Table 3.
Robust reference intervals and overlap percentages for ROTEM Sigma INTEM parameters in dogs, compared with classical reference intervals previously published for ROTEM Delta.
| INTEM | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Robust | Barthélemy et al. (18) | Pereira et al. (19) | Schefer et al. (20) | |||
| Reference value | Overlap | Reference value | Overlap | Reference value | Overlap | ||
| CT (s) | [98.85–151.15] | [108.58–198.00] | 47.60% | [135.00–283.00] | 10.90% | [23.00–87.00] | 0.00% |
| MCF (mm) | [44.38–67.62] | [41.50–68.70] | 85.50% | [92.00–210.00] | 0.00% | [50.00–65.00] | 100.00% |
| A10 (mm) | [29.47–58.53] | [29.50–57.70] | 100.00% | – | – | [21.00–55.00] | 75.10% |
| ML (%) | [−1.72–15.72] | [0.00–28.40] | 55.40% | [5.00–27.00] | 48.70% | [0.00–12.00] | 100.00% |
| LI60 (%) | [100.00–100.00] | [92.20–100.00] | 100.00% | [93.00–100.00] | 100.00% | – | – |
| G (dyn·s) | [3938.87–9590.43] | – | – | – | – | [7–9] | 0.00% |