Abstract
Aging is a multifactorial and heterogeneous biological process, where chronological age alone does not accurately reflect an individual’s functional or physiological state. The emerging discipline of precision geronutrition integrates the principles of geroscience with precision nutrition, aiming to delay the onset of age-related functional decline by modulating fundamental molecular mechanisms, such as nutrient-sensing pathways (mTOR, AMPK, and sirtuins), inflammaging, and oxidative stress. A major barrier to progress has been the absence of validated biomarkers that can quantify biological aging and assess intervention efficacy. Recent advances in biological aging clocks, in particular DNA methylation–based epigenetic clocks, provide powerful tools to objectively measure biological age, and evaluate the impact of nutritional interventions. This review outlines the conceptual framework of precision geronutrition, highlights molecular targets relevant to dietary modulation, and discusses the role of aging clocks as tools for assessing biological aging in preventive and personalized nutrition. The integration of dynamic aging clocks into nutritional intervention frameworks will be essential to transition from a disease-oriented model to a preventive, healthspan-centered paradigm. Future challenges include large-scale clinical validation, standardization of aging biomarkers, cost reduction, and translation into public health and clinical applications.
Keywords: Aging clock, Epigenetics, Geroscience, Multi-omics, Personalized nutrition
INTRODUCTION
During the period 1950-2023, global life expectancy increased by 25.1 years for female, and 23.6 years for male (1). This has resulted in a rapid demographic shift towards older populations. Ageing is characterized by a progressive loss of physiological integrity, leading to impaired function, and increased vulnerability to death. However, the aging process is not homogenous. While chronological age—the number of years lived—is a primary risk factor for functional impairments, chronic diseases, and mortality, it is a poor predictor of an individual's functional capacity, resilience, or disease susceptibility. Thus, this underscores the need to elucidate the biological aging process and the determinants of healthy aging. Biological aging reflects the cumulative, progressive decline in physiological integrity driven by molecular and cellular damage, which varies significantly between individuals (2).
Healthy ageing is the process of developing and maintaining the functional ability that enables wellbeing in older age (3). Nutrition is a fundamental pillar of health, and diet is the modifiable factor that exerts the greatest impact on human health and wellbeing (4). For decades, dietary guidelines for healthy aging have largely followed a “one-size-fits-all” approach. However, it is now evident from the advancement of precision nutrition that inter-individual variability in responses to diet is substantial, influenced by a complex interplay of genetics, epigenetics, gut microbiome, and metabolic phenotype (5).
Concurrently, the field of geroscience has provided a powerful framework by positing that targeting the fundamental biological mechanisms of aging itself—the “hallmarks of aging”—could simultaneously delay the onset of multiple age-related conditions, and thereby extend healthspan (6). These hallmarks, which include epigenetic alterations, deregulated nutrient-sensing, and chronic inflammation —referred to as inflammaging— provide a molecular roadmap for interventions.
The convergence of these two fields is giving rise to a new, integrative paradigm, that of precision geronutrition. This approach leverages personalized nutritional strategies to modulate core aging pathways. To date, translation to clinical practice has been limited by the lack of robust, dynamic biomarkers to quantify biological aging and objectively measure intervention efficacy. Recent advances in biological aging clocks, particularly those based on epigenetic markers—such as DNA methylation—have begun to address this gap (7, 8). These clocks provide quantitative estimates of biological age, enabling the validation and refinement of personalized nutritional strategies.
In this review, we introduce the conceptual framework of precision geronutrition, including its molecular targets, and the evidence for nutritional modulation. We describe the pivotal role of multi-omics data and biological aging clocks in personalizing dietary interventions and monitoring their effectiveness. Overall, this review discusses the translational potential and future challenges of integrating these approaches to promote a shift from disease treatment to healthspan-focused preventive medicine.
DEFINITION OF PRECISION GERONUTRITION
Precision geronutrition is an evidence-based discipline that integrates individualized biological information into the design of targeted nutritional interventions, thereby modulating the fundamental mechanisms of aging. This approach integrates principles from geroscience with the analytical frameworks of precision nutrition, utilizing genomic, epigenetic, metabolomic, proteomic, and microbiome data to guide personalized dietary strategies (9).
Unlike conventional geriatric nutrition, which primarily focuses on correcting nutrient deficiencies or managing age-related functional decline, precision geronutrition emphasizes the proactive modulation of biological processes that drive aging, including dysregulated nutrient-sensing, inflammaging, mitochondrial dysfunction, gut microbiome, and the loss of proteostasis. Positioned at the interface of systems biology, nutrition science, and preventive medicine, this emerging field aims to maintain metabolic resilience and physiological integrity through molecularly informed dietary strategies (9).
The association between dietary factors and healthy aging has been demonstrated in longitudinal cohorts with more than 100,000 participants over the last three decades (10). This study has suggested a score for dietary factors that are associated with healthy aging. Healthy aging has been defined by preserved cognitive, physical, and mental health, and by survival to age 70 free of major chronic disease. However, interindividual variability in response to specific dietary components has not been considered—representing a key limitation.
To develop personalized diet strategies, individual variability in dietary response needs to be measured. These individual-level responses to the same foods can then be used to build predictive algorithms for personalized dietary recommendations. Among candidate readouts, postprandial glycemic responses to identical foods are prioritized, because they vary widely across individuals, and respond promptly on an individual basis (11). This led to early personalized nutrition programs that target cardiometabolic health, and recent studies have shown the improved efficacy of personalized advice over standard dietary guidance in this domain (12).
