Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jan 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Dec 31;23(2):280–287. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.025

Table 4.

Implementation Outcomes for Large-Scale Data-Driven Quality Improvement in Assisted Living in Wisconsin

Implementation Outcomes n %
Adoption
 Total enrollments between 2013 and 2020 810 n/a
 Members enrolled as of end of 2020 (n = 1573 eligible)* 487 (31)
Feasibility
 Members that completed quality assessment ≥1 quarter (n = 810) 746 (92)
 Members that administered resident survey ≥1 y (n = 810) 661 (82)
Fidelity
 Membership
  Members never suspended from membership in good standing (n = 780 eligible) 538 (69)
  Average members in good standing per quarter n/a (88)
 Participation
  Members that completed quality assessment in Q1 2021 (n = 506 eligible) 407 (80)
 Continuous participation
  Members that never missed a quarterly quality assessment (n = 780 eligible)§ 275 (35)
  Members that never missed an annual resident survey (n = 780 eligible)§ 338 (43)
Penetration
 Residents in member communities as of end of 2020|| (n = 30,345 eligible**) 14,237 (47)
Sustainability
 Membership
  Members enrolled >2 y (n = 746) 529 (71)
  Members enrolled >5 y (n = 746) 277 (37)
 Participation
  Members that completed quality assessment >8 quarters (n = 746) 468 (63)
  Members that completed quality assessment >20 quarters (n = 746) 230 (31)

n/a: not available due to variable n by quarter.

*

Belong to one of the 4 Wisconsin provider associations.

Member enrollments since 2013.

Quarterly average since definition of membership rules in Q2 2015.

§

Enrolled ≥2 quarters.

||

Estimated as number of licensed beds in enrolled communities.

**

Licensed beds in communities belonging to one of the 4 WI provider associations.