TABLE 1.

Name and location of the studied populations and estimated diversity parameters

Geographic group	Population no. and name	Region	No. of samples	Mean no. of allelesa	Allelic richnessa
1	1. Istria	Croatia-Slovenia	17	3.3 (0.61)	2.7 (0.48)
2	2. Pavia	Lombardia	11	2.6 (0.43)	2.4 (0.44)
	3. Langhe	Piemonte	15	3.3 (0.81)	2.9 (0.62)
	4. Asti	Piemonte	9	2.7 (0.42)	2.6 (0.37)
	5. Alba	Piemonte	7	3.0 (0.49)	2.9 (0.47)
3	6. Pianoro	Emilia Romagna	9	2.7 (0.57)	2.6 (0.52)
	7. Val di Zena	Emilia Romagna	10	3.1 (0.59)	2.8 (0.48)
4	8. Firenze	Toscana	32	4.4 (0.97)	3.0 (0.46)
5	9. Pietralunga	Umbria	7	2.6 (0.43)	2.5 (0.43)
	10. Montemaggiore	Umbria	12	2.4 (0.57)	2.2 (0.53)
	11. Città di Castello	Umbria	12	3.1 (0.74)	2.7 (0.60)
	12. Gubbio	Umbria	25	4.3 (0.84)	2.9 (0.46)
	13. Appennino Umbro	Umbria	9	2.6 (0.53)	2.4 (0.50)
6	14. Fabro	Umbria	11	2.9 (0.46)	2.6 (0.39)
	15. Montecastrilli	Umbria	9	3.0 (0.62)	2.8 (0.57)
7	16. Ascoli	Marche	10	3.0 (0.58)	2.7 (0.55)
	17. Chieti	Abruzzo	5	2.4 (0.43)	2.4 (0.46)
8	18. Valle Roveto	Abruzzo	7	2.4 (0.43)	2.4 (0.44)
9	19. Quadri, Rosello	Abruzzo	12	3.1 (0.59)	2.8 (0.42)
	20. R. del Sangro, M. del. Sannio	Abruzzo-Molise	10	3.1 (0.46)	2.8 (0.36)
	21. Ateleta, S.P. Avellana	Abruzzo-Molise	18	3.9 (0.59)	3.0 (0.50)
	22. Castel del Giudice	Molise	16	3.1 (0.46)	2.7 (0.37)
10	23. Agnone	Molise	10	3.7 (0.75)	3.3 (0.65)
11	24. Isernia, Campobasso	Molise	16	3.6 (0.57)	3.1 (0.42)
12	25. Benevento, Avellino	Campania	5	2.4 (0.37)	2.4 (0.40)
13	26. Potenza	Basilicata	12	1.9 (0.34)	1.7 (0.26)

^aStandard errors of the means are shown in parentheses.