Because personalized nutrition should be developed based on biological phenotype, multi-omics profiling is needed to interrogate the physiological and molecular basis of interindividual differences. Epigenomic, metabolomic, and microbiome data can be used to characterize aging phenotypes, which can in turn inform the contribution of physiological and metabolic factors to aging-clock measures. In parallel, dietary assessment should evaluate diet-derived features that may modulate aging clocks, including degree of food processing, macronutrient composition, and meal timing. Study of how these characteristics interact with aging-clock dynamics remains incomplete.
Integration of multi-omics data, individual food-response profiles, and diet features linked to healthy aging will enable the development of prediction models for personalized dietary recommendations. These models should be validated through clinical studies, using changes in aging-clock measures alongside functional and metabolic outcomes. Fig. 1 shows an overview of the developmental strategy for precision geronutrition:
Fig. 1.
Developing personalized dietary recommendations for healthy aging in precision geronutrition.
FUNDAMENTAL MECHANISMS OF PRECISION GERONUTRITION
The efficacy of precision geronutrition depends on its ability to target the biological process of aging. The key molecular pathways through which nutritional components can modulate these processes can provide the scientific basis for targeted dietary interventions.
Nutrient-sensing pathways
Nutrient-sensing pathways constitute a central regulatory network that links nutrient availability to cellular metabolism, stress adaptation, and longevity (13, 14). Among these, mTOR, AMPK, and the Sirtuin family form a tightly interconnected signaling axis that integrates energy status with molecular mechanisms of aging. Imbalances within this axis, which are often driven by nutrient excess, mitochondrial stress, or chronic inflammation, accelerate biological aging, whereas dietary or pharmacological interventions that restore its homeostasis promote longevity across diverse organisms (15-18). The mTOR pathway functions as a key anabolic regulator that promotes cellular growth, protein synthesis, and lipid biosynthesis in response to nutrient abundance (19). In senescent cells, mTORC1 activity remains chronically elevated, leading to impaired autophagy and accelerated cellular aging (20, 21). Dietary interventions and bioactive phytochemical supplements have been shown to inhibit mTORC1 signaling and extend lifespan. For example, curcumin has been reported to inhibit TORC1—the yeast ortholog of mammalian mTORC1— activity and extend lifespan in yeast, while Epigallocatechin gallate has been shown to suppress cellular senescence by the inhibition of mTOR pathway (22, 23). Moreover, caloric restriction (CR) has been shown to suppress activated mTOR signaling in aged skeletal muscle, suggesting a potential link between the anti-aging effects of CR, and the modulation of mTOR signaling (24).
In contrast, AMPK acts as a metabolic checkpoint activated by increased AMP/ATP ratios under nutrient stress. AMPK suppresses mTORC1 signaling, stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis via PGC−1α, and enhances autophagy, thereby preserving cellular energy balance (25). Vitamin D has been shown to enhance AMPK activity in both cellular and animal models (26, 27). In addition, resveratrol, a bioactive phytochemical known to activate AMPK, has been shown to activate AMPK and attenuate oxidative stress–induced cellular senescence, as well as to suppress skin aging in mice (28, 29). The Sirtuin family (SIRT1-SIRT7) serves as a set of NAD+–dependent deacetylases that regulate DNA repair, chromatin remodeling, and mitochondrial function (30). Declining NAD+ levels with age impair Sirtuin activity, leading to loss of genomic stability and reduced metabolic efficiency (31). Essential nutrients that support NAD+ biosynthesis—such as niacin (vitamin B3), nicotinamide, and the essential amino acid tryptophan tryptophan—contribute to the maintenance of Sirtuin activity (32). In addition, CR and various bioactive compounds, including resveratrol and quercetin, can enhance NAD+ levels and thereby promote SIRT1 activation (33-36).
Inflammaging
Inflammaging is a systemic chronic inflammation that is accompanied by cellular senescence, immunosenescence, organ dysfunction, and age-related diseases (37). Factors secreted by senescent cells, known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), promote chronic inflammation, and can induce senescence in normal cells (38). In addition, chronic inflammation accelerates the senescence of immune cells, resulting in weakened immune function, and an inability to clear senescent cells (39). Vitamin D has been shown to exert anti-inflammaging effects in human gingival fibroblasts, and omega-3 reduced inflammation in various diseases (40, 41). Furthermore, Several dietary phytochemicals including curcumin, anthocyanins, catechin/epicatechin, and oleuropein exhibit neuroprotective activity through the modulation of neuro-inflammaging (42).
Mitochondrial function and oxidative stress
Mitochondria are central regulators of cellular energy metabolism and redox balance. During aging, mitochondrial dysfunction leads to impaired ATP production, excessive generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and subsequent oxidative damage to DNA, proteins, and lipids. These changes contribute to cellular senescence and tissue functional decline. Precision geronutrition aims to restore mitochondrial homeostasis through personalized nutritional strategies that target mitochondrial metabolism and antioxidant defense. Key interventions include the optimization of NAD+ metabolism to support sirtuin–mediated mitochondrial maintenance, supplementation with coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) to enhance electron transport efficiency, and dietary inclusion of polyphenols and antioxidant vitamins to mitigate oxidative stress. Furthermore, bioactive nutrients, such as omega–3 fatty acids, polyphenol-rich foods, and vitamins C and E, exhibit synergistic effects in reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion and enhancing endogenous antioxidant systems (e.g., glutathione and superoxide dismutase) (43-45). Collectively, these approaches highlight the potential of precision nutritional modulation to counteract mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, thereby sustaining metabolic resilience while delaying biological aging.
