Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct 11;77(6):1086–1091. doi: 10.1086/498176

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Models of the Effects of mtDNA Background Haplotype and the DXS8090(166)-DXS1068(258) Nuclear Haplotype in Males Homoplasmic for 11778A→G, 14484T→C, and 14495A→G[Note]

A. Independent Effect of the Nuclear Haplotype DXS8090(166)-DXS1068(258), with χ2 = 31.42, P < .001
Variables in the Equation P OR (95% CI)
DXS8090(166)-DXS1068(258) .001 35.25 (4.62–268.73)
Constant .001 .03
B. Independent Effect of the mtDNA Haplotype, with χ2 = 7.53, P = .006
Variables in the Equation P OR (95% CI)
Non mtDNA haplotype J .007 2.89 (1.34–6.19)
Constant .001 .43
C. Synergistic Interaction between DXS8090(166)-DXS1068(258) and Non-J mtDNA Background, with χ2 = 27.38, P < .001
Variables in the Equation P OR (95% CI)
(Non mtDNA haplogroup J) × DXS8090(166)-DXS1068(258) .65 9,340.46 (0–1.91 × 1021)
Constant .65 0
D. Antagonistic Interaction between DXS8090(166)-DXS1068(258) and Non-J mtDNA Background, with χ2 = 2.86, P = .09
Variables in the Equation P OR (95% CI)
(mtDNA haplogroup J) × DXS8090(166)-DXS1068(258) .152 4.73 (.56–39.61)
Constant .031 .467

Note.— The additive model is shown in the text and has the greatest χ2 of 35.68 (P < .0001).