Table 2.
The comparison of diagnostic performance of different detection methods.
| Detection method | TP | FP | TN | FN | Agreement | Positive agreement | Negative agreement | PPV | NPV | TAT (Day) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mNGS | 72 | 15 | 108 | 51 | 0.732 | 0.585 | 0.878 | 0.828 | 0.679 | 1.83 (1.05, 2.10) |
| Culture | 16 | 6 | 117 | 107 | 0.541 | 0.130 | 0.951 | 0.727 | 0.522 | 6.86 (5.05, 7.00) |
| Conventional methods | 48 | 22 | 103 | 73 | 0.614 | 0.397 | 0.824 | 0.686 | 0.585 | 4.08 (1.26, 5.28) |
| Combined methods | 88 | 27 | 95 | 36 | 0.744 | 0.710 | 0.779 | 0.765 | 0.725 | - |
TP, true positive; FP, false positive; TN, true negative; FN, false negative; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value. TAT, turnaround time, defined as the entire duration from sample submission to the issuance of the official microbial detection report.