Table 1. Comparative analysis between His-TAC and Y2H methods to efficiently reveal specific TRX/target complexes in trx1Δtrx2Δ yeast mutants.
| Affinity chromatography*
|
Yeast two-hybrid†
|
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Targets | TRX1 | TRX2 | Ath2 | Ath3 | TRX1 | TRX2 | Ath2 | Ath3 |
| AHP1 | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | − | ++ |
| TSA1 | ++ | + | + | NI | − | ++++ | − | NT |
| MET16 | + | + | + | NI | +++ | ++ | ++ | − |
| MSRA | NI | NI | NI | NI | + | ++ | +/− | +/− |
All TRX baits are mutated and carry a CXXS active site. NT, not tested; Ath2, AtTrxh2; Ath3, AtTrxh3.
Plus signs (+, ++, +++), spot density as observed on 2D gels. NI, the corresponding target was not identified among the 2D spots analyzed.
Plus signs (+, ++, +++), the level of two-hybrid interactions; −, no interaction occurred between partners tested; +/−, a faint but reproducible interaction.