Skip to main content
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
. 2026 Jan 21;76(1):007034. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.007034

Yersinia fenwicki sp. nov., isolated from human clinical cases in Aotearoa | New Zealand and Australia

Lucia Rivas 1, Hugo Strydom 2, Hilary Miller 3, David Winter 3, Angela Cornelius 1, Jing Wang 3, Rikki Graham 4, Asha Kakkanat 4, Gino Micalizzi 4, Jacqueline (Jackie) Wright 1,*
PMCID: PMC12828076  PMID: 41568815

Abstract

A Gram-negative bacillus isolated from human clinical cases in Aotearoa | New Zealand (NZ) and Australia was identified as a new species within the genus Yersinia based on genetic and phenotypic characteristics. This species demonstrated distinct biochemical differences in comparison to those typically reported for Yersinia enterocolitica (biotypes 1A, 1B, 2, 3, 4 and 5), including the ability to utilise raffinose and melibiose. Whole-genome sequencing data identified a total of 11 strains as a novel multi locus sequence type 598 (using the seven-gene McNally scheme). A closed genome for this species was obtained using Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing, polished with high-accuracy Illumina short-read sequence data. Analysis of the 16S rRNA showed the closest similarity (98.36%) to Yersinia hibernica and Yersinia artesiana. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) values were below the threshold of ≤95% ANI when compared to the type strains of other Yersinia species, with Y. enterocolitica subsp. enterocolitica (94.1%) identified as the closest relative, thereby providing evidence that these strains should be considered as a novel species. The type strain is NZRM 4767T=DSM 120367T.

Keywords: clinical, Yersinia fenwicki, Yersinia species nov.

Introduction

The genus Yersinia is a member of the order Enterobacterales and belongs to the family Yersiniaceae [1]. Currently, there are 26 species within the genus Yersinia. Whilst many species within Yersinia are considered to be of low pathogenicity to humans and found within the environment, there are at least three species including Yersinia enterocolitica, Yersinia pestis (the causative agent of plague) and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis which are pathogenic to immunocompetent humans [2]. These three species have been shown to have evolved independently [3].

In Aotearoa | New Zealand (NZ), Y. enterocolitica and less frequently Y. pseudotuberculosis cause significant gastrointestinal infection in human and animals with no recorded cases of Y. pestis [4]. There are six internationally recognised Y. enterocolitica biotypes (BTs) (1A, 1B, 2, 3, 4 and 5), which can be further subdivided into numerous (>48) serotypes based on their heat-stable antigens [5,6]. Y. enterocolitica BT 1A, which includes a wide range of serotypes, is often considered internationally as non-pathogenic because it lacks the classical Y. enterocolitica virulence determinants that include a virulence plasmid (pYV) and chromosomal gene invasin (inv), as well as the attachment and invasion locus (ail) [7,8]. However, growing epidemiological evidence suggests that Y. enterocolitica BT 1A can cause gastrointestinal disease [9].

The NZ case definition for a confirmed human case of yersiniosis, which includes YE BT 1A, is a clinically compatible illness accompanied by laboratory definitive evidence of either (a) isolation of Y. enterocolitica or Y. pseudotuberculosis from blood or faeces, or (b) detection of Yersinia spp. nucleic acid from faeces [10]. All diagnostic laboratories in NZ are required to reflex culture all Yersinia screen-positive samples and forward isolates to the national Enteric Reference Laboratory (ERL) for confirmation and epidemiological typing. Following a detailed validation process, which included parallel testing of several hundred isolates, routine whole-genome sequencing of all Yersinia isolates referred to ERL was implemented for species identification and further typing in 2024.

In 2010, the ERL first observed an atypical Yersinia strain from a human faecal sample referred from a primary clinical diagnostic laboratory. Biochemical typing of the strain showed biochemical reactions that differentiated it from Y. enterocolitica. However, the phenotypic characteristics observed were similar to those previously reported as unusual Y. enterocolitica strains recovered from domestic animals and clinical cases in NZ in the 1990s [11]. Therefore, this strain was originally reported as ‘atypical Y. enterocolitica’. Unfortunately, the strains from the study of Fenwick et al. [11] were not available for the current analysis. The genomes of six of the atypical Y. enterocolitica isolated from clinical samples were submitted to EnteroBase Yersinia and assigned a sequence type (ST) 598 (McNally scheme [12,13]) and hierarchical cluster (HierCC) [14] Yersinia HC1490_4399, which has been reported as a novel species of Yersinia [15]. In 2023, an additional two genomes identifying as ST598 and Yersinia HC1490_4399 were submitted into the EnteroBase Yersinia database by an Australian laboratory following isolation from human clinical samples. These isolates were identified from Australian human clinical samples tested in 2023 and characterised as Y. enterocolitica BT 1A using biochemical typing.

