Abstract
This study investigated students' allocation of responding as a function of task difficulty and type of reinforcement contingency (i.e., accuracy based or time based). Four regular education fourth-grade students were presented with two identical stacks of easy and then difficult math worksheets using a reversal design. Regardless of condition, completing problems from each stack of worksheets was reinforced according to a different contingency; one required correct completion of math problems (accuracy based) and one required on-task behavior (time based). Results suggested that 3 of the 4 students preferred the accuracy-based contingency when given easy material and the time-based contingency when given difficult material. One student allocated more responding to the accuracy-based contingency when given easy problems but did not show a clear preference for either contingency with difficult problems. The implications of these findings for designing reinforcement-based programs for tasks of varying difficulty are discussed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (141.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ayllon T., Roberts M. D. Eliminating discipline problems by strengthening academic performance. J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Spring;7(1):71–76. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elliott B. E., Xu W., Mudrik K., Marshall J., Vekemans M., Holden J. J. Karyotypic evolution of a murine mammary adenocarcinoma in vitro and during progression from primary to metastatic growth in vivo. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1992 Jun;4(4):281–289. doi: 10.1002/gcc.2870040403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fisher W., Piazza C. C., Bowman L. G., Hagopian L. P., Owens J. C., Slevin I. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491–498. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoch Hannah, McComas Jennifer J., Johnson LeAnn, Faranda Nicky, Guenther Shayna L. The effects of magnitude and quality of reinforcement on choice responding during play activities. J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Summer;35(2):171–181. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neef N. A. Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Fall;25(3):691–699. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neef N. A., Mace F. C., Shade D. Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: the interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):37–52. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neef N. A., Shade D., Miller M. S. Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):575–583. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Northup J., George T., Jones K., Broussard C., Vollmer T. R. A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):201–212. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pace G. M., Ivancic M. T., Edwards G. L., Iwata B. A., Page T. J. Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249–255. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]