Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct 31;102(45):16281–16286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501427102

Table 1. Skill of discriminant models in predicting the modern distributions of blue and valley oak.

Satellite data
Range maps
Model Percent correct κ Percent correct κ
Blue oak
   (50%) 82 0.41 84 0.50
   (80%) 87 0.48 87 0.53
Valley oak
   (50%) 71 0.10 81 0.52
   (80%) 79 0.12 83 0.51

Numbers in parentheses indicate the likelihood threshold for assigning individual cells to the oak-present group in the discriminant model. Increasing the threshold from 50% to 80% likely improves the models' match to the satellite data and range maps, reducing the modern area predicted as suitable for blue oak (–24%) and valley oak (–27%). Percent correct reflects the percentage of all cells correctly assigned to oak-present and oak-absent groups. κ values account for the cells that would be assigned correctly by chance, where κ < 0.4 is poor agreement, 0.4 < κ < 0.55 is fair agreement, 0.55 < κ < 0.70 is good agreement, and κ > 0.7 is very good to excellent agreement (24).