Modulation of the gut microbiome
The gut microbiome undergoes dysbiosis with age, characterized by reduced diversity and an increase in pro-inflammatory taxa (46, 47). Dietary fibers reaching the colon are anaerobically fermented by the gut bacteria, which produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) as metabolic by-products, such as acetate, propionate, and butylate. Among SCFAs, acetate typically accounts for about 60-75% of the total fecal SCFAs (48). Butyrate is a histone deacetylase inhibitor with potent anti-inflammatory activity and mitigates neuroinflammation in aged mice (49). CR has been shown to prevent age-related alterations in the gut microbiome, while adherence to a Mediterranean diet modulates the gut microbial composition to promote a healthy lifespan (50, 51). Thus, targeting the microbiome through personalized dietary strategies represents a promising avenue within precision geronutrition to promote a healthy lifespan.
Proteostasis and cellular maintenance
Proteostasis refers to the dynamic balance of protein synthesis, folding, repair, and degradation that ensures proper protein function and cellular integrity. Aging disrupts this tightly regulated network, leading to the accumulation of misfolded or damaged proteins, activation of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and a progressive decline in cellular function. Precision geronutrition seeks to restore proteostatic balance through nutritional modulation tailored to individual metabolic profiles. Adjusting both the quantity and quality of protein intake is critical to maintain protein turnover, while bioactive dietary components, such as spermidine and resveratrol, stimulate autophagy, facilitating the removal of damaged proteins and organelles to enhance cellular housekeeping. Moreover, amino acid balance, including methionine restriction and the regulation of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), can fine-tune mTOR signaling, and reduce age-related proteotoxic stress (52, 53). Maintaining proteostasis and cellular maintenance thus constitutes a pivotal target of precision geronutrition, linking nutritional regulation to molecular mechanisms that preserve cellular homeostasis and promote healthy longevity.
DIETARY INFLUENCE ON BIOLOGICAL AGING ASSESSED BY AGING CLOCK
Aging clocks
The paradigm for measuring aging has shifted from chronological years to biological age. Aging clocks are used to quantity biological age, which is more informative than chronological age to reflect an organism’s aging condition (54). Molecular ageing clocks are machine learning algorithms that are trained from specific molecular omics data, including genomic, epigenomic, proteomic, and metabolomic biomarkers (Table 1). These clocks can be used to monitor and evaluate the efficacy of dietary strategy to delay biological aging in precision geronutrition.
Table 1.
Representative epigenomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic aging clocks
| Clock name | Biomarkers | Predictive accuracy | Key features | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epigenetic clock | Horvath Clock (2013) | 353 CpG sites | r = 0.96; MAE: 3.6 years | Pan-tissue clock; applicable across 51 tissue and cell types | (7) |
| Hannum Clock (2013) | 71 CpG sites | r = 0.91; MAE: ∼4.9 years | Blood-specific; focuses on intrinsic aging | (55) | |
| DNAm PhenoAge (Levine) | 513 CpG sites and Gompertz cofficients | HR = 0.98, P = 2.72E-2 | Predicts multiple aging-related endpoints | (57) | |
| DNAm GrimAge | 1,030 CpG sites (7 DNAm plasma protein surrogates + smoking pack-years) | HR = 1.12, P = 8.6E-5 | Best mortality and aging outcomes predictor using plasma protein surrogates and smoking years | (56) | |
| DunedinPACE | 173 CpG sites | HR = 1.26, 95% CI for mortality 1.14–1.40 | Tracks pace of aging over time to measures rate of biological aging; sensitive to interventions | (59) | |
| Proteomic clock | Lehallier Ultra-Predictive Clock | 491 proteins (SOMAmers) | r = 0.98 (learning); r = 0.96 (test); MAE: 2.44 years (test) | Most accurate proteomic clock | (70) |
| Tanaka Age Signature | 76-protein signature (from 1,301 proteins analyzed) | HR = 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.04 | PROage (estimated biological age) and PROaccel (biological age acceleration) | (69) | |
| Menni Age Signature | 11 circulating proteins | Clear relationship with age | Identifies circulating age-associated proteins | (66) | |
| ProtAge | 204 age-related proteins | r = 0.94, MAE = 2.24 | Associated with 18 major chronic disease and biological, physical, and cognitive function | (68) | |
| Metabolomic clock | Metabolic Age Score (Hertel) | 59 urinary metabolites | r = 0.96 for women; r = 0.93 for men | 1H NMR spectroscopy; urine-based metabolomics | (74) |
| LC-MS Metabolome Clock (Lassen) | Untargeted metabolite measurement using UHPLC-QATOF | RMSE: 5.88 years; r2 = 0.63 | Whole blood samples, neural network model, | (75) | |
| MileAge | 168 plasma metabolites | HR = 1.51; 95% CI, 1.43-1.59 | More predictive of all-casue of mortality and strongly associated with health and aging markers | (76) |
r, Correlation; MAE, Mean Absolute Error; HR, Hazard ratio; CI, Confident Interval; RMSE, Root Mean Square Error.
