Skip to main content
. 2005 Nov;12(11):1322–1327. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.12.11.1322-1327.2005

TABLE 1.

Macroscopic findings and GM, PCR-ELISA, and real-time PCR results for animals in the treated arm of the study

Day Rat ID Diseasea Tissue burdenb GM
PCR-ELISA
Real-time PCR
Index Resultd Index Result Result
+2 1 0 0 1.250 NEG 0.207 NEG NEG
2 0 0 0.589 NEG 0.221 NEG NEG
3 0 1 1.255 NEG 0.221 NEG NEG
+4 4 0 1.3 8.270 POS 10.329 POS POS
5 0 1 0.454 NEG 0.225 NEG NEG
6 0 0 1.648 POS 5.141 POS NEG
+6 10 2 0 0.639 NEG 0.230 NEG NEG
11 1 1 7.906 POS 2.343 POS NEG
+8 7 4 1.5 >MCc POS 4.282 POS NEG
8 3 1 2.774 POS 3.906 POS POS
9 1 1 0.589 NEG 0.033 NEG NEG
+10 16 4 1.9 >MC POS 5.235 POS NEG
17 3 1 0.818 NEG 1.690 POS NEG
18 1 1 0.343 NEG 5.418 POS NEG
+12 13 4 1.7 8.183 POS 3.455 POS NEG
14 3 1.45 0.220 NEG 2.235 POS NEG
15 2 0 >MC POS 2.418 POS NEG
+12 19 0 0 0.581 NEG 0.146 NEG NEG
20 0 0 0.427 NEG 0.244 NEG NEG
21 0 0 0.253 NEG 0.582 NEG NEG
No. of infected animals with positive results/total no. 8/17 11/17 2/17
a

Disease indicates the macroscopic extent of disease in livers, graded from 0 to 4.

b

Tissue burden indicates log CFU/gram of tissue cultured.

c

>MC OD was greater than the measurement capacity of the instrument. For the purposes of statistical analysis, these cases were assigned an index of 10.0. Rats 19, 20, and 21 are negative control animals in both groups.

d

NEG, negative; POS, positive.