Skip to main content
. 2026 Jan 13;12:1720646. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1720646

TABLE 4.

Correlation between UHR and stroke in Shaoyang area.

Characteristic Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value
UHR (continuous) 1.11 1.08, 1.13 < 0.001 1.07 1.04, 1.11 < 0.001 1.06 1.02, 1.10 0.005
UHR
Q1
Q2 2.28 1.64, 3.17 < 0.001 1.87 1.29, 2.72 < 0.001 1.51 1.01, 2.24 0.043
Q3 2.78 2.00, 3.85 < 0.001 2.24 1.54, 3.27 < 0.001 1.74 1.13, 2.68 0.012
Q4 3.38 2.44, 4.68 < 0.001 2.20 1.49, 3.25 < 0.001 1.59 0.98, 2.57 0.060
P for trend < 0.001 <0.001 0.084

CI, Confidence Interval; OR, Odds Ratio. Model 1: no covariates were adjusted. Model 2: adjusted for Age, Sex, Careers, Smoking, Drinking, Hepertension, Diabetes, CHD, Liver disease, Kindey disease, and Tumor. Model 3: adjusted for Age, Sex, Careers, Smoking, Drinking, Hepertension, Diabetes, CHD, Liver disease, Kindey disease, Tumor, SBP, DBP, BMI, TC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C.