Table 2.
Gender differences in leadership competency, emotional intelligence, and self-esteem (N = 260).
| Gender | Leadership competency | Test and P-value Z test |
Emotional intelligence | Test and P-value Z test |
Self esteem | Test and P-value Z test |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | N | % | N | % | ||||
| Male | 139.33 | 30.45 | −9.511 | 67.45 | 25.75 | −9.265 | 29.99 | 5.39 | −5.164 |
| Female | 94.89 | 32.14 | <0.001 | 95.39 | 23.04 | <0.001 | 27.35 | 4.15 | <0.001 |
Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen’s d for mean differences. The large effect sizes for leadership competency (d = 1.42) and emotional intelligence (d = −1.14) indicate substantive practical significance beyond statistical significance. Gender differences are visualized in Figures 1, 2. The counterintuitive finding, whereby females’ emotional intelligence advantage does not translate to leadership competency advantage, constitutes the central paradox addressed through moderation analysis.