Skip to main content
. 2025 Dec 17;16:2409. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-32385-0

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Structural analysis of Control and FSHD skeletal myotubes with and without EPS. (A) EPS enhances contractility in control myotubes but not in FSHD myotubes. Beat amplitude (%) was quantified using multielectrode array (MEA) analysis in control and FSHD myotubes, with or without 12-hour electrical pulse stimulation (EPS). Left: Representative heat maps showing beat amplitude (%) in CTRL1 and FSHD2 myotubes under the indicated conditions. Right: Each dot represents the beat amplitude (%) recorded from a single electrode (n = 60 electrodes per group). Data are visualized as dot-box plots, presenting the median ± interquartile range (IQR), with mean values indicated by red bars. **p < 0.01, unpaired Student’s t-test. Immunofluorescent images of myotubes from (B) Control and (C) FSHD1 cell lines stained for (i) nuclei, (ii) actin, and (iii) ɑ-actinin, which are blue, green, and red in (iv) merged image, respectively. (D) Immunofluorescent images of myotubes from Control and FSHD2 cell lines under non-paced (-EPS) and paced (+ EPS) conditions. Scale bar = 20 μm. (E-G) Quantitative analysis of images with bars representing mean and error bars of standard deviation. Significance bars were generated using two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test, with ***p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and * p < 0.05; (E) Percent of image area positive for actin stain; (F) Z-line density within cells; (G) Z-line orientational order parameter.