Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Feb 6.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2023 Jun 19;70(7):2139–2148. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2023.3236918

TABLE IV.

Comparison between the proposed F-ML and the previous analytical model.

Pressure-only WI Method Wf1 Amplitude Wf1 Time Wf2 Amplitude Wf2 Time Wb1 Amplitude Wb1 Time
F-ML
Correlation Coefficient (r) 0.88 0.75 0.84 0.97 0.71 0.60
Limit of Agreement 125 23.8 45.2 31.9 11.3 85.9
Mean Difference 1.2 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.5
Analytical Method
Correlation Coefficient (r) 0.85 0.94 0.72 0.98 NC NC
Limit of Agreement 107 13 54 23 42 250
Mean Difference −29. 8 2 3.1 6 6.6 52
*

Correlations have p-values< 0.05 unless otherwise indicated. All wave intensity amplitudes are reported in units of Wm2s2×104 and timings are reported in ms. NC indicates no correlation. The data for ODE-based analytical model are adopted from [21].