Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Feb 6.
Published in final edited form as: Front Educ (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 7;7:814157. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.814157

TABLE 1 |.

School professional (SP) and student participant characteristics.

SP characteristics (N = 169) N (%)/mean (SD)

Professional role: (N = 163)
School counselor 96 (58.9%)
School social worker 39 (23.9%)
Other (School psychologist, behavioral intervention specialist, special education teacher, etc.) 28 (17.2%)
Years in current position (mean) (N = 163) 8.1 years (SD = 7.8)
Prior experience with CBT: (N = 163)
None 62 (38.0%)
Only informal training (e.g., professional development) 44 (27.0%)
Formal training (e.g., graduate program) 57 (35.0%)
Employed at rural school? 83(49.1%)
School’s percentage of free/reduced lunches (mean) 42.9% (SD = 18.2)
Any students identified? 149 (88.2%)
Number of students identified (mean) 8 students (SD = 3.5)
Any students consented? 122 (72.2%)
Identified any students that screened positive (any level)? 122 (100%)
Proportion of students that screened positive (any level) (mean) 0.88 (SD = 0.16)
Identified any students that screened moderate/severe? 120 (98%)
Proportion of students that screened moderate/severe (mean) 0.68 (SD = 0.22)

Student characteristics (N = 899) N (%)/mean (SD)

Identified as female? 582 (64.7%)
Self-identified race:
White/Caucasian 651 (72.4%)
Black/African American 43 (4.8%)
Bi-/multi-racial 83 (9.2%)
American Indian or Alaska Native 55 (6.1%)
Other 63 (7.0%)
Currently in housing insecurity/temporary housing? 99 (11.0%)
Heard of CBT? 263 (29.3%)