Skip to main content
. 2025 Dec 19;16:2952. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-32771-8

Table 8.

Comparison of two RNA extraction methods for HA and NA classification using the portable system on sample set 3 with known AIV subtype (H7N6). Subtypes were characterised by manually mapping to a non-redundant reference gene set downloaded from GISAID. [+++] indicates the average depth of coverage is above quality threshold of > 30x. [—] indicates the average depth of coverage is below 30x and hence did not pass the quality threshold for generating a consensus sequence.

Sample No. Sample Name RNA extraction kit Type of sample GISAID mapping HA average depth of coverage NA average depth of coverage
13a W24_02663-1 QIAamp Viral RNA Mini kit Oropharyngeal H7 N6 +++ (109.3x) +++ (494.5x)
14a W24_02665-7 Oropharyngeal H7 N6 +++ (150.4x) +++ (625.4x)
15a W24_02665-10 Cloacal H7 N6 +++ (149.6x) +++ (524.3x)
16a W24_02665-5 Oropharyngeal H7 N6 +++ (245.2x) +++ (452.1x)
17a W24_02665-4 Cloacal H7 N6 +++ (39.4x) +++ (216.4x)
Number of samples successfully characterised as H7 or N6 5/5 (100%) 5/5 (100%)
95% Confidence Interval 56.55–99.49 47.82–100
13b W24_02663-1b Zymo Quick-RNA viral kit Oropharyngeal H7 N6 +++ (419.3x) +++ (990.9x)
14b W24_02665-7b Oropharyngeal H7 N6 +++ (100.8x) +++ (537.2x)
15b W24_02665-10b Cloacal Low read N6 — (28.5x) +++ (275.9x)
16b W24_02665-5b Oropharyngeal Low read Low read — (N/A) — (N/A)
17b W24_02665-4b Cloacal Low read Low read — (N/A) — (N/A)
Number of samples successfully characterised as H7 or N6 2/5 (40%) 3/5 (60%)
95% Confidence Interval 5.27–85.34 14.66–94.73