Table 2.
Comparative overview of orphan medical device regulation in the EU and the US.
| Dimension | European Union (EU MDR 2017/745) | United States (HUD/HDE framework) |
|---|---|---|
| Legal status | No formal orphan-device designation | Legally codified orphan-device category (≤8,000/year) |
| Evidentiary standard | “Expected clinical benefit” (full CE-marking requirements) | “Probable benefit” (reduced evidentiary threshold) |
| Flexibility mechanism | Exceptional derogations (Art. 59, Art. 5(5)); non-binding MDCG 2024–10 guidance | Statutory humanitarian pathway under the Safe Medical Devices Act |
| Financial incentives | None (no fee waivers, no exclusivity) | Profit permitted for pediatric uses; annual distribution cap |
| Oversight | Decentralized (Notified Bodies, national authorities) | Centralized FDA oversight with IRB supervision |
| Policy philosophy | Interpretive flexibility within rigid law | Codified flexibility balancing access and safeguards |
| Systemic consequence | Fragmented access, limited viability | Predictable early access, structured incentives |