This study aimed to describe a new species within Yersinia with the support of genomic and biochemical data. As this novel species has a similar biochemical profile as the unusual YE first described by Fenwick et al. [11], and in recognition of the contribution Emeritus Professor Stanley Fenwick has made to the study of Yersinia in NZ, we propose that this novel species be named Yersinia fenwicki.

Physiology and chemotaxonomy

Table 1 outlines the bacterial isolates and genomic data analysed in this study. One of the NZ clinical isolates has been assigned the type strain for Y. fenwicki and has been deposited in the New Zealand Reference Culture Medical Section (NZRM) as NZRM 4767T and in the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ) as DSM 120367T. MALDI-TOF MS [Bruker MALDI Biotyper® (MBT); Billerica, MA, USA] identified NZRM 4767T as Y. enterocolitica/Yersinia intermedia. The protein patterns of all the strains tested matched with patterns already known for Yersinia species with scores of between 1.77 and 2.16 (MBT Compass Library 2023). Therefore, this strain cannot be distinguished from its genetically closest relatives using this technique [16].

Table 1. Isolates belonging to Y. fenwicki sp. nov. The New Zealand Reference Medical Section (NZRM) number is shown for isolates deposited into that collection. The numbers in the brackets are the PHF Science Laboratory numbers. The type strain for Y. fenwicki sp. nov. is denoted with T and is equivalent to the DSMZ GmBH collection DSM 120367T. The complete genomes of NZRM 4767T and raw sequence reads for all NZ and Australian isolates analysed in this study are available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Short Read Archive (SRA) under BioProjects PRJNA1142067 and PRJEB83896, respectively.

Isolate no. Isolation information Biosample accession
Source Material Country Year
NZRM 4767T (15ER0244) Human Faecal New Zealand 2015 SAMN43575973
NZRM 4765 (15ER0058) Human Faecal New Zealand 2015 SAMN43575971
NZRM 4766 (15ER0187) Human Faecal New Zealand 2015 SAMN43575972
NZRM 4768 (18ER0470) Human Faecal New Zealand 2018 SAMN43575974
NZRM 4769 (18ER0612) Human Faecal New Zealand 2018 SAMN43575975
NZRM 4770 (21ER3874) Human Faecal New Zealand 2021 SAMN44268530
NZRM 4771 (22ER0879) Human Faecal New Zealand 2022 SAMN43575976
22ER4185 Human Faecal New Zealand 2022 SAMN43575977
NZRM4780 (24ER0337) Human Faecal New Zealand 2024 SAMN43575978
M2300673ta Human Faecal Australia 2023 SAMEA117565739
M2301254ta Human Faecal Australia 2023 SAMEA117565740

Biochemical profiling as previously described [16] was performed for NZRM 4767T and all associated ST598 isolates that were viable in NZ (Table 1). Bacterial cells were aerobically cultured on Tryptone Soya Agar (TSA; Fort Richard, Auckland, NZ) and Cefsulodin-Irgasan-Novobiocin (CIN; Fort Richard) agar plates and incubated at 28 °C for 18 h±2 h. Gram staining was performed using colonies from TSA, and cell morphology was observed using an optical microscope. Both API 20E and API 50 CH kits (bioMérieux; Marcy-l’Étoile, France) were inoculated and incubated at 28 °C to determine biochemical characteristics and sugar fermentation, respectively. In addition, motility was tested using in-house motility test media in a stab tube, and a lipid hydrolysis test was performed using Nagler agar plates (Fort Richard, Auckland, NZ) inoculated and incubated at 28 °C for 48 h. Catalase activity was considered positive when bubble production in 3% (v/v) hydrogen peroxide solution was observed. Oxidase activity was evaluated using filter paper moistened with tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

NZRM 4767T demonstrated positive reactions for both the aesculin and salicin biochemical tests, which are two reactions that are used to differentiate YE BT 1A from BTs 1B–5 [5] (Table 2). However, distinct biochemical differences were also observed for NZRM 4767T in comparison to those typically reported for all YE (Table 2), including the ability to utilise raffinose and melibiose and an inability to decarboxylate ornithine. All other associated NZ ST598 isolates tested demonstrated the same biochemical test results as NZRM 4767T. Using a Y. enterocolitica biotyping scheme adapted from Wauters et al. [5], both Australian isolates exhibited fermentation of xylose, trehalose and salicin; production of indole; and tween-esterase and pyrazinamidase activity at 25 °C after 48 h which correlated with Y. enterocolitica BT 1A. As reported in other studies, identification of Yersinia to the species level by traditional biochemical methods can be difficult due to heterogeneous biochemical phenotypes [17,19].