Epigenetic clocks
Epigenetic clocks are the most established ageing clocks, and use DNA methylation (DNAm) features at CpG dinucleotides (7, 55). DNAm clocks yield estimates of biological age acceleration, termed DNAm age. These clocks can accurately predict age across a wide range of different tissue types. To increase the predictive accuracy of biological age, non-epigenic ageing biomarkers, such as inflammatory and metabolic markers in blood plasma, and smoking years, are included for machine learning training either at a single time point (PhenoAge and GrimAge clocks), or from successive longitudinal measurements of ageing biomarkers aimed at capturing the pace of ageing (DunedinPoAm and DunedinPACE clocks) (8, 56-59). Nutritional interventions have been shown to modulate DNA methylation patterns that are associated with biological age. Dietary interventions significantly reduce epigenetic aging (60, 61). In a study of twins, an 8-week vegan diet intervention resulted in a significantly slower rate of epigenetic aging, compared to the omnivorous diet group (62). In addition, polyphenolic modulators of DNA methylation, such as garlic, berries, green tea, and oolong tea, have been reported to play a significant role in reducing epigenetic age (63). Specific nutrients, such as folate, vitamin B12, and betaine, which are involved in one-carbon metabolism, directly influence the availability of methyl groups, and thereby affect epigenetic regulation (64, 65). Collectively, these studies highlight the potential of dietary interventions and food components to modulate epigenetic age, thereby emphasizing the possibility of nutritional approaches to control biological age.
Proteomic clocks
Proteomic clocks quantify biological age based on age-associated plasma proteins. Technical advances in mass spectrometry-based, antibody-based, and aptamer-based proteomics have led to the development of multiple proteomic ageing clocks that use human plasma and cerebrospinal fluids (66-68). The plasma protein-based ageing clock showed association with mortality, multi-morbidity, healthspan, and lifespan, while many proteins in this clock were modulated by parabiosis in mice and exercise in humans, two rejuvenation paradigms (69, 70). Healthy dietary patterns can modulate proteomic profiles in the human body, and these proteomic alterations may contribute to the regulation of various age-related diseases (71, 72). However, the limitations remain that plasma protein concentrations can be affected by the function of many organs, such as the kidney (73).
Metabolomic clocks
Metabolomic clocks employ small-molecule metabolites that reflect mitochondrial function, lipid metabolism, and redox balance (74-76). As aging progresses, mitochondrial dysfunction, altered energy metabolism, oxidative stress, and the dysregulation of lipid and amino acid metabolism occur; these changes are directly reflected in circulating metabolite profiles, such as NAD+, lactate, branched-chain amino acids, and SCFAs (77). Although studies that directly demonstrate improvements in metabolomic clocks through nutritional or dietary interventions remain limited, evidence suggests that metabolomic changes induced by dietary supplementation and gut microbiome modulation through polyphenol-rich diets may represent promising strategies to modulate metabolomic aging trajectories (78, 79).
PRECISION GERONUTRITION IN PRACTICE: THE PERSONALIZED CYCLE
Multi-omics profiling and biomarker-based nutrition integrate diverse biological data sets, including genomics, epigenomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics, and metagenomics, to generate a holistic view of an individual's health and aging status. By collecting and analyzing data across these molecular layers, researchers can identify genetic predispositions, metabolic activities, and microbiome compositions that influence diet–health interactions (80, 81). Advanced bioinformatics and machine-learning techniques are then applied to merge these data, uncovering biomarkers and pathways that reflect metabolic dysfunctions or inflammatory processes. For example, specific microbial metabolites identified through metabolomics and metagenomics may serve as biomarkers for insulin resistance or chronic inflammation (82). This systems-level integration allows for the precise identification of biological targets, such as altered NAD+ metabolism or aberrant immune signaling, that contribute to age-related physiological decline (83). Once these molecular targets are defined, the data guide the design of personalized nutritional interventions that are aimed at restoring homeostasis and promoting healthy aging. For example, individuals showing NAD+ metabolic dysfunction may benefit from diets or supplements that enhance NAD+ synthesis, while those exhibiting chronic inflammation may be recommended anti-inflammatory dietary patterns, such as a modified Mediterranean diet (84). Similarly, in cases of gut microbiota imbalance, specific prebiotics or probiotics can be prescribed to promote microbial diversity and improve metabolic function (85).
TRANSLATIONAL PERSPECTIVES AND CHALLENGES
The integration of biological aging clocks with precision geronutrition offers a framework for converting molecular aging science into actionable healthcare. However, several challenges must be addressed before these approaches can be effectively implemented in clinical and public health contexts. A major limitation is the lack of standardized methodologies to assess biological age. Since the first report of an epigenetic aging clock, several clocks have been developed using cohort data to estimate biological age relative to chronological age. As summarized in Table 1, these models draw on diverse inputs—including the methylome, metabolome, and transcriptome. However, their performance characteristics and intended endpoints differ across clocks (e.g., accuracy, calibration, and prognostic validity), limiting comparability and hindering uniform interpretation. At this point, multi-omics approaches have emerged as a powerful complementary strategy to enhance biological age estimation. Integrating genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and microbiome data enables a more comprehensive characterization of aging biology, while machine-learning–based modeling can reveal biomarker networks associated with healthspan and exceptional longevity (86, 87). By capturing regulatory changes across multiple molecular layers, multi-omics–derived aging measures provide greater sensitivity and mechanistic resolution than single-omic clocks, and importantly, allow evaluation of how nutritional interventions modulate aging trajectories—thereby supporting precision geronutrition as a clinically actionable framework. Collectively, these advancements establish multi-omics aging clocks as a practical foundation for precision geronutrition, enabling quantifiable assessment of dietary effects on biological aging. However, to translate this potential into clinical utility, standardized reference frameworks and large-scale, longitudinal validation across diverse populations remain essential. Another important challenge is accessibility. Comprehensive multi-omics profiling remains largely confined to research settings, limiting its applicability to everyday healthcare. To make biological-age assessment feasible for routine health monitoring, advances in high-throughput sequencing, single-cell omics, and metabolomic technologies are required. Integrating these tools into digital health platforms could further reduce accessibility barriers by enabling remote sampling, real-time data integration, and automated interpretation. Ethical and social considerations are equally important (88, 89). The ability to quantify biological age raises concerns about data privacy, potential discrimination, and psychological burden. Misuse of biological-age information by employers or insurers could exacerbate inequities. Therefore, ethical and regulatory frameworks must evolve alongside scientific progress to ensure data protection, informed consent, and equitable access. Biological age should be viewed as a dynamic, modifiable health indicator, rather than a determinant of personal worth or potential. The complexity of individual nutritional responses adds another layer of challenge. Factors such as genetics, gut microbiome composition, lifestyle, medication use, and environmental exposure shape personalized dietary outcomes. Consequently, precision geronutrition must rely on AI-driven, multivariate models, rather than single-variable approaches (90). Systems biology and digital–twin simulations—virtual models of individual metabolic systems—offer promising tools to predict optimal interventions and minimize trial-and-error in personalized dietary strategies (90). Finally, clinical integration and public-health adaptation are critical for successful translation. Healthcare professionals must be trained to interpret biological-age data, and apply it effectively in patient management. At a population level, early identification of accelerated aging through biological clocks could guide targeted dietary recommendations to prevent disease onset. Policymakers should promote education, accessibility, and the cost-effective implementation of geronutritional strategies to ensure that the benefits of precision nutrition are equitably distributed across socioeconomic groups.
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Precision geronutrition represents an emerging and transformative paradigm that integrates molecular geroscience with personalized nutrition to decelerate biological aging and extend healthspan. By harnessing multi-omics profiling and biological aging clocks, this approach enables individualized, data-driven nutritional interventions that can be objectively monitored over time. The integration of nutrition science with dynamic, quantifiable biomarkers marks a critical step toward preventive, precision-based health management. Rather than addressing diseases after their onset, precision geronutrition seeks to modulate the molecular mechanisms that precede pathological aging, positioning nutrition as a proactive determinant of longevity. Biological aging clocks, particularly multi-omics models, provide essential tools to evaluate the efficacy of interventions and reframe aging as a modifiable biological process. Future efforts should prioritize large-scale clinical validation linking aging-clock metrics to measurable health outcomes; the development of integrative platforms that unify genomic, metabolic, and dietary data for real-time analysis; and the translation of these precision approaches into public health frameworks. Ensuring accessibility and cost-effectiveness will be crucial for broad implementation. Ultimately, the convergence of precision nutrition, multi-omics technologies, and biological aging clocks will enable a new era of proactive health management, in which the pace of aging itself becomes a measurable and modifiable target for lifelong wellbeing.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by Korea Food Research Institute (E0210100).
Footnotes
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors have no conflicting interests.
References
- 1.Schumacher AE, Zheng P, Barber RM, et al. Global age-sex-specific all-cause mortality and life expectancy estimates for 204 countries and territories and 660 subnational locations, 1950-2013;2023: a demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. The Lancet. 2025;406:1731–1810. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01330-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lowsky DJ, Olshansky SJ, Bhattacharya J, Goldman DP. Heterogeneity in healthy aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69:640–649. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glt162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Organization WH. Decade of healthy ageing: baseline report 2020 [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ordovas JM, Corella D. Nutritional genomics. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2004;5:71–118. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.5.061903.180008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Berry SE, Valdes AM, Drew DA, et al. Human postprandial responses to food and potential for precision nutrition. Nat Med. 2020;26:964–973. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0934-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153:1194–1217. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14:3156. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Teschendorff AE, Horvath S. Epigenetic ageing clocks: statistical methods and emerging computational challenges. Nat Rev Genet. 2025;26:350–368. doi: 10.1038/s41576-024-00807-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.da Silva BR, Brennan L, Horst MA, Wishart DS, Prado CM. Advancing precision nutrition: bridging mechanistic insight and clinical implementation. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2025;21:515–517. doi: 10.1038/s41574-025-01141-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tessier AJ, Wang F, Korat AA, et al. Optimal dietary patterns for healthy aging. Nat Med. 2025;31:1644–1652. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03570-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zeevi D, Korem T, Zmora N, et al. Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses. Cell. 2015;163:1079–1094. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bermingham KM, Linenberg I, Polidori L, et al. Effects of a personalized nutrition program on cardiometabolic health: a randomized controlled trial. Nat Med. 2024;30:1888–1897. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02951-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Aiello A, Accardi G, Candore G, et al. Nutrient sensing pathways as therapeutic targets for healthy ageing. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2017;21:371–380. doi: 10.1080/14728222.2017.1294684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Templeman NM, Murphy CT. Regulation of reproduction and longevity by nutrient-sensing pathways. J Cell Biol. 2018;217:93–106. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201707168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nacarelli T, Azar A, Sell C. Aberrant mTOR activation in senescence and aging: A mitochondrial stress response? Exp Gerontol. 2015;68:66–70. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2014.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yang Y, Lu X, Liu N, et al. Metformin decelerates aging clock in male monkeys. Cell. 2024;187:6358–6378. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Harrison DE, Strong R, Sharp ZD, et al. Rapamycin fed late in life extends lifespan in genetically heterogeneous mice. Nature. 2009;460:392–395. doi: 10.1038/nature08221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang H, Ryu D, Wu Y, et al. NAD(+) repletion improves mitochondrial and stem cell function and enhances life span in mice. Science. 2016;352:1436–1443. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Laplante M, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell. 2012;149:274–293. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Carroll B, Nelson G, Rabanal-Ruiz Y, et al. Persistent mTORC1 signaling in cell senescence results from defects in amino acid and growth factor sensing. J Cell Biol. 2017;216:1949–1957. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201610113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Houssaini A, Breau M, Kebe K, et al. mTOR pathway activation drives lung cell senescence and emphysema. JCI Insight. 2018;3:e93203. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.93203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Naaz A, Zhang Y, Faidzinn NA, Yogasundaram S, Dorajoo R, Alfatah M. Curcumin inhibits TORC1 and prolongs the lifespan of cells with mitochondrial dysfunction. Cells. 2024;13:1470. doi: 10.3390/cells13171470.d42d9725aff1416ba61e0f9d8c451e2f [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kumar R, Sharma A, Kumari A, Gulati A, Padwad Y, Sharma R. Epigallocatechin gallate suppresses premature senescence of preadipocytes by inhibition of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and induces senescent cell death by regulation of Bax/Bcl-2 pathway. Biogerontology. 2019;20:171–189. doi: 10.1007/s10522-018-9785-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ataman M, Mittal N, Tintignac L, et al. Calorie restriction and rapamycin distinctly mitigate aging-associated protein phosphorylation changes in mouse muscles. Commun Biol. 2024;7:974. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06679-4.1f7ca75d353a4189a55f463594bfe771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jeon SM. Regulation and function of AMPK in physiology and diseases. Exp Mol Med. 2016;48:e245. doi: 10.1038/emm.2016.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chang E, Kim Y. Vitamin D ameliorates fat accumulation with AMPK/SIRT1 activity in C2C12 skeletal muscle cells. Nutrients. 2019;11:2806. doi: 10.3390/nu11112806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chang E. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on adipose tissue inflammation and NF-kappaB/AMPK activation in obese mice fed a high-fat diet. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:10915. doi: 10.3390/ijms231810915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ido Y, Duranton A, Lan F, Weikel KA, Breton L, Ruderman NB. Resveratrol prevents oxidative stress-induced senescence and proliferative dysfunction by activating the AMPK-FOXO3 cascade in cultured primary human keratinocytes. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0115341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115341.5d12ad145c454a4a9f2181ddba1209e4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xia Y, Zhang H, Wu X, Xu Y, Tan Q. Resveratrol activates autophagy and protects from UVA-induced photoaging in human skin fibroblasts and the skin of male mice by regulating the AMPK pathway. Biogerontology. 2024;25:649–664. doi: 10.1007/s10522-024-10099-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Carafa V, Rotili D, Forgione M, et al. Sirtuin functions and modulation: from chemistry to the clinic. Clin Epigenetics. 2016;8:61. doi: 10.1186/s13148-016-0224-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Covarrubias AJ, Perrone R, Grozio A, Verdin E. NAD(+) metabolism and its roles in cellular processes during ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22:119–141. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00313-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Houtkooper RH, Canto C, Wanders RJ, Auwerx J. The secret life of NAD+: an old metabolite controlling new metabolic signaling pathways. Endocr Rev. 2010;31:194–223. doi: 10.1210/er.2009-0026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Spath MR, Hoyer-Allo KJR, Seufert L, et al. Organ protection by caloric restriction depends on activation of the de novo NAD+ synthesis pathway. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023;34:772–792. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Luo G, Xiao L, Wang D, et al. Resveratrol attenuates excessive ethanol exposure-induced beta-cell senescence in rats: A critical role for the NAD(+)/SIRT1-p38MAPK/p16 pathway. J Nutr Biochem. 2021;89:108568. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2020.108568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sharma A, Chabloz S, Lapides RA, Roider E, Ewald CY. Potential synergistic supplementation of NAD+ promoting compounds as a strategy for increasing healthspan. Nutrients. 2023;15:445. doi: 10.3390/nu15020445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Igarashi M, Nakagawa-Nagahama Y, Miura M, et al. Chronic nicotinamide mononucleotide supplementation elevates blood nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide levels and alters muscle function in healthy older men. NPJ Aging. 2022;8:5. doi: 10.1038/s41514-022-00084-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fulop T, Larbi A, Dupuis G, et al. Immunosenescence and inflamm-aging as two sides of the same coin: friends or foes? Front Immunol. 2018;8:1960. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01960.f4d761d2d48345c2bdde44db008e4f99 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Campisi J. Aging, cellular senescence, and cancer. Ann Rev Physiol. 2013;75:685–705. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kennedy BK, Berger SL, Brunet A, et al. Geroscience: linking aging to chronic disease. Cell. 2014;159:709–713. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Simopoulos AP. Omega-3 fatty acids in inflammation and autoimmune diseases. J Am Coll Nutr. 2002;21:495–505. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2002.10719248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lu HC, Lin T, Ng MY, et al. Anti-inflammaging effects of vitamin D in human gingival fibroblasts with advanced glycation end product stimulation. J Dent Sci. 2023;18:666–673. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.10.003.cf35421663f941d18ea62a52c9040260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Davinelli S, Maes M, Corbi G, Zarrelli A, Willcox DC, Scapagnini G. Dietary phytochemicals and neuro-inflammaging: from mechanistic insights to translational challenges. Immun Ageing. 2016;13:16. doi: 10.1186/s12979-016-0070-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gren A. Effects of vitamin E, C and D supplementation on inflammation and oxidative stress in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2013;83:168–175. doi: 10.1024/0300-9831/a000156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chai SC, Davis K, Zhang Z, Zha L, Kirschner KF. Effects of tart cherry juice on biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in older adults. Nutrients. 2019;11:228. doi: 10.3390/nu11020228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kerlikowsky F, Kruger K, Hahn A, Schuchardt JP. Multimicronutrient and omega-3 fatty acid supplementation reduces low-grade inflammation in older participants: An exploratory study. Nutr Res. 2025;140:46–58. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2025.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Thevaranjan N, Puchta A, Schulz C, et al. Age-associated microbial dysbiosis promotes intestinal permeability, systemic inflammation, and macrophage dysfunction. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;21:455–466. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Odamaki T, Kato K, Sugahara H, et al. Age-related changes in gut microbiota composition from newborn to centenarian: a cross-sectional study. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16:90. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0708-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Parada Venegas D, De la Fuente MK, Landskron G, et al. Short chain fatty acids (SCFAs)-mediated gut epithelial and immune regulation and its relevance for inflammatory bowel diseases. Front Immunol. 2019;10:277. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01486.a9169df15629429c9d20f7960e3fbb21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Matt SM, Allen JM, Lawson MA, Mailing LJ, Woods JA, Johnson RW. Butyrate and dietary soluble fiber improve neuroinflammation associated with aging in mice. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1832. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01832.4ee0809fabf34ea4a394b0d2a219fd35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kurup K, Matyi S, Giles CB, et al. Calorie restriction prevents age-related changes in the intestinal microbiota. Aging (Albany NY) 2021;13:6298–6329. doi: 10.18632/aging.202753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ghosh TS, Rampelli S, Jeffery IB, et al. Mediterranean diet intervention alters the gut microbiome in older people reducing frailty and improving health status: the NU-AGE 1-year dietary intervention across five European countries. Gut. 2020;69:1218–1228. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Choi BH, Hyun S, Koo SH. The role of BCAA metabolism in metabolic health and disease. Exp Mol Med. 2024;56:1552–1559. doi: 10.1038/s12276-024-01263-6.ad5ba64cc5204101bb87db8990eceb4a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Babygirija R, Lamming DW. The regulation of healthspan and lifespan by dietary amino acids. Transl Med Aging. 2021;5:17–30. doi: 10.1016/j.tma.2021.05.001.58e016bcefc8409ebb579d662f84d483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Baker III GT, Sprott RL. Biomarkers of aging. Exp Gerontol. 1988;23:223–239. doi: 10.1016/0531-5565(88)90025-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hannum G, Guinney J, Zhao L, et al. Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol Cell. 2013;49:359–367. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lu AT, Quach A, Wilson JG, et al. DNA methylation GrimAge strongly predicts lifespan and healthspan. Aging (Albany NY) 2019;11:303–327. doi: 10.18632/aging.101684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Levine ME, Lu AT, Quach A, et al. An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan. Aging (Albany NY) 2018;10:573–591. doi: 10.18632/aging.101414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Belsky DW, Caspi A, Arseneault L, et al. Quantification of the pace of biological aging in humans through a blood test, the DunedinPoAm DNA methylation algorithm. Elife. 2020;9:e54870. doi: 10.7554/eLife.54870.sa2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Belsky DW, Caspi A, Corcoran DL, et al. DunedinPACE, a DNA methylation biomarker of the pace of aging. Elife. 2022;11:e73420. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73420.ed8e667fe7084ba990e0b7e3f557bdcc [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Fitzgerald KN, Hodges R, Hanes D, et al. Potential reversal of epigenetic age using a diet and lifestyle intervention: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Aging (Albany NY) 2021;13:9419–9432. doi: 10.18632/aging.202913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yaskolka Meir A, Keller M, Hoffmann A, et al. The effect of polyphenols on DNA methylation-assessed biological age attenuation: the DIRECT PLUS randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2023;21:364. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03067-3.9cb62bb94b3e4e4983fd73d3f2b68a05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dwaraka VB, Aronica L, Carreras-Gallo N, et al. Unveiling the epigenetic impact of vegan vs. omnivorous diets on aging: insights from the Twins Nutrition Study (TwiNS). BMC Med. 2024;22:301. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03513-w.869a3e24e5c04b8ab44dadf995536283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Villanueva JL, Vita AA, Zwickey H, et al. Dietary associations with reduced epigenetic age: a secondary data analysis of the methylation diet and lifestyle study. Aging (Albany NY) 2025;17:994–1010. doi: 10.18632/aging.206240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Amenyah SD, Hughes CF, Ward M, et al. Influence of nutrients involved in one-carbon metabolism on DNA methylation in adults-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev. 2020;78:647–666. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuz094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Choi SW, Friso S. Modulation of DNA methylation by one-carbon metabolism: a milestone for healthy aging. Nutr Res Pract. 2023;17:597–615. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2023.17.4.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Menni C, Kiddle SJ, Mangino M, et al. Circulating proteomic signatures of chronological age. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biomedical Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2015;70:809–816. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Baird GS, Nelson SK, Keeney TR, et al. Age-dependent changes in the cerebrospinal fluid proteome by slow off-rate modified aptamer array. Am J Pathol. 2012;180:446–456. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.10.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Argentieri MA, Xiao S, Bennett D, et al. Proteomic aging clock predicts mortality and risk of common age-related diseases in diverse populations. Nat Med. 2024;30:2450–2460. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03164-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Tanaka T, Basisty N, Fantoni G, et al. Plasma proteomic biomarker signature of age predicts health and life span. Elife. 2020;9:e61073. doi: 10.7554/eLife.61073.d90b5f67b19b406eb35690442335fc2e [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Lehallier B, Shokhirev MN, Wyss‐Coray T, Johnson AA. Data mining of human plasma proteins generates a multitude of highly predictive aging clocks that reflect different aspects of aging. Aging cell. 2020;19:e13256. doi: 10.1111/acel.13256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Du S, Chen J, Kim H, et al. Plasma protein biomarkers of healthy dietary patterns: results from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study and the framingham heart study. J Nutr. 2023;153:34–46. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2022.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kim H, Lichtenstein AH, Ganz P, et al. Identification of protein biomarkers of the dietary approaches to stop hypertension diet in randomized feeding studies and validation in an observational study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12:e028821. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028821.2a69756338824358951656a9062697df [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tryggvason K, Wartiovaara J. How does the kidney filter plasma? Physiology. 2005;20:96–101. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00045.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hertel J, Friedrich N, Wittfeld K, et al. Measuring biological age via metabonomics: the metabolic age score. J Proteome Res. 2016;15:400–410. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Lassen JK, Wang T, Nielsen KL, Hasselstrom JB, Johannsen M, Villesen P. Large-scale metabolomics: predicting biological age using 10,133 routine untargeted LC-MS measurements. Aging Cell. 2023;22:e13813. doi: 10.1111/acel.13813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mutz J, Iniesta R, Lewis CM. Metabolomic age (MileAge) predicts health and life span: A comparison of multiple machine learning algorithms. Sci Adv. 2024;10:eadp3743. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adp3743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Adav SS, Wang Y. Metabolomics Signatures of Aging: Recent Advances. Aging Dis. 2021;12:646–661. doi: 10.14336/AD.2020.0909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Moco S, Martin FP, Rezzi S. Metabolomics view on gut microbiome modulation by polyphenol-rich foods. J Proteome Res. 2012;11:4781–4790. doi: 10.1021/pr300581s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kouraki A, Nogal A, Nocun W, et al. Machine learning metabolomics profiling of dietary interventions from a six-week randomised trial. Metabolites. 2024;14:311. doi: 10.3390/metabo14060311.dae2bdb56db64558af08c0b95165b497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ramos-Lopez O, Martinez JA, Milagro FI. Holistic integration of omics tools for precision nutrition in health and disease. Nutrients. 2022;14:4074. doi: 10.3390/nu14194074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Babu M, Snyder M. Multi-Omics Profiling for Health. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2023;22:100561. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Zhou Y, Tang J, Du W, Zhang Y, Ye BC. Screening potential biomarkers associated with insulin resistance in high-fat diet-fed mice by integrating metagenomics and untargeted metabolomics. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12:e0409423. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04094-23.05bbb2795f814e9296c615cfa971d631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Elhassan YS, Philp AA, Lavery GG. Targeting NAD+ in metabolic disease: new insights into an old molecule. J Endocr Soc. 2017;1:816–835. doi: 10.1210/js.2017-00092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Grosso G, Laudisio D, Frias-Toral E, et al. Anti-inflammatory nutrients and obesity-associated metabolic-inflammation: state of the art and future direction. Nutrients. 2022;14:1137. doi: 10.3390/nu14061137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Ma T, Shen X, Shi X, et al. Targeting gut microbiota and metabolism as the major probiotic mechanism - An evidence-based review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2023;138:178–198. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.06.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Chen C, Wang J, Pan D, et al. Applications of multi-omics analysis in human diseases. MedComm (2020) 2023;4:e315. doi: 10.1002/mco2.315.7f5639a60f9a42cfb20b4eff5700f3d1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Ying K, Castro JP, Shindyapina AV, et al. Depletion of loss-of-function germline mutations in centenarians reveals longevity genes. Nat Commun. 2024;15:9030. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52967-2.5caa0089e32b4109a566c31b600051c0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Gursoy G, Harmanci A, Tang H, Ayday E, Brenner SE. When biology gets personal: hidden challenges of privacy and ethics in biological big data. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2019;24:386–390. doi: 10.1142/9789813279827_0035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Voultsos P. Ethical considerations surrounding health-related big data research. Cuad Bioet. 2023;34:189–218. doi: 10.30444/CB.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Gkouskou K, Vlastos I, Karkalousos P, Chaniotis D, Sanoudou D, Eliopoulos AG. The "virtual digital twins" concept in precision nutrition. Adv Nutr. 2020;11:1405–1413. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

