Skip to main content
. 2026 Jan 6;15:1711701. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1711701

Table 3.

Treatment outcomes and adverse reactions in the two groups.

Observation indicators PAE (n=150) VP (n=135) Z/χ2 P-value
Hemostatic Efficacy 52.388 <0.001
 Significant Improvement 121 (80.7%) 31 (23.0%)
 Moderate Improvement 20 (13.3%) 47 (34.8%)
 No Improvement 9 (6.0%) 57 (42.2%)
 Total Effective Cases 141 (94.0%) 78 (57.8%)
Hematological parameters
 HB change value (g/L) 1.0 (-5.0-9.3) -4.0 (-10.0-2.0)* -4.692 <0.001
 RBC change value (x10^12/L) 0.0 (-0.2-0.3) -0.2 (-0.4-0.0)* -4.599 <0.001
 HCT change value (%) 0.3 (-1.7-2.3) -1.4 (-3.5-0.6)* -4.460 <0.001
 PLT change value (x10^9/L) -0.5 (-25.5-26.0) -5.0 (-40.0-24.0) -1.309 0.191
Adverse Reactions
 Local infection 4 (2.7%) 17 (12.6%) 10.256 0.001
 Pelvic persistent pain 46 (30.7%) 63 (46.7%) 7.701 0.006
 Gastrointestinal reactions 10 (6.7%) 8 (5.9%) 0.066 0.797
 Fever 23 (15.3%) 9 (6.7%) 5.354 0.021
Recurrence of bleeding 5 (3.3%) 14 (10.4%) 5.655 0.017

*indicated statistically significant differences compared with pre-treatment levels, P<0.05. Significant improvement = bleeding cessation ≤ 24 h after treatment; Moderate improvement = bleeding cessation ≤ 3 days or minimal bleeding ≤ 7 days; No improvement = bleeding persisting > 7 days. Total hemostatic efficacy rate = (Significant improvement + Moderate improvement) /total cases × 100%; “Pelvic persistent pain” was defined as persistent pain lasting more than 3 days after treatment.