Table 1.
Comparison of representative IWFS/IWFG methods
| Method | Selector type | Grouping | Interpretability | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L2X | MLP | No | Salient features | Unstable, no grouping |
| INVASE | Actor–critic policy net | No | Adaptive subset size | High variance, unstable |
| LSPIN | Locally sparse NN | No | Sparse local masks | Misses global structure |
| gI | Info-theoretic redundancy | Yes | Learns groups | High complexity |
| GroupFS | MoE with discrete gating | Yes | Cluster-level subsets | Rigid, low flexibility |
FlexGPC is designed to address their limitations by enhancing expressiveness (via RAC), stability (via regularization and clamping), and robustness under missingness