Table 3.

Comparison of the Power of the DMLB with That of the TDT, When α=.0001

	Power for δp =
	1			.8			.5			.3
Model and p (m)	N	TDT	DMLB	N	TDT	DMLB	N	TDT	DMLB	N	TDT	DMLB
Additive:
.2 (.2)	51	.82	.75	75	.81	.76	173	.80	.80	437	.80	.87
.5 (.5)	95	.81	.73	154	.81	.75	410	.80	.79	1,000	.70	.77
.1 (.2)	68	.82	.78	100	.81	.79	233	.80	.84	596	.80	.92
.5 (.2)	511	.80	.77	772	.80	.79	1,000	.34	.39	1,000	.04	.08
.2 (.5)	123	.81	.77	196	.80	.80	514	.80	.90	1,000	.54	.89
.1 (.5)	177	.80	.80	281	.80	.83	730	.80	.94	1,000	.30	.83
Dominant:
.2 (.2)	71	.81	.76	106	.81	.77	250	.80	.81	642	.80	.88
.5 (.5)	288	.80	.76	461	.80	.77	1,000	.66	.67	1,000	.09	.12
.1 (.2)	82	.81	.78	122	.81	.80	287	.80	.85	741	.80	.93
.5 (.2)	1,000	.55	.52	1,000	.26	.26	1,000	.04	.04	1,000	.00	.01
.2 (.5)	188	.81	.79	300	.80	.82	783	.80	.91	1,000	.26	.66
.1 (.5)	225	.80	.80	356	.80	.85	923	.80	.95	1,000	.19	.69
Multiplicative:
.2 (.2)	25	.84	.78	36	.82	.77	81	.80	.82	201	.80	.91
.5 (.5)	35	.82	.75	61	.82	.79	169	.80	.86	486	.80	.96
.1 (.2)	37	.82	.77	54	.81	.79	123	.81	.86	308	.80	.94
.5 (.2)	235	.80	.82	351	.80	.85	834	.80	.94	1,000	.27	.78
.2 (.5)	50	.82	.78	81	.80	.82	217	.80	.94	612	.80	1.00
.1 (.5)	86	.81	.80	137	.81	.85	357	.80	.96	999	.80	1.00
Recessive:
.2 (.2)	143	.81	.77	211	.80	.78	493	.80	.81	1,000	.62	.72
.5 (.5)	56	.82	.77	92	.81	.79	247	.80	.84	700	.80	.93
.1 (.2)	1,000	.64	.63	1,000	.33	.33	1,000	.05	.05	1,000	.01	.01
.5 (.2)	326	.81	.80	489	.80	.83	1,000	.69	.85	1,000	.13	.42
.2 (.5)	406	.80	.79	636	.80	.82	1,000	.44	.57	1,000	.06	.16
.1 (.5)	1,000	.06	.05	1,000	.02	.02	1,000	.00	.00	1,000	.00	.00