Skip to main content
Dermatology and Therapy logoLink to Dermatology and Therapy
letter
. 2025 Nov 8;16(1):143–154. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01575-z

The Multifaceted Properties of Copper and Zinc in Skin Healing

Nicolas Kluger 1,2,3, Edward Lain 4, Nicolas Frasson 5, Gautier Doat 6, Aline Stennevin 6, Pascale Bianchi 7,
PMCID: PMC12873029  PMID: 41205051

Abstract

Copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) are trace elements required for a multitude of physiological processes, including wound healing, and there has been a long history of including both metal ions in topical skin repair formulations. Wound healing involves complex and dynamic cellular mechanisms in the main phases of platelet hemostasis, inflammation, granulation tissue formation, re-epithelialization, and extracellular matrix remodeling. This process is influenced by the balance in the skin’s commensal microbiota, and the risk of microbes becoming pathogenic through migration and colonization of the deeper tissues. We examine the antimicrobial effects of Cu/Zn versus their roles in the innate immune response that prevents the invasion and proliferation of microorganisms and in the cellular mechanisms that promote wound healing. Cu/Zn modulates macrophage polarization, promoting the transition from the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype to the pro-healing M2 phenotype, which is critical for tissue repair. Both elements also act as cofactors that modulate the activities of important growth factors, mediators, and enzymes, including antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase, which have a role in the innate immune response to pathogens and protect cells from oxidative damage, reducing inflammation and promoting healing. These divalent ions stimulate angiogenesis, and the Cu/Zn combination can also modulate integrin expression in keratinocytes, which are needed for re-epithelialization, supporting cellular mobility and differentiation, and enhancing the healing process. The synergistic roles of Cu/Zn in preventing infection while stimulating the skin’s natural immune defenses encourage efficient tissue repair after injury. Topical Cu/Zn-containing formulations therefore hold promise for improving wound management.

Keywords: Wound healing, Microbiota, Topical, Copper, Zinc

Key Summary Points

Despite long-standing empirical use, the clinical integration of copper and zinc in wound care remains controversial.
Copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) act synergistically in wound healing, enhancing antimicrobial defense, immune modulation, and tissue regeneration through their combined biochemical roles.
Clinical and preclinical evidence supports the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Cu/Zn-containing topical therapies in accelerating wound closure and improving healing outcomes.
Topical Cu/Zn formulations provide targeted antibacterial activity that reduces pathogenic burden while preserving commensal skin flora, supporting balanced wound microbiota and optimal healing. 

Introduction

The process of wound healing is dynamic, involving various cellular mechanisms associated with the main phases of platelet hemostasis, inflammation, granulation tissue formation, re-epithelialization, and extracellular matrix remodeling [1, 2]. While wound healing is a natural physiological reaction to tissue injury, as it proceeds through the different stages, it involves a complex interplay among various cell types, molecular mediators, and the vascular system [1]. Essential elements, which cannot be synthesized by living organisms and must therefore be supplied by an external source (food, dietary supplements, topical formulations, etc.), have important roles in these mechanisms [3]. This includes divalent metal ions that are needed for the catalytic and structural functioning of proteins, enzymes, and transcription factors [3, 4]. The second and third most abundant trace metal elements in the human body after iron are zinc (Zn) and copper (Cu) [2, 3].

Ointments containing Cu and Zn have been used for centuries as topical antiseptic preparations, such as the Dalibour formula, also known as Dalibour or Alibour water [5]. As first described by French surgeon Jacques Dalibour in the eighteenth century, the original formula contained copper sulfate and zinc sulfate, and was used to treat skin irritations and minor wounds, including soldiers’ wounds during armed conflicts [6]. The Smith Papyrus, Egyptian medical text written between 2600 and 2200 BC, provides the oldest recorded medical use of Cu compounds in wound treatment [7, 8].

In the modern era, the most common approaches taken towards wound healing are mechanical and involve protecting the damaged areas with dressings [9, 10]. Topical preparations containing tissue-repairing and antibacterial ingredients that speed up the wound healing process are also used in the early phase to cleanse the wound, attract growth factors to the injured site, and prevent secondary infections [11, 12]. Moreover, recent research has highlighted the wound microbiome and related host-microbiota interactions that could influence the healing process, particularly the importance of maintaining a balance in the skin microbiota [13]. The negative effect of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy on this balance is well recognized [14], as well as the fact that antibiotic therapy is often used inappropriately and unsuccessfully in chronic wound infections, and overuse is associated with antimicrobial resistance [15]. Modern wound care practices must therefore integrate specific considerations to attain the desired antimicrobial outcomes.

