals of Meloidae beetles (a), Bar plot showing the number of ASVs that are more prevalent in males for each species (H. polymorphus, L. trimaculatus, M. proscarabaeus, M. variabilis, Z. flava), calculated using the formula (M-F)/M, where M and F represent the relative abundances in male and female individuals, respectively. The ASV counts are shown on a log₁₀ scale for each meloid species. (b), List of ASVs which are more abundant in male than female individuals in at least four out of five meloid species (H. polymorphus, L. trimaculatus, M. proscarabaeus, M.variabilis, Z. flava). For each ASV the differential abundance between male and female individuals is reported only when > 0. The more abundant ASVs in male than female individuals in all five species (ASV21 and ASV64) are in bold

Apart from 616 ASVs endowed with i ≤ 0 in all meloid species, 1,207 ASVs were more abundant in males than in females in only one species, 139 in two, and 27 in three of the five meloid species (Fig. 4a; Table S5). Eleven taxonomically heterogeneous ASVs, encompassing different bacterial genera and families, were more abundant in males than females in four out of five meloid species (Fig. 4a, b; Table S5). Only two ASVs were consistently more abundant in male than female individuals across all five meloid species, namely ASV64 and ASV21 (Fig. 4a, b; Table S5), referable to the members of Cutibacterium genus and the Enterobacteriaceae family, respectively.

Thus, while sex-dependent differences in microbiome composition between Meloidae species were observed, only a few bacterial signatures were more prevalent in male than female individuals in most or all species.

Terpene Biosynthethic Gene Clusters in Staphyloccus spp. and Cutibacterium spp.

The comparative analysis of available reference genomes of the representative Cutibacterium spp. and Staphylococcus spp. revealed that biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) involved in terpene and terpene-precursor biosynthesis were widespread in these bacterial genera, with every genome analysed containing at least one cluster (Fig. S4a, b). In some cases, AntiSMASH predicted a specific terpene product, for example staphyloxanthin, but the end-product of many other BGCs was unassigned.

The comparative analysis of gene annotations unveiled that Cutibacterium spp. possess the non-mevalonate (methylerythritol phosphate, MEP) pathway for the biosynthesis of isopentenyl pyrophosphate (Fig. S4c), whereas Staphylococcus spp. carries the genes for both the mevalonate-dependent (MVA) and the MEP pathway for terpene biosynthesis. In addition, both genera harbour the gene annotated as K13787, implicated in the biosynthesis of farnesol, an essential intermediate in juvenile hormone production.

Discussions

Cantharidin is a bioactive terpenoid produced by blister beetles and implicated in both defence and reproductive behavior. The compound has a long-standing history of use in both folk and traditional medicine. It was employed in traditional Chinese medicine as well as by ancient Greek and Roman physicians for a variety of purposes, ranging from the treatment of warts to potential anti-cancer therapies, as an antiphlogistic, and even as an aphrodisiac by different human populations [19, 38]. Despite its historical background, the actual clinical use of cantharidin is limited due to its toxicity, particularly affecting the renal, hepatic, urinary, and gastrointestinal systems [20]. Approved medical applications are restricted to topical treatments for warts and for molluscum contagiosum, a viral skin infection [39]. Numerous studies have highlighted its promising broad-spectrum antitumor activity against various types of cancers, including leukemia, esophageal carcinoma, lung cancer, rectal cancer, and breast cancer, with notable results reported for liver cancer [40].

