Skip to main content
. 2026 Feb 5;54(4):gkag089. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkag089

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Tracking of DNMT1-Halo tagged molecules by live cell imaging. (A) Cell nucleus showing Halo-tagged DNMT1 molecules labeled with 0.25 nM JF646 Halo ligand for 5 min and imaged using HiLo microscopy at ∼ 97 fps over a 10 s period. Still from representative Halo-tagged DNMT1 E8 (+/+) movie (composite of five frames, ∼ 0.5 s). Dotted line denotes outline of the nucleus, scale bar = 5 µm. (B) Representative nucleus showing DNMT1-Halo-FLAG trajectories in an asynchronous E8 (+/+) cell. Left, all trajectories shown in a 10 s movie. Right, a subset of the trajectories from the last 4.5 s of the corresponding movie. (C-F) Spot-on analysis showing the dynamics of DNMT1-Halo-FLAG tagged molecules in the E8 (+/+) and F3 (+/-) cell lines, using a three-state model. (C–E) Violin plots showing the distribution of 183-236 cells across at least five replicates. (F) Pie chart showing the distribution of fast or slow diffusing and chromatin-bound DNMT1 molecules in asynchronous E8 (+/+) cells. (G) Diffusion coefficient (D) of various chromatin-modifying factors, transcription factors and DNA repair machinery proteins imaged by single molecule live cell imaging plotted against their molecular weight (represented as inverse cubic root molecular weight Inline graphic, units of MW = kDa). Dotted line represents the best fit (linear regression). Generally, the diffusion coefficient decreases with increased molecular weight of the protein. Source of data given in Supplementary Table 4.