The development of topical skin repair products with enhanced properties to prevent infection is therefore of increasing interest, as well as those that also promote rapid and scarless healing, thereby improving the quality and aesthetics of wound healing [16, 17]. This needs better understanding of the wound microbiome and the relationship between it and cellular responses involved in wound healing. Topical Cu/Zn-containing preparations have antiseptic properties that could have a negative effect on the wound healing process. However, alteration of the skin’s microbiota balance by Cu/Zn has never been demonstrated, and Cu and Zn have additional roles in the processes that prevent tissue invasion by pathogens, the innate immune response to skin damage, and the cellular mechanisms that promote healing. Here, we provide a concise and pragmatic overview of the antimicrobial effects of Cu and Zn, the roles of these divalent ions in the immune response and wound healing process, and evidence supporting their use in wound healing formulations.

Ethical Approval

This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

The Skin Microbiota and Wound Healing

The skin is the first protective barrier of the human body against its environment, and the skin’s microbiota, which contains bacteria, fungi, and viruses, helps to maintain this function and hence regulate health and disease via a symbiotic relationship between the skin and its resident microorganisms [17]. A breach of the skin barrier enables opportunistic infection, where commensal microbes migrate from the surface to the interior of the skin, grow, and colonize the deeper tissues. The risk of wound infection increases as microbial load increases and according to microbial species, microbial interactions, and synergy [15]. Additionally, biofilm formation, characterized by the aggregation and attachment of bacterial cells to a surface, protected by a self-produced extracellular polymeric substance, can impair the healing process, a scenario commonly seen in chronic wounds [15, 18].

The subsequent impact of wound infection is dependent on various factors, including the host’s immune system, and the virulence and location of the microorganisms [15]. Pathogenic microorganisms with high potentials for proliferation and causing inflammation can have a negative impact on the wound healing process because chronic inflammation can prevent wound closure and therefore delay healing [17, 19]. A common example is opportunistic Staphylococcus aureus infection, which is responsible for most bacterial skin and soft tissue infections [20] and renowned for its negative effect in many types of wounds [21].

When treating skin lesions, it is therefore essential to prevent the invasion of surrounding tissues by microbiota and maintain a balance among commensal species [13, 17]. Steady state interactions between bacteria and the immune system induces specific T cell responses that are important for tissue repair [22, 23] and commensal microbiota in the skin trigger type I interferon-dependent innate repair responses in injured skin [24]. The recruitment of antigen-presenting cells to the skin has been shown to be microbiota-dependent [25], and skin regeneration in wound repair is enhanced by microbes via interleukin-1β signaling [26]. It has also been demonstrated that commensals can promote epidermal production of antimicrobial peptides [27, 28] and produce antimicrobials [29, 30]. Consequently, broad-spectrum antibiotic treatments could eliminate potentially beneficial commensal bacteria, disrupting the symbiotic, homeostatic relationship that exists with the skin epithelium. Optimal wound healing should instead be encouraged by preventing the invasion and proliferation of microorganisms from the wound site. Moreover, in acute burns or after skin grafts, it is essential to control local infection to prevent skin graft rejection [31, 32]; again, the bacterial and septic environment is a crucial element for achieving good healing.

Role of Cu and Zn in Wound Healing

The key roles of Cu and Zn in the functioning of proteins, enzymes, and transcription factors [3, 4] translate into multifaceted roles in the wound healing process. These roles can be categorized broadly into those that relate to the prevention of tissue invasion by microbiota at the wound site and to the cellular process of wound healing.

Both trace elements have two important properties that are relevant to the prevention of tissue invasion by pathogens: (1) mechanisms of toxicity towards microorganisms; (2) mechanisms related to stimulation of the innate immune system.

As positively charged ions, it is thought that one of the main mechanisms of toxicity involves the electrostatic binding of Cu and Zn to negatively charged bacterial membranes, thereby altering the charge balance of the cell surface, leading to cell structure deformation and killing of the microorganism [3338]. Moreover, there is evidence, mostly from in vitro studies of pathogens such as S. aureus and Escherichia coli, that Cu/Zn generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) [35, 36, 38], which play a major role in cell signaling pathways when present at a low level but have harmful oxidative effects on essential cellular macromolecules when present at high concentrations [39]. ROS thereby induce DNA degradation and membrane lipid peroxidation, which has a bactericidal effect [34, 37]. Zn may also exert an antimicrobial effect by antagonizing the uptake of other key trace metal nutrients and by binding to sites that do not normally contain a metal ion, thereby inhibiting key enzymes [33]. There have been no reports of an alteration in the balance of the skin’s commensal microbiota in vivo by Cu/Zn treatment.

Cu and Zn ions also stimulate ROS generation by phagocytic cells (macrophages and neutrophils) as a defense against pathogenic microorganisms by the host innate immune system [39]. Cu and Zn are essential cofactors for the enzyme Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD), which is involved in ROS regulation [2, 35, 40]. Cofactors are components that are essential for the biologic activity of enzymes, thereby maintaining cellular redox balance and driving synthetic and catabolic reactions by the cell [41]. Additionally, ROS production by phagocytes relies on nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphatase (NADPH) oxidase, a process that requires Zn [42, 43], and Cu increases the genetic expression of this enzyme [44].