The mechanisms of cantharidin activity in tumour cells involve the modulation of multiple signaling pathways regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, cell migration, and invasion [40]. These effects are primarily mediated through its potent inhibition of serine/threonine protein phosphatases PP1, PP2A, and PP5, which are key regulators of eukaryotic cell fate [41–43]. While the antitumor properties of cantharidin have been quite widely studied, its effect(s) on bacteria have never been fully clarified. In this study, we demonstrated that cantharidin does not exert growth inhibitory activity against representative bacterial strains from distant phyla endowed with extremely diverse cell structures, including both Gram-positive and -negative species, namely Bacillota (B. subtilis subsp. spizizenii ATCC 6633, E. faecalis ATCC 29212, and S. aureus ATCC 25923) and Pseudomonadota (A. baylyi ATCC 33304, E. coli MG1655, and P. aeruginosa ATCC 15692). This lack of activity could be explained by fundamental differences in the structure of prokaryotic phosphatases. Although bacterial phosphatases catalyze similar reactions, they typically belong to distinct protein families (e.g., PPM-type phosphatases) and exhibit different structural and regulatory features compared to their eukaryotic counterparts [44]. These structural differences at the target level are likely to account for the apparently intrinsic resistance of the tested bacteria to cantharidin. Moreover, exclusion by the bacterial membrane or extrusion by the activity of efflux pumps could also contribute to cantharidin resistance. Since cantharidin susceptibility was determined on a definite panel of reference strains under standard conditions for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, more focused studies on bacterial isolates from Meloidae insect are needed to confirm that cantharidin tolerance is an intrinsic feature of the bacterial component of the Meloidae microbiota. Moreover, the standard antimicrobial susceptibility test may not reflect the complex insect-microbe interactions and overlooks the potential metabolic activities of the holobiont that could affect cantharidin susceptibility in vivo.

The lack of cantharidin antibacterial activity is a prerequisite for the plausibility of the hypothesis that the insect-associated microbiome may play a role in its biosynthesis. This hypothesis is consistent with the evidence that insect-associated bacterial symbionts can contribute to the synthesis of essential nutrients or bioactive compounds involved in defense against predators [45]. Since males of the Meloidae family produce more cantharidin than females, we investigated the microbiome of representative species of the family, belonging to the main phylogenetic lineages, namely H. polymorphus, L. trimaculatus, M. proscarabaeus, M. variabilis, and Z. flava. Our results revealed that the most abundant phylum in all the samples was Pseudomonadota, in line with previous studies on coleopteran species such as scarab beetles (Anomala dimidiata (Hope,1831)), ground beetles (Harpalus rufipes (De Geer, 1774)), and wood-boring beetles (Monochamus saltuarius (Gebler, 1830)), where Pseudomonadota was identified as a dominant component of the gut microbiota [46–48]. The prevalence of this phylum may reflect its metabolic versatility and potential role in nutrient assimilation, degradation of plant-derived compounds, and detoxification processes commonly required in phytophagous beetles [45]. Gut bacteria of the phylum Pseudomonadota have been shown to influence coleopteran biology in several systems. These bacteria can breakdown recalcitrant plant polymers by producing cellulases (e.g., Pseudomonas sp. [49]). or pectinases (e.g., Stammera sp. [50]). They also contribute to the degradation of plant toxins, as observed for Pseudomonas fulva (caffeine; [51]), Acinetobacter sp. (tea saponin [52]), and Novosphingobium sp. (the phenolic compound naringenin [53]).

Although microbial communities in Meloidae exhibit clear species-specific structures, with dominant taxa varying across species, overall diversity did not differ significantly between sexes. However, Cutibacterium spp. and Staphylococcus spp. were predominant in males in the majority or even all of the insect species. Moreover, two ASVs, referred to Cutibacterium and Enterobacteriaceae, showed a trend toward higher abundance in males in all species, suggesting putative sex-associated microbial patterns. However, these patterns did not reach statistical significance, and their potential link to cantharidin biogenesis should be cautiously considered.

Members of the Cutibacterium and Staphylococcus genera have previously been detected in insect microbiomes [54–56], suggesting that they could play a role in host-associated microbial communities. Notably, members of these two genera are notoriously fatty acids-resistant colonizers of the human skin [57–59], and contain numerous biosynthetic gene clusters predicted to produce terpenes or terpene precursors, though most of their metabolic end-products are still uncharacterized. This raise the possibility that insect-associated Cutibacterium spp. and Staphylococcus spp. may contribute to the production of intermediates in the biosynthesis of juvenile hormone or cantharidin, potentially influencing host physiology and microbial interactions, but an experimental validation is required to uncover their functional roles and confirm an involvement in the biosynthesis of cantharidin.

