Skip to main content
. 2025 May 6;8:100171. doi: 10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100171

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazard model analysis for overall survival

Variables Univariate
Multivariate
Hazards ratio 95% Confidence interval P value Hazards ratio 95% Confidence interval P value
Sex (male versus female) 0.79 0.41-1.51 0.48
Age (≥65 versus <65 years) 1.33 0.71-2.49 0.38
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (≥1 versus 0) 2.94 1.57-5.52 <0.01 2.33 1.08-5.00 0.03
Dysphagia score
 0 Reference — — Reference — —
 1-2 2.33 1.12-4.86 0.02 1.88 0.81-4.36 0.14
 3-4 4.29 1.99-9.27 <0.01 2.97 1.17-7.53 0.02
Smoking history (any tobacco product, including cigarettes, cigars, or pipes)
 Never smoker Reference — —
 Ex-smoker 1.02 047-2.22 0.97
 Current smoker 1.06 052-2.18 0.87
Tumor location
 Cervical esophagus/upper thoracic esophagus Reference — —
 Middle thoracic esophagus 1.29 0.63-2.66 0.48
 Lower thoracic esophagus/esophagogastric junction 1.09 0.50-2.37 0.83
Metastasis (metachronous versus synchronous) 0.74 0.35-1.56 0.43
Recurrence (distant versus locoregional) 5.43 × 108 0-not reached 1
Prior esophagectomy (yes versus no) 0.81 0.39-1.65 0.56
Prior radiotherapy (yes versus no) 0.74 0.40-1.38 0.35
Programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score (≥1% versus <1%) 0.95 0.36-2.47 0.92
Liver metastasis (yes versus no) 3.76 1.83-7.72 <0.01 2.90 1.18-7.10 0.02
Lung metastasis (yes versus no) 1.05 0.54-2.04 0.88
Peritoneal metastasis (yes versus no) 2.69 0.93-7.75 0.07
Lymph node metastasis (yes versus no) 0.93 0.36-2.38 0.88
Number of metastasis
 0 Reference — —
 1 0.30 0.07-1.38 0.12
 ≥2 0.70 0.16-2.95 0.63
Treatment regimen (immune checkpoint inhibitor + chemotherapy versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab) 1.17 0.58-2.38 0.66
Immune checkpoint inhibitor agent (pembrolizumab versus nivolumab) 1.09 0.55-2.15 0.80
Early tumor shrinkage (yes versus no) 0.21 0.07-0.60 <0.01 0.34 0.11-0.88 0.04
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (≥ median 4.4 versus < median 4.4) 1.70 0.91-3.16 0.10 — — —