Skip to main content
. 2026 Jan 7;16:1618319. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1618319

Table 5.

Group mean fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and fractal dimension (FD) values in the whole skeleton and in significant voxels obtained for different models in healthy controls (HC) and multiple sclerosis (MS) cohort.

Metric Model nvoxels HC MS Cohen’s d
FD (whole skeleton) box size: 1–2 1.805 1.815
box size: 1–4 1.868 1.879
box size: 1–8 1.946 1.948
box size: 8–16 2.266 2.224
FA (whole skeleton) MS vs. HC 81,253 0.409 ± 0.023 0.386 ± 0.030 −0.84
MD (whole skeleton) (10−3 mm2/s) MS vs. HC 81,253 0.666 ± 0.020 0.712 ± 0.045 1.23
FA (significant voxels) MS vs. HC 53,111 0.420 ± 0.023 0.392 ± 0.034 −0.99
MS vs. HC + Age 50,169 0.422 ± 0.023 0.393 ± 0.034 −1.01
MS vs. HC + Age + SDMT 55,912 0.418 ± 0.023 0.389 ± 0.034 −0.98
MS vs. HC + Age + SDMT + EDSS 42,589 0.433 ± 0.023 0.400 ± 0.036 −1.02
MD (significant voxels) (10−3 mm2/s) MS vs. HC 53,111 0.679 ± 0.020 0.733 ± 0.052 1.30
MS vs. HC + Age 50,169 0.680 ± 0.020 0.736 ± 0.053 1.30
MS vs. HC + Age + SDMT 55,912 0.677 ± 0.020 0.731 ± 0.051 1.29
MS vs. HC + Age + SDMT + EDSS 42,589 0.682 ± 0.021 0.741 ± 0.055 1.31

Covariates used in a given model are mentioned after the plus sign. All FA and MD values are significantly different between HC and MS (p < 0.001). Effect size (Cohen’s d) is also presented for the difference between HC and MS.