Indeed, the biosynthetic pathway of cantharidin has not yet been fully elucidated. As for many other terpenoids, cantharidin biosynthesis is hypothesized to originate from the MVA pathway, a well-characterized metabolic route involved in the production of sesquiterpenes [24]. Within this pathway, farnesol is a key intermediate. Following its synthesis, farnesol undergoes a series of enzymatic oxidations leading to farnesoic acid, which is then converted into juvenile hormone acid and subsequently into juvenile hormone acid diol. These compounds are recognized as crucial intermediates in the biosynthesis not only of the juvenile hormone but also of cantharidin [24]. While early steps involving isoprenoid precursors have been characterized to some extent, the downstream transformations leading to cantharidin remain unresolved, suggesting the involvement of yet-unidentified insect enzymes or, possibly, microbial partners contributing to the final stages of its assembly. These considerations highlight the importance of the hologenome as a functional unit in elucidating the processes underlying cantharidin production.

In this study, microbiome analysis was performed using DNA from the whole insect body. However, this approach may overlook tissue- or organ-specific microbial contributions, given that cantharidin is not evenly distributed throughout the body but rather accumulates in specific tissues and organs. For instance, in E. chinensis, its localization displays a pronounced tissue-specific trend, with the male accessory glands containing over 70 times the concentration found in the head [60, 61]. The fat body showed the second-highest cantharidin content (approximately 2.11 mg/g), exhibiting the highest expression levels of the biosynthetic gene juvenile hormone epoxide hydrolase, suggesting it may be a key site of active biosynthesis. Therefore, targeting these tissues could enrich for microbial taxa that are more likely to participate in cantharidin production. Fat bodies have been demonstrated to host endosymbiont bacteria contributing to the host metabolism, as in the case of Blattabacterium, an endosymbiont of Blattella germanica (Blattodea) fat bodies, which participates in the synthesis of essential amino acids, nitrogen recycling, and modulates immune gene expression [62].

Conclusions

In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that representative strains of major bacterial taxa are resistant to the toxic activity of cantharidin and provide novel insights into sex-associated differences in the Meloidae microbiome, but they do not yet offer sufficient evidence for a bacterial contribution to cantharidin biosynthesis. 16 S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing did not identify predominant bacterial taxa uniquely associated with male individuals, despite their consistently higher cantharidin levels. However, the observed differences in microbiome composition between males and females cannot exclude the hypothesis of a putative involvement of the insect hologenome in the biosynthesis of this terpenoid. More focused approaches are needed to evaluate if bacteria, including those identified in this study, have a role in cantharidin biogenesis. Future research should therefore be directed to the identification of the reactions and enzymes involved in the terminal steps of cantharidin biogenesis, and the functional characterization of the microbiome in producing organs (i.e., the fat bodies).

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank all colleagues who supported this research through the collection of specimens included in this study: S. Gisondi (CREA, Rome), A. Di Giulio (University Roma Tre), P. Mariottini (University Roma Tre), V. Filippini (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia), D. Lucente (University of Palermo), E. Erbani (University of Genova), L. Vignoli (University Roma Tre), and A. Chebbi (ISBST - Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Sidi Thabet - Manouba University).

Author Contributions

EM, MAB, PV, and AR contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by LS. Formal analysis and investigations were performed by AB, DV, FPR, and PV. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AB, DV, PV, AR, and LS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi Roma Tre within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This study was supported by the Excellence Departments grant (art. 1, paragraphs 314–337, Law 232/2016), awarded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR) to the Department of Science, Roma Tre University, and by the National Biodiversity Future Center PNRR grant (NBFC Project – M4-C2-Inv.1.5, CUP F83B22000040006). E.M. acknowledges the support of NRRP, Mission 4, Component 2, Investment 1.4 - Call for tender n°3138, 16 Dec. 2021, Decree 3175 18 Dec. 2021 of Italian Ministry of University and Research (IMUR) funded by the EU Next Generation EU Project Code [CN00000033].

