Skip to main content
. 2005 Nov 7;102(46):16563–16565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507069102

Table 1. EXAFS fitting results for chloroperoxidase compound I.

Fe—N
Fe—S
Fe—O
N R σ2 N R σ2 N R σ2 Eo Error
Raw 4 2.000 (3) 0.0016 (1) 1 2.473 (9) 0.0061 (9) 1 1.653 (6) 0.0039 (6) -13.4 (12) 0.337
4 1.996 (3) 0.0016 (2) 0 1 1.650 (6) 0.0041 (7) -14.8 (11) 0.369
4 1.992 (3) 0.0015 (2) 1 2.467 (9) 0.0054 (9) 0 -17.2 (10) 0.390
4 1.990 (3) 0.0015 (2) 0 0 -17.8 (10) 0.416
Filtered 4 2.007 (2) 0.0017 (1) 1 2.478 (5) 0.0069 (6) 1 1.654 (3) 0.0031 (3) -11.4 (6) 0.133
4 2.002 (3) 0.0017 (1) 0 1 1.651 (4) 0.0033 (4) -13.0 (8) 0.203
4 1.992 (3) 0.0016 (2) 1 2.470 (10) 0.0060 (11) 0 -17.3 (12) 0.291
4 1.991 (4) 0.0016 (2) 0 0 -17.8 (11) 0.324

Raw and Fourier-filtered data were fit over the region k = 3-15 Å-1. Coordination number N, interatomic distance R (Å), mean-square deviation in R (the Debye-Waller factor), σ22), and the threshold energy shift E0 (eV). The values in parentheses are estimated SDs obtained from the diagonal elements of the covariance matrix. Empirically, EXAFS uncertainties are ± 0.02 Å for R and ±20% for N and σ2. The fit error is defined as [Σk6(χexptl – χcalc)2k6χ2exptl]1/2. Best fits are shown in boldface. Alternative fits with different coordination numbers are shown also. Coordination numbers, N, were constrained during fits.