Skip to main content
. 2025 Dec 17;6(2):101038. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2025.101038

Figure 3.

Figure 3

ReticularNet performance on the test set. Left: correlation between predicted and ground truth reticular pseudodrusen lesion pixel areas, with regression line y = 1.15x+0.74, R = 0.80, P < 0.0001. Middle: violin plot of the area error (prediction–ground truth), showing a relatively symmetrical distribution around zero. Right: Bland–Altman plot of area differences versus mean area; red dashed lines denote 95% limits of agreement (±1.96 standard deviation). GT = ground truth.