Table 3.

Results of Canonical Discriminant Analyses of Neuropsychological Test Measures Predicting Liability Status

							Whole Sample
	Calibration Samplea			Replication Samplea			All-Effects Model			Large-Effects Model
Variable	Partial R2	Pb	Weightc	Partial R2	Pb	Weightc	Partial R2	Pb	Weightc	Partial R2	Pb	Weightc
Verbal working memory	.009	.66	.17	.004	.85	.11	.004	.82	.09
Spatial working memory	.084	.02	.59	.041	.17	.44	.082	.03	.57	.087	.01	.53
Divided tion	.097	.01	−.55	.076	.04	−.52	.118	.005	−.60	.115	.002	−.60
Sequencing	.014	.55	.01	.011	.63	−.08	.015	.54	.05
Verbal fluency	.005	.81	−.08	.011	.63	−.05	.008	.73	−.01
Categorization	.010	.65	.18	.005	.81	.13	.006	.76	.13
Choice reaction time	.058	.08	−.41	.041	.17	−.32	.062	.06	−.41	.054	.06	−.38
Selective attention	.022	.39	.18	.002	.93	.06	.014	.55	.17
Verbal episodic memory	.005	.82	−.06	.006	.78	.03	.012	.61	−.15
Recall intrusions	.040	.18	−.42	.057	.08	−.49	.063	.06	−.51	.075	.02	−.49
Semantic clustering	.016	.51	.31	.018	.46	.19	.031	.27	.36
Story memory	.001	.94	.07	.011	.64	.05	.006	.79	.07
Visual episodic memory	.029	.28	−.08	.004	.83	−.09	.013	.58	−.11
Face recognition	.023	.38	−.07	.023	.38	−.21	.033	.25	−.24
Verbal ability	.004	.85	.15	.019	.45	.36	.021	.41	.39
Spatial ability	.007	.75	−.16	.007	.76	−.18	.014	.55	−.28
Motor speed	.005	.82	.05	.007	.76	−.04	.004	.83	−.00

^aResults are for all-effects models.

^bProbability that the partial R²=0.

^cStandardized canonical weights.