Skip to main content
. 2026 Jan 30;58(2):73. doi: 10.1007/s11250-026-04866-5

Table 2.

Medians of the herd A. marginale seroprevalence, B. Bovis and B. bigemina. h distribution compared across 18 categoric factors of 28 properties from the Reconcavo Baiano region, State of Bahia, Brazil

A. marginale seroprevalence B. bovis h B. bigemina h
Independent variable (n)
Category (n)
Median
(%)
IQR
(%)
p Median
(h)
IQR
(%)
p Median
(h)
IQR
(%)
p
Genetic composition (28) 0.229 0.004 0.023
 European (10) 22.5 9.75–25.8 0.002 0.002–0.002 0.003 0.002–0.003
 Indian (18) 14 4-19.8 0.005 0.004-0.00675 0.004 0.003-0.00675
Production system (28) 0.149 0.064 0.194
 Beef (16) 14 3.5–19.3 0.0045 0.00375–0.00625 0.004 0.003-0.00625
 Dairy (12) 22.5 5.5–26.3 0.002 0.002-0.00525 0.003 0.002-0.00525
Cattle reposition (14) 0.44 0.948 0.218
 From Atlantic Forest biome (7) 18 5-24.5 0.005 0.003–0.008 0.004 0.003–0.006
 From Caatinga biome (7) 6 3–18 0.006 0.0025–0.007 0.007 0.005–0.01
Tick infestation occurrence (28) 0.336 0.624 0.542
 Part of the year (10) 20.5 16.8–23.5 0.0045 0.0025–0.00575 0.0035 0.003-0.00575
 All through the year (18) 11.5 4-24.5 0.0035 0.002-0.00575 0.0035 0.002–0.0065
Criteria for acaricide treatments (28) 0.361 0.466 0.367
 Systematic or prophylactic (9) 18 4–20 0.004 0.002–0.007 0.004 0.003–0.006
 High tick infestation in cattle (19) 16 5-26.5 0.004 0.002–0.005 0.003 0.0025–0.0055
Injectable acaricide formulations (28) 0.026 0.002 0.082
 Yes (22) 11.5 4-19.8 0.005 0.00325-0.006 0.004 0.003-0.00675
 No (6) 24 22.3–25.8 0.002 0.00125-0.002 0.003 0.00225-0.003
Pour-on acaricide formulations (28) 1.000 0.529 0.776
 Yes (22) 17 4.5–23.8 0.004 0.002–0.006 0.0035 0.003-0.00575
 No (6) 17.5 7-24.3 0.003 0.002-0.00475 0.003 0.002–0.0085
Spray acaricide formulations (28) 0.554 0.029 0.048
 Yes (19) 18 4-25.5 0.002 0.002–0.005 0.006 0.004–0.007
 No (9) 11 6–20 0.006 0.004–0.006 0.003 0.002–0.0045
Use of avermectins (ivermectin - doramectin) (27) 0.026 0.003 0.080
 Yes (22) 11.5 4-19.8 0.005 0.00325-0.006 0.004 0.003-0.00675
 No (5) 25 22–26 0.002 0.001–0.002 0.003 0.002–0.003
Use of pyrethroids (27) 0.676 0.572 0.480
 Yes (25) 16 4–24 0.004 0.002–0.006 0.003 0.003–0.006
 No (2) 19.5 19.3–19.8 0.005 0.0045–0.0055 0.005 0.0045–0.0055
Use of amitraz (27) 0.334 0.360 0.601
 Yes (1) 25 25–25 0.002 0.002–0.002 0.005 0.005–0.005
 No (26) 16 4-22.8 0.004 0.002–0.006 0.0035 0.003–0.006
Use of fipronil (27) 0.036 0.152 0.374
 Yes (13) 6 2–20 0.005 0.002–0.007 0.004 0.003–0.006
 No (14) 21 12.3–27.5 0.0035 0.002–0.005 0.003 0.00225–0.00575
Use of organophosphates (27) 0.732 0.466 0.972
 Yes (23) 12 4-24.5 0.004 0.002–0.0055 0.004 0.003–0.0065
 No (4) 18.5 17.5–19.3 0.005 0.0035–0.007 0.0035 0.003–0.0045
Rotation of acaricide compound (27) 0.579 0.459 0.818
 Yes (10) 14 2.5–23.3 0.004 0.002-0.00475 0.0035 0.003-0.00475
 No (17) 18 6–23 0.005 0.002–0.006 0.004 0.003–0.007
Multiple acaricides classes used simultaneously (28) 0.235 0.218 0.237
 Yes (12) 16 3.5–20.3 0.0045 0.002–0.007 0.004 0.003–0.007
 No (16) 20.5 6-26.3 0.0035 0.002–0.005 0.003 0.002-0.00525
Use different products with same compound (27) 0.607 0.487 0.551
 Yes (15) 16 4-24.5 0.004 0.002–0.005 0.003 0.003–0.005
 No (12) 14.5 5.5–20.5 0.0045 0.00275–0.00625 0.004 0.003–0.007

Note: Mann Whitney test. Variables with P values in bold were considered significative. Interquartile range, IQR. Herd inoculation rate, h