Skip to main content
. 2026 Jan 7;26:170. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13967-0

Table 3.

Multi-group interrupted time series analysis of monthly relative-value units per employee

Periods/Parameters Central town and street PHIs vs. Remote countryside PHIs Other PHIs vs. Remote countryside PHIs Central town and street PHIs vs. Other PHIs
Period I (Before the pilot reform, n = 24 months)
Trend of control (β1) 4.24 (2.69–5.78)*** 4.24 (2.69–5.78)*** 4.64 (2.50–6.77)***
Level difference (treatment - control, β6) 8.64 (−37.96–20.66) 28.52 (−1.45–58.50) −37.57 (−70.52 to −4.61) *
Trend difference (treatment - control, β7) 1.12 (−2.21 to 4.45) 0.40 (−2.24–3.03) 0.72 (−2.92–4.36)
Period II (After the pilot reform, n = 36 months)
Trend of control (β1 + β3) 11.04 (8.82–13.25)*** 11.04 (8.82–13.25)*** 4.93 (3.64–6.21)***
Trend of treatment (β1 + β3 + β7 + β9) 2.53 (1.55–3.52)*** 4.93 (3.64–6.21)*** 2.53 (1.55–3.52)***
Trend difference (treatment - control, β7 + β9) −8.50 (−10.93 to −6.08)*** −6.11 (−8.67–−3.55)*** −2.40 (−4.02 to −0.78)**
Period III (After COVID-19 pandemic, n = 36 months)
Trend of control (β1 + β5) −5.11 (−9.27 to −0.95)* −5.11 (−9.27 to −0.95)* 1.16 (−2.13–4.45)
Trend of treatment (β1 + β5 + β7 + β11) 4.16 (0.56–7.77)* 1.16 (−2.13–4.45) 4.16 (0.56–7.77)*
Trend difference (treatment - control, β7 + β11) 9.27 (3.77–14.78)** 6.27 (0.97–11.58)* 3.00 (−1.88–7.88)
Total impact
Trend of control (β1 + β3 + β5) 1.69 (−1.41–4.79) 1.69 (−1.41–4.79) 1.46 (−0.82–3.73)
Trend of treatment (β1 + β3 + β5 + β7 + β9 + β11) 1.34 (−0.88–3.56) 1.46 (−0.82–3.73) 1.34 (−0.88–3.56)
Trend difference (treatment - control, β7 + β9 + β11) −0.35 (−4.16–3.46) −0.23 (−4.10–3.61) −0.12 (−3.30–3.06)

Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; regression with Newey–West standard errors-lag (1)