Abstract
Positive reinforcement was more effective than negative reinforcement in promoting compliance and reducing escape-maintained problem behavior for a child with autism. Escape extinction was then added while the child was given a choice between positive or negative reinforcement for compliance and the reinforcement schedule was thinned. When the reinforcement requirement reached 10 consecutive tasks, the treatment effects became inconsistent and reinforcer selection shifted from a strong preference for positive reinforcement to an unstable selection pattern.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (95.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Iwata B. A., Dorsey M. F., Slifer K. J., Bauman K. E., Richman G. S. Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):197–209. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lalli J. S., Vollmer T. R., Progar P. R., Wright C., Borrero J., Daniel D., Barthold C. H., Tocco K., May W. Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Fall;32(3):285–296. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piazza C. C., Fisher W. W., Hanley G. P., Remick M. L., Contrucci S. A., Aitken T. L. The use of positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape-maintained destructive behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Summer;30(2):279–298. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tustin R. D. Preference for reinforcers under varying schedule arrangements: A behavioral economic analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):597–606. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]