Cu and Zn are involved in each of the major cellular activities associated with skin healing (Fig. 1) [2, 34, 45]. After injury, hemostasis is established via coagulation and clot formation, during which time Zn enhances platelet activity and aggregation and serves as a hemostatic cofactor [46], providing the basis for the inflammatory phase and tissue formation. At the beginning of the inflammatory phase, Zn regulates the migration and phagocytosis activities of neutrophils [45], as shown in conditions of Zn deficiency by the promotion of monocyte differentiation into pro-inflammatory (M1) and inhibition of immune-regulatory (M2) macrophages [47]. Deficiency of Zn has also been shown to reduce the B lymphocyte population, thereby reducing antibody production, negatively affecting phagocytosis, and preventing wound bed clearance [48]. During the proliferation phase of wound healing, Zn acts as an important cofactor during the development of granulation tissue by modulating collagen/extracellular matrix deposition [49], stimulating angiogenesis [45], and enhancing keratinocyte migration by increasing the expression of integrins, the main mediators of cell migration, and promoting epidermal re-epithelialization [50]. During the proliferation and remodeling stages, Zn is required for maintaining balance in matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which are Zn-dependent enzymes that digest dermal basal membranes and the extracellular matrix [2]. Zn has a particularly important role in the proteolytic activity of MMP-1, which is obligatory for keratinocyte migration [51]. Re-epithelialization is crucial to prevent infection through the re-establishment of the barrier function of the epidermis and the secretion of antimicrobial and immune-related peptides [52].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The impact of copper and zinc in the different stages of wound healing Created in BioRender. Genies, C. (2025) https://BioRender.com/56qn0jg. Cu copper, ECM extracellular matrix, M1 pro-inflammatory macrophages, M2 immune-regulatory macrophages, MMP matrix metalloproteinases, ROS reactive oxygen species, TIMP tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase, Zn zinc, + activation

At the beginning of the wound healing process, Cu is also involved in the recruitment of macrophages to the wound and their polarization to M1 or M2 macrophages [34]. During the proliferation phase, Cu promotes angiogenic factor expression and wound angiogenesis [53], and accelerates wound contraction and re-epithelialization [34]. Important Cu-dependent factors and enzymes are involved in this process, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is secreted by platelets, macrophages, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells [2, 34]. This triggers the chemotaxis of neutrophils and fibroblasts, initiates fibroblast proliferation, induces matrix protein and MMP synthesis, and stimulates angiogenesis. Additionally, the expression of integrins α2, β1, and α6, known to mediate cell migration, re-epithelialization, and granulation tissue formation, is Cu-dependent [50]. During the remodeling phase, Cu stimulates the expression of MMPs within dermal fibroblasts [54] and may have an impact on the balance between MMPs and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP) [55]. Cu also acts as a cofactor for lysyl oxidase, which facilitates the formation, development, and maturation of extracellular matrix during wound healing [34] by catalyzing the formation of covalent cross-links between collagens [2, 56]. The key role of Cu in extracellular matrix remodeling is also suggested by the clinical spectrum of Wilson disease (progressive liver damage, inflammation, fibrosis, and cirrhosis), which is caused by poor cellular excretion of Cu [57].

Cu and Zn ions therefore work together in the wound healing process (Fig. 1). Both regulate the immune response by modulating macrophage polarization, promoting the transition of macrophages from the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype to the pro-healing M2 phenotype, which is critical for tissue repair [58]. Cu stimulates angiogenesis, enhancing the expression of angiogenic growth factors [59, 60], and both Cu and Zn act as cofactors for antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD, which not only have a role in the innate immune response to pathogens but also protect cells from oxidative damage, reducing inflammation and promoting healing [61, 62]. Additionally, Zn has been shown to induce metallothionein, which is antioxidative, in human epidermal wounds [63]. Both Cu and Zn also modulate integrin expression in keratinocytes and maintain the MMP balance needed for re-epithelialization, supporting cellular mobility and differentiation, and enhancing the healing process [64].

