Table 12. Summary of other biomechanical parameter outcomes from representative studies across cross-linking protocols in progressive keratoconus.
A-CXL: accelerated corneal cross-linking; CH: corneal hysteresis (viscoelastic property of the cornea; surrogate for corneal biomechanical strength); cl-ACXL: continuous light-accelerated corneal cross-linking; CRF: corneal resistance factor (a measure of viscous and elastic resistance of the cornea); CXL: corneal collagen cross-linking; DAI: deformation amplitude index (normalized corneal stiffness relative to intraocular pressure); DAR: deformation amplitude ratio (corneal stiffness); IR: integrated radius (corneal resistance to deformation); MHz: megahertz; NS: not significant (p-value > 0.05); pl-ACXL: pulsed light-accelerated corneal cross-linking; RF: riboflavin; TE-CXL: transepithelial corneal cross-linking
| Study | CXL Protocol | Parameter | Timepoint | Change | Significance |
| Hashemi et al., 2015 [74] | A-CXL vs Dresden | CH | 6 months | No significant difference | NS |
| Hashemi et al., 2015 [74] | A-CXL vs Dresden | CRF | 6 months | No significant difference | NS |
| Shao et al., 2020 [55] | TE-CXL | Brillouin shift | 6 months | +25 MHz cone region | p < 0.01 |
| Karotkar et al., 2022 [80] | cl-ACXL | DAI | 1 year | -0.19 mm (1.04→0.85) | p < 0.05 |
| Karotkar et al., 2022 [80] | pl-ACXL | DAI | 1 year | -0.28 mm (1.12→0.84) | p < 0.01 |
| Manumuraleekrishna et al., 2024 [83] | A-CXL (Iso- vs Hypo-osmolar RF) | CH | 1 year | Greater in iso-osmolar RF | p < 0.05 |
| Manumuraleekrishna et al., 2024 [83] | A-CXL (Iso- vs Hypo-osmolar RF) | CRF | 1 year | Greater in iso-osmolar RF | p < 0.05 |
| Ang et al., 2025 [64] | A-CXL | DAR | 6 months | -1.447 | p < 0.01 |
| Ang et al., 2025 [64] | A-CXL | IR | 6 months | -1.753 | p < 0.05 |