Skip to main content
. 2026 Jan 16;16:1732197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1732197

Table 3.

Participant demographics in included studies (n=7, reported in 10 papers).

Study ID, first author, year, country, Aim Sample characteristics (reflecting language used in papers)
1. Andalibi, 2021, USA – reported across 3 papers:
  •  a. Pyle, 2021, USA (19).

  •   Aim: to investigate (non)disclosure of pregnancy loss among LGBTQ people to known ties on social media

  •  b. Lacombe-Duncan, 2022 (20).

  •   Aim: informed by minority stress theory, to explore the experiences of multi-level stigma and resilience among LGBTQ+ people in the context of conception, pregnancy, and loss

  •  c. Andalibi, 2022 (21).

  •   Aim: informed by an intracategorical intersectional lens, to uncover the benefits and challenges of LGBTQ-specific and non-LGBTQ-specific pregnancy and loss-related online spaces

Sample overview:
17 LGBTQ+ people
Relationship to loss:
14 “physically experienced pregnancy loss”, 3 “in an intimate partnership in which pregnancy loss occurred”
Gender:
15 cisgender women, 1 transmasculine person, 1 non-binary person
Sexual orientation:
3 lesbian, 1 bisexual, 5 Queer, 2 asexual, 6 multiple orientations
Race/Ethnicity:
Race: 13 White, 1 Black/African American, 1 Latinx, 1 multiple races/ethnicities, 1 human
Ethnicity: 1 African American, 7 White, 2 American, 1 Jewish, 2 Latinx, 3 European, 1 multiple
Country:
All USA
Age:
Mean 34.4 yrs (SD 3.3)
Relationship details:
16 married, 1 single
Loss details
-single losses reported
- pregnancy loss (defined as an undesired loss of a pregnancy at any gestational age) in last 2 years
- gestation at loss n/r
Conception details:
n/r
Parity:
n/r
Other notes:
Information on education, income, religion, geography, social media use available in papers
2. Cacciatore 2011, USA (22).
  Aim: to explore child death in same-gendered-parent  
  families; specifically ‘maternally bereaved lesbians’.
Sample overview:
6 lesbian mothers
Relationship to loss:
Not specified – describes as maternally bereaved lesbians
Gender:
Language of women is used throughout, without any mention of cisgender/transgender
Sexual orientation:
All lesbian
Race/Ethnicity:
Ethnicity: 4 Caucasian, 1 Jewish, 1 Italian-Irish, 1 European-Canadian
Country:
USA
Age:
3 aged 36-45, 3 aged 46-55
Relationship details:
4 partnered (including 1 married in Canada), 2 single
Loss details
- 5 “of the children had died during the perinatal period or birth”, 1 had died in adulthood; describes “all the deaths were traumatic and unexpected”
-details of any earlier losses n/r
-time since loss n/r
Conception details:
- n/r
Parity:
- inclusive of losses, 2 had 1 child, 3 had 2 children, 2 had 3 children; 2 had no living children at the time of participation
Other notes:
Information on religion and socioeconomic demographics available in paper
3. Peel, 2010, UK, USA, Canada and Australia (23).
  Aim: to explore lesbian and bisexual women’s
  experiences of miscarriage, stillbirth and neonatal
  death.
Sample overview:
60 women
Relationship to loss:
78% had “physically experienced their loss(es) (i.e. carried the pregnancy)” (also referred to as “birth mothers”), 22% “had experienced loss as the social mother (i.e. the partner of the women who had carried the pregnancy)”
Gender:
Language of women is used throughout, without any mention of cisgender/transgender
Sexual orientation:
All described as non-heterosexual; 76.6% were lesbian, 15% bisexual, 8.3% ‘other’
Race/Ethnicity:
92% white (further details n/r)
Country:
43.3% UK, 28.3% USA, 18.3% Canada, 10.0% Australia
Age:
Mean 35, range 22–55 years
Relationship details:
82% in relationship with a woman, 8% single, 5% in polyamorous relationships, 3% married to a man, 1 in a relationship with a trans man. (Note: this is current relationship; 90% were in same relationship at time of loss)
Loss details:
- one-third had experienced multiple losses
- majority early miscarriage, some late miscarriage, stillbirth or neonatal death
- majority experienced most recent loss occurred in past 5 years (83%), including 45% of sample in past year
Conception details:
- all except one were planned pregnancies
- 84% conceived using donor sperm (majority at a clinic, some at home, minority via IVF); 14% via sexual intercourse with male partner, 2% via sexual intercourse with a man who was not their partner
- conceived within 1 month-10 years of trying (mean 9.2 months, SD n/r)
Parity:
-unclear: reports that 55% had children, with mean age 4.5 years (range 4 days-17 years); also reports number of losses
Other notes:
Information on social class and disability available in paper
4. Riggs, 2020, Australia, USA and European Union (24).
  Aim: to explore experiences of pregnancy loss among a
  sample of men, trans/masculine, and non-binary people
  who had undertaken a pregnancy
Sample overview:
16 men, trans/masculine, and non-binary people
Relationship to loss:
All had experienced pregnancy loss, “having undertaken at least one pregnancy following a gender transition”
Gender:
Collectively described as men, trans/masculine and non-binary; multiple genders listed; most used he/him or they/them pronouns
Sexual orientation:
Range of sexual orientations (e.g. bisexual, fluid, gay, human-sexual, pansexual, queer), including multiple stated; 2 n/r; 0 stated heterosexual
