| Item | Question | Preparatory Sources Informing Delphi Items | |
| Domain 1. Target group | Systematic review | Stakeholder dialogues | |
| 1 | To what extent do you agree that the target group benefits most from participating in a diagnosis-specific group intervention (e.g., only individuals with stress or anxiety)? | Systematic literature review | Theme: Needs of the Target Group |
| 2 | To what extent do you agree that the target group benefits most from participating in a mixed group intervention involving anxiety, depression and/or stress? | Systematic literature review | Theme: Needs of the Target Group |
| Open-ended question: Please elaborate your considerations here: | |||
| Domain 2. Professionals | |||
| 3 | To what extent do you agree that NBHIs should be delivered by an interdisciplinary team? (e.g., a physiotherapist and a nurse, or a psychologist and a nature guide) | Theme: Competency Development | |
| To what extent do you agree that the following professional groups should deliver the nature-based health interventions to the target group? | Theme: Competency Development | ||
| 4 | - Nurse | ||
| 5 | - Medical doctor | ||
| 6 | - Physiotherapist | ||
| 7 | - Occupational therapist | ||
| 8 | - Psychologist | ||
| 9 | - Nature educator | ||
| 10 | To what extent do you agree that the professional’s knowledge and experience with NBHIs is essential? | Theme: Competency Development | |
| 11 | To what extent do you agree that the professional’s knowledge and experience with the target group—people with mild to moderate anxiety, depression and/or stress—is essential? | Theme: Competency Development | |
| Open-ended question: Are there any other important professional groups not mentioned here? | |||
| Domain 3. Mechanisms of change | |||
| Based on your knowledge of the target group, to what extent do you agree that the following mechanisms of change should be integrated into a NBHI for people with mild to moderate anxiety, depression and/or stress? | Themes: Added Value of Nature AND Needs of the Target Group | ||
| 12 | - Nature experiences and nature interaction | ||
| 13 | - Exchange of experiences | ||
| 14 | - Sensory experiences | ||
| 15 | - Social communities | ||
| 16 | - Physical activity | ||
| 17 | - Empowerment | ||
| 18 | - Body awareness | ||
| 19 | - Self-reflection | ||
| 20 | - Coping ability/self-efficacy | ||
| 21 | - Participation in everyday life | ||
| Open-ended question: Are there any other important mechanisms of change you think should be included? | |||
| Domain 4. Outcome selection | |||
| We are interested in your assessment of which outcomes are most important to measure. How would you rank the following four outcomes? (1 being the one you consider most important to measure) | Systematic literature review | Theme: Measuring the Intervention | |
| - Symptoms (fx. DASS-21) | |||
| - Quality of life (fx. EQ-5D) | |||
| - Well being (fx. WHO-5) | |||
| - Functioning (fx PSFS) | |||
| Open-ended question: Are there any other more important outcomes not mentioned here? | |||