Increased understanding of the mechanisms of action of Cu and Zn in wound healing is accompanied by clinical and preclinical evidence from the application of topical formulations containing Cu or Zn, which are well established in wound healing [2, 8, 6567]. Zn ions released from Zn-containing wound dressings have been shown to upregulate the genes relevant to tissue remodeling, collagen deposition, and fibroblast growth activities, hence enhancing wound repair [2, 68], and wound dressings containing Cu-based nanomaterials and nanoparticles have also been confirmed to accelerate wound healing [2, 8]. One study of 20 patients, 10 with diabetes, who responded poorly to silver wound dressings, found that treatment with Cu dressings enhanced wound healing, with a mean wound area reduction approximately 2.4 times higher than with silver dressing treatment [69]. Further evidence of the potential benefits of Cu and Zn inclusion in topical wound preparations is available from preclinical studies. A mouse model study found that topical treatment with copper sulfate not only improved the speed of wound contraction and closure but also improved the quality of the regenerated tissue [70]. Other studies have shown that materials doped with both Cu and Zn can enhance wound healing by modulating immune responses and promoting tissue repair. For instance, in a mouse model of wounds infected with methicillin-resistant S. aureus, a Cu/Zn-doped hydrogel was demonstrated to have enhanced antibacterial activity and accelerated healing in comparison to control groups given hydrogel without Cu/Zn [58]. Another in vivo study showed the wound healing rate was significantly faster in a group treated with a Cu/Zn loaded nanofiber dressing than in groups given the same dressing without Cu/Zn [71]. In both studies, Cu/Zn promoted macrophage polarization towards the regenerative M2 phenotype [58, 71]. Other preclinical or in vitro studies of different wound healing compositions containing Cu and Zn showed evidence of the synergistic inhibition of bacterial growth and biofilm formation [7274]. Moreover, in a study of patients operated on for pilonidal sinus disease, topical Zn treatment tended to increase Cu in the wounds and adjacent skin, suggesting a positive synergistic effect between Cu and Zn [75].

There is also real-world evidence of the benefits of topical skin healing formulations containing Cu and Zn for treating minor skin impairments and wounds. For example, formulations containing a postbiotic Aquaphilus dolomiae extract, and copper and zinc salts have proved to be effective and are indicated for use in patients with various conditions, including radiation dermatitis [76] and hand eczema [77]. In a study of 1317 infants, children, and adults with various types of superficial skin impairment, daily use of a formulation containing A. dolomiae extract, copper sulfate, and zinc sulfate for around 3 weeks was highly effective and well tolerated, with positive feedback from most participants [78, 79]. Another study, involving 40 adults who used this skin healing preparation in tattoo aftercare, showed it was well tolerated and, in self assessments, was regarded as efficient or very efficient in the healing process [80]. The good tolerability and safety of topical products containing Cu or Zn could be expected since they are designed to act on the skin surface, with minimal systemic absorption [81, 82], and are not intended for long-term use or for use on large wounds or severe burns. However, while the risk of interfering with mineral metabolism (e.g., Cu) is low, caution may be advised in patients with metabolic disorders, such as Wilson disease [57].

As well as cumulative evidence of the benefits of Cu/Zn-containing formulations in different settings, understanding is also required of patient-specific lifestyle, dietary, and genetic factors that may influence wound healing [83] and theoretically mitigate the beneficial effects of Cu/Zn. For example, patients who smoke display delayed and/or compromised wound healing, which is thought to be related to the negative vascular effects of nicotine and carbon monoxide displacement, and the toxic effect of chemicals, such as hydrogen cyanide, in cigarette smoke [84]. Also, poor diet or malnutrition will impair wound healing if there are insufficient amino acids to aid tissue regeneration, or a deficiency of minerals and vitamins to support increased cellular activity and the regenerative pathways during the healing response [85, 86]. Vitamin C, for example, serves to not only stimulate collagen gene expression but is required for prolyl hydroxylase and lysyl hydroxylase activity, enzymes that are needed for mature collagen formation [86, 87]. Genetic and epigenetic factors can also influence the wound healing process, with certain patient genotypes dictating cutaneous microbiome composition and diversity [88], and changes in DNA methylation from ageing and lifestyle, histone modification, and chromatin remodeling alter the transcription of genes related to all three phases of the wound healing process [89].

Conclusion

There is a wealth of literature examining the roles and effects of Cu and Zn in wound healing. In this article, we focus on the properties of Cu/Zn that are relevant to preventing the invasion and proliferation of microorganisms into the deeper skin tissues, which is essential for an optimal wound healing process after injury. Cu and Zn are essential trace elements in many physiological processes and have long been recognized for their abilities to promote wound healing and help control infection. While Cu and Zn have antiseptic properties that could, in theory, slow down healing, there is no evidence that Cu/Zn alters the skin’s microbiota balance, and Cu- and Zn-dependent mechanisms are involved in the innate immune response to skin injury, which may stimulate the skin’s natural immune defenses. Moreover, Cu and Zn have been shown to work together in various stages of the wound healing process, with synergistic effects that enhance antimicrobial activity, immune regulation, and tissue repair. Clinical research indicates that existing Cu/Zn-containing formulations are generally well tolerated and safe for topical use. However, despite their widespread application in wound healing, there remains a lack of consensus in the literature regarding the optimal concentration ratios of copper and zinc. While both elements are essential, their efficacy can vary significantly depending on the specific wound environment and individual patient characteristics. Therefore, we advocate for further research to explore and refine topical Cu/Zn-containing formulations, as their continued development holds promise for improving wound management while ensuring safety.

Acknowledgments

Medical Writing, Editorial and Other Assistance

Enovalife Medical Communication Service Center provided editorial assistance and publications coordination, on behalf of Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique, and Joanne Knowles (Joanne Knowles Medical Writing Ltd.) provided medical writing support, on behalf of Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique.

Author Contributions

All authors (Nicolas Kluger, Edward Lain, Nicolas Frasson, Gautier Doat, Aline Stennevin and Pascale Bianchi) participated in the development of this manuscript. All authors gave final approval before submission.

Funding

The development of this paper and its Rapid Service Fee was funded by Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique & Personal Care.

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Declarations

Conflict of Interest

Nicolas Kluger has served as an investigator in clinical studies, a lecturer, and an expert for Pierre Fabre and Bioderma NAOS; and has provided expert services for La Roche Posay and Bayer, all in relation to wound healing through tattoos. Outside the field of wound healing, the author has provided expertise to UCB Finland and Novartis Finland, and served as a lecturer for Eucerin (Beiersdorf) and Astellas Finland. Edward Lain has received consulting fees and honoraria for lectures, presentations, and expert testimonies, as well as financial support for attending meetings and/or travel from Pierre Fabre unrelated to this manuscript. Nicolas Frasson has received funding from Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique (for conducting clinical trials) unrelated to this manuscript. Gautier Doat, Aline Stennevin, and Pascale Bianchi are employees of Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique & Personal Care.

Ethical Approval

This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Wilkinson HN, Hardman MJ. Wound healing: cellular mechanisms and pathological outcomes. Open Biol. 2020;10(9):200223. 10.1098/rsob.200223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yang N, Venezuela J, Almathami S, Dargusch M. Zinc-nutrient element based alloys for absorbable wound closure devices fabrication: current status, challenges, and future prospects. Biomaterials. 2022;280:121301. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zoroddu MA, Aaseth J, Crisponi G, Medici S, Peana M, Nurchi VM. The essential metals for humans: a brief overview. J Inorg Biochem. 2019;195:120–9. 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2019.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Szabo R, Bodolea C, Mocan T. Iron, copper, and zinc homeostasis: physiology, physiopathology, and nanomediated applications. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021;11(11):2958. 10.3390/nano11112958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Morris GE. The use of Dalibour’s water in the treatment of skin diseases. N Engl J Med. 1943;229(13):509–10. 10.1056/NEJM194309232291303. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Parish LC, Witkowski JA. Traditional therapeutic agents. Clin Dermatol. 2000;18(1):5–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grass G, Rensing C, Solioz M. Metallic copper as an antimicrobial surface. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(5):1541–7. 10.1128/aem.02766-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kornblatt AP, Nicoletti VG, Travaglia A. The neglected role of copper ions in wound healing. J Inorg Biochem. 2016;161:1–8. 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2016.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dreifke MB, Jayasuriya AA, Jayasuriya AC. Current wound healing procedures and potential care. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015;48:651–62. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Korting HC, Schöllmann C, White RJ. Management of minor acute cutaneous wounds: importance of wound healing in a moist environment. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25(2):130–7. 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03775.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bradley M, Cullum N, Nelson EA, Petticrew M, Sheldon T, Torgerson D. Systematic reviews of wound care management: (2). Dressings and topical agents used in the healing of chronic wounds. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(17 Pt 2):1–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kolimi P, Narala S, Nyavanandi D, Youssef AAA, Dudhipala N. Innovative treatment strategies to accelerate wound healing: trajectory and recent advancements. Cells. 2022;11(15):2439. 10.3390/cells11152439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.White EK, Grice EA. The wound microbiome. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2023;15(6):a041218. 10.1101/cshperspect.a041218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zielińska M, Pawłowska A, Orzeł A, et al. Wound microbiota and its impact on wound healing. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(24):17318. 10.3390/ijms242417318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hurlow J, Bowler PG. Acute and chronic wound infections: microbiological, immunological, clinical and therapeutic distinctions. J Wound Care. 2022;31(5):436–45. 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.5.436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Khunger N. Optimising wound healing in aesthetic surgery: from the laboratory to the clinic. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2016;9(3):137–8. 10.4103/0974-2077.191643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yang Y, Huang J, Zeng A, Long X, Yu N, Wang X. The role of the skin microbiome in wound healing. Burns Trauma. 2024;12:tkad059. 10.1093/burnst/tkad059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Percival SL, Emanuel C, Cutting KF, Williams DW. Microbiology of the skin and the role of biofilms in infection. Int Wound J. 2012;9(1):14–32. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00836.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tang Q, Xue N, Ding X, et al. Role of wound microbiome, strategies of microbiota delivery system and clinical management. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;192:114671. 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cheung GYC, Bae JS, Otto M. Pathogenicity and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Virulence. 2021;12(1):547–69. 10.1080/21505594.2021.1878688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Harris-Tryon TA, Grice EA. Microbiota and maintenance of skin barrier function. Science. 2022;376(6596):940–5. 10.1126/science.abo0693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Harrison OJ, Linehan JL, Shih HY, et al. Commensal-specific T cell plasticity promotes rapid tissue adaptation to injury. Science. 2019;363(6422):eaat6280. 10.1126/science.aat6280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Linehan JL, Harrison OJ, Han SJ, et al. Non-classical immunity controls microbiota impact on skin immunity and tissue repair. Cell. 2018;172(4):784-96 e18. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Di Domizio J, Belkhodja C, Chenuet P, et al. The commensal skin microbiota triggers type I IFN-dependent innate repair responses in injured skin. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(9):1034–45. 10.1038/s41590-020-0721-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ubags ND, Trompette A, Pernot J, et al. Microbiome-induced antigen-presenting cell recruitment coordinates skin and lung allergic inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147(3):1049-62.e7. 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang G, Sweren E, Liu H, et al. Bacteria induce skin regeneration via IL-1β signaling. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29(5):777-91.e6. 10.1016/j.chom.2021.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lai Y, Cogen AL, Radek KA, et al. Activation of TLR2 by a small molecule produced by Staphylococcus epidermidis increases antimicrobial defense against bacterial skin infections. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(9):2211–21. 10.1038/jid.2010.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li D, Lei H, Li Z, Li H, Wang Y, Lai Y. A novel lipopeptide from skin commensal activates TLR2/CD36-p38 MAPK signaling to increase antibacterial defense against bacterial infection. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3):e58288. 10.1371/journal.pone.0058288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nakatsuji T, Chen TH, Narala S, et al. Antimicrobials from human skin commensal bacteria protect against Staphylococcus aureus and are deficient in atopic dermatitis. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(378):eaah4680. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aah4680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zipperer A, Konnerth MC, Laux C, et al. Human commensals producing a novel antibiotic impair pathogen colonization. Nature. 2016;535(7613):511–6. 10.1038/nature18634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Roshangar L, Soleimani Rad J, Kheirjou R, Reza Ranjkesh M, Ferdowsi Khosroshahi A. Skin burns: review of molecular mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Wounds. 2019;31(12):308–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Burgess M, Valdera F, Varon D, Kankuri E, Nuutila K. The immune and regenerative response to burn injury. Cells. 2022;11(19):3073. 10.3390/cells11193073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Djoko KY, Ong CL, Walker MJ, McEwan AG. The role of copper and zinc toxicity in innate immune defense against bacterial pathogens. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(31):18954–61. 10.1074/jbc.R115.647099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang Z, Xue H, Xiong Y, et al. Copper incorporated biomaterial-based technologies for multifunctional wound repair. Theranostics. 2024;14(2):547–70. 10.7150/thno.87193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Salah I, Parkin IP, Allan E. Copper as an antimicrobial agent: recent advances. RSC Adv. 2021;11(30):18179–86. 10.1039/d1ra02149d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Qi K, Cheng B, Yu J, Ho W. Review on the improvement of the photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of ZnO. J Alloys Compd. 2017;727:792–820. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.142. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mendes CR, Dilarri G, Forsan CF, et al. Antibacterial action and target mechanisms of zinc oxide nanoparticles against bacterial pathogens. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):2658. 10.1038/s41598-022-06657-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lv H, Yang M, Yang Y, et al. Metal ion and antibiotic co-loaded nanoparticles for combating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-induced osteomyelitis. ACS Nano. 2025;19(5):5253–68. 10.1021/acsnano.4c11956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Staerck C, Gastebois A, Vandeputte P, et al. Microbial antioxidant defense enzymes. Microb Pathog. 2017;110:56–65. 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fukai T, Ushio-Fukai M. Superoxide dismutases: role in redox signaling, vascular function, and diseases. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;15(6):1583–606. 10.1089/ars.2011.3999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sun Y, Zhang T, Lu B, Li X, Jiang L. Application of cofactors in the regulation of microbial metabolism: a state of the art review. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1145784. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1145784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Droste A, Chaves G, Stein S, et al. Zinc accelerates respiratory burst termination in human PMN. Redox Biol. 2021;47:102133. 10.1016/j.redox.2021.102133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Noh KM, Koh JY. Induction and activation by zinc of NADPH oxidase in cultured cortical neurons and astrocytes. J Neurosci. 2000;20(23):RC111. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-23-j0001.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chen GF, Sudhahar V, Youn SW, et al. Copper transport protein antioxidant-1 promotes inflammatory neovascularization via chaperone and transcription factor function. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14780. 10.1038/srep14780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lin PH, Sermersheim M, Li H, Lee PHU, Steinberg SM, Ma J. Zinc in wound healing modulation. Nutrients. 2017;10(1):16. 10.3390/nu10010016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lebedeva S, Galenko-Yaroshevsky P Jr, Samsonov M, et al. Molecular mechanisms of wound healing: the role of zinc as an essential microelement. Res Results Pharmacol. 2023;9(1):25–39. 10.18413/rrpharmacology.9.10003. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dierichs L, Kloubert V, Rink L. Cellular zinc homeostasis modulates polarization of THP-1-derived macrophages. Eur J Nutr. 2018;57(6):2161–9. 10.1007/s00394-017-1491-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fraker PJ, King LE. Reprogramming of the immune system during zinc deficiency. Annu Rev Nutr. 2004;24:277–98. 10.1146/annurev.nutr.24.012003.132454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Maywald M, Meurer SK, Weiskirchen R, Rink L. Zinc supplementation augments TGF-β1-dependent regulatory T cell induction. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017. 10.1002/mnfr.201600493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tenaud I, Leroy S, Chebassier N, Dreno B. Zinc, copper and manganese enhanced keratinocyte migration through a functional modulation of keratinocyte integrins. Exp Dermatol. 2000;9(6):407–16. 10.1034/j.1600-0625.2000.009006407.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ågren MS. Think zinc in wound care. J Wound Care. 2025;34(6):387–8. 10.12968/jowc.2025.0215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pastar I, Stojadinovic O, Yin NC, et al. Epithelialization in wound healing: a comprehensive review. Adv Wound Care. 2014;3(7):445–64. 10.1089/wound.2013.0473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Urso E, Maffia M. Behind the link between copper and angiogenesis: established mechanisms and an overview on the role of vascular copper transport systems. J Vasc Res. 2015;52(3):172–96. 10.1159/000438485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Philips N, Hwang H, Chauhan S, Leonardi D, Gonzalez S. Stimulation of cell proliferation and expression of matrixmetalloproteinase-1 and interluekin-8 genes in dermal fibroblasts by copper. Connect Tissue Res. 2010;51(3):224–9. 10.3109/03008200903288431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhang Y, Yuan F, Yan K, et al. Long-term waterborne Cu2+ exposure affects collagen metabolism in fish. Aquat Toxicol. 2023;257:106452. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cai L, Xiong X, Kong X, Xie J. The role of the lysyl oxidases in tissue repair and remodeling: a concise review. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;14(1):15–30. 10.1007/s13770-016-0007-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Schilsky ML, Roberts EA, Bronstein JM, et al. A multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis and management of Wilson disease: executive summary of the 2022 practice guidance on Wilson disease from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2023;77(4):1428–55. 10.1002/hep.32805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Huo S, Liu S, Liu Q, et al. Copper-zinc-doped bilayer bioactive glasses loaded hydrogel with spatiotemporal immunomodulation supports MRSA-infected wound healing. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024;11(5):e2302674. 10.1002/advs.202302674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kong N, Lin K, Li H, Chang J. Synergy effects of copper and silicon ions on stimulation of vascularization by copper-doped calcium silicate. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2(8):1100–10. 10.1039/c3tb21529f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Geng X, Liu K, Wang J, Su X, Shi Y, Zhao L. Preparation of ultra-small copper nanoparticles-loaded self-healing hydrogels with antibacterial, inflammation-suppressing and angiogenesis-enhancing properties for promoting diabetic wound healing. Int J Nanomedicine. 2023;18:3339–58. 10.2147/ijn.s399933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tian J, Dong X, Sabola EE, et al. Sequential regulation of local reactive oxygen species by Ir@Cu/Zn-MOF nanoparticles for promoting infected wound healing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2024;10(6):3792–805. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c00261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lansdown AB. Metallothioneins: potential therapeutic aids for wound healing in the skin. Wound Repair Regen. 2002;10(3):130–2. 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2002.20101.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ågren MS, Chafranska L, Eriksen JO, et al. Spatial expression of metallothionein, matrix metalloproteinase-1 and Ki-67 in human epidermal wounds treated with zinc and determined by quantitative immunohistochemistry: a randomised double-blind trial. Eur J Cell Biol. 2021;100(3):151147. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2020.151147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tenaud I, Sainte-Marie I, Jumbou O, Litoux P, Dréno B. In vitro modulation of keratinocyte wound healing integrins by zinc, copper and manganese. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140(1):26–34. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02603.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ågren MS. Zinc in wound repair. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(10):1273–4. 10.1001/archderm.135.10.1273-a. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 66.Lansdown AB. Influence of zinc oxide in the closure of open skin wounds. Int J Cosmet Sci. 1993;15(2):83–5. 10.1111/j.1467-2494.1993.tb00072.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Rostan EF, DeBuys HV, Madey DL, Pinnell SR. Evidence supporting zinc as an important antioxidant for skin. Int J Dermatol. 2002;41(9):606–11. 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2002.01567.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Li J, Liu X, Tan L, et al. Zinc-doped Prussian blue enhances photothermal clearance of Staphylococcus aureus and promotes tissue repair in infected wounds. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4490. 10.1038/s41467-019-12429-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gorel O, Hamuda M, Feldman I, Kucyn-Gabovich I. Enhanced healing of wounds that responded poorly to silver dressing by copper wound dressings: prospective single arm treatment study. Health Sci Rep. 2024;7(1):e1816. 10.1002/hsr2.1816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Luong D, Yergeshov AA, Zoughaib M, et al. Transition metal-doped cryogels as bioactive materials for wound healing applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;103:109759. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Luo W, Li Z, Ren C, et al. Zn2+ driven H2S/Cu2+ sustained releasing nanofibers with immunoregulation for wound healing. Mater Des. 2024;238:112626. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112626. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ye L, He X, Obeng E, et al. The CuO and AgO co-modified ZnO nanocomposites for promoting wound healing in Staphylococcus aureus infection. Mater Today Bio. 2023;18:100552. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Song J, Chen H, Lv Y, et al. CuO2-assisting-Zn single atom hybrid nanozymes for biofilm-infected wound healing. Chem Eng J. 2023;474:145706. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.145706. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Fakher S, Westenberg D. Evaluation of the antibacterial properties of four bioactive biomaterials for chronic wound management. Future Microbiol. 2025;20(3):247–58. 10.1080/17460913.2025.2453334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Mirastschijski U, Martin A, Jorgensen LN, Sampson B, Ågren MS. Zinc, copper, and selenium tissue levels and their relation to subcutaneous abscess, minor surgery, and wound healing in humans. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2013;153(1–3):76–83. 10.1007/s12011-013-9658-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.De Rauglaudre G, Courdi A, Delaby-Chagrin F, et al. Tolérance de l’association de sucralfate / sels de Cu-Zn dans les radiodermites [Tolerance of the association sucralfate / Cu-Zn salts in radiation dermatitis]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2008;Spec No 1:11–5. 10.1016/s0151-9638(08)70092-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ribet V, Mielewczyk E, Sirvent A, Georgescu V, Rossi AB. A novel dermo-cosmetic product containing thermal spring water, sucralfate, copper sulfate, and zinc sulfate in the management of hand eczema. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2018;11:373–81. 10.2147/ccid.s157849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Shi Y, Lain E, Frasson N, Ortiz-Brugués A, Stennevin A. Correction to: The real-world effectiveness and tolerability of a soothing cream containing the postbiotic Aquaphilus dolomiae extract-G2 for skin healing. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024;14(6):1697–701. 10.1007/s13555-024-01167-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Shi Y, Lain E, Frasson N, Ortiz-Brugués A, Stennevin A. The real-world effectiveness and tolerability of a soothing cream containing the postbiotic Aquaphilus dolomiae extract-G2 for skin healing. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024;14(6):1697–701. 10.1007/s13555-024-01167-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kluger N, Lauze C, Coutanceau C. Tolerability and cosmetic acceptance of a purifying cleansing gel and a hydrating skin repairing emulsion for tattoo aftercare (abstract 787). European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology. Amsterdam. 25–28 September 2024.
  • 81.Ågren MS, Krusell M, Franzén L. Release and absorption of zinc from zinc oxide and zinc sulfate in open wounds. Acta Derm Venereol. 1991;71(4):330–3. 10.2340/0001555571330333. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Lansdown AB, Mirastschijski U, Stubbs N, Scanlon E, Ågren MS. Zinc in wound healing: theoretical, experimental, and clinical aspects. Wound Repair Regen. 2007;15(1):2–16. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2006.00179.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Sangha MS, Deroide F, Meys R. Wound healing, scarring and management. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2024;49(4):325–36. 10.1093/ced/llad410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.McDaniel JC, Browning KK. Smoking, chronic wound healing, and implications for evidence-based practice. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2014;41(5):415–23. 10.1097/won.0000000000000057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Saeg F, Orazi R, Bowers GM, Janis JE. Evidence-based nutritional interventions in wound care. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;148(1):226–38. 10.1097/prs.0000000000008061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Seth I, Lim B, Cevik J, et al. Impact of nutrition on skin wound healing and aesthetic outcomes: a comprehensive narrative review. JPRAS Open. 2024;39:291–302. 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Boyera N, Galey I, Bernard BA. Effect of vitamin C and its derivatives on collagen synthesis and cross-linking by normal human fibroblasts. Int J Cosmet Sci. 1998;20(3):151–8. 10.1046/j.1467-2494.1998.171747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Tipton CD, Wolcott RD, Sanford NE, et al. Patient genetics is linked to chronic wound microbiome composition and healing. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(6):e1008511. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Yu H, Wang Y, Wang D, et al. Landscape of the epigenetic regulation in wound healing. Front Physiol. 2022;13:949498. 10.3389/fphys.2022.949498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.


Articles from Dermatology and Therapy are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES