Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2002 May;77(3):357–366. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-357

The living legacy of the Harvard Pigeon Lab: quantitative analysis in the wide world.

A W Logue 1
PMCID: PMC1284868  PMID: 12083687

Abstract

From the Harvard Pigeon Lab of the 1960s arose a behavior-analytic approach that was quantitative and rigorous, rooted in Herrnstein's matching law. Researchers modified the matching law to describe choice behavior in a variety of different settings and examined its relations with other quantitative models. Beginning in the early 1970s, researchers began using the Harvard Pigeon Lab's quantitative framework to study in the laboratory specific aspects of the world outside the laboratory. Much of this work concerned investigations of self-control-choice of a larger, more delayed reinforcer over a smaller, less delayed reinforcer. Experiments using a quantitative framework derived from the matching law have also been conducted outside the laboratory; however, these have been far less frequent. Current and future researchers will benefit the field by devising new, creative ways to investigate the matching law and related quantitative models outside the laboratory. Such research can help to demonstrate the validity of these models as basic principles of behavior, can enhance public opinion of and rewards for such research, and can stimulate further development of the Harvard Pigeon Lab's quantitative approach by using that approach with new variables.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (122.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ainslie G. W. Impulse control in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):485–489. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ainslie G. Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychol Bull. 1975 Jul;82(4):463–496. doi: 10.1037/h0076860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baum W. M. Choice in free-ranging wild pigeons. Science. 1974 Jul 5;185(4145):78–79. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4145.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baum W. M. Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Sep;32(2):269–281. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baum W. M., Rachlin H. C. Choice as time allocation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):861–874. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baum W. M. Time allocation in human vigilance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jan;23(1):45–53. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baum W., Kraft J. Group choice: competition, travel, and the ideal free distribution. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 May;69(3):227–245. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beardsley S. D., McDowell J. J. Application of Herrnstein's hyperbola to time allocation of naturalistic human behavior maintained by naturalistic social reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Mar;57(2):177–185. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bickel W. K., Odum A. L., Madden G. J. Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1999 Oct;146(4):447–454. doi: 10.1007/pl00005490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cherek D. R., Lane S. D. Effects of d,l-fenfluramine on aggressive and impulsive responding in adult males with a history of conduct disorder. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1999 Oct;146(4):473–481. doi: 10.1007/pl00005493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cherek D. R., Moeller F. G., Dougherty D. M., Rhoades H. Studies of violent and nonviolent male parolees: II. Laboratory and psychometric measurements of impulsivity. Biol Psychiatry. 1997 Mar 1;41(5):523–529. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(96)00426-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Christensen-Szalanski J. J. Discount functions and the measurement of patients' values. Women's decisions during childbirth. Med Decis Making. 1984;4(1):47–58. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8400400108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chung S. H., Herrnstein R. J. Choice and delay of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jan;10(1):67–74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Critchfield T. S., Kollins S. H. Temporal discounting: basic research and the analysis of socially important behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Spring;34(1):101–122. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Davison M. C., Tustin R. D. The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Mar;29(2):331–336. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fisher W. W., Mazur J. E. Basic and applied research on choice responding. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):387–410. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Green L., Myerson J., Lichtman D., Rosen S., Fry A. Temporal discounting in choice between delayed rewards: the role of age and income. Psychol Aging. 1996 Mar;11(1):79–84. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.11.1.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. HERRNSTEIN R. J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267–272. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Herrnstein R. J. Formal properties of the matching law. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jan;21(1):159–164. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Herrnstein R. J., Heyman G. M. Is matching compatible with reinforcement maximization on concurrent variable interval variable ratio? J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Mar;31(2):209–223. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Herrnstein R. J., Loveland D. H. Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jul;24(1):107–116. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kirby K. N., Petry N. M., Bickel W. K. Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999 Mar;128(1):78–87. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.128.1.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kraft J. R., Baum W. M. Group choice: the ideal free distribution of human social behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Jul;76(1):21–42. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Logue A. W., Anderson Y. D. Higher-education administrators: when the future does not make a difference. Psychol Sci. 2001 Jul;12(4):276–281. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Logue A. W., Rodriguez M. L., Peña-Correal T. E., Mauro B. C. Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification of experience-based differences. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jan;41(1):53–67. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Logue A. W., Tobin H., Chelonis J. J., Wang R. Y., Geary N., Schachter S. Cocaine decreases self-control in rats: a preliminary report. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1992;109(1-2):245–247. doi: 10.1007/BF02245509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mace F. C. Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technologies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):529–550. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mace F. C., Neef N. A. Limited matching on concurrent-schedule reinforcement of academic behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):585–596. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Madden G. J., Petry N. M., Badger G. J., Bickel W. K. Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control participants: drug and monetary rewards. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997 Aug;5(3):256–262. doi: 10.1037//1064-1297.5.3.256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Martens B. K., Lochner D. G., Kelly S. Q. The effects of variable-interval reinforcement on academic engagement: a demonstration of matching theory. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Spring;25(1):143–151. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mazur J. E., Logue A. W. Choice in a "self-control" paradigm: effects of a fading procedure. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Jul;30(1):11–17. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Miller H. L. Matching-based hedonic scaling in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):335–347. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mitchell S. H. Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non-smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1999 Oct;146(4):455–464. doi: 10.1007/pl00005491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Murray L. K., Kollins S. H. Effects of methylphenidate on sensitivity to reinforcement in children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: an application of the matching law. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Winter;33(4):573–591. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Myerson J., Hale S. Practical implications of the matching law. J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Fall;17(3):367–380. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Neef N. A., Mace F. C., Shade D. Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: the interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):37–52. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Odum A. L., Madden G. J., Badger G. J., Bickel W. K. Needle sharing in opioid-dependent outpatients: psychological processes underlying risk. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000 Nov 1;60(3):259–266. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(00)00111-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Petry N. M., Bickel W. K., Arnett M. Shortened time horizons and insensitivity to future consequences in heroin addicts. Addiction. 1998 May;93(5):729–738. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.9357298.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Petry N. M., Casarella T. Excessive discounting of delayed rewards in substance abusers with gambling problems. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999 Aug 2;56(1):25–32. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00010-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rachlin H., Green L. Commitment, choice and self-control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jan;17(1):15–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schweitzer J. B., Sulzer-Azaroff B. Self-control in boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: effects of added stimulation and time. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1995 May;36(4):671–686. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb02321.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sonuga-Barke E. J., Taylor E., Sembi S., Smith J. Hyperactivity and delay aversion--I. The effect of delay on choice. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1992 Feb;33(2):387–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb00874.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Squires N., Fantino E. A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jan;15(1):27–38. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Vollmer T. R., Bourret J. An application of the matching law to evaluate the allocation of two- and three-point shots by college basketball players. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Summer;33(2):137–150. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Vuchinich R. E., Simpson C. A. Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998 Aug;6(3):292–305. doi: 10.1037//1064-1297.6.3.292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Vuchinich R. E., Tucker J. A. Contributions from behavioral theories of choice to an analysis of alcohol abuse. J Abnorm Psychol. 1988 May;97(2):181–195. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.97.2.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES