Table 2.
Adaptation decision log linking stakeholder insights to intervention changes.
| ID | Principle | Stakeholder insight | Adaptation decision | Implementation in the Irish context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emotionally safe framing | Language implying “goodbye” caused distress for families | Reframed intervention as life-affirming storytelling | Sessions celebrate identity; prompts avoid end-of-life framing |
| 2 | Family and sibling inclusivity | Families wanted siblings and parents actively involved, especially in home settings | Expanded sessions to actively facilitate joint reflection and expression across the entire family unit | Manual includes sibling and family-friendly tools like drawing, music, allowing families to co-create stories together |
| 3 | Flexible, personalised participation | Children with low energy or limited communication need alternatives | Added emotion cards, visual prompts, drawing tasks, and audio/video options | Children and their families choose multiple expression tools and modes |
| 4 | Selective therapeutic recreation | Full Barretstown recreation cycle too structured for home-based PPC | Integrated only playful, creative elements of the model | Focused fun-centric practices maintain engagement without overstructure. |
| 5 | Family autonomy and pacing | Families wanted control over timing, story and final product especially during bereavement | Adopted family-led protocols allowing families to choose when and how the digital story is finalised | Families set the pacing and format preferences during a pre-intervention call |
| 6 | Facilitator preparedness | Facilitators may face emotional strain | Developed psychological preparation, resilience training, and ongoing support | Training covers emotional resilience, digital tools, ethical communication, and child engagement strategies and includes mock-up sessions |