Race/Ethnicity:
n/r
Country:
3 Australia, 8 European Union (including UK), 5 US
Age:
Mean 35, range 23-49
Relationship details:
2 single/no partner, 1 casual partners, 13 in a relationship (including 1 now separated; 4 with cisgender woman, 6 with cisgender man, 3 with transgender man)
Loss details
-10 had one pregnancy loss, 6 had multiple
- Gestational age at loss ranged from 3–23 weeks; authors described as 19 early term losses (12 weeks or less) and 5 late term losses.
-Time since loss n/r
Conception details:
- n/r
Parity:
Separate to the pregnancy losses, 13 had live births (range 1-4) and the remaining 3 were pregnant at time of interview
Other notes:
Taken from a wider trans masculine pregnancy project involving 51 participants; 16 of whom had experienced loss
5. Rose, 2022, 2023, Australia and England – reported
  across 2 papers:
 a. Rose & Oxlad, 2022 (25).
 Aim: to explore how the context in the lead up to loss
 was important for LGBTQ+ people when pregnancy loss
 occurred
 b. Rose & Oxlad, 2023 (26).
 Aim: to explore LGBTQ+ people’s workplace leave and
 support experiences following pregnancy losses as
 gestational or non-gestational parents
Sample overview:
14 LGBTQ+ people
Relationship to loss:
- 5 experienced pregnancy loss as gestational parents (only)
- 4 experienced pregnancy loss as both gestational parents and as non-gestational parents (where a partner was pregnant)
-5 cisgender men experienced pregnancy loss as non-gestational parents in context of surrogacy
Gender:
8 cisgender women, 5 cisgender men, and 1 trans non-binary person; although eligible, 0 intersex or asexual people took part
Sexual orientation:
Reported as a range represented within LGBTQ+; 11 were in a same-gender relationship at the time of loss
Race/Ethnicity/’Cultural diversity’:
-includes 2 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, 1 Greek-Australian (thesis reports remainder of cultural identities as: 2 n/r, 1 Irish, 1 4th generation Australian, 1 English, 1 Anglo-Australian, 2 Anglo-Celtic, 3 White; with the 2 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander self-describing as Caucasian/Indigenous and Aboriginal-mixed)
-2 had partners for whom English was a 2nd language
Country:
Australia (12) and England (2)
Age:
30–60 years (mean 40)
Relationship details:
All in long-term relationships
Loss details
- 2 experienced 1 pregnancy loss; 12 experienced multiple (2–5)
- details on gestational age at loss n/r; includes “ectopic pregnancies, miscarriage, medically induced termination and stillbirth”
-notes that some also experienced “other reproductive losses, including unsuccessful egg insemination or embryo transfers”
- time since loss: 8m-10years (mean 3.78yrs, SD 2.59)
Conception details:
- n/r
Parity:
- 6 caring for living children at the time of interview (details n/r; thesis reports 8 have living children)
Other notes:
Paper 5b is limited to a subset of the 12 participants residing in Australia. Information on surrogacy details available in papers. Further sample details available in thesis (including religion).
6. Røseth, 2023, Denmark and Norway (27).
  Aim: to explore how Danish and Norwegian lesbian
  couples bereaved of a child in the perinatal period
  experience the loss, and to examine the maternity care
  offered
Sample overview:
6 lesbian couples
Relationship to loss:
6 birth mothers/biological mothers and 6 non-birth mothers/co-mothers
Gender:
Language of women is used throughout, without any mention of cisgender/transgender
Sexual orientation:
All lesbian
Race/Ethnicity:
n/r
Country:
4 couples Danish nationality and living in Denmark, 2 couples Norwegian nationality and living in Norway
Age:
29–42 years
Relationship details:
“Living in a relationship with another woman when they lost their baby”
Loss details
- gestation at loss 21–40 weeks (eligibility was “late pregnancy or the first few days after birth” and some included birthing a baby who “had already died or risked dying”)
- losses occurred within last 3 years
Conception details:
- n/r
Parity:
- n/r
Other notes:
None
7. Wojnar, 2007, USA and Canada (28).
  Aim: explore miscarriage amongst lesbian couples
Sample overview:
10 lesbian couples
Relationship to loss:
10 ‘birth mothers’(“the partner who conceived and miscarried pregnancy”) and 10 ‘social mothers’ (“the birth mother’s female partner”)
Gender:
Language of women is used throughout, without any mention of cisgender/transgender
Sexual orientation:
All lesbian
Race/Ethnicity:
All white
Country:
USA and Canada
Age:
30-45 (birth mothers: mean 37.6, SD 4.19, range 30-42; social mothers: mean 38.0, SD 4.60, range 31-45)
Relationship details:
In ‘committed’ relationship (at time of loss and still in that relationship)
Loss details
- 1–4 miscarriages
- gestation at loss 5–20 weeks, mean 11.0 weeks, SD 4.34
-losses occurred 1 week-2 years prior to study enrolment, mean 11.6 weeks, SD 4.25
Conception details:
- 5 used ‘alternative insemination’ with known donor, 5 used unknown donor; n/r whether clinic or home
Parity:
- 0–3 living children: previous to loss, 5 birth mothers had given birth,0 social mothers had given birth
Other notes:
Information on education and employment available in paper

Language used in the sample characteristics reflects the language used in the papers (e.g. use of people, parent, mother).