Skip to main content
. 2026 Jan 22;41(1):cyaf064. doi: 10.1093/her/cyaf064

Table 1.

Joint display of teachers’ quantitative and qualitative ratings of intervention activities and the whole intervention on acceptability, feasibility, student acceptability, and appropriateness.

Intervention activities average ratings Whole intervention ratings
Mean [SD] a % of teachers agreeing b Mean [SD] a % of teachers agreeing b Quotes from interviews
Acceptability 3.86 [0.94] 73% 3.94 [0.94] 67% ‘I think there were really too many ideas […], but there were many practical things included, which was really great.’ (Interview 03, Line. 111)
‘Therefore, I was actually the only one who did it [the intervention], in the end.’ (Interview 01, Line 138)
Student acceptability 4.04 [0.86] 80% 3.72 [0.96] 61% ‘. . . and the kids said, Oh, this again [nutrition]?’ (Interview 01, line 62)
‘Only the aspect of sleep, that was new for the kids.’ (Interview 06, Line 16)
‘I believe what the kids really liked was the practical connection, you know, to their everyday life with nutrition and PA.’ (Interview 02, Line 153)
Feasibility 3.95 [0.89] 74% 3.33 [0.90] 56% ‘I always managed only about half of what was planned for an [school] hour.’ (Interview 05, Line 91)
Appropriateness 4.11 [0.90] 84% 3.83 [0.62] 72% ‘It was very detailed and comprehensive, so I think even my very committed parents eventually stopped reading it.’ (Interview 05, Line 56)
a

On a 5-point score, where 5 is the fully agreement with the intervention being acceptable, feasible, appropriate.

b

% of teachers agree/fully agree [4, 5] with the intervention being acceptable, feasible, appropriate; SD = standard deviation.