Table 8.
Relative abundance of genus level in cecum dominant microorganisms.
| Items | CON | LLP | MLP | HLP | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteroides | 17.80 ± 2.55 | 16.80 ± 0.69 | 19.65 ± 0.79 | 17.70 ± 2.01 | 0.412 |
| Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group | 14.00 ± 0.64 | 11.897 ± 0.74 | 13.21 ± 0.68 | 14.62 ± 1.10 | 0.278 |
| Fusobacterium | 6.43 ± 1.20a | 6.37 ± 0.68a | 3.22 ± 0.85b | 4.90 ± 0.52b | 0.017 |
| Phascolarctobacterium | 3.01 ± 0.56 | 3.09 ± 0.73 | 3.23 ± 0.46 | 3.66 ± 0.13 | 0.586 |
| Treponema | 4.17 ± 1.68a | 1.13 ± 0.12b | 1.81 ± 0.30b | 0.96 ± 0.27b | 0.023 |
| WPS-2_norark | 1.69 ± 0.22 | 1.65 ± 0.25 | 2.96 ± 0.49 | 2.57 ± 0.29 | 0.147 |
CON, control, basal diet; LLP, basal diet + 106 CFU/kg L. paracasei LK01; MLP, basal diet + 107 CFU/kg L. paracasei LK01; HLP, basal diet + 108 CFU/kg L. paracasei LK01. Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). n = 4.