Skip to main content
. 2005 Nov 19;331(7526):1173. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38625.685706.AE

Table 5.

Crude and adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of low birth weight in ovarian stimulation and IVF/ICSI groups of women, compared with natural conception group

Observed effect
Overall effect*
Direct effect
Group Odds ratio P value Odds ratio P value Odds ratio P value
Natural conception (n=2915) Reference - Reference - Reference -
Ovarian stimulation (n=710) 1.20 (1.04 to 1.38) 0.01 1.07 (0.93 to 1.24) 0.4 1.26 (1.08 to 1.50) 0.002
IVF/ICSI (n=743) 1.26 (1.10 to 1.45) <0.001 1.09 (0.93 to 1.28) 0.3 1.28 (1.09 to 1.47) 0.004
Subfertility treatment (n=1453) 1.23 (1.10 to 1.37) <0.001 1.08 (0.96 to 1.22) 0.2 1.27 (1.11 to 1.45) <0.001

ICSI=intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF=in vitro fertilisation.

*

Multivariable analysis accounting for birth year, maternal age, and parity (confounders).

Multivariable analysis accounting for birth year, maternal age, and parity (confounders) and for infant sex, caesarean delivery, zygosity, and chorionicity (mediating variables).

Comprises ovarian stimulation and IVF/ICSI groups.