Table 11. Summary of corneal stromal demarcation line depth outcomes from representative studies across cross-linking protocols in progressive keratoconus.
A-CXL: accelerated corneal cross-linking; AS-OCT: anterior segment optical coherence tomography; cl-ACXL: continuous light-accelerated corneal cross-linking; CXL: corneal collagen cross-linking; EFPL-M-TECXL: transepithelial enhanced fluence pulsed light accelerated CXL; eRF: enhanced riboflavin; I-CXL: transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking using iontophoresis (riboflavin delivery via iontophoresis); μm: micrometer; NR: not reported; NS: not significant (p-value > 0.05); pl-ACXL: pulsed light-accelerated corneal cross-linking; RF: riboflavin; WMD: weighted mean difference
| Study | CXL Protocol | Demarcation Line Depth (via AS-OCT) | Comparison |
| Bikbova et al., 2016 [39] | I-CXL | 172 ± 16 μm | vs Dresden: 292 μm (p < 0.001) |
| Dervenis et al., 2020 [17] | Dresden | 322.50 μm | vs pl-ACXL: 319.95 μm (NS) |
| Kobashi et al., 2020 [12] | Dresden | Deeper than A-CXL (actual values NR) | WMD vs A-CXL: -102.25 μm 95% CI: -157.16 to -47.35 (p < 0.001) |
| Mazzotta et al., 2022 [52] | TE-EFPL ACXL | 282.6 ± 23.6 μm | NR |
| Karotkar et al., 2022 [80] | pl-ACXL | 251.13 ± 18.28 μm | vs cl-ACXL: 245.28 μm (NS) |
| Manumuraleekrishna et al., 2024 [83] | A-CXL (Iso-osmolar RF) | 252 μm | vs hypo-osmolar: 210 μm (NS) |
| Dina et al., 2025 [69] | A-CXL | 278.9 ± 31.71 μm | vs Dresden: 280.42 μm (NS) |