Data Availability

Raw sequencing reads have been deposited to the NIH Sequence Read Archive under the bioproject number: PRJNA1327909.

Declarations

Author Statement

We sincerely thank the anonymous Reviewers for their insightful comments and constructive feedback. We have carefully considered their criticism and revised the manuscript to improve its clarity and readability. Additional statistical analyses have also been incorporated to reinforce the robustness of our findings.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Arianna Basile and Lucrezia Spagoni contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Arianna Basile, Email: arianna.basile@uniroma3.it.

Alessandra Riccieri, Email: alessandra.riccieri@uniroma3.it.

References

  • 1.Koide RT (2023) On Holobionts, Holospecies, and holoniches: the role of microbial symbioses in ecology and evolution. Microb Ecol 85:1143–1149. 10.1007/s00248-022-02005-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Iltis C, Tougeron K, Hance T, Louâpre P, Foray V (2022) A perspective on insect-microbe holobionts facing thermal fluctuations in a climate-change context. Environ Microbiol 24:18–29. 10.1111/1462-2920.15826 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhang W, Stelinski LL, Mohamed A, Wang G, Tettamanti G, Chen M, Hong M, Daly EZ, Bruin J, Renault D, Keyhani NO, Zhao Q (2025) Unlocking agro-ecosystem sustainability: exploring the bottom-up effects of microbes, plants, and insect herbivores. Integr Zool 20:465–484. 10.1111/1749-4877.12911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kaltenpoth M (2009) Actinobacteria as mutualists: general healthcare for insects? Trends Microbiol 17:529–535. 10.1016/j.tim.2009.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Klassen JL (2014) Microbial secondary metabolites and their impacts on insect symbioses. Curr Opin Insect Sci 4:15–22. 10.1016/j.cois.2014.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ramadhar TR, Beemelmanns C, Currie CR, Clardy J (2014) Bacterial symbionts in agricultural systems provide a strategic source for antibiotic discovery. J Antibiot 67:53–58. 10.1038/ja.2013.77 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chevrette MG, Carlson CM, Ortega HE, Thomas C, Ananiev GE, Barns KJ, Book AJ, Cagnazzo J, Carlos C, Flanigan W, Grubbs KJ, Horn HA, Hoffmann FM, Klassen JL, Knack JJ, Lewin GR, McDonald BR, Muller L, Melo WGP, Pinto-Tomás AA et al (2019) The antimicrobial potential of Streptomyces from insect microbiomes. Nat Comm 10:516. 10.1038/s41467-019-08438-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hofstereftter RW, Cronin JT, Klepzig KD, Moser JC, Ayres MP (2006) Antagonisms, mutualisms and commensalisms affect outbreak dynamics of the Southern pine beetle. Oecologia 147:679–691. 10.1007/s00442-005-0312-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Scott JJ, Oh DC, Yuceer MC, Klepzig KD, Clardy J, Currie CR (2008) Bacterial protection of beetle-fungus mutualism. Science 322:63. 10.1126/science.1160423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Seipke RF, Kaltenpoth M, Hutchings MI (2012) Streptomyces as symbionts: an emerging and widespread theme? FEMS Microbiol Rev 36:862–876. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00313.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Baniecki ML, Wirth DF, Clardy J (2007) High-throughput Plasmodium falciparum growth assay for malaria drug discovery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:716–723. 10.1128/aac.01144-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Song X, Yang T, Zhou C, Luo S, Dong M, Yan X, Lv W, Zheng F, Zhou C, Wei Y (2022) Differences in Microbiome composition and transcriptome profiles between male and female Paederus fuscipes harbouring pederin-producing bacteria. Insect Mol Biol 31:457–470. 10.1111/imb.12772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kellner RL (2001) Suppression of Pederin biosynthesis through antibiotic elimination of endosymbionts in Paederus Sabaeus. J Insect Physiol 47:475–483. 10.1016/s0022-1910(00)00140-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Song X, Huang T, Yan X, Zuo M, Pan Y, He H, Li Y, Zou Y, Du C, Zheng F, Yang T (2024) The pederin-producing bacteria density dynamics in Paederus fuscipes at different developmental stages. Med Vet Entomol 38:59–72. 10.1111/mve.12697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Riccieri A, Mancini E, Pitzalis M, Salvi D, Bologna MA (2022) Multigene phylogeny of blister beetles (Coleoptera, Meloidae) reveals extensive polyphyly of the tribe lyttini and allows redefining its boundaries. Syst Entomol 47:569–580. 10.1111/syen.12547 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Riccieri A, Capogna E, Pinto JD, Bologna MA (2023) Molecular phylogeny, systematics and biogeography of the subfamily nemognathinae (Coleoptera, Meloidae). Invertebr Sys 37:101–116. 10.1071/IS22056 [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gisondi S, Gasperi T, Roma E, Tomai P, Gentili A, Vignoli L, Bologna MA, Mancini E (2019) Cantharidin content in two mediterranean species of blister beetles, Lydus trimaculatus and Mylabris variabilis (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Entomol Sci 22:258–263. 10.1111/ens.12364 [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Deng LP, Dong J, Cai H, Wang W (2013) Cantharidin as an antitumor agent: a retrospective review. Curr Med Chem 20:159–166. 10.2174/092986713804806711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Saferaiter ME, Soldini MPC, Del Río MG (2024) Cantharidin: a multipurpose beetlejuice. Neotrop Entomol 53:964–971. 10.1007/s13744-024-01164-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moed L, Shwayder TA, Chang MW (2001) Cantharidin revisited: a blistering defense of an ancient medicine. Arch Dermatol 137:1357–1360. 10.1001/archderm.137.10.1357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu D, Chen Z (2009) The effects of Cantharidin and Cantharidin derivates on tumour cells. Anti-Cancer Agents Med Chem 9:392–396. 10.2174/1871520610909040392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fratini E, Salvemini M, Lombardo F, Muzzi M, Molfini M, Gisondi S, Roma E, D’Ezio V, Persichini T, Gasperi T, Mariottini P, Di Giulio A, Bologna MA, Cervelli M, Mancini E (2021) Unraveling the role of male reproductive tract and haemolymph in cantharidin-exuding Lydus trimaculatus and Mylabris variabilis (Coleoptera: Meloidae): a comparative transcriptomics approach. BMC Genomics 22:808. 10.1186/s12864-021-08118-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Riccieri A, Spagoni L, Li M, Franchini P, Rossi MN, Fratini E, Cervelli M, Bologna MA, Mancini E (2024) Comparative genomics provides insights into molecular adaptation to hypermetamorphosis and Cantharidin metabolism in blister beetles (Coleoptera: Meloidae). Integr Zool 19:975–988. 10.1111/1749-4877.12819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sun Q, Wang B, Xie Y, Xue F, Ma S, Zhao B, Lin Y (2025) Research progress on the biological characteristics and the synthesis pathway of Cantharidin in the family meloidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 182:104345. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2025.104345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sutherland TD, Unnithan GC, Andersen JF, Evans PH, Murataliev MB, Szabo LZ, Mash EA, Bowers WS, Feyereisen R (1998) A cytochrome P450 terpenoid hydroxylase linked to the suppression of insect juvenile hormone synthesis. PNAS 95:12884–12889. 10.1073/pnas.95.22.12884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tian X, Li S, Cheng D, Tong D, Zhou T, Yi L, Zhang Y, Lü S (2025) Identification of the key regulatory network and genes highly associated with the synthesis of Cantharidin in Epicauta chinensis by transcriptome and metabolome analyses. Insect Sci. 10.1111/1744-7917.70102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Greule A, Stok JE, De Voss JJ, Cryle MJ (2018) Unrivalled diversity: the many roles and reactions of bacterial cytochromes P450 in secondary metabolism. Nat Prod Rep 35:757–791. 10.1039/c7np00063d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bravo C, Bautista LM, Garcia-Paris M, Blanco G, Alonso JC (2014) Males of a strongly polygynous species consume more poisonous food than females. PLoS ONE 9:e111057. 10.1371/journal.pone.0111057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Campos-Sánchez JC, Guardiola FA, Esteban MÁ (2023) Effects of Cantharidin on fish Erythrocytes, tumor cell Lines, and marine pathogenic bacteria. Fishes 8:270. 10.3390/fishes8050270 [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kenny MC, Giarra MN, Granata E, Socha JJ (2018) How temperature influences the viscosity of hornworm hemolymph. J Exp Biol 221:jeb186338. 10.1242/jeb.186338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hammer TJ, Dickerson JC, Fierer N (2015) Evidence-based recommendations on storing and handling specimens for analyses of insect microbiota. PeerJ 3:e1190. 10.7717/peerj.1190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP (2016) DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583. 10.1038/nmeth.3869 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596. 10.1093/nar/gks1219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Louca S, Parfrey LW, Doebeli M (2016) Decoupling function and taxonomy in the global ocean Microbiome. Science 353:1272–1277. 10.1126/science.aaf4507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated Estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Heller D, Hernández-Plaza A, Forslund SK, Cook H, Mende DR, Letunic I, Rattei T, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Bork P (2019) EggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D309–D314. 10.1093/nar/gky1085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Blin K, Shaw S, Augustijn HE, Reitz ZL, Biermann F, Alanjary M, Fetter A, Terlouw BR, Metcalf WW, Helfrich EJN, van Wezel GP, Medema MH, Weber T (2023) AntiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res 51:W46–W50. 10.1093/nar/gkad344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Beauregard H (1890) Les insectes Vésicants. Félix Alcan, Paris [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Keam SJ (2024) Cantharidin topical solution 0.7%: first approval. Paediatr Drugs 26:95–100. 10.1007/s40272-023-00600-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhou J, Ren Y, Tan L, Song X, Wang M, Li Y, Cao Z, Guo C (2020) Norcantharidin: research advances in pharmaceutical activities and derivatives in recent years. Biomed Pharmacother 131:110755. 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li YM, Casida JE (1992) Cantharidin–binding protein: identification as protein phosphatase 2A. PNAS USA 89:11867–11870. 10.1073/pnas.89.24.11867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bertini I, Calderone V, Fragai M, Luchinat C, Talluri E (2009) Structural basis of serine/threonine phosphatase Inhibition by the archetypal small molecules Cantharidin and Norcantharidin. J Med Chem 52:4838–4843. 10.1021/jm900610k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Puerto Galvis CE, Vargas Méndez LY, Kouznetsov VV (2013) Cantharidin–based small molecules as potential therapeutic agents. Chem Biol Drug Des 82:477–499. 10.1111/cbdd.12180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shi Y (2009) Serine/threonine phosphatases: mechanism through structure. Cell 139:468–484. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang Y, Zhang S, Xu L (2023) The pivotal roles of gut microbiota in insect plant interactions for sustainable pest management. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 9:66. 10.1038/s41522-023-00435-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Magagnoli S, Alberoni D, Baffoni L, Martini A, Marini F, Di Gioia D, Mazzon M, Marzadori C, Campanelli G, Burgio G (2022) The ground beetle Pseudoophonus rufipes gut Microbiome is influenced by the farm management system. Sci Rep 12:22638. 10.1038/s41598-022-25408-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ge SX, Li TF, Ren LL, Zong SX (2023) Host-plant adaptation in xylophagous insect-microbiome systems: contributions of longicorns and gut symbionts revealed by parallel metatranscriptome. iScience 26:106680. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Msango K, Gouda MNR, Ramakrishnan B, Kumar A, Subramanian S (2024) Variation and functional profile of gut bacteria in the scarab beetle, Anomala dimidiata, under a cellulose-enriched microenvironment. Sci Rep 14:22400. 