Table 2. Biochemical results for NZRM 4767T Y. fenwicki compared with those of other Yersinia species with >90 % average nucleotide identity (ANI) similarity and/or >98 % pairwise similarities with the 16S rRNA gene for NZRM 4767T Y. fenwicki.

1, Y. fenwicki sp. nov. (n=8); 2, Y. enterocolitica (YE) biotype (BT) 1A (n=27); 3, YE BT 1B (n=4); 4, YE BT 2 (n=58); 5, YE BT 3 (n=23); 6, YE BT 4 (n=30); 7, YE BT 5 (n=4); 8, Yersinia artesiana (n=4); 9, Yersinia proxima (n=10); 10, Yersinia hibernica (n=2).

Results for YE, Y. artesiana, Y. proxima and Y. hibernica were extracted from Le Guern et al. [16]. Testing for Y. fenwicki included eight strains from NZ only (Table 1). Criteria used based on Le Guern et al. [16]: +, 90 % or more strains positive; −, 90 % or more strains negative; d, 11–89 % of strains positive. Shaded results are key differentiators for Y. fenwicki compared with other Yersinia species. All strains were negative for lysine decarboxylase, D-adonitol and L-rhamnose, starch and D-tagatose; and all were positive for urease, sucrose, L-arabinose, D-ribose and D-cellobiose.

Characteristic 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Utilisation of:
β-Galactosidase + + + + + + d + + +
Ornithine decarboxylase d d d d d d d
Citrate utilisation d d
Indole + + + + +
Acetoin production d + + + d + d +
+
API 50 CH panel
d-Xylose + + + + + + + + +
l-Sorbose + + + + + + d + + +
Inositol + + + d + + +
d-Sorbitol + + + + + + d + + +
Arbutin + + + d d d d + + +
Aesculin ferric citrate + + + + +
Salicin + d d d + + +
d-Maltose + + + + + + d + + +
d-Lactose d + d + d d + +
d-Melibiose +
d-Sucrose + + + + + + + + +
d-Trehalose + + + + + + d + + +
d-Raffinose +
Gentobiose + + + + + + d + + +
l-Fucose + +
d-Arabitol + d + + +
Potassium gluconate + + + d + + + +
Potassium 2-ketogluconate d +
Potassium 5-ketogluconate + + + d d + + +
Lipase activity + + + +
Motility at 28 °C + + + + d +

Genome features

All isolates were grown in TSA (Fort Richard, Auckland, NZ) at 28 °C for 24 h±2 h, prior to genomic DNA extraction using either the Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit, or the QiaSymphony DSP DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) or the Chemagic 360 extraction platform (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The DNA quality and concentration were determined using PicoGreen (Quant-iT; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sequencing libraries containing 1 ng of DNA were prepared using the Nextera XT chemistry (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) for 150 bp paired-end sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq or NextSeq sequencer, according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Illumina). Sequence quality checks, de novo assembly and species identification were performed using an in-house pipeline comprising Fastp v.0.20.1 [20] (no trimming of reads was performed), Centrifuge v.1.0.4 [21], Skesa v.2.3.0 [22] and Quast v.5.0.2 [23]. Assembly statistics including depth, number of contigs, N50 and GC% are provided in Table S1, available in the online Supplementary Material.

Oxford nanopore sequencing was performed on NZRM 4767T, as well as four other NZ ST598 isolates to obtain finished-quality genomes. Nanopore sequencing was performed using the native barcoding kit (SQK-NDB114, Oxford, UK), run on a GridION flow cell (R10.4.1). Reads were base called using Dorado v.0.7.0 (https://github.com/nanoporetech/dorado) using the super-accurate base calling model (dna_r10.4.1_e8.2_400bps_sup). Quality trimming was performed using Filtlong v. 0.2.1 (https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong), removing reads less than 2,000 bp and retaining 90% of the best reads. Nanopore reads were assembled using Trycycler v.0.5.4 [24], followed by long-read polishing with Medaka v.1.8.0 (https://github.com/nanoporetech/medaka) and further polishing with Illumina data using Polypolish v.0.6.0 [25].

After assembly, a circular finished-quality chromosome of 4,723,104 bp was generated for NZRM 4767T (Accession NZ_CP170755). CheckM (version 1.2.3) was used to evaluate the quality of the whole-genome sequencing [26] which revealed 99.35% completeness and 1.31% contamination, thus meeting the minimum standards for prokaryotic taxonomy [27]. Two putative plasmids of 68,836 and 5,481 bp were assembled. Some variation in chromosome and plasmid length was observed among the other strains sequenced with nanopore, with chromosome sizes ranging from 4,606,130 to 4,743,899 bp and plasmids ranging from 4,359 to 261,589 bp. Annotation using Bakta v.1.5.0 [28] identified 4,404 genes of which 4,236 were coding.

All assemblies had 8 copies of 5S rRNA genes, 7 copies of 23 rRNA genes and 80 tRNA genes. Seven 16S rRNA copies were present, and these could be split into two sequence types with four copies in one type and three in the other type. Pairwise identity within each type was >99.9% and 98.5–98.8% between the two types. The most common 16S rRNA gene allele from NZRM 4767T (NCBI accession: PQ431197) was extracted from the genome for analysis. The full-length 16S rRNA gene was queried in the EzBioCloud 16S database as previously described [27,29]. It is recommended that only species with 98.7% or higher 16S similarity are selected for further calculation of the overall genome-related index [27]. As outlined in Table 3, the 16S rRNA gene for NZRM 4767T showed the closest similarity (98.36%) to Y. hibernica and Y. artesiana, followed by Y. enterocolitica subsp. palearctica (98.29%) and Y. enterocolitica subsp. enterocolitica (97.88%)

Table 3. Pairwise similarities of the 16S rRNA gene for Y. fenwicki NZRM 4767T (NCBI accession: PQ431197) to other type strains of Yersinia. Nucleotide mismatch is based on differences between the Y. fenwicki 16S rRNA gene to the reference sequences.

Name Type strain Accession Pairwise similarity (%) Mismatch/total nt
Y. hibernica CFS1934 MK129259 98.36 24/1,465
Y. artesiana IP42281 LR745664 98.36 24/1,465
Y. enterocolitica subsp. palearctica Y11 FR729477 98.29 25/1,465
Y. enterocolitica subsp. enterocolitica ATCC 9610 JPDV01000006 97.88 31/1,465
Yersinia massiliensis CCUG 53443 CAKR01000050 97.75 33/1,465
Yersinia alsatica IP38850 LR745670 97.68 34/1,465
Yersinia canariae SRR7544370 MN434982 97.41 38/1,465
Yersinia vastinensis IP38594 LR745669 97.27 40/1,465
Y. proxima IP37424 LR745667 97.27 40/1,465
Y. intermedia ATCC 29909 AF366380 97.26 40/1,461
Yersinia rohdei ATCC 43380 ACCD01000072 97.20 41/1,465
Yersinia nurmii CIP 110231 CPYD01000031 97.20 41/1,465
Yersinia frederiksenii ATCC 33641 JPPS01000006 97.13 42/1,465
Yersinia thracica IP34646 LR745665 97.13 42/1,465
Yersinia mollaretii ATCC 43969 AF366382 97.12 42/1,461
Yersinia pekkanenii CIP 110230 CWJL01000114 97.00 44/1,465

The ANI values were calculated using fastANI version 1.33 [30]. As outlined in Table 4, NZRM 4767T was most closely related to Y. enterocolitica subsp. enterocolitica (94.1% ANI), Y. enterocolitica subsp. palearctica (93.9%), Y. artesiana (93.0% ANI) and Y. proxima (92.7% ANI). These ANI values were representative of all ST598 genomes analysed in the current study (Table S2). The ANI values for NZRM 4767T were below the threshold of ≤95% ANI and showed a strong and clear demarcation when compared to the type strains of other Yersinia species. This observation is concordant with the species status of this strain according to the proposed delineation cut-off of 95–96% [27,31]. In addition, the digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values for NZRM 4767T were calculated using the recommended d4 formula within Type (Strain) Genome Server (TYGS) hosted by the DSMZ [32]. As outlined in Table 4, the output resulted in the comparison of 12 Yersinia species with dDDH d4 formula values ranging from 56.1% for Y. enterocolitica subsp. enterocolitica ATCC 9610T to as low as 21.9% for Yersinia ruckeri ATCC 29473T, which were all below the threshold of 70% for the same species identification, further supporting NZRM 4767T as a novel species. As per TYGS recommendations, dDDH formula d4 was used for comparisons because it is independent of genome length and thus robust against the use of incomplete draft genomes [33,35], such as Y. enterocolitica subsp. enterocolitica ATCC 9610T. The use of the d4 formula and 70% cut-off to delineate other novel Yersinia species has been previously used in the description of new Yersinia species [19,36, 37].

Table 4. ANI and dDDH values for Y. fenwicki NZRM 4767T (Accession NZ_CP170755) queried against type strains of other Yersinia species. The dDDH values (d0, d4 and d6) and Confidence Intervals (model C.I.) calculated using the TYGS.

Yersinia species, strain ANI (%) dDDH values
d0 % [C.I.] d4 % [C.I.] d6 % [C.I.]
Y. enterocolitica subsp. enterocolitica ATCC 9610T 94.13 74.5 [70.6–78.2] 56.1 [53.4–58.8] 73.0 [69.5–76.2]
Y. enterocolitica subsp. palearctica Y11T 93.92 71.0 [67.1–74.7] 55.0 [52.4–57.8] 69.7 [66.3–73.0]
Y. artesiana IP42281T 92.97 71.1 [67.2–74.8] 49.4 [46.8–52.0] 68.1 [64.7–71.3]
Y. proxima IP37424T 92.66 72.2 [68.3–74.6] 48.6 [46.0–51.2] 68.7 [65.3–72.0]
Y. thracica IP34646T 87.57 60.0 [56.3–63.6] 33.0 [30.6–35.6] 52.8 [49.7–55.9]
Yersinia rochesterensis ATCC BAA-2637T 87.55 61.3 [57.6–64.9] 33.0 [30.5–35.5] 53.7 [50.6–56.8]
Yersinia kristensenii subsp. kristensenii ATCC 33638T 87.52 60.1 [56.4–63.7] 32.7 [30.2–35.2] 52.7 [49.6–55.8]
Y. canariae NCTC 14382T 87.35 65.0 [61.2–68.6] 32.5 [30.1–35.0] 56.1 [53.0–59.3]
Y. hibernica CFS1934T 86.14 59.1 [55.5–62.6] 30.2 [27.8–32.7] 50.7 [47.7–53.8]
Y. alsatica IP38850T 85.31 53.4 [49.9–56.8] 28.1 [25.7–30.6] 45.7 [42.6–48.6]
Y. frederiksenii ATCC 33641T 85.27 53.5 [50.0–56.6] 27.7 [25.4–30.2] 45.5 [42.2–48.6]
Y. rohdei ATCC 43380T 84.41 46.7 [43.3–50.1] 27.2 [24.9–29.7] 40.6 [37.7–43.7]
Y. ruckeri ATCC 29473T 81.16 22.6 [19.3–26.2] 21.8 [19.6–24.3] 21.5 [18.7–24.5]

Whole-genome sequencing data used to infer a multi locus ST identified these isolates as ST598 using the McNally scheme [12]. The Illumina-sequenced genome for NZRM 4767T, as well as all associated ST598 genomes analysed in this study (Table 1), was compared with 241 published Yersinia sequences [16,38]. Assemblies for the published isolates were downloaded from either the Bacterial Isolate Genome Sequence Database (BIGSdb) Yersinia database hosted by the Pasteur Institute [38,39] or EnteroBase [13]. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using the 500 core genes of the Yersinia cgMLST scheme previously described by Savin et al. [38]. The Genome Comparator plugin (v.2.7.7) from BIGSdb-Pasteur was used to obtain the cgMLST allele sequences for each isolate. Allele sequences were concatenated and aligned using MAFFT, and a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed using IQTree, using the GTR+F+I+G4 model and 2,000 bootstrap replicates. The genomes for NZRM 4767T and all associated ST598 genomes fell into a new clade that was strongly demarcated from other recognised Yersinia species (Fig. 1). All ST598 genomes analysed in this study had a very close genetic relationship with a mean ANI of 99.94% (Table S2) and 2–12 out of 500 core-allele differences between them (data not shown).

Fig. 1. Maximum likelihood tree of Yersinia based on an alignment of concatenated allele sequences from 500 core genes. Bootstrap values for species-level clades are shown. The scale bar shows nucleotide substitutions per site.

Fig. 1.

NZRM 4767T and the associated ST598 genomes from NZ were analysed for virulence genes using Abricate v.1.0.1 (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate) with the virulence factor database (VFDB) [40]. All genomes lacked the chromosomally encoded ail virulence gene commonly associated with pathogenic BTs of Y. enterocolitica but did possess the invA gene [41] which is seen in all NZ YE including BT 1A (unpublished data). All genomes also lacked the ystB or ystA genes, with only one of these genes commonly observed in different YE BTs [41,42]. The Y. fenwicki described here were isolated from human clinical cases of acute gastroenteritis. However, presence does not equal causation, and it is beyond the scope of this study to establish the pathogenicity of this species.

For NZRM 4767T, two plasmid replicon signatures (ColRNAI_rep_cluster_1987 and rep_cluster_904) were identified with MOB-recon from MOB-suite version 3.1.0 [43]. blast analysis of the plasmids revealed no close similarities to the pYV virulence plasmid of Yersinia [41,44]. All ST598 genomes possessed the antimicrobial resistance genes blaA and vatF which have been previously reported in NZ Y. enterocolitica strains [45].

Description of Yersinia fenwicki sp. nov.

Yersinia fenwicki (fen.wick’i, N.L. gen. n. fenwicki, named to honour and acknowledge the significant pioneering contribution made by Emeritus Professor Stanley Fenwick to yersiniosis knowledge and understanding in NZ).

Cells are short Gram-negative rods that grow well aerobically on TSA at 25–37 °C producing 1–2 mm diameter colonies after 24 h incubation. Colonies on CIN are pin-sized and circular and have a deep red centre surrounded by a translucent border. The strains tested are motile, reduce nitrate and are oxidase- and lipase-negative and catalase-positive. In API 20E tests, all strains are positive for β-galactosidase and urease utilisation, as well as indole production, and negative for lysine and ornithine decarboxylation, arginine dihydrolase, H2S production, tryptophan deaminase and gelatinase. In all API 50 CH tests, fermentation of l-arabinose, d-ribose, d-xylose, d-galactose, d-glucose, d-fructose, d-mannose, l-sorbose, inositol, d-mannitol, d-sorbitol, N-acetylglucosamine, arbutin, aesculin, salicin, d-cellobiose, d-maltose, d-melibiose, d-sucrose, d-trehalose, d-raffinose, gentobiose, l-fucose, d-arabitol, gluconate and potassium 5-ketogluconate was positive, while negative for erythritol, d-arabinose, l-xylose, d-adonitol, methyl β-d-xylopyranoside, l-rhamnose, dulcitol, methyl α-d-mannopyranoside, methyl α-d-glucopyranoside, amygdalin, inulin, d-melezitose, glucogen, xylitol, d-turanose, d-lyxose, d-tagatose, d-fucose, l-arabitol and starch.

The type strain, NZRM 4767T=DSM 120367T, and all associated ST598 isolates analysed in this study were isolated from human faecal samples from either NZ or Australia (Table 1).

The DNA G+C content of NZRM 4767T is 47.01 mol%, and the chromosomal length is 4,723,104 bp. Two putative plasmids of 68,836 and 5,481 bp were also identified.

The complete genome of NZRM 4767T and raw sequence reads for all isolates analysed in this study are available on NCBI SRA under BioProject numbers PRJNA1142067 and PRJEB83896 (accession numbers available in Table 1). This BioProject also includes the sequences for the two putative plasmids (accession numbers CP170756 and CP170757) identified for NZRM 4767T.

Supplementary material

Uncited Supplementary Material 1.
ijsem-76-07034-s001.xlsx (52.3KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.007034

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the New Zealand Ministry of Health for their support of this study and its publication, including the use of the clinical isolates, and associated data. These data were collected as part of the national surveillance programme. We also thank Anne Midwinter for her assistance and Ernest Williams and Michael Addidle for their expertise as peer reviewers of this manuscript. Finally, we acknowledge the significant pioneering contribution made by Emeritus Professor Stanley Fenwick to yersiniosis knowledge and understanding in New Zealand.

Abbreviations

ANI

average nucleotide identity

BIGSdb

Bacterial Isolate Genome Sequence Database

BTs

biotypes

CIN

Cefsulodin-Irgasan-Novobiocin

dDDH

digital DNA–DNA hybridization

DSMZ

Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen

ERL

Enteric Reference Laboratory

NCBI

National Center for Biotechnology Information

NZ

Aotearoa | New Zealand

NZRM

New Zealand Reference Culture Medical Section

SRA

Short Read Archive

ST

sequence type

TSA

Tryptone Soya Agar

TYGS

Type (Strain) Genome Server

VFDB

virulence factor database

Footnotes

Funding: This work was supported by the ESR Strategic Science Investment Fund of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment.

Ethical statement: No specific consent was required from patients. New Zealand Ministry of Health requires case isolate referral for epidemiological typing of patient isolates for surveillance purposes under the Health Act (1956). As no additional sampling or information was asked from patients, and patient information was de-identified, no further formal approval from an ethical committee or informed consent was required. The Queensland Department of Health also requires the referral of Yersinia isolates for epidemiological typing for surveillance purposes according to the Public Health Regulation (2018).

Accession No: The type strain has been lodged as NZRM 4767T and DSM 120367T. The 16S rRNA gene allele from NZRM 4767T has been lodged with NCBI as PQ431197.

Contributor Information

Lucia Rivas, Email: lucia.rivas@phfscience.nz.

Hugo Strydom, Email: hugo.strydom@phfscience.nz.

Hilary Miller, Email: hilary.miller@phfscience.nz.

David Winter, Email: david.winter@phfscience.nz.

Angela Cornelius, Email: angela.cornelius@phfscience.nz.

Jing Wang, Email: jing.wang@phfscience.nz.

Rikki Graham, Email: Rikki.Graham@health.qld.gov.au.

Asha Kakkanat, Email: Asha.Kakkanat@health.qld.gov.au.

Gino Micalizzi, Email: Gino.Micalizzi@health.qld.gov.au.

Jacqueline (Jackie) Wright, Email: jackie.wright@phfscience.nz.

References

  • 1.Adeolu M, Alnajar S, Naushad S, S Gupta R. Genome-based phylogeny and taxonomy of the “Enterobacteriales”: proposal for Enterobacterales ord. nov. divided into the families Enterobacteriaceae, Erwiniaceae fam. nov., Pectobacteriaceae fam. nov., Yersiniaceae fam. nov., Hafniaceae fam. nov., Morganellaceae fam. nov., and Budviciaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:5575–5599. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Davis KM. All Yersinia are not created equal: phenotypic adaptation to distinct niches within mammalian tissues. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:261. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Reuter S, Connor TR, Barquist L, Walker D, Feltwell T, et al. Parallel independent evolution of pathogenicity within the genus Yersinia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:6768–6773. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317161111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rivas L, Strydom H, Paine S, Wang J, Wright J. Yersiniosis in New Zealand. Pathogens. 2021;10:191. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wauters G, Kandolo K, Janssens M. Revised biogrouping scheme of Yersinia enterocolitica. Contrib Microbiol Immunol. 1987;9:14–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Eksic S, Steigerwalt AG, Bockemuhl J, Huntley-Carter GP, Brenner DJ. Yersinia rohdei sp. nov. isolated from human and dog feces and surface water. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1987;37:327–332. doi: 10.1099/00207713-37-4-327. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Campioni F, Falcão JP. Genotyping of Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 1A strains from clinical and nonclinical origins by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Can J Microbiol. 2014;60:419–424. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2014-0211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sihvonen LM, Jalkanen K, Huovinen E, Toivonen S, Corander J, et al. Clinical isolates of Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 1A represent two phylogenetic lineages with differing pathogenicity-related properties. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:208. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tennant SM, Grant TH, Robins-Browne RM. Pathogenicity of Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 1A. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;38:127–137. doi: 10.1016/S0928-8244(03)00180-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora Yersiniosis. 2023. https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/for-the-health-sector/health-sector-guidance/communicable-disease-control-manual/yersiniosis
  • 11.Fenwick SG, Wauters G, Ursing J, Gwozdz M. Unusual Yersinia enterocolitica strains recovered from domestic animals and people in New Zealand. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1996;16:241–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1996.tb00142.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hall M, Chattaway MA, Reuter S, Savin C, Strauch E, et al. Use of whole-genus genome sequence data to develop a multilocus sequence typing tool that accurately identifies Yersinia isolates to the species and subspecies levels. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:35–42. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02395-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhou Z, Alikhan NF, Mohamed K, Fan Y, Achtman M. The EnteroBase user’s guide, with case studies on Salmonella transmissions, Yersinia pestis phylogeny, and Escherichia core genomic diversity. Genome Res. 2020;30:138–152. doi: 10.1101/gr.251678.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhou Z, Charlesworth J, Achtman M. HierCC: a multi-level clustering scheme for population assignments based on core genome MLST. Bioinformatics. 2021;37:3645–3646. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Achtman M, Zhou Z, Charlesworth J, Baxter L. EnteroBase: hierarchical clustering of 100 000s of bacterial genomes into species/subspecies and populations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci . 2022;377:20210240. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Le Guern A-S, Savin C, Angermeier H, Brémont S, Clermont D, et al. Yersinia artesiana sp. nov., Yersinia proxima sp. nov., Yersinia alsatica sp. nov., Yersina vastinensis sp. nov., Yersinia thracica sp. nov. and Yersinia occitanica sp. nov., isolated from humans and animals. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:5363–5372. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fredriksson-Ahomaa M, Joutsen S, Laukkanen-Ninios R. Identification of Yersinia at the species and subspecies levels is challenging. Curr Clin Micro Rpt . 2018;5:135–142. doi: 10.1007/s40588-018-0088-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Karhukorpi J, Päivänurmi M. Differentiation of Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 1A from pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica biotypes by detection of β-glucosidase activity: comparison of two chromogenic culture media and Vitek2. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63:34–37. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.062521-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nguyen SV, Greig DR, Hurley D, Donoghue O, Cao Y, et al. Yersinia canariae sp. nov., isolated from a human yersiniosis case. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:2382–2387. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kim D, Song L, Breitwieser FP, Salzberg SL. Centrifuge: rapid and sensitive classification of metagenomic sequences. Genome Res. 2016;26:1721–1729. doi: 10.1101/gr.210641.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Souvorov A, Agarwala R, Lipman DJ. SKESA: strategic k-mer extension for scrupulous assemblies. Genome Biol. 2018;19:153. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1540-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wick RR, Judd LM, Cerdeira LT, Hawkey J, Méric G, et al. Trycycler: consensus long-read assemblies for bacterial genomes. Genome Biol. 2021;22:266. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02483-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wick RR, Holt KE. Polypolish: Short-read polishing of long-read bacterial genome assemblies. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022;18:e1009802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2024;74:006300. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schwengers O, Jelonek L, Dieckmann MA, Beyvers S, Blom J, et al. Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification. Microb Genom. 2021;7:000685. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:1613–1617. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:2567–2572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409727102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D801–D807. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci. 2010;2:117–134. doi: 10.4056/sigs.531120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Martins BTF, Meirelles JL de, Omori WP, Oliveira RR de, Yamatogi RS, et al. Comparative genomics and antibiotic resistance of Yersinia enterocolitica obtained from a pork production chain and human clinical cases in Brazil. Food Res Int. 2022;152:110917. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nguyen SV, Muthappa DM, Hurley D, Donoghue O, McCabe E, et al. Yersinia hibernica sp. nov., isolated from pig-production environments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019;69:2023–2027. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nguyen SV, Cunningham SA, Jeraldo P, Tran A, Patel R. Yersinia occitanica is a later heterotypic synonym of Yersinia kristensenii subsp. rochesterensis and elevation of Yersinia kristensenii subsp. rochesterensis to species status. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71 doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Savin C, Criscuolo A, Guglielmini J, Le Guern A-S, Carniel E, et al. Genus-wide Yersinia core-genome multilocus sequence typing for species identification and strain characterization. Microb Genom. 2019;5:e000301. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jolley KA, Maiden MCJ. BIGSdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:595. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Liu B, Zheng D, Zhou S, Chen L, Yang J. VFDB 2022: a general classification scheme for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D912–D917. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bancerz-Kisiel A, Pieczywek M, Łada P, Szweda W. The Most Important Virulence Markers of Yersinia enterocolitica and Their Role during Infection. Genes (Basel) 2018;9:235. doi: 10.3390/genes9050235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Platt-Samoraj A. Toxigenic properties of Yersinia enterocolitica Biotype 1A. Toxins. 2022;14:118. doi: 10.3390/toxins14020118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Robertson J, Nash JHE. MOB-suite: software tools for clustering, reconstruction and typing of plasmids from draft assemblies. Microb Genom. 2018;4:e000206. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Robertson J, Bessonov K, Schonfeld J, Nash JHE. Universal whole-sequence-based plasmid typing and its utility to prediction of host range and epidemiological surveillance. Microb Genom. 2020;6:mgen000435. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rivas L, Szeto J, Elvy J, Dyet K, Wright J, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility and treatment of clinical cases of yersiniosis in Aotearoa | New Zealand. Microbiol Spectr. 2025;13:e0275124. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02751-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Uncited Supplementary Material 1.
ijsem-76-07034-s001.xlsx (52.3KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.007034

Articles from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Society for General Microbiology and the International Union of Microbiological Societies

RESOURCES