Skip to main content
. 2026 Jan 7;16:1689253. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1689253

Table 2.

The comparison of diagnostic performance of different detection methods.

Detection method TP FP TN FN Agreement Positive agreement Negative agreement PPV NPV TAT (Day)
mNGS 72 15 108 51 0.732 0.585 0.878 0.828 0.679 1.83 (1.05, 2.10)
Culture 16 6 117 107 0.541 0.130 0.951 0.727 0.522 6.86 (5.05, 7.00)
Conventional methods 48 22 103 73 0.614 0.397 0.824 0.686 0.585 4.08 (1.26, 5.28)
Combined methods 88 27 95 36 0.744 0.710 0.779 0.765 0.725 -

TP, true positive; FP, false positive; TN, true negative; FN, false negative; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value. TAT, turnaround time, defined as the entire duration from sample submission to the issuance of the official microbial detection report.