10.1038/s41598-024-73417-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sheng P, Huang S, Wang Q, Wang A, Zhang H (2012) Isolation, screening, and optimization of the fermentation conditions of highly cellulolytic bacteria from the hindgut of Holotrichia parallela larvae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Appl Biochem Biotechnol 167:270–284. 10.1007/s12010-012-9670-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Salem H, Kirsch R, Pauchet Y, Berasategui A, Fukumori K, Moriyama M, Cripps M, Windsor D, Fukatsu T, Gerardo NM (2020) Symbiont digestive range reflects host plant breadth in herbivorous beetles. Curr Biol 30:2875–2886e4. 10.1016/j.cub.2020.05.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ceja-Navarro JA, Vega FE, Karaoz U, Hao Z, Jenkins S, Lim HC, Kosina P, Infante F, Northen TR, Brodie EL (2015) Gut microbiota mediate caffeine detoxification in the primary insect pest of coffee. Nat Commun 6:7618. 10.1038/ncomms8618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang S, Shu J, Xue H, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Fang L, Wang Y, Wang H (2020) The gut microbiota in camellia weevils are influenced by plant secondary metabolites and contribute to saponin degradation. mSystems 5:e00692–e00619. 10.1128/mSystems.00692-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cheng C, Wickham JD, Chen L, Xu D, Lu M, Sun J (2018) Bacterial microbiota protect an invasive bark beetle from a pine defensive compound. Microbiome 6:132. 10.1186/s40168-018-0518-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Guidolin AS, Cônsoli FL (2017) Symbiont diversity of Aphis (Toxoptera) citricidus (Hemiptera: Aphididae) as influenced by host plants. Microb Ecol 73:201–210. 10.1007/s00248-016-0892-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Cameirão C, Costa D, Rufino J, Pereira JA, Lino-Neto T, Baptista P (2024) Diversity, Composition, and specificity of the Philaenus spumarius bacteriome. Microorganisms 12:298. 10.3390/microorganisms12020298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.El Hamss H, Maruthi MN, Omongo CA, Wang HL, van Brunschot S, Colvin J, Delatte H (2024) Microbiome diversity and composition in Bemisia tabaci SSA1-SG1 whitefly are influenced by their host’s life stage. Microbiol Res 278:127538. 10.1016/j.micres.2023.127538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Nakamura K, O’Neill AM, Williams MR, Cau L, Nakatsuji T, Horswill AR, Gallo RL (2020) Short chain fatty acids produced by Cutibacterium acnes inhibit biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Sci Rep 10:21237. 10.1038/s41598-020-77790-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bücher C, Burtscher J, Domig KJ (2021) Propionic acid bacteria in the food industry: an update on essential traits and detection methods. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 20:4299–4323. 10.1111/1541-4337.12804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kengmo Tchoupa A, Kretschmer D, Schittek B, Peschel A (2023) The epidermal lipid barrier in microbiome-skin interaction. Trends Microbiol 31:723–734. 10.1016/j.tim.2023.01.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jiang M, Lü S, Zhang Y (2017) Characterization of juvenile hormone related genes regulating Cantharidin biosynthesis in Epicauta chinensis. Sci Rep 7:2308. 10.1038/s41598-017-02393-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Muzzi M, Mancini E, Fratini E, Cervelli M, Gasperi T, Mariottini P, Persichini T, Bologna MA, Di Giulio A (2022) Male accessory glands of blister beetles and Cantharidin release: a comparative ultrastructural analysis. Insects 13:132. 10.3390/insects13020132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Silva FJ, Domínguez–Santos R, Latorre A, García–Ferris C (2024) Comparative transcriptomics of fat bodies between symbiotic and quasi–aposymbiotic adult females of Blattella Germanica with emphasis on metabolic integration with its endosymbiont Blattabacterium and its immune system. Int J Mol Sci 25:4228. 10.3390/ijms25084228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Raw sequencing reads have been deposited to the NIH Sequence Read Archive under the bioproject number: PRJNA1327909.


Articles from Microbial Ecology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES