TABLE IV.
Comparison between the proposed F-ML and the previous analytical model.
| Pressure-only WI Method | Wf1 Amplitude | Wf1 Time | Wf2 Amplitude | Wf2 Time | Wb1 Amplitude | Wb1 Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-ML | ||||||
| Correlation Coefficient (r) | 0.88 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.97 | 0.71 | 0.60 |
| Limit of Agreement | 125 | 23.8 | 45.2 | 31.9 | 11.3 | 85.9 |
| Mean Difference | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
| Analytical Method | ||||||
| Correlation Coefficient (r) | 0.85 | 0.94 | 0.72 | 0.98 | NC | NC |
| Limit of Agreement | 107 | 13 | 54 | 23 | 42 | 250 |
| Mean Difference | −29. 8 | 2 | 3.1 | 6 | 6.6 | 52 |
Correlations have -values< 0.05 unless otherwise indicated. All wave intensity amplitudes are reported in units of and timings are reported in ms. NC indicates no correlation. The data for ODE-based analytical model are adopted from [21].