Skip to main content
. 2026 Jan 7;12:1713771. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1713771

Table 8.

Relative abundance of genus level in cecum dominant microorganisms.

Items CON LLP MLP HLP p-value
Bacteroides 17.80 ± 2.55 16.80 ± 0.69 19.65 ± 0.79 17.70 ± 2.01 0.412
Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group 14.00 ± 0.64 11.897 ± 0.74 13.21 ± 0.68 14.62 ± 1.10 0.278
Fusobacterium 6.43 ± 1.20a 6.37 ± 0.68a 3.22 ± 0.85b 4.90 ± 0.52b 0.017
Phascolarctobacterium 3.01 ± 0.56 3.09 ± 0.73 3.23 ± 0.46 3.66 ± 0.13 0.586
Treponema 4.17 ± 1.68a 1.13 ± 0.12b 1.81 ± 0.30b 0.96 ± 0.27b 0.023
WPS-2_norark 1.69 ± 0.22 1.65 ± 0.25 2.96 ± 0.49 2.57 ± 0.29 0.147

CON, control, basal diet; LLP, basal diet + 106 CFU/kg L. paracasei LK01; MLP, basal diet + 107 CFU/kg L. paracasei LK01; HLP, basal diet + 108 CFU/kg L. paracasei LK01. Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). n = 4.