Skip to main content
. 2026 Feb 3;18(2):e102911. doi: 10.7759/cureus.102911

Table 11. Summary of corneal stromal demarcation line depth outcomes from representative studies across cross-linking protocols in progressive keratoconus.

A-CXL: accelerated corneal cross-linking; AS-OCT: anterior segment optical coherence tomography; cl-ACXL: continuous light-accelerated corneal cross-linking; CXL: corneal collagen cross-linking; EFPL-M-TECXL: transepithelial enhanced fluence pulsed light accelerated CXL; eRF: enhanced riboflavin; I-CXL: transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking using iontophoresis (riboflavin delivery via iontophoresis); μm: micrometer; NR: not reported; NS: not significant (p-value > 0.05); pl-ACXL: pulsed light-accelerated corneal cross-linking; RF: riboflavin; WMD: weighted mean difference

Study CXL Protocol Demarcation Line Depth (via AS-OCT) Comparison
Bikbova et al., 2016 [39] I-CXL 172 ± 16 μm vs Dresden: 292 μm  (p < 0.001)
Dervenis et al., 2020 [17] Dresden 322.50 μm vs pl-ACXL: 319.95 μm (NS)
Kobashi et al., 2020 [12] Dresden Deeper than A-CXL (actual values NR) WMD vs A-CXL: -102.25 μm 95% CI: -157.16 to -47.35 (p < 0.001)
Mazzotta et al., 2022 [52] TE-EFPL ACXL 282.6 ± 23.6 μm NR
Karotkar et al., 2022 [80] pl-ACXL 251.13 ± 18.28 μm  vs cl-ACXL: 245.28 μm  (NS)
Manumuraleekrishna et al., 2024 [83] A-CXL (Iso-osmolar RF) 252 μm vs hypo-osmolar: 210 μm (NS)
Dina et al., 2025 [69] A-CXL 278.9 ± 31.71 μm  vs Dresden: 280.42 μm  (NS)