Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct 31;102(45):16176–16181. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508489102

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Computational analysis of intron size and alternative splicing in the Drosophila and human genomes. (A and B) Every internal exon within the human or the Drosophila genomes is displayed as a function of the nucleotide length of its upstream (x axis) and downstream (y axis) introns. Each point within the scatter plots represents a unique exon. The x and y axes are shown in log scale. (A) Exon profile of the human genome. The majority of introns are long; however, ≈25% of exons are flanked by at least one short intron. The vertical and horizontal lines demarcate the experimentally determined 200- to 250-nt transition from cross-intron to cross-exon recognition. (B) Exon profile of the Drosophila genome. The majority (>85%) of exons are flanked by at least one short intron. (CF) Color diagrams displaying the probability of an exon's undergoing alternative splicing as a function of the length of its flanking introns. The upstream and downstream intron length increases exponentially along the x and y axes. The color scale (Right) represents the fold increase in the probability of an exon's being alternatively spliced relative to the probability calculated for exons that are flanked by introns <225 nt. (C) Probability diagram for exon skipping within the Drosophila genome. (D) Drosophila alternative 5′ or 3′ splice-site usage. (E) Human exon skipping. (F) Human alternative 5′ or